Dyspepsia
Conditions
Keywords
abdominal, stomach, dyspepsia, food allergy
Brief summary
The main purpose of this study is to determine if standard and investigational tests used to help diagnose and treat food allergies can provide information that will be useful in determining the cause of dyspepsia and helpful in designing a treatment plan. The study will also determine if there is a connection between positive allergy tests and inflammation in the upper abdomen.
Detailed description
Recurrent abdominal pain is the most common type of pain in school age children and young adolescents. Over 80% of these children have pain in the upper abdomen which is diagnosed as functional dyspepsia (FD). Many of these children are also found to have eosinophilic duodenitis (ED). ED is a type of inflammation in the lining of the gastrointestinal tract characterized by an increase in eosinophils. An increase in intestinal eosinophils is a finding also seen with food allergy upon exposure to the offending antigen. The presence of intestinal eosinophilia in ED would suggest an allergic mechanism may be involved in the generation of pain and other symptoms associated with ED. Endoscopy and biopsy are used to aid in the identification of ED, which often is followed by elimination diets and food challenges to identify the offending allergen. This approach is both invasive (due to endoscopy) and cumbersome (due to the complexity and restrictiveness of the elimination diet). The value of screening for food hypersensitivities in children with ED has not been well characterized despite the theoretical links between food hypersensitivities, gut inflammation, and symptoms of dyspepsia. The current study will determine if standard and investigational tests used to evaluate food hypersensitivity have the potential to be used as biomarkers to direct treatment of children with ED.
Interventions
DEVICEin vitro and in vivo allergy testing
Patch Test: food to be tested is suspended in sterile saline, placed on the skin of the back using a Finn Chamber secured with surgical tape and left in place for 48 hours.
Sponsors
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age of 8-17 years, inclusive * Diagnosis of functional dyspepsia (FD) by physician based on Rome II criteria (patient group only) * Undergoing endoscopy to evaluate FD following demonstration of a lack of clinical response to acid reduction therapy (patient group only) * Informed permission/assent
Exclusion criteria
(patient goup): * Previous testing for food-specific IgE, IgG, IgG4, skin prick or allergy patch tests within the past 12 months or any previous positive result(s) for food-specific IgE, IgG, IgG4, SPT or APT to milk, egg, soy, corn, peanut or wheat; * Any use of steroids or leukotriene receptor antagonists within one month prior to the study * Any use of antihistamines, antihistamine-like drugs or topical steroid within two weeks prior to the study * Any chronic non-gastrointestinal illness requiring regular medical care
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| measure specific IgE, IgG total, IgG subclass 4, skin prick tests and atopy patch tests to milk, egg, soy, corn, peanut and wheat | 48 hrs and 72 hrs after patch placement |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Determine T-lymphocytes, eosinophils and mast cell densities on duodenal biopsy samples demonstrating eosinophilia | collected at time of biopsy, patient group only |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed