Skip to content

PRELUDE:Study to Investigate the Prevention of Relapse in Lymphoma Using Daily Enzastaurin

A Phase 3 Clinical Study to Investigate the Prevention of Relapse in Lymphoma Using Daily Enzastaurin

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00332202
Enrollment
758
Registered
2006-06-01
Start date
2006-06-30
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2018-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non Hodgkin Lymphoma

Brief summary

This clinical research study is to investigate the prevention of relapse in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) using enzastaurin daily. This is a randomised trial which compares Enzastaurin to Placebo (dummy treatment), the chance of receiving Enzastaurin is 2 to 1.

Interventions

DRUGenzastaurin

1125 mg loading dose then 500 mg, oral, daily, until disease progression or maximum of 3 years

DRUGplacebo

oral, daily

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma * Recently completed R-CHOP therapy and achieved remission * International Prognostic Index (IPI) score 3,4,5 * At least 18 years of age * Agree to study follow-up schedule

Exclusion criteria

* Have received therapy other than R-CHOP for lymphoma * Serious medical condition such as infection,second cancer,heart disease * Received radiation to more than one lesion * Unable to swallow tablets

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Disease-Free SurvivalBaseline to Measured Progressive Disease or Death from Any Cause (up to 80.30 months)Overall Disease-Free Survival (DFS) time is defined as the time from the date of study enrollment to the first date of objectively determined disease recurrence (progressive disease) or death from any cause. DFS was assessed according to International Working Group recommendations. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as a ≥ 50% increase from the lowest point in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of any previously identified abnormal node for partial or nonresponders, or the appearance of any new lesion during or at the end of therapy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Event-Free SurvivalBaseline to Objective PD, Start of New Therapy or Death From Any Cause (up to 76.81 months)Overall Event-Free Survival (EFS) time is defined as the time from the date of study enrollment to the first date of objectively determined disease recurrence (progressive disease), institution of a new anti-cancer treatment, or death from any cause. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as a ≥ 50% increase from the lowest point in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of any previously identified abnormal node for partial or nonresponders, or the appearance of any new lesion during or at the end of therapy.
Event-Free Survival at 2 YearsBaseline to 2 YearsEvent-Free Survival at 2 years (EFS2) is defined as the rate of EFS at 2 years from the date of study enrollment and is determined using the distribution of overall EFS times. Event-free survival rates at 2 years will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Overall SurvivalBaseline to Date of Death from Any Cause (up to 80.30 months)Overall survival (OS) time is defined as the time from the date of study enrollment to the date of death from any cause.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsFirst dose through 30 days post-study treatment discontinuation (up to 81.30 months)Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events.
Disease Free Survival at 2 YearsBaseline to 2 YearsDisease-free survival at 2 years (DFS2) is defined as the rate of DFS at 2 years from the date of study enrollment and is determined using the distribution of overall DFS times. Disease-free survival rates at 2 years will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) ScoreBaseline, Month 6; Baseline, Month 24; Baseline, Month 33The EQ-5D instrument is a participant-rated questionnaire used to evaluate health status. The EQ-5D assesses five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) that participants rate using three levels (no problem, some problem, or extreme problem), as well as overall health status. The five dimensions can be combined using country-specific weights to create an estimate of overall health status score. The possible values for score range from -0.594 (severe problems in all 5 dimensions) to 1 (no problem in all dimensions) on a scale where 1 represents the best possible health state. This analysis utilized mixed-effect model repeated measure (MMRM) analysis of change from baseline in the EQ-5D for the United Kingdom population-based index score adjusting for baseline covariates.
Translational Research: DFS Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Germinal-center B-cells (GCB) Versus Non-germinal-center B-cellsBaseline to 24 months (2 years)Reported are the DFS for GCB and non-GCB status. DLBCL molecular subtypes of GCB/non-GCB using Hans' algorithm were determined by protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was used to assess molecular subtype characterization of GCB and non-GCB.
Translational Research: DFS of Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Protein Kinase C-β2 (PKC-β2) ExpressionBaseline to 94.5 monthsReported are the DFS based on PKC-β2 protein expression. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was performed to assess protein expression of PKC-β2 in cytoplasm scored for percent of tumor cells stained, and using 50% positive staining as the cutoff for high/low expression (high expression: \>=50% staining, low expression: \<50% staining).
Pharmacokinetics: Average Steady-State Concentration (Cavg,ss) for Total AnalyteMonth 2, Month 4: Predose
Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) ScoreBaseline, Month 2; Baseline, Month 4; Baseline, Month 6; Baseline, Month 12; Baseline, Month 18; Baseline, Month 24; Baseline, Month 36The FACT-Lym assesses health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in participants with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It includes the 27-item cancer-specific FACT-G (General), which assesses physical, social/family, emotional and functional well-being, plus a 15-item subscale that assesses concerns specific to lymphoma. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much), yielding a possible score of 0-168, with higher scores representing better HRQoL. This analysis utilized mixed-effect model repeated measure (MMRM) analysis of change from baseline adjusting for baseline covariates.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental
Enzastaurin 500 mg administered PO QD after an initial loading dose of 1125 mg on Day 1.
504
Placebo: Arm B - Control
Placebo administered PO QD after an initial loading dose of placebo on Day 1.
254
Total758

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event7228
Overall StudyDeath52
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up21
Overall StudyPhysician Decision68
Overall StudyProgressive Disease10660
Overall StudyProtocol Entry Criteria Not Met65
Overall StudyProtocol Violation72
Overall StudySponsor Decision12
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3617

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo: Arm B - ControlTotalEnzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental
Age, Continuous62.65 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.09
62.35 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.78
62.19 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.13
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African
2 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
155 Participants464 Participants309 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
East Asian
73 Participants217 Participants144 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
13 Participants37 Participants24 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
West Asian (Indian sub-continent)
11 Participants32 Participants21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
9 Participants29 Participants20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
4 Participants14 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
5 Participants18 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
16 Participants40 Participants24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
China
7 Participants25 Participants18 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
2 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
4 Participants13 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
5 Participants16 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
10 Participants32 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
10 Participants25 Participants15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
India
11 Participants33 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
10 Participants25 Participants15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
33 Participants87 Participants54 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
9 Participants22 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
7 Participants16 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
3 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Puerto Rico
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
21 Participants58 Participants37 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
5 Participants25 Participants20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
5 Participants24 Participants19 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
8 Participants32 Participants24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
61 Participants186 Participants125 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
105 Participants350 Participants245 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
149 Participants408 Participants259 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
406 / 493185 / 249
serious
Total, serious adverse events
135 / 49372 / 249

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Disease-Free Survival

Overall Disease-Free Survival (DFS) time is defined as the time from the date of study enrollment to the first date of objectively determined disease recurrence (progressive disease) or death from any cause. DFS was assessed according to International Working Group recommendations. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as a ≥ 50% increase from the lowest point in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of any previously identified abnormal node for partial or nonresponders, or the appearance of any new lesion during or at the end of therapy.

Time frame: Baseline to Measured Progressive Disease or Death from Any Cause (up to 80.30 months)

Population: All randomized participants. DFS is censored at the last assessable disease free assessment for participants who are alive or have not progressed. The number of censored participant data for enzastaurin and placebo is 369 (73.2%) and 180 (70.9%), respectively.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalOverall Disease-Free Survival42.8 Month
Placebo: Arm B - ControlOverall Disease-Free Survival43.1 Month
p-value: 0.54195% CI: [0.689, 1.216]Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Score

The EQ-5D instrument is a participant-rated questionnaire used to evaluate health status. The EQ-5D assesses five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) that participants rate using three levels (no problem, some problem, or extreme problem), as well as overall health status. The five dimensions can be combined using country-specific weights to create an estimate of overall health status score. The possible values for score range from -0.594 (severe problems in all 5 dimensions) to 1 (no problem in all dimensions) on a scale where 1 represents the best possible health state. This analysis utilized mixed-effect model repeated measure (MMRM) analysis of change from baseline in the EQ-5D for the United Kingdom population-based index score adjusting for baseline covariates.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6; Baseline, Month 24; Baseline, Month 33

Population: All randomized participants who completed at least one EQ-5D assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalChange From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) ScoreMonth 60.02 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.01
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalChange From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) ScoreMonth 240.02 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.01
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalChange From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) ScoreMonth 330.03 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.01
Placebo: Arm B - ControlChange From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) ScoreMonth 60.00 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.01
Placebo: Arm B - ControlChange From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) ScoreMonth 240.03 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.02
Placebo: Arm B - ControlChange From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) ScoreMonth 330.03 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.01
Comparison: Analysis for Month 6p-value: 0.267Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis for Month 24p-value: 0.807Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis for Month 33p-value: 0.864Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Disease Free Survival at 2 Years

Disease-free survival at 2 years (DFS2) is defined as the rate of DFS at 2 years from the date of study enrollment and is determined using the distribution of overall DFS times. Disease-free survival rates at 2 years will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Baseline to 2 Years

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalDisease Free Survival at 2 Years0.785 proportion of participants
Placebo: Arm B - ControlDisease Free Survival at 2 Years0.748 proportion of participants
Secondary

Event-Free Survival

Overall Event-Free Survival (EFS) time is defined as the time from the date of study enrollment to the first date of objectively determined disease recurrence (progressive disease), institution of a new anti-cancer treatment, or death from any cause. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as a ≥ 50% increase from the lowest point in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of any previously identified abnormal node for partial or nonresponders, or the appearance of any new lesion during or at the end of therapy.

Time frame: Baseline to Objective PD, Start of New Therapy or Death From Any Cause (up to 76.81 months)

Population: All randomized participants. EFS is censored at the last assessable disease-free assessment for participants who are alive, have not progressed or started new anticancer treatment. The number of censored participant data for enzastaurin and placebo is 364 (72.2%) and 176 (69.3%), respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalEvent-Free SurvivalMinimum EFS Survival0.03 Month
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalEvent-Free SurvivalMaximum EFS Survival76.81 Month
Placebo: Arm B - ControlEvent-Free SurvivalMaximum EFS Survival71.56 Month
Placebo: Arm B - ControlEvent-Free SurvivalMinimum EFS Survival0.03 Month
Secondary

Event-Free Survival at 2 Years

Event-Free Survival at 2 years (EFS2) is defined as the rate of EFS at 2 years from the date of study enrollment and is determined using the distribution of overall EFS times. Event-free survival rates at 2 years will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Baseline to 2 Years

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalEvent-Free Survival at 2 Years0.781 Proportion of participants
Placebo: Arm B - ControlEvent-Free Survival at 2 Years0.734 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events.

Time frame: First dose through 30 days post-study treatment discontinuation (up to 81.30 months)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events459 Participants
Placebo: Arm B - ControlNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events230 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) time is defined as the time from the date of study enrollment to the date of death from any cause.

Time frame: Baseline to Date of Death from Any Cause (up to 80.30 months)

Population: All randomized participants. Overall survival is censored at the last date of contact for participants who have no reported death. The number of censored participant data for enzastaurin and placebo is 404 (80.2%) and 205 (80.7%), respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalOverall SurvivalMinimum OS Survival0.03 Month
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalOverall SurvivalMaximum OS Survival76.81 Month
Placebo: Arm B - ControlOverall SurvivalMinimum OS Survival0.03 Month
Placebo: Arm B - ControlOverall SurvivalMaximum OS Survival80.30 Month
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics: Average Steady-State Concentration (Cavg,ss) for Total Analyte

Time frame: Month 2, Month 4: Predose

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had evaluable PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalPharmacokinetics: Average Steady-State Concentration (Cavg,ss) for Total Analyte2370 nanomole/liter (nmol/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 59.9
Secondary

Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Score

The FACT-Lym assesses health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in participants with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It includes the 27-item cancer-specific FACT-G (General), which assesses physical, social/family, emotional and functional well-being, plus a 15-item subscale that assesses concerns specific to lymphoma. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much), yielding a possible score of 0-168, with higher scores representing better HRQoL. This analysis utilized mixed-effect model repeated measure (MMRM) analysis of change from baseline adjusting for baseline covariates.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 2; Baseline, Month 4; Baseline, Month 6; Baseline, Month 12; Baseline, Month 18; Baseline, Month 24; Baseline, Month 36

Population: All randomized participants who completed at least one FACT-Lym assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalQuality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) ScoreMonth 62.04 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.87
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalQuality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) ScoreMonth 182.87 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.89
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalQuality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) ScoreMonth 42.56 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.8
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalQuality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) ScoreMonth 242.72 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.99
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalQuality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) ScoreMonth 123.85 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.87
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalQuality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) ScoreMonth 362.54 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.13
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalQuality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) ScoreMonth 22.45 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.67
Placebo: Arm B - ControlQuality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) ScoreMonth 364.22 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.43
Placebo: Arm B - ControlQuality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) ScoreMonth 21.86 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.93
Placebo: Arm B - ControlQuality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) ScoreMonth 42.51 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.06
Placebo: Arm B - ControlQuality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) ScoreMonth 62.82 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.1
Placebo: Arm B - ControlQuality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) ScoreMonth 122.11 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.29
Placebo: Arm B - ControlQuality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) ScoreMonth 181.73 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.26
Placebo: Arm B - ControlQuality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) ScoreMonth 243.96 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.26
Comparison: Analysis for Month 2p-value: 0.606Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis for Month 4p-value: 0.971Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis for Month 6p-value: 0.58Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis for Month 12p-value: 0.265Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis for Month 18p-value: 0.46Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis for Month 24p-value: 0.441Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis for Month 36p-value: 0.357Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Translational Research: DFS of Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Protein Kinase C-β2 (PKC-β2) Expression

Reported are the DFS based on PKC-β2 protein expression. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was performed to assess protein expression of PKC-β2 in cytoplasm scored for percent of tumor cells stained, and using 50% positive staining as the cutoff for high/low expression (high expression: \>=50% staining, low expression: \<50% staining).

Time frame: Baseline to 94.5 months

Population: All randomized participants for which a pre-treatment tumor tissue was provided and had evaluable samples.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalTranslational Research: DFS of Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Protein Kinase C-β2 (PKC-β2) Expression64.86 percentage of participants
Placebo: Arm B - ControlTranslational Research: DFS of Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Protein Kinase C-β2 (PKC-β2) Expression81.16 percentage of participants
Placebo: Arm B - Control With Germinal-center B-cellsTranslational Research: DFS of Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Protein Kinase C-β2 (PKC-β2) Expression61.54 percentage of participants
Placebo Arm B- Control With Non-germinal-center B-cellsTranslational Research: DFS of Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Protein Kinase C-β2 (PKC-β2) Expression70.58 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.08495% CI: [0.947, 3.329]Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.58595% CI: [0.527, 3.137]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Translational Research: DFS Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Germinal-center B-cells (GCB) Versus Non-germinal-center B-cells

Reported are the DFS for GCB and non-GCB status. DLBCL molecular subtypes of GCB/non-GCB using Hans' algorithm were determined by protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was used to assess molecular subtype characterization of GCB and non-GCB.

Time frame: Baseline to 24 months (2 years)

Population: All randomized participants for which a pre-treatment tumor tissue was provided and had evaluable samples.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Enzastaurin: Arm A - ExperimentalTranslational Research: DFS Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Germinal-center B-cells (GCB) Versus Non-germinal-center B-cells76.31 percentage of participants
Placebo: Arm B - ControlTranslational Research: DFS Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Germinal-center B-cells (GCB) Versus Non-germinal-center B-cells75.97 percentage of participants
Placebo: Arm B - Control With Germinal-center B-cellsTranslational Research: DFS Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Germinal-center B-cells (GCB) Versus Non-germinal-center B-cells66.21 percentage of participants
Placebo Arm B- Control With Non-germinal-center B-cellsTranslational Research: DFS Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Germinal-center B-cells (GCB) Versus Non-germinal-center B-cells68.20 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.495% CI: [0.415, 1.42]Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.53995% CI: [0.557, 3.08]Regression, Cox

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026