Skip to content

Promoting Tolerance to Peanut in High-Risk Children

Induction of Tolerance Through Early Introduction of Peanut in High-Risk Children (ITN032AD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00329784
Acronym
LEAP
Enrollment
640
Registered
2006-05-25
Start date
2006-12-31
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2019-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eczema, Egg Allergy, Food Allergy

Keywords

peanut allergy, egg allergy, eczema, peanut, allergy, allergies, allergic reaction, anaphylaxis, infants, children

Brief summary

This study will evaluate whether early exposure to peanuts promotes tolerance and provides protection from developing peanut allergy in children who are allergic to eggs or who have severe eczema. This study has been continued into the ITN049AD (LEAP-On) Study (NCT01366846).

Detailed description

Allergic reactions to peanuts are potentially life-threatening and, in some children, can result from ingestion of only trace quantities of peanuts. At highest risk are children with eczema or who are allergic to eggs; these children have a 20% chance of developing peanut allergy by the age of five. The majority of children allergic to peanuts have their first reaction between the ages of 14 and 24 months, often at the time of their first exposure to peanut. Currently, there is no cure for peanut allergy. Peanut allergy has become an increasingly common problem in early childhood in the United States and the United Kingdom. Despite current public health guidelines in both countries recommending the avoidance of peanut consumption in the first years of life, the proportion of children with peanut allergy doubled in these countries over the period from 1998 to 2003. In contrast, peanuts are commonly consumed by infants in relatively high amounts in Africa, Southeast Asia and Israel, yet the rate of peanut allergy is quite low and does not appear to be increasing. Peanut consumption by infants in these parts of the world may actually protect children from developing peanut allergy by promoting oral tolerance to peanuts. Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to either follow a peanut consumption regimen or a strict peanut avoidance regimen. Those assigned to the peanut consumption group will be asked to consume an age-appropriate snack three times a week for the duration of the study and will be monitored closely during their first introduction to peanut. Those assigned to the peanut avoidance group will be asked to avoid ingestion of peanut for the first three years of life. A physical exam, allergy testing, and other immune system tests requiring blood collection will occur at Years 1, 3, and 5 following study entry. During the study, parents will maintain regular contact with study dietitians.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALPeanut Consumption Group

Peanut-containing snack. Children are to consume 2 g of peanut protein in three servings per week (total of 6 g) over 3 servings.

Sponsors

Immune Tolerance Network (ITN)
CollaboratorNETWORK
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Months to 10 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Able to consume solid food * Allergy to eggs and/or severe eczema * Informed consent obtained from parent or guardian.

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically significant chronic illness. Participants with eczema or recurrent wheeze are not excluded. * Positive skin prick test for peanut allergen with a wheel diameter greater than 4 mm in the presence of a negative saline control * Previous or current consumption of peanut protein that exceeds 0.2 g of peanut protein on at least one occasion or 0.5 g over a single week * Investigator-suspected allergy to peanut protein * Investigator-suspected allergy to peanut protein in care provider or current household member. * Diagnosis of persistent asthma * ALT (SGPT) or bilirubin greater than 2 times the upper limit of age-related normal value * BUN or creatinine greater than 1.25 times the upper limit of age-related normal value * Platelet count less than 100,000/mL, hemoglobin less than 9 g/dL, or investigator-suspected immunocompromise * Unwillingness or inability to comply with study requirements and procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Peanut Allergy at 60 Months of Age - by Skin Prick Test Stratum60 monthsAt 60 months of age, participants were given an oral food challenge Participants regarded as unlikely to be allergic to peanut received 5 g of peanut protein in a single dose. These participants were considered to have a peanut allergy if they experienced any type of reaction following consumption. A double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge was offered to other participants with a total of 9.4 g of peanut protein administered in increments. These participants were considered to have a peanut allergy if at any point during the dose escalation procedure the participant had a reaction. Participants for whom data from the oral food challenge were either inconclusive or not available, a diagnostic algorithm based on clinical history, the results of a skin-prick test, and the values for peanut-specific IgE were used to determine whether or not a participant should be considered to have peanut allergy.
Number of Participants With Peanut Allergy at 60 Months of Age - Both Strata Combined60 monthsAt 60 months of age, participants were given an oral food challenge Participants regarded as unlikely to be allergic to peanut received 5 g of peanut protein in a single dose. These participants were considered to have a peanut allergy if they experienced any type of reaction following consumption. A double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge was offered to other participants with a total of 9.4 g of peanut protein administered in increments. These participants were considered to have a peanut allergy if at any point during the dose escalation procedure the participant had a reaction. Participants for whom data from the oral food challenge were either inconclusive or not available, a diagnostic algorithm based on clinical history, the results of a skin-prick test, and the values for peanut-specific IgE were used to determine whether or not a participant should be considered to have peanut allergy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SCORAD at 60 Months60 monthsAt 60 months of age, participants were assessed for eczema using a modified Scoring Atopic Dermatitis System (SCORAD). This measure was used to detect eczema in children who may not have had access to topical anti-inflammatory medications or whose parents cannot recall or report the severity of their child's eczema. Eczema is any type of dermatitis or inflammation of the skin. Atopic dermatitis is the most severe and chronic of all types of eczema. The range of the SCORAD is 0-103. A score of 0 indicates no eczema, scores between 0 and 15 indicate mild eczema, scores between 15 and 40 indicate moderate eczema, and scores greater than 40 indicate severe eczema.
Number of Participants With Asthma at 60 Months60 monthsAt 60 months of age, participants were assessed for asthma. Participants were considered to have asthma if they had a history of cough, wheeze, or shortness of breath that (1) was responsive to therapy with bronchodilators on two or more occasions in the previous 24 months, (2) required one visit to a physician in the previous 24 months, or (3) occurred during the night, during early morning, or upon exercising in the intervals between exacerbations at any time in the previous 12 months.
Number of Participants With Rhinitis at 60 Months60 monthsAt 60 months of age, participants were assessed for rhinitis. Two types of rhinitis were assessed, perennial rhinoconjunctivitis and seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis. Participants were considered to have either type of rhinitis if they showed a sensitization to the allergen and clinical history of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms experienced either when exposed to the relevant allergen (perennial) or during the relevant season (seasonal).
Number of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mm60 monthsAt 60 months of age, participants were assessed for potential allergy to selected food allergens. Participants were considered to have a specific sensitivity if a skin prick containing the allergen produced a wheal size measuring greater than or equal to 3 mm.
Number of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/L60 monthsAt 60 months of age, participants were assessed for potential allergy to selected food allergens. Participants were considered to have a specific food sensitivity if a blood draw showed specific IgE levels greater than or equal to 0.35 kU/L for selected ingested allergens.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants between 4 and 11 months of age with pre-existing allergy to egg and/or severe eczema were recruited in the United Kingdom between December 2006 and May 2009.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were stratified into cohorts based on a skin prick test for peanut allergen. Participants were either negative (no measureable wheal after test) or positive (a wheal measuring between 1 and 4 mm in diameter). Participants were then randomized into treatment groups.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance Group
Participants who had a negative response to a skin prick test for peanut allergen (no measurable wheal) and were then randomized to the peanut avoidance group. Participants were instructed to avoid exposure to peanut protein during study participation.
270
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption Group
Participants who had a negative response to a skin prick test for peanut allergen (no measurable wheal) and were then randomized to the peanut consumption group. Participants were fed at least 2 g of peanut protein 3 times per week (a total of 6g). The preferred peanut source was Bamba (a peanut snack), although peanut butter was an acceptable substitute. After age 3, participants were allowed to eat whole peanuts.
272
Positive Stratum - Peanut Avoidance Group
Participants who had a positive response to a skin prick test for peanut allergen (a wheal measuring between 1 and 4 mm) and were then randomized to the peanut avoidance group. Participants were instructed to avoid exposure to peanut protein during study participation.
51
Positive Stratum - Peanut Consumption Group
Participants who had a positive response to a skin prick test for peanut allergen (a wheal measuring between 1 and 4 mm) and were then randomized to the peanut consumption group. Participants were fed at least 2 g of peanut protein 3 times per week (a total of 6g). The preferred peanut source was Bamba (a peanut snack), although peanut butter was an acceptable substitute. After age 3, participants were allowed to eat whole peanuts.
47
Total640

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0100
Overall StudyOther1200
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject4200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNegative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupPositive Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupPositive Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupTotalNegative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance Group
Age at Onset of Eczema2.3 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
2.1 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
2.4 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
2.3 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
2.2 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
Age, Continuous7.7 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
8.4 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
7.9 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
7.8 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
7.7 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
Peanut-specific IgE0.0 kUA/L0.4 kUA/L1.3 kUA/L0.0 kUA/L0.0 kUA/L
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
272 Participants51 Participants47 Participants640 Participants270 Participants
SCORAD33.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.4
33.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2
37.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.6
34.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.9
35.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.9
Severe Eczema246 Participants48 Participants41 Participants571 Participants236 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
124 Participants17 Participants19 Participants256 Participants96 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
148 Participants34 Participants28 Participants384 Participants174 Participants
Total IgE76.4 kUA/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 181.4
125.7 kUA/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 174.8
306.4 kUA/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 666.5
104.8 kUA/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 307.9
95.1 kUA/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 321.8

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
268 / 270271 / 27251 / 5147 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
55 / 27047 / 27215 / 5114 / 47

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Peanut Allergy at 60 Months of Age - Both Strata Combined

At 60 months of age, participants were given an oral food challenge Participants regarded as unlikely to be allergic to peanut received 5 g of peanut protein in a single dose. These participants were considered to have a peanut allergy if they experienced any type of reaction following consumption. A double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge was offered to other participants with a total of 9.4 g of peanut protein administered in increments. These participants were considered to have a peanut allergy if at any point during the dose escalation procedure the participant had a reaction. Participants for whom data from the oral food challenge were either inconclusive or not available, a diagnostic algorithm based on clinical history, the results of a skin-prick test, and the values for peanut-specific IgE were used to determine whether or not a participant should be considered to have peanut allergy.

Time frame: 60 months

Population: Intent-to-treat - all randomly assigned participants who were evaluable for peanut allergy at age 60 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Peanut Allergy at 60 Months of Age - Both Strata Combined54 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Peanut Allergy at 60 Months of Age - Both Strata Combined10 Participants
p-value: <0.0001Chi-squared
Primary

Number of Participants With Peanut Allergy at 60 Months of Age - by Skin Prick Test Stratum

At 60 months of age, participants were given an oral food challenge Participants regarded as unlikely to be allergic to peanut received 5 g of peanut protein in a single dose. These participants were considered to have a peanut allergy if they experienced any type of reaction following consumption. A double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge was offered to other participants with a total of 9.4 g of peanut protein administered in increments. These participants were considered to have a peanut allergy if at any point during the dose escalation procedure the participant had a reaction. Participants for whom data from the oral food challenge were either inconclusive or not available, a diagnostic algorithm based on clinical history, the results of a skin-prick test, and the values for peanut-specific IgE were used to determine whether or not a participant should be considered to have peanut allergy.

Time frame: 60 months

Population: Intent-to-treat - all randomly assigned participants who were evaluable for peanut allergy at age 60 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Peanut Allergy at 60 Months of Age - by Skin Prick Test Stratum36 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Peanut Allergy at 60 Months of Age - by Skin Prick Test Stratum5 Participants
Positive Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Peanut Allergy at 60 Months of Age - by Skin Prick Test Stratum18 Participants
Positive Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Peanut Allergy at 60 Months of Age - by Skin Prick Test Stratum5 Participants
p-value: <0.0001Chi-squared
p-value: 0.004Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With Asthma at 60 Months

At 60 months of age, participants were assessed for asthma. Participants were considered to have asthma if they had a history of cough, wheeze, or shortness of breath that (1) was responsive to therapy with bronchodilators on two or more occasions in the previous 24 months, (2) required one visit to a physician in the previous 24 months, or (3) occurred during the night, during early morning, or upon exercising in the intervals between exacerbations at any time in the previous 12 months.

Time frame: 60 months

Population: Intent-to-treat with asthma data available

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Asthma at 60 Months50 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Asthma at 60 Months54 Participants
p-value: 0.642Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/L

At 60 months of age, participants were assessed for potential allergy to selected food allergens. Participants were considered to have a specific food sensitivity if a blood draw showed specific IgE levels greater than or equal to 0.35 kU/L for selected ingested allergens.

Time frame: 60 months

Population: Intent-to-treat with data available

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/LWalnut IgE52 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/LBrazil nut IgE45 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/LMilk IgE99 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/LHazel nut IgE101 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/LEgg IgE120 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/LCashew IgE61 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/LSesame IgE89 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/LAlmond IgE62 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/LPeanut IgE93 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/LAlmond IgE71 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/LWalnut IgE70 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/LPeanut IgE88 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/LEgg IgE114 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/LMilk IgE105 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/LSesame IgE104 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/LBrazil nut IgE55 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/LHazel nut IgE116 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Food Specific IgE Greater Than or Equal to 0.35 kU/LCashew IgE73 Participants
Comparison: Comparison for Peanut IgEp-value: 0.859Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison for Egg IgEp-value: 0.885Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison for Milk IgEp-value: 0.403Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison for Sesame IgEp-value: 0.106Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison for Brazil Nut IgEp-value: 0.202Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison for Hazel Nut IgEp-value: 0.108Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison for Cashew IgEp-value: 0.157Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison for Walnut IgEp-value: 0.04Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison for Almond IgEp-value: 0.262Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With Rhinitis at 60 Months

At 60 months of age, participants were assessed for rhinitis. Two types of rhinitis were assessed, perennial rhinoconjunctivitis and seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis. Participants were considered to have either type of rhinitis if they showed a sensitization to the allergen and clinical history of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms experienced either when exposed to the relevant allergen (perennial) or during the relevant season (seasonal).

Time frame: 60 months

Population: Intent-to-treat with rhinitis data available

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Rhinitis at 60 MonthsPerennial Rhinoconjunctivitis134 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Rhinitis at 60 MonthsSeasonal Rhinoconjunctivitis106 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Rhinitis at 60 MonthsSeasonal Rhinoconjunctivitis115 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Rhinitis at 60 MonthsPerennial Rhinoconjunctivitis132 Participants
Comparison: Comparison for Seasonal Rhinoconjunctivitisp-value: 0.417Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison for Perennial Rhinoconjunctivitisp-value: 0.926Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mm

At 60 months of age, participants were assessed for potential allergy to selected food allergens. Participants were considered to have a specific sensitivity if a skin prick containing the allergen produced a wheal size measuring greater than or equal to 3 mm.

Time frame: 60 months

Population: Intent-to-treat with data available

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mmPeanut Wheal71 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mmBrazil nut Wheal29 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mmEgg Wheal96 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mmHazel nut Wheal34 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mmSesame Wheal22 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mmCashew Wheal42 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mmAlmond Wheal42 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mmWalnut Wheal27 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupNumber of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mmMilk Wheal28 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mmWalnut Wheal34 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mmMilk Wheal25 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mmSesame Wheal22 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mmBrazil nut Wheal26 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mmAlmond Wheal50 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mmPeanut Wheal30 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mmHazel nut Wheal41 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mmCashew Wheal59 Participants
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupNumber of Participants With Specific Skin Prick Test Greater Than or Equal to 3mmEgg Wheal102 Participants
Comparison: Comparison for Peanut Whealp-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison for Egg Whealp-value: 0.361Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison for Milk Whealp-value: 0.76Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison for Sesame Whealp-value: 0.834Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison for Brazil Nut Whealp-value: 0.882Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison for Hazel Nut Whealp-value: 0.226Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison for Cashew Whealp-value: 0.024Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison for Walnut Whealp-value: 0.204Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison for Almond Whealp-value: 0.194Chi-squared
Secondary

SCORAD at 60 Months

At 60 months of age, participants were assessed for eczema using a modified Scoring Atopic Dermatitis System (SCORAD). This measure was used to detect eczema in children who may not have had access to topical anti-inflammatory medications or whose parents cannot recall or report the severity of their child's eczema. Eczema is any type of dermatitis or inflammation of the skin. Atopic dermatitis is the most severe and chronic of all types of eczema. The range of the SCORAD is 0-103. A score of 0 indicates no eczema, scores between 0 and 15 indicate mild eczema, scores between 15 and 40 indicate moderate eczema, and scores greater than 40 indicate severe eczema.

Time frame: 60 months

Population: Intent-to-treat with SCORAD data available

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Negative Stratum - Peanut Avoidance GroupSCORAD at 60 Months7.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.6
Negative Stratum - Peanut Consumption GroupSCORAD at 60 Months6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
p-value: 0.369Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026