Prostate Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
adenocarcinoma of the prostate, stage IIB prostate cancer, stage IIA prostate cancer
Brief summary
RATIONALE: Giving radiation therapy that uses a 3-dimensional (3-D) image of the tumor to help focus thin beams of radiation directly on the tumor, and giving hypofractionated radiation therapy (higher doses over a shorter period of time), may be less costly with fewer side effects and just as effective in treating prostate cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying several different radiation therapy regimens to compare how well they work in treating patients with stage II prostate cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: Primary * Compare the disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with favorable-risk stage II prostate cancer treated with hypofractionated vs conventionally fractionated three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Secondary * Compare time to local progression, freedom from biochemical recurrence, and disease-specific and overall survival of patients treated with these regimens. * Determine the incidence of gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxic effects in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare the degree, duration, and significant differences in disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) decrements, using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), in patients treated with these regimens. * Determine whether anxiety and/or depression, as measured by the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25), are decreased with therapy that improves DFS of these patients . * Determine whether the incremental gain in DFS outweighs decrements in the generic domains of HRQOL (i.e., mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) in patients treated with these regimens. * Conduct a cost-utility analysis of hypofractionated 3D-CRT or IMRT as a prostate cancer therapy if this regimen is shown to be as effective as conventionally fractionated 3D-CRT or IMRT in improving DFS. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to Gleason score (2-4 vs 5-6), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (\< 4 ng/mL vs 4-\<9 ng/mL), and planned radiotherapy modality (three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy \[3D-CRT\] vs intensity-modulated radiotherapy \[IMRT\]). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I: Patients undergo conventionally fractionated 3D-CRT or IMRT once daily 5 days a week for 8.2 weeks (total of 41 treatments). * Arm II: Patients undergo hypofractionated 3D-CRT or IMRT once daily 5 days a week for 5.6 weeks (total of 28 treatments). Quality of life, anxiety, and depression are assessed at baseline and then at 6 months and 1, 2, and 5 years after the start of radiotherapy. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1,067 patients will be accrued to this study.
Interventions
Radiation therapy will be given once daily, five days a week, at 1.8 Gy per fraction, for 41 fractions and a total dose of 73.8 Gy
Radiation therapy will be given once daily, five days a week, at 2.5 Gy per fraction, for 28 fractions and a total dose of 70 Gy.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate within the past 6 months * Clinical stage T1-2c * Combined Gleason score 2-6 * Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) \< 10 ng/mL within the past 6 months * PSA evaluated at least 10 days after prostate biopsy * For patients who received finasteride, PSA evaluated at least 30 after completion of finasteride * For patients who received dutasteride, PSA evaluated at least 90 after completion of dutasteride * No regional lymph node involvement * No distant metastases PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * Zubrod performance status 0-1 * No unstable angina and/or congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization within the past 6 months * No transmural myocardial infarction within the past 6 months * No acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring IV antibiotics * No chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation or other respiratory illness requiring hospitalization or precluding study treatment * No hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice and/or coagulation defects * No known AIDS * No prior or concurrent lymphomatous/hematogenous malignancy or other invasive malignancy except nonmelanomatous skin cancer or any other cancer for which the patient has been continually disease-free for ≥ 5 years (e.g., carcinoma in situ of the bladder or oral cavity) * No other severe, active comorbidity PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * See Disease Characteristics * No prior radical prostatectomy or cryosurgery for prostate cancer * No prior hormonal therapy, including any of the following: * Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (e.g., goserelin or leuprolide) * Antiandrogens (e.g., flutamide or bicalutamide) * Estrogens \[e.g., diethylstilbestrol (DES)\] * Surgical castration (bilateral orchiectomy) * No prior pelvic radiotherapy or prostate brachytherapy * No prior or concurrent cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer * At least 30 days since prior finasteride * At least 90 days since prior dutasteride * No concurrent neoadjuvant or adjuvant hormonal therapy * Concurrent warfarin or other blood-thinning agents allowed
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Five-year Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate | Analysis occurs after all patients have been followed for five years. | Five-year rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. DFS events included local progression, distant metastatic progression, biochemical recurrence as defined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Phoenix definition, or death from any cause. Patients who experienced second primary cancers remained under observation for DFS events. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Five-year Local Progression Rate | Analysis occurs after all patients have been followed for five years. | Clinical criteria for local recurrence are progression (increase in palpable abnormality) at any time, failure of regression of the palpable tumor by 2 years, and redevelopment of a palpable abnormality after complete disappearance of previous abnormalities. Histologic criteria for local recurrence are presence of prostatic carcinoma upon biopsy and positive biopsy of the palpably normal prostate more than 2 years after the start of treatment. The arms were not statistically compared because of an insufficient number of events. |
| Five-year Disease-specific Survival Rate | Analysis occurs after all patients have been followed for five years. | An event was death in association with any of the following conditions: * Primary cause of death certified as due to prostate cancer * Further clinical tumor progression occurring after initiation of salvage anti-tumor (e.g., (androgen suppression) therapy * A rise (that exceeds 1.0 ng/mL) in the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level on at least two consecutive occasions that occurs during or after salvage androgen suppression therapy * Disease progression in the absence of any anti-tumor therapy * Death from a complication of therapy, irrespective of disease status. The arms were not statistically compared because of an insufficient number of events. |
| Five-year PSA Failure Rate | Analysis occurs after all patients have been followed for five years. | Five-year rates are shown (cumulative incidence estimates). Note, although the protocol calls this endpoint Freedom from biochemical recurrence, it defines the endpoint as The time to PSA failure. An event for PSA, i.e. biochemical, failure was the first of the following: initiation of non-protocol (e.g., salvage) hormone therapy, or an increase in PSA of at least 2 ng/mL. Time to biochemical failure was measured from study entry until the date of failure. |
| Five-year Overall Survival Rate | Analysis occurs after all patients have been followed for five years. | Five-year rates Kaplan-Meier estimates. Overall survival (OS) was measured from study entry until the date of death. Patients still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date of last follow-up |
| Frequency of Patients With GU and GI Acute and Late Toxicity | Acute toxicity is measured from start of treatment to 90 days from the completion of treatment. Late toxicity is defined as toxicity occuring after 90 days from completion of treatment. Analysis occured at the time of the primary endpoint analysis. | The frequency of genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events as defined and graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3) were compared between treatment arms. Acute toxicity was defined as any toxicity beginning within 90 days of completion of RT, and late toxicity was defined as any toxicity beginning more than 90 days after the completion of RT. Acute and late GU and GI toxicity rates were tabulated and reported in two ways: dichotomized as \< grade 2 vs ≥ grade 2, and dichotomized as \< grade 3 vs ≥ grade 3. Higher grade indicates more severity. |
| The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | Baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months, and 5 years | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices questionaire is designed to assess the use of erectile aids among patients treated for prostate cancer. This instrument is used to complement the sexual symptom domain in the EPIC. The percentage of Yes responses to the following questions are reported: Do you have a penile prosthesis, Have you used an medications or devices to aid or improve erections?. |
| Change From Baseline in Assessment of Anxiety and Depression Using the HSCL-25 | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 5 years | Anxiety and depression were measured with the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25). It consists of 25 items: Part I of the HSCL-25 has 10 items for anxiety symptoms; Part II has 15 items for depression symptoms. The scale for each question includes four categories of response (Not at all, A little, Quite a bit, Extremely, rated 1 to 4, respectively). Two scores are calculated: the total score is the average of all 25 items and ranges from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates worse symptoms. The HSCL-25 tool was assessed at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 5 years. For each patient, the change in score from baseline to the time point is calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the time point value. |
| EQ-5D Scores | Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 5 years | The EQ-5D is a 2-part self-assessment questionnaire. First part is 5 items (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each with 3 problem levels (1-none, 2-moderate, 3-extreme). Health states are defined by the combination of the leveled responses to the 5 dimensions, generating 243 health states to which unconsciousness and death are added. The 2nd part is a visual analogue scale (VAS) valuing current health state, measured on a 20-cm 10-point interval scale. Worst imaginable health state is scored as 0 at the bottom of the scale, and best imaginable health state is scored as 100 at the top. Both the 5-item index score and the VAS score are transformed into a utility score between 0 -Worst health stat and 1 -Best health state. A two-sided Wilcoxon test with alpha 0.05 was used due to the skewed, thus non-normal, nature of the data. |
| Assessment of Trade-off Between Disease-free Survival and Quality of Life. | From baseline to 5 years from the start of treatment | To examine trade-offs between the survival time and QOL, we were to combine them for each patient into two single measurements: quality adjusted live year (QALY) and quality adjusted disease-free survival year (QADFSY). We were to use Glasziou's multiple health-state (Q-TWiST) models to use the repeated measures of EQ-5D. |
| Statistical Modeling of Genomic Biomarkers | Baseline biomarker collection. Analysis would occur after the primary endpoint analysis. | — |
| Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | Baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months, and 5 years | Prostate cancer (PC) Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) outcomes as measured by change over time in the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite \[EPIC\], a PC HRQOL instrument measuring a broad spectrum of urinary, bowel, and sexual symptoms related to radiotherapy, is compared between arms. The EPIC questionnaire was grouped into four domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, hormonal), each with a score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), and was assessed at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months, and 5 years. The difference in score from baseline to each time point was calculated and the Wilcoxon test statistic was used to test the null hypothesis that responses are the same across the two treatment arms vs. the alternative hypothesis that they are different, using a 2-sided alpha of 0.05 at each timepoint, resulting in an alpha of 0.0125 for each domain. Each row refers to a separate analysis. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Collection of Paraffin-embedded Tissue Block, Serum, Plasma, and Buffy Coat Cells for Future Translational Research Analyses | From baseline to 5 years from the start of treatment. |
Countries
Canada, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Conventional 3D-CRT Conventional 3D-CRT or IMRT: Radiation therapy will be given once daily, five days a week, at 1.8 Gy per fraction, for 41 fractions and a total dose of 73.8 Gy | 542 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT Hypofractionated 3D-CRT or IMRT: Radiation therapy will be given once daily, five days a week, at 2.5 Gy per fraction, for 28 fractions and a total dose of 70 Gy. | 550 |
| Total | 1,092 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 10 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 6 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Conventional 3D-CRT | Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 67 years | 67 years | 67 years |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 542 Participants | 550 Participants | 1092 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 466 / 534 | 497 / 545 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 28 / 534 | 32 / 545 |
Outcome results
Five-year Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate
Five-year rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. DFS events included local progression, distant metastatic progression, biochemical recurrence as defined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Phoenix definition, or death from any cause. Patients who experienced second primary cancers remained under observation for DFS events.
Time frame: Analysis occurs after all patients have been followed for five years.
Population: Eligible patients who did not withdraw consent
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Five-year Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate | 85.3 percentage of participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Five-year Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate | 86.3 percentage of participants |
Assessment of Trade-off Between Disease-free Survival and Quality of Life.
To examine trade-offs between the survival time and QOL, we were to combine them for each patient into two single measurements: quality adjusted live year (QALY) and quality adjusted disease-free survival year (QADFSY). We were to use Glasziou's multiple health-state (Q-TWiST) models to use the repeated measures of EQ-5D.
Time frame: From baseline to 5 years from the start of treatment
Population: This analysis was not conducted because there were no differences in EQ-5D scores. See results presented for Outcome Measure 10: Evaluation and Comparison of the Cost-utility of Each Treatment Arm Using EQ-5D.
Change From Baseline in Assessment of Anxiety and Depression Using the HSCL-25
Anxiety and depression were measured with the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25). It consists of 25 items: Part I of the HSCL-25 has 10 items for anxiety symptoms; Part II has 15 items for depression symptoms. The scale for each question includes four categories of response (Not at all, A little, Quite a bit, Extremely, rated 1 to 4, respectively). Two scores are calculated: the total score is the average of all 25 items and ranges from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates worse symptoms. The HSCL-25 tool was assessed at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 5 years. For each patient, the change in score from baseline to the time point is calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the time point value.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 5 years
Population: Eligible patients with a follow-up HSCL-25 who did not withdraw consent
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Change From Baseline in Assessment of Anxiety and Depression Using the HSCL-25 | 6 months | 31.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.8 |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Change From Baseline in Assessment of Anxiety and Depression Using the HSCL-25 | 12 months | 31.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.3 |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Change From Baseline in Assessment of Anxiety and Depression Using the HSCL-25 | 24 months | 31.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.5 |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Change From Baseline in Assessment of Anxiety and Depression Using the HSCL-25 | 5 years | 30.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.1 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Change From Baseline in Assessment of Anxiety and Depression Using the HSCL-25 | 5 years | 32.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.9 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Change From Baseline in Assessment of Anxiety and Depression Using the HSCL-25 | 6 months | 31.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.1 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Change From Baseline in Assessment of Anxiety and Depression Using the HSCL-25 | 24 months | 31.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Change From Baseline in Assessment of Anxiety and Depression Using the HSCL-25 | 12 months | 32.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9 |
Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC
Prostate cancer (PC) Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) outcomes as measured by change over time in the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite \[EPIC\], a PC HRQOL instrument measuring a broad spectrum of urinary, bowel, and sexual symptoms related to radiotherapy, is compared between arms. The EPIC questionnaire was grouped into four domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, hormonal), each with a score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), and was assessed at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months, and 5 years. The difference in score from baseline to each time point was calculated and the Wilcoxon test statistic was used to test the null hypothesis that responses are the same across the two treatment arms vs. the alternative hypothesis that they are different, using a 2-sided alpha of 0.05 at each timepoint, resulting in an alpha of 0.0125 for each domain. Each row refers to a separate analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months, and 5 years
Population: Eligible patients with both a baseline and follow-up EPIC domain score, who did not withdraw consent
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 6 mo. EPIC Bowel Domain | -4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.1 |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 6 mo. EPIC Urinary Domain | 0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.5 |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 6 mo. EPIC Sexual Domain | -8.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.9 |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 6 mo. EPIC Hormonal Domain | -2.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.5 |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 12 mo. EPIC Bowel Domain (n=273, 294) | -3.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.4 |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 12 mo. EPIC Urinary Domain | -0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.4 |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 12 mo. EPIC Sexual Domain | -8.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.7 |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 12 mo. EPIC Hormonal Domain | -1.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.5 |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 24 mo. EPIC Bowel Domain | -4.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.4 |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 24 mo. EPIC Urinary Domain | -0.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.6 |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 24 mo. EPIC Sexual Domain | -9.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.1 |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 24 mo. EPIC Hormonal Domain | -2.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.5 |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 60 mo. EPIC Bowel Domain | -3.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.8 |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 60 mo. EPIC Urinary Domain | -1.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.4 |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 60 mo. EPIC Sexual Domain | -13.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.1 |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 60 mo. EPIC Hormonal Domain | -2.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.3 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 60 mo. EPIC Hormonal Domain | -2.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.4 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 6 mo. EPIC Bowel Domain | -3.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.7 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 24 mo. EPIC Bowel Domain | -6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.7 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 6 mo. EPIC Urinary Domain | -1.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.9 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 60 mo. EPIC Bowel Domain | -5.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.6 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 6 mo. EPIC Sexual Domain | -7.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.8 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 24 mo. EPIC Urinary Domain | -0.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.4 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 6 mo. EPIC Hormonal Domain | -1.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 60 mo. EPIC Sexual Domain | -15.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.4 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 12 mo. EPIC Bowel Domain (n=273, 294) | -7.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.6 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 24 mo. EPIC Sexual Domain | -10.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 12 mo. EPIC Urinary Domain | -1.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.1 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 60 mo. EPIC Urinary Domain | -3.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 12 mo. EPIC Sexual Domain | -8.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 24 mo. EPIC Hormonal Domain | -1.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.5 |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Comparison of Disease-specific HRQOL Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC); the Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Supplements the EPIC | 12 mo. EPIC Hormonal Domain | -1.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.4 |
EQ-5D Scores
The EQ-5D is a 2-part self-assessment questionnaire. First part is 5 items (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each with 3 problem levels (1-none, 2-moderate, 3-extreme). Health states are defined by the combination of the leveled responses to the 5 dimensions, generating 243 health states to which unconsciousness and death are added. The 2nd part is a visual analogue scale (VAS) valuing current health state, measured on a 20-cm 10-point interval scale. Worst imaginable health state is scored as 0 at the bottom of the scale, and best imaginable health state is scored as 100 at the top. Both the 5-item index score and the VAS score are transformed into a utility score between 0 -Worst health stat and 1 -Best health state. A two-sided Wilcoxon test with alpha 0.05 was used due to the skewed, thus non-normal, nature of the data.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 5 years
Population: Eligible patients with a baseline or follow-up EQ-5D score who did not withdraw consent
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | Baseline VAS Score | 85.0 units on a scale |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | Baseline Index Score | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | 6 mo. VAS Score | 85.0 units on a scale |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | 6 mo. Index Score | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | 12 mo. VAS Score | 85.0 units on a scale |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | 12 mo. Index Score | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | 24 mo. VAS Score | 85.0 units on a scale |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | 24 mo. Index Score | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | 60 mo. VAS Score | 85.0 units on a scale |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | 60 mo. Index Score | 0.9 units on a scale |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | 24 mo. Index Score | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | Baseline VAS Score | 82.0 units on a scale |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | 12 mo. Index Score | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | Baseline Index Score | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | 60 mo. Index Score | 0.9 units on a scale |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | 6 mo. VAS Score | 85.0 units on a scale |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | 24 mo. VAS Score | 85.0 units on a scale |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | 6 mo. Index Score | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | 60 mo. VAS Score | 82.0 units on a scale |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | EQ-5D Scores | 12 mo. VAS Score | 81.5 units on a scale |
Five-year Disease-specific Survival Rate
An event was death in association with any of the following conditions: * Primary cause of death certified as due to prostate cancer * Further clinical tumor progression occurring after initiation of salvage anti-tumor (e.g., (androgen suppression) therapy * A rise (that exceeds 1.0 ng/mL) in the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level on at least two consecutive occasions that occurs during or after salvage androgen suppression therapy * Disease progression in the absence of any anti-tumor therapy * Death from a complication of therapy, irrespective of disease status. The arms were not statistically compared because of an insufficient number of events.
Time frame: Analysis occurs after all patients have been followed for five years.
Population: All eligible patients
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Five-year Disease-specific Survival Rate | 0.2 percentage of participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Five-year Disease-specific Survival Rate | 0.2 percentage of participants |
Five-year Local Progression Rate
Clinical criteria for local recurrence are progression (increase in palpable abnormality) at any time, failure of regression of the palpable tumor by 2 years, and redevelopment of a palpable abnormality after complete disappearance of previous abnormalities. Histologic criteria for local recurrence are presence of prostatic carcinoma upon biopsy and positive biopsy of the palpably normal prostate more than 2 years after the start of treatment. The arms were not statistically compared because of an insufficient number of events.
Time frame: Analysis occurs after all patients have been followed for five years.
Population: All eligible patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Five-year Local Progression Rate | 1.2 percentage of participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Five-year Local Progression Rate | 0.4 percentage of participants |
Five-year Overall Survival Rate
Five-year rates Kaplan-Meier estimates. Overall survival (OS) was measured from study entry until the date of death. Patients still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date of last follow-up
Time frame: Analysis occurs after all patients have been followed for five years.
Population: Eligible patients who did not withdraw consent.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Five-year Overall Survival Rate | 93.2 percentage of participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Five-year Overall Survival Rate | 92.5 percentage of participants |
Five-year PSA Failure Rate
Five-year rates are shown (cumulative incidence estimates). Note, although the protocol calls this endpoint Freedom from biochemical recurrence, it defines the endpoint as The time to PSA failure. An event for PSA, i.e. biochemical, failure was the first of the following: initiation of non-protocol (e.g., salvage) hormone therapy, or an increase in PSA of at least 2 ng/mL. Time to biochemical failure was measured from study entry until the date of failure.
Time frame: Analysis occurs after all patients have been followed for five years.
Population: Eligible patients who did not withdraw consent.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Five-year PSA Failure Rate | 8.1 percentage of participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Five-year PSA Failure Rate | 6.3 percentage of participants |
Frequency of Patients With GU and GI Acute and Late Toxicity
The frequency of genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events as defined and graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3) were compared between treatment arms. Acute toxicity was defined as any toxicity beginning within 90 days of completion of RT, and late toxicity was defined as any toxicity beginning more than 90 days after the completion of RT. Acute and late GU and GI toxicity rates were tabulated and reported in two ways: dichotomized as \< grade 2 vs ≥ grade 2, and dichotomized as \< grade 3 vs ≥ grade 3. Higher grade indicates more severity.
Time frame: Acute toxicity is measured from start of treatment to 90 days from the completion of treatment. Late toxicity is defined as toxicity occuring after 90 days from completion of treatment. Analysis occured at the time of the primary endpoint analysis.
Population: All eligible patients who started study treatment and did not withdraw consent
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Frequency of Patients With GU and GI Acute and Late Toxicity | Late GU: Grade >= 3 | 12 participants |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Frequency of Patients With GU and GI Acute and Late Toxicity | Acute GI: Grade >= 3 | 3 participants |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Frequency of Patients With GU and GI Acute and Late Toxicity | Acute GU: Grade >= 2 | 145 participants |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Frequency of Patients With GU and GI Acute and Late Toxicity | Acute GU: Grade >= 3 | 13 participants |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Frequency of Patients With GU and GI Acute and Late Toxicity | Late GI: Grade >= 2 | 75 participants |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Frequency of Patients With GU and GI Acute and Late Toxicity | Late GI: Grade >= 3 | 14 participants |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Frequency of Patients With GU and GI Acute and Late Toxicity | Late GU: Grade >= 2 | 121 participants |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | Frequency of Patients With GU and GI Acute and Late Toxicity | Acute GI: Grade >= 2: | 55 participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Frequency of Patients With GU and GI Acute and Late Toxicity | Late GU: Grade >= 3 | 19 participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Frequency of Patients With GU and GI Acute and Late Toxicity | Acute GI: Grade >= 2: | 58 participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Frequency of Patients With GU and GI Acute and Late Toxicity | Late GI: Grade >= 2 | 121 participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Frequency of Patients With GU and GI Acute and Late Toxicity | Acute GI: Grade >= 3 | 4 participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Frequency of Patients With GU and GI Acute and Late Toxicity | Late GU: Grade >= 2 | 161 participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Frequency of Patients With GU and GI Acute and Late Toxicity | Acute GU: Grade >= 2 | 147 participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Frequency of Patients With GU and GI Acute and Late Toxicity | Late GI: Grade >= 3 | 22 participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | Frequency of Patients With GU and GI Acute and Late Toxicity | Acute GU: Grade >= 3 | 18 participants |
Statistical Modeling of Genomic Biomarkers
Time frame: Baseline biomarker collection. Analysis would occur after the primary endpoint analysis.
Population: The protocol did not provide sufficient detail to meet National Cancer Institute requirements for release of specimens from the NRG tissue bank for the protocol-specified analysis, therefore no assays were performed and no data were collected for this outcome measure. Specimen use will require federal approval and funding separate from this trial.
The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire
The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices questionaire is designed to assess the use of erectile aids among patients treated for prostate cancer. This instrument is used to complement the sexual symptom domain in the EPIC. The percentage of Yes responses to the following questions are reported: Do you have a penile prosthesis, Have you used an medications or devices to aid or improve erections?.
Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months, and 5 years
Population: Eligible patients answering the questionaire, who did not withdraw consent
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | Baseline penile prosthesis question | 2.0 percentage of participants |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | Baseline medications/devices question | 24.5 percentage of participants |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | 6 mo. penile prosthesis question | 2.5 percentage of participants |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | 6 mo. medications/devices question | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | 12 mo. penile prosthesis question | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | 12 mo. medications/devices question | 29.6 percentage of participants |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | 24 mo. penile prosthesis question | 1.5 percentage of participants |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | 24 mo. medications/devices question | 36.3 percentage of participants |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | 60 mo. penile prosthesis question | 1.7 percentage of participants |
| Conventional 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | 60 mo. medications/devices question | 35.2 percentage of participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | 24 mo. medications/devices question | 33.3 percentage of participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | Baseline penile prosthesis question | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | 12 mo. medications/devices question | 30.3 percentage of participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | Baseline medications/devices question | 23.0 percentage of participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | 60 mo. medications/devices question | 31.7 percentage of participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | 6 mo. penile prosthesis question | 0.6 percentage of participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | 24 mo. penile prosthesis question | 0 percentage of participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | 6 mo. medications/devices question | 24.1 percentage of participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | 60 mo. penile prosthesis question | 1.2 percentage of participants |
| Hypofractionated 3D-CRT | The Utilization of Sexual Medications/Devices Questionaire | 12 mo. penile prosthesis question | 0.6 percentage of participants |
Collection of Paraffin-embedded Tissue Block, Serum, Plasma, and Buffy Coat Cells for Future Translational Research Analyses
Time frame: From baseline to 5 years from the start of treatment.