Non Hodgkin Lymphoma
Conditions
Brief summary
This clinical research study is to investigate the prevention of relapse in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) using enzastaurin daily. This is a randomised trial which compares Enzastaurin to Placebo (dummy treatment), the chance of receiving Enzastaurin is 2 to 1.
Interventions
1125 mg loading dose then 500 mg, oral, daily, until disease progression or maximum of 3 years
oral, daily
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Clinical diagnosis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma * Recently completed R-CHOP therapy and achieved remission * International Prognostic Index (IPI) score 3,4,5 * At least 18 years of age * Agree to study follow-up schedule
Exclusion criteria
* Have received therapy other than R-CHOP for lymphoma * Serious medical condition such as infection,second cancer,heart disease * Received radiation to more than one lesion * Unable to swallow tablets
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Disease-Free Survival | Baseline to Measured Progressive Disease or Death from Any Cause (up to 80.30 months) | Overall Disease-Free Survival (DFS) time is defined as the time from the date of study enrollment to the first date of objectively determined disease recurrence (progressive disease) or death from any cause. DFS was assessed according to International Working Group recommendations. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as a ≥ 50% increase from the lowest point in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of any previously identified abnormal node for partial or nonresponders, or the appearance of any new lesion during or at the end of therapy. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Event-Free Survival | Baseline to Objective PD, Start of New Therapy or Death From Any Cause (up to 76.81 months) | Overall Event-Free Survival (EFS) time is defined as the time from the date of study enrollment to the first date of objectively determined disease recurrence (progressive disease), institution of a new anti-cancer treatment, or death from any cause. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as a ≥ 50% increase from the lowest point in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of any previously identified abnormal node for partial or nonresponders, or the appearance of any new lesion during or at the end of therapy. |
| Event-Free Survival at 2 Years | Baseline to 2 Years | Event-Free Survival at 2 years (EFS2) is defined as the rate of EFS at 2 years from the date of study enrollment and is determined using the distribution of overall EFS times. Event-free survival rates at 2 years will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Overall Survival | Baseline to Date of Death from Any Cause (up to 80.30 months) | Overall survival (OS) time is defined as the time from the date of study enrollment to the date of death from any cause. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | First dose through 30 days post-study treatment discontinuation (up to 81.30 months) | Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events. |
| Disease Free Survival at 2 Years | Baseline to 2 Years | Disease-free survival at 2 years (DFS2) is defined as the rate of DFS at 2 years from the date of study enrollment and is determined using the distribution of overall DFS times. Disease-free survival rates at 2 years will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Score | Baseline, Month 6; Baseline, Month 24; Baseline, Month 33 | The EQ-5D instrument is a participant-rated questionnaire used to evaluate health status. The EQ-5D assesses five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) that participants rate using three levels (no problem, some problem, or extreme problem), as well as overall health status. The five dimensions can be combined using country-specific weights to create an estimate of overall health status score. The possible values for score range from -0.594 (severe problems in all 5 dimensions) to 1 (no problem in all dimensions) on a scale where 1 represents the best possible health state. This analysis utilized mixed-effect model repeated measure (MMRM) analysis of change from baseline in the EQ-5D for the United Kingdom population-based index score adjusting for baseline covariates. |
| Translational Research: DFS Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Germinal-center B-cells (GCB) Versus Non-germinal-center B-cells | Baseline to 24 months (2 years) | Reported are the DFS for GCB and non-GCB status. DLBCL molecular subtypes of GCB/non-GCB using Hans' algorithm were determined by protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was used to assess molecular subtype characterization of GCB and non-GCB. |
| Translational Research: DFS of Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Protein Kinase C-β2 (PKC-β2) Expression | Baseline to 94.5 months | Reported are the DFS based on PKC-β2 protein expression. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was performed to assess protein expression of PKC-β2 in cytoplasm scored for percent of tumor cells stained, and using 50% positive staining as the cutoff for high/low expression (high expression: \>=50% staining, low expression: \<50% staining). |
| Pharmacokinetics: Average Steady-State Concentration (Cavg,ss) for Total Analyte | Month 2, Month 4: Predose | — |
| Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Score | Baseline, Month 2; Baseline, Month 4; Baseline, Month 6; Baseline, Month 12; Baseline, Month 18; Baseline, Month 24; Baseline, Month 36 | The FACT-Lym assesses health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in participants with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It includes the 27-item cancer-specific FACT-G (General), which assesses physical, social/family, emotional and functional well-being, plus a 15-item subscale that assesses concerns specific to lymphoma. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much), yielding a possible score of 0-168, with higher scores representing better HRQoL. This analysis utilized mixed-effect model repeated measure (MMRM) analysis of change from baseline adjusting for baseline covariates. |
Countries
Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental Enzastaurin 500 mg administered PO QD after an initial loading dose of 1125 mg on Day 1. | 504 |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control Placebo administered PO QD after an initial loading dose of placebo on Day 1. | 254 |
| Total | 758 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 72 | 28 |
| Overall Study | Death | 5 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 6 | 8 |
| Overall Study | Progressive Disease | 106 | 60 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Entry Criteria Not Met | 6 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 7 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Sponsor Decision | 1 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 36 | 17 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo: Arm B - Control | Total | Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 62.65 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.09 | 62.35 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.78 | 62.19 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.13 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized African | 2 Participants | 7 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian | 155 Participants | 464 Participants | 309 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized East Asian | 73 Participants | 217 Participants | 144 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic | 13 Participants | 37 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Native American | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized West Asian (Indian sub-continent) | 11 Participants | 32 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Australia | 9 Participants | 29 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Belgium | 4 Participants | 14 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Brazil | 5 Participants | 18 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada | 16 Participants | 40 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment China | 7 Participants | 25 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Czechia | 2 Participants | 8 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Denmark | 4 Participants | 13 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Finland | 5 Participants | 16 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 10 Participants | 32 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 10 Participants | 25 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Greece | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Hungary | 2 Participants | 6 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment India | 11 Participants | 33 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 10 Participants | 25 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Japan | 33 Participants | 87 Participants | 54 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Mexico | 9 Participants | 22 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 7 Participants | 16 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Portugal | 3 Participants | 8 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Puerto Rico | 1 Participants | 4 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment South Korea | 21 Participants | 58 Participants | 37 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Spain | 5 Participants | 25 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Sweden | 5 Participants | 24 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Taiwan | 8 Participants | 32 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 4 Participants | 8 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 61 Participants | 186 Participants | 125 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 105 Participants | 350 Participants | 245 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 149 Participants | 408 Participants | 259 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 406 / 493 | 185 / 249 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 135 / 493 | 72 / 249 |
Outcome results
Overall Disease-Free Survival
Overall Disease-Free Survival (DFS) time is defined as the time from the date of study enrollment to the first date of objectively determined disease recurrence (progressive disease) or death from any cause. DFS was assessed according to International Working Group recommendations. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as a ≥ 50% increase from the lowest point in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of any previously identified abnormal node for partial or nonresponders, or the appearance of any new lesion during or at the end of therapy.
Time frame: Baseline to Measured Progressive Disease or Death from Any Cause (up to 80.30 months)
Population: All randomized participants. DFS is censored at the last assessable disease free assessment for participants who are alive or have not progressed. The number of censored participant data for enzastaurin and placebo is 369 (73.2%) and 180 (70.9%), respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Overall Disease-Free Survival | 42.8 Month |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Overall Disease-Free Survival | 43.1 Month |
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Score
The EQ-5D instrument is a participant-rated questionnaire used to evaluate health status. The EQ-5D assesses five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) that participants rate using three levels (no problem, some problem, or extreme problem), as well as overall health status. The five dimensions can be combined using country-specific weights to create an estimate of overall health status score. The possible values for score range from -0.594 (severe problems in all 5 dimensions) to 1 (no problem in all dimensions) on a scale where 1 represents the best possible health state. This analysis utilized mixed-effect model repeated measure (MMRM) analysis of change from baseline in the EQ-5D for the United Kingdom population-based index score adjusting for baseline covariates.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6; Baseline, Month 24; Baseline, Month 33
Population: All randomized participants who completed at least one EQ-5D assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Score | Month 6 | 0.02 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.01 |
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Score | Month 24 | 0.02 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.01 |
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Score | Month 33 | 0.03 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.01 |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Score | Month 6 | 0.00 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.01 |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Score | Month 24 | 0.03 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.02 |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Score | Month 33 | 0.03 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.01 |
Disease Free Survival at 2 Years
Disease-free survival at 2 years (DFS2) is defined as the rate of DFS at 2 years from the date of study enrollment and is determined using the distribution of overall DFS times. Disease-free survival rates at 2 years will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Baseline to 2 Years
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Disease Free Survival at 2 Years | 0.785 proportion of participants |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Disease Free Survival at 2 Years | 0.748 proportion of participants |
Event-Free Survival
Overall Event-Free Survival (EFS) time is defined as the time from the date of study enrollment to the first date of objectively determined disease recurrence (progressive disease), institution of a new anti-cancer treatment, or death from any cause. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as a ≥ 50% increase from the lowest point in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of any previously identified abnormal node for partial or nonresponders, or the appearance of any new lesion during or at the end of therapy.
Time frame: Baseline to Objective PD, Start of New Therapy or Death From Any Cause (up to 76.81 months)
Population: All randomized participants. EFS is censored at the last assessable disease-free assessment for participants who are alive, have not progressed or started new anticancer treatment. The number of censored participant data for enzastaurin and placebo is 364 (72.2%) and 176 (69.3%), respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Event-Free Survival | Minimum EFS Survival | 0.03 Month |
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Event-Free Survival | Maximum EFS Survival | 76.81 Month |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Event-Free Survival | Maximum EFS Survival | 71.56 Month |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Event-Free Survival | Minimum EFS Survival | 0.03 Month |
Event-Free Survival at 2 Years
Event-Free Survival at 2 years (EFS2) is defined as the rate of EFS at 2 years from the date of study enrollment and is determined using the distribution of overall EFS times. Event-free survival rates at 2 years will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Baseline to 2 Years
Population: All randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Event-Free Survival at 2 Years | 0.781 Proportion of participants |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Event-Free Survival at 2 Years | 0.734 Proportion of participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events.
Time frame: First dose through 30 days post-study treatment discontinuation (up to 81.30 months)
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | 459 Participants |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | 230 Participants |
Overall Survival
Overall survival (OS) time is defined as the time from the date of study enrollment to the date of death from any cause.
Time frame: Baseline to Date of Death from Any Cause (up to 80.30 months)
Population: All randomized participants. Overall survival is censored at the last date of contact for participants who have no reported death. The number of censored participant data for enzastaurin and placebo is 404 (80.2%) and 205 (80.7%), respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Overall Survival | Minimum OS Survival | 0.03 Month |
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Overall Survival | Maximum OS Survival | 76.81 Month |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Overall Survival | Minimum OS Survival | 0.03 Month |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Overall Survival | Maximum OS Survival | 80.30 Month |
Pharmacokinetics: Average Steady-State Concentration (Cavg,ss) for Total Analyte
Time frame: Month 2, Month 4: Predose
Population: All participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had evaluable PK data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Pharmacokinetics: Average Steady-State Concentration (Cavg,ss) for Total Analyte | 2370 nanomole/liter (nmol/L) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 59.9 |
Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Score
The FACT-Lym assesses health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in participants with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It includes the 27-item cancer-specific FACT-G (General), which assesses physical, social/family, emotional and functional well-being, plus a 15-item subscale that assesses concerns specific to lymphoma. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much), yielding a possible score of 0-168, with higher scores representing better HRQoL. This analysis utilized mixed-effect model repeated measure (MMRM) analysis of change from baseline adjusting for baseline covariates.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 2; Baseline, Month 4; Baseline, Month 6; Baseline, Month 12; Baseline, Month 18; Baseline, Month 24; Baseline, Month 36
Population: All randomized participants who completed at least one FACT-Lym assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Score | Month 6 | 2.04 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.87 |
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Score | Month 18 | 2.87 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.89 |
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Score | Month 4 | 2.56 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.8 |
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Score | Month 24 | 2.72 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.99 |
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Score | Month 12 | 3.85 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.87 |
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Score | Month 36 | 2.54 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.13 |
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Score | Month 2 | 2.45 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.67 |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Score | Month 36 | 4.22 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.43 |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Score | Month 2 | 1.86 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 0.93 |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Score | Month 4 | 2.51 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.06 |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Score | Month 6 | 2.82 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.1 |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Score | Month 12 | 2.11 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.29 |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Score | Month 18 | 1.73 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.26 |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Score | Month 24 | 3.96 Units on a Scale | Standard Error 1.26 |
Translational Research: DFS of Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Protein Kinase C-β2 (PKC-β2) Expression
Reported are the DFS based on PKC-β2 protein expression. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was performed to assess protein expression of PKC-β2 in cytoplasm scored for percent of tumor cells stained, and using 50% positive staining as the cutoff for high/low expression (high expression: \>=50% staining, low expression: \<50% staining).
Time frame: Baseline to 94.5 months
Population: All randomized participants for which a pre-treatment tumor tissue was provided and had evaluable samples.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Translational Research: DFS of Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Protein Kinase C-β2 (PKC-β2) Expression | 64.86 percentage of participants |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Translational Research: DFS of Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Protein Kinase C-β2 (PKC-β2) Expression | 81.16 percentage of participants |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control With Germinal-center B-cells | Translational Research: DFS of Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Protein Kinase C-β2 (PKC-β2) Expression | 61.54 percentage of participants |
| Placebo Arm B- Control With Non-germinal-center B-cells | Translational Research: DFS of Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Protein Kinase C-β2 (PKC-β2) Expression | 70.58 percentage of participants |
Translational Research: DFS Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Germinal-center B-cells (GCB) Versus Non-germinal-center B-cells
Reported are the DFS for GCB and non-GCB status. DLBCL molecular subtypes of GCB/non-GCB using Hans' algorithm were determined by protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was used to assess molecular subtype characterization of GCB and non-GCB.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 months (2 years)
Population: All randomized participants for which a pre-treatment tumor tissue was provided and had evaluable samples.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin: Arm A - Experimental | Translational Research: DFS Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Germinal-center B-cells (GCB) Versus Non-germinal-center B-cells | 76.31 percentage of participants |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control | Translational Research: DFS Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Germinal-center B-cells (GCB) Versus Non-germinal-center B-cells | 75.97 percentage of participants |
| Placebo: Arm B - Control With Germinal-center B-cells | Translational Research: DFS Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Germinal-center B-cells (GCB) Versus Non-germinal-center B-cells | 66.21 percentage of participants |
| Placebo Arm B- Control With Non-germinal-center B-cells | Translational Research: DFS Participants With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Germinal-center B-cells (GCB) Versus Non-germinal-center B-cells | 68.20 percentage of participants |