Skip to content

A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Compare the Efficacy of Treatment With Denosumab Versus Alendronate Sodium in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density.

A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Compare the Efficacy of Treatment With Denosumab Versus Alendronate Sodium in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Denisty

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00330460
Enrollment
1189
Registered
2006-05-26
Start date
2006-05-31
Completion date
2008-01-31
Last updated
2011-01-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteopenia, Osteoporosis

Keywords

Osteoporosis, Osteopenia, AMG 162, Fracture - hip, Postmenopausal

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density, the mean percent change in total hip BMD in subjects receiving denosumab is not less than that observed in subjects receiving alendronate sodium by more than a pre-specified non-inferiority margin.

Interventions

DRUGAlendronate

ALN; 70 mg; oral; once weekly

DRUGDenosumab

60 mg; SC; every 6 months

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- Patient is an ambulatory postmenopausal woman - Patient has BMD value that corresponds to a T-score of less than or equal to -2.0 (g/cm2) at the lumbar spine OR total hip within range specific to the study protocol.

Exclusion criteria

o Any disorder that compromises the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and/or to comply with study procedures * Evidence of any of the following per subject report, chart review or central laboratory result: 1. Hyper- or hypothyroidism; however, subjects on stable thyroid hormone replacement therapy may be allowed per the following criteria: * If TSH level is normal, subject is eligible for the study. * If TSH level is below normal range, subject is not eligible for the study. * If TSH level is elevated (\> 5.5 mIU/mL to 10.0 mIU/mL), serum T4 should be measured. If serum T4 is within normal range, subject is eligible. If serum T4 is outside of normal range, subject is not eligible for the study. * If TSH level is above 10.0 mIU/mL, subject is not eligible. 2. Current hyper- or hypoparathyroidism 3. Elevated transaminases * Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST; serum glutamate-oxaloacetic transaminase \[SGOT\]) ³ 2.0 x upper limits of normal (ULN) * Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT; serum glutamate-pyruvate transaminase \[SGPT\]) ³ 2.0 x ULN 4. Significantly impaired renal function as determined by serum creatinine ³ 2.0 mg/dL 5. Current hypo- or hypercalcemia based on the central laboratory reference ranges 6. Active gastric or duodenal ulcer; history of significant gastrointestinal bleed requiring hospitalization or transfusion, or dyspepsia or gastroesophageal reflux disease that is uncontrolled by medication 7. Rheumatoid Arthritis, Paget's disease, Cushing's disease, hyperprolactinemia, or cirrhosis of the liver 8. Known to have tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, or hepatitis B surface antigen 9. Malignancy (except fully resected cutaneous basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma, cervical or breast ductal carcinoma in situ) within the last 5 years 10. Any metabolic bone disease, eg, osteomalacia or osteogenesis imperfecta, which may interfere with the interpretation of the findings 11. Malabsorption syndrome or any gastrointestinal disorders that are associated with malabsorption * Received any solid organ or bone marrow transplant * Vitamin D deficiency (25(OH) vitamin D level \< 12 ng/mL). Vitamin D repletion will be permitted and subjects may be re-screened; see Section 7. * Any laboratory abnormality which, in the opinion of the investigator, will prevent the subject from completing the study or interfere with the interpretation of the study results * Contraindicated or poorly tolerant of ALN therapy; contraindications for ALN therapy include: 1. Abnormalities of the esophagus, which delay esophageal emptying such as stricture or achalasia. 2. Inability to stand or sit upright for at least 30 minutes. 3. Hypersensitivity to ALN or other constituents of ALN tablets o Known sensitivity to mammalian cell derived drug products * Known intolerance to calcium supplements * Administration of intravenous bisphosphonate, or fluoride (except for dental treatment) or strontium ranelate * Oral bisphosphonate treatment: * ³ 3 months cumulatively in the past 2 years, OR * ³ 1 month in the past year, OR * Any use during the 3-month period prior to randomization * PTH or PTH derivatives (eg, teriparatide) within the last year * Administration of any of the following treatments within 3 months of randomization: 1. Any SERM (eg, raloxifene) 2. Tibolone 3. Anabolic steroids or testosterone 4. Glucocorticosteroids (³ 5 mg prednisone equivalent per day for more than 10 days) 5. Systemic (oral, transdermal, topical) hormone replacement therapy (local vaginal estrogen preparation will be allowed) 6. Calcitonin 7. Calcitriol or vitamin D derivatives 8. Other bone active drugs including anti-convulsives (except benzodiazepines) and heparin 9. Chronic systemic ketoconazole, androgens, ACTH, cinacalcet, aluminum, lithium, protease inhibitors, methotrexate, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists 10. Height, weight or girth which may preclude accurate DXA measurements * Less than 2 lumbar vertebrae (L1-L4) evaluable for DXA measurements * Both hips not evaluable by DXA (eg, history of bilateral hip replacement or pins in both hips) * Currently enrolled in or has not yet completed at least 1 month since ending other investigational device or drug trial(s), or subject is receiving other investigational agent(s) * Any physical or psychiatric disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, will prevent the subject from completing the study or interfere with the interpretation of the study results * Evidence of alcohol or substance-abuse within the last 12 months which the investigator believes would interfere with understanding or completing the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 1212 monthsBone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 1212 monthsBone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
Trochanter Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 1212 monthsBone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 1212 monthsBone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
Distal 1/3 Radius Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 1212 monthsBone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First Subject Enrolled: 26-Apr-2006 Last Subject Enrolled: 17-Nov-2006

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Alendronate 70 mg QW595
Denosumab 60 mg Q6M594
Total1,189

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event108
Overall StudyDeath11
Overall StudyIneligibility determined13
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up83
Overall StudyNoncompliance21
Overall StudyOther10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1817

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAlendronate 70 mg QWDenosumab 60 mg Q6MTotal
Age Continuous64.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
64.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
64.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
9 Participants7 Participants16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
69 Participants66 Participants135 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Japanese
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 Participants7 Participants10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or Caucasian
502 Participants502 Participants1004 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
595 Participants594 Participants1189 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
261 / 586270 / 593
serious
Total, serious adverse events
37 / 58634 / 593

Outcome results

Primary

Total Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12

Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Randomized subjects who have a nonmissing baseline and at least 1 nonmissing postbaseline evaluation at or prior to month 12. LOCF used as imputation method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Alendronate 70 mg QWTotal Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 122.6 Percent Change from Baseline
Denosumab 60 mg Q6MTotal Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 123.5 Percent Change from Baseline
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.7, 1.2]ANCOVA
Secondary

Distal 1/3 Radius Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12

Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Alendronate 70 mg QWDistal 1/3 Radius Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 120.6 Percent Change from Baseline
Denosumab 60 mg Q6MDistal 1/3 Radius Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 121.1 Percent Change from Baseline
p-value: 0.000195% CI: [0.3, 0.9]ANCOVA
Secondary

Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12

Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Alendronate 70 mg QWFemoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 121.8 Percent Change from Baseline
Denosumab 60 mg Q6MFemoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 122.4 Percent Change from Baseline
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.3, 1]ANCOVA
Secondary

Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12

Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Alendronate 70 mg QWLumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 124.2 Percent Change from Baseline
Denosumab 60 mg Q6MLumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 125.3 Percent Change from Baseline
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.7, 1.4]ANCOVA
Secondary

Trochanter Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12

Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Alendronate 70 mg QWTrochanter Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 123.4 Percent Change from Baseline
Denosumab 60 mg Q6MTrochanter Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 124.5 Percent Change from Baseline
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.6, 1.4]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026