Skip to content

Evaluating a Telehealth Treatment for Veterans With Hepatitis C and PTSD

Evaluating a Telehealth Treatment for Veterans With Hepatitis C and PTSD

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00333710
Enrollment
53
Registered
2006-06-06
Start date
2006-09-30
Completion date
2009-10-31
Last updated
2014-12-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Disease, Hepatitis C, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

Keywords

Rehabilitation, Telecommunication

Brief summary

The main objective of this proposal is to develop and test the efficacy of two interventions (a telehealth and face-to-face intervention) designed to improve quality of life, self-care, motivation to engage in healthcare, and psychological distress in patients diagnosed with HCV and PTSD. It is hypothesized that

Detailed description

Patients with comorbid diagnoses of HCV and PTSD may experience increased risk of diminished quality of life, given that PTSD is associated with poor self-care and medical non-compliance. To date, no systematic efforts to improve quality of life in this high-risk population have been documented. The main objective of this proposal is to develop and test the feasibility and efficacy of two cognitive-behavioral interventions (a telehealth intervention and a face-to-face intervention) designed to improve quality of life, self-care, motivation to engage in healthcare, and psychological distress in patients diagnosed with HCV and PTSD. A secondary objective is to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the interventions. I plan to develop the interventions, pilot test them, and deliver the refined treatments to veterans with HCV and PTSD. Participants will be 70 patients from VA Boston who meet study criteria. Assessment will occur at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and 3- and 6-month follow-up. Assessments will measure quality of life, self-care, motivation to engage in healthcare, and psychological distress. Analyses will examine study feasibility, the effects of the treatment conditions, and the cost effectiveness of the interventions. It is hypothesized that the telephone and face-to-face intervention will improve outcomes, as compared to treatment as usual, but that the participants will be more satisfied with the telephone intervention. In addition, it is predicted that the telephone condition will be cost effective as compared to the face-to-face intervention

Interventions

Individual face-to-face contact with educational and goal setting components

Individual telephone contact with educational and goal setting components

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of hepatitis C * Clinical diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder * Need to have access to a telephone

Exclusion criteria

* Life threatening or acute illness * Current alcohol or substance dependence * Currently prescribed interferon treatment * No access to a telephone

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hepatitis C Virus Knowledge Questionnairepre-treatment, post-treatmentThis is a 62-item measure which assesses knowledge of the hepatitis C Virus. Range is 0 to 62. Higher scores reflect greater hepatitis C knowledge

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Individual Face-to-face Contact
Individual face-to-face contact treatment Individual psychotherapy: Individual face-to-face contact with educational and goal setting components
19
Individual Telephone Contact
Individual telephone contact treatment Telehealth Intervention: Individual telephone contact with educational and goal setting components
18
Control Condition/Treatment as Usual
Control condition/treatment as usual. No active treatment
16
Total53

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIndividual Face-to-face ContactIndividual Telephone ContactControl Condition/Treatment as UsualTotal
Age, Continuous54.37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.89
52.28 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.19
55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
53.85 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.64
Region of Enrollment
United States
19 participants18 participants16 participants53 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants1 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants17 Participants16 Participants49 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 190 / 180 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 180 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Hepatitis C Virus Knowledge Questionnaire

This is a 62-item measure which assesses knowledge of the hepatitis C Virus. Range is 0 to 62. Higher scores reflect greater hepatitis C knowledge

Time frame: pre-treatment, post-treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Individual Face-to-face ContactHepatitis C Virus Knowledge QuestionnairePre-Treatment37.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.78
Individual Face-to-face ContactHepatitis C Virus Knowledge QuestionnairePost-Treatment45.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.89
Individual Telephone ContactHepatitis C Virus Knowledge QuestionnairePre-Treatment40.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.19
Individual Telephone ContactHepatitis C Virus Knowledge QuestionnairePost-Treatment42.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.03
Control Condition/Treatment as UsualHepatitis C Virus Knowledge QuestionnairePre-Treatment35.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.05
Control Condition/Treatment as UsualHepatitis C Virus Knowledge QuestionnairePost-Treatment34.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.09

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026