Skip to content

A Study of Bevacizumab (Avastin) in Women With HER2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

A Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab in Combination With Docetaxel in Comparison With Docetaxel Plus Placebo, as First Line Treatment for Patients With HER2 Negative Metastatic and Locally Recurrent Breast Cancer.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00333775
Enrollment
736
Registered
2006-06-06
Start date
2006-03-31
Completion date
2013-10-31
Last updated
2016-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of Avastin in combination with docetaxel, versus docetaxel plus placebo, in patients with metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer who are candidates for taxane-based chemotherapy but who have not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The anticipated time on treatment is 1-2 years and the target sample size is 500+ individuals.

Detailed description

Five participants randomized to the docetaxel 100 mg/m\^2 plus placebo group actually received docetaxel 100 mg/m\^2 plus bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg and are included in the docetaxel 100 mg/m\^2 plus bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg group for the adverse event results. Sixteen participants randomized to the docetaxel 100 mg/m\^2 plus placebo group actually received docetaxel 100 mg/m\^2 plus bevacizumab 15.0 mg/kg and are included in the docetaxel 100 mg/m\^2 plus bevacizumab 15.0 mg/kg group for the adverse event results.

Interventions

DRUGDocetaxel

Docetaxel was supplied in 2 vials, 1 containing docetaxel and 1 containing a solvent, for intravenous infusion.

DRUGPlacebo to bevacizumab

Placebo to bevacizumab was supplied as a sterile liquid for intravenous infusion in single-use vials.

DRUGBevacizumab

Bevacizumab was supplied as a sterile liquid for intravenous infusion in single-use vials.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female patients ≥ 18 years of age. * Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative cancer of the breast with locally recurrent or metastatic disease, suitable for chemotherapy. * No adjuvant chemotherapy within 6 months before randomization, and no taxane-based chemotherapy within 12 months before randomization. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous chemotherapy for metastatic or locally recurrent breast cancer. * Radiotherapy for treatment of metastatic disease. * Other primary tumors within last 5 years, except for controlled limited basal cell or squamous cancer of the skin, or cancer in situ of the cervix. * Spinal cord compression or brain metastases. * Major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to randomization. * Inadequate bone marrow, liver, or renal function. * Uncontrolled hypertension.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free SurvivalBaseline to the 15 Sep 2008 cut-off date (up to 2 years, 6 months)Progression-free survival was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.0). Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the time of the first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was defined as ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or appearance of new lesion(s).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response or a Partial ResponseBaseline to the 15 Sep 2008 cut-off date (up to 2 years, 6 months)Responses were evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. A complete response was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions or the disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. A partial response was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter.
Duration of ResponseBaseline to the 15 September 2008 cut-off date (up to 2 years, 6 months)Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documented complete response or partial response to disease progression or death. A complete response was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions or the disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. A partial response was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. Responses were evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.
Time to Treatment FailureBaseline to the 15 September 2008 cut-off date (up to 2 years, 6 months)Time to treatment failure was defined as time from randomization to the date of disease progression, death, or withdrawal of treatment due to an adverse event, withdrawal of informed consent, insufficient therapeutic response, refusal of treatment/failure to co-operate, or failure to return, whichever occurred first.
Overall SurvivalBaseline to the 15 Sep 2008 cut-off date (up to 2 years, 6 months)Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Mexico, Netherlands, Panama, Poland, Portugal, Romania, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

21 participants randomized to the placebo group received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg (n=5) or 15.0 mg/kg (n=16). Please see the Detailed Description for an explanation of the differences in the number of participants in the treatment groups in Participant Flow and Adverse Events.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus Placebo
Participants received docetaxel 100 mg/m\^2 intravenously on Day 1 of each 3 week cycle for a maximum of 27 weeks (9 cycles). In addition, participants received placebo to bevacizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or participant withdrawal.
241
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg
Participants received docetaxel 100 mg/m\^2 intravenously on Day 1 of each 3 week cycle for a maximum of 27 weeks (9 cycles). In addition, participants received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or participant withdrawal.
248
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus Bevacizumab 15.0 mg/kg
Participants received docetaxel 100 mg/m\^2 intravenously on Day 1 of each 3 week cycle for a maximum of 27 weeks (9 cycles). In addition, participants received bevacizumab 15.0 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or participant withdrawal.
247
Total736

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDeath144149143
Overall StudyIn Follow-up When Study Stopped879296
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1078

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalDocetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus Bevacizumab 15.0 mg/kgDocetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kgDocetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus Placebo
Age, Continuous53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.61
53.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.78
53.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.61
53.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.47
Sex: Female, Male
Female
736 Participants247 Participants248 Participants241 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
216 / 217251 / 252260 / 261
serious
Total, serious adverse events
82 / 217106 / 252120 / 261

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.0). Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the time of the first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was defined as ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or appearance of new lesion(s).

Time frame: Baseline to the 15 Sep 2008 cut-off date (up to 2 years, 6 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants, regardless of whether they received study drug or not.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus PlaceboProgression-free Survival8.0 Months
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kgProgression-free Survival8.7 Months
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus Bevacizumab 15.0 mg/kgProgression-free Survival8.8 Months
p-value: 0.031895% CI: [0.63, 0.98]Log Rank
p-value: 0.003695% CI: [0.57, 0.9]Log Rank
Secondary

Duration of Response

Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documented complete response or partial response to disease progression or death. A complete response was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions or the disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. A partial response was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. Responses were evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

Time frame: Baseline to the 15 September 2008 cut-off date (up to 2 years, 6 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants, regardless of whether they received study drug or not. Only participants with measurable disease at Baseline who had a complete response or a partial response were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus PlaceboDuration of Response6.4 Months
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kgDuration of Response7.2 Months
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus Bevacizumab 15.0 mg/kgDuration of Response7.0 Months
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause.

Time frame: Baseline to the 15 Sep 2008 cut-off date (up to 2 years, 6 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants, regardless of whether they received study drug or not.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus PlaceboOverall SurvivalNA Months
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kgOverall SurvivalNA Months
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus Bevacizumab 15.0 mg/kgOverall SurvivalNA Months
p-value: 0.696295% CI: [0.62, 1.37]Log Rank
p-value: 0.076595% CI: [0.45, 1.04]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response or a Partial Response

Responses were evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. A complete response was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions or the disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. A partial response was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter.

Time frame: Baseline to the 15 Sep 2008 cut-off date (up to 2 years, 6 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants, regardless of whether they received study drug or not. Only participants with measurable disease at Baseline were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Complete Response or a Partial ResponseComplete response1.0 Percentage of participants
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Complete Response or a Partial ResponsePartial response43.5 Percentage of participants
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With a Complete Response or a Partial ResponseComplete response3.0 Percentage of participants
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With a Complete Response or a Partial ResponsePartial response52.2 Percentage of participants
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus Bevacizumab 15.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With a Complete Response or a Partial ResponseComplete response1.0 Percentage of participants
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus Bevacizumab 15.0 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With a Complete Response or a Partial ResponsePartial response62.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Treatment Failure

Time to treatment failure was defined as time from randomization to the date of disease progression, death, or withdrawal of treatment due to an adverse event, withdrawal of informed consent, insufficient therapeutic response, refusal of treatment/failure to co-operate, or failure to return, whichever occurred first.

Time frame: Baseline to the 15 September 2008 cut-off date (up to 2 years, 6 months)

Population: Intent-to-treat population: All randomized participants, regardless of whether they received study drug or not.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus PlaceboTime to Treatment Failure6.1 months
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kgTime to Treatment Failure7.0 months
Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 Plus Bevacizumab 15.0 mg/kgTime to Treatment Failure7.7 months
p-value: 0.110595% CI: [0.69, 1.04]Log Rank
p-value: 0.024195% CI: [0.65, 0.97]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 27, 2026