Skip to content

Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes

CSP #557 - Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes (VA CARDS)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00326196
Acronym
VA CARDS
Enrollment
198
Registered
2006-05-16
Start date
2006-07-31
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2014-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

CABG, Coronary Disease, Diabetes, PCI

Brief summary

This is a randomized, multi-site, clinical trial comparing percutaneous coronary stenting (PCI) with drug eluding stents to coronary bypass for angiographically significant coronary artery disease in diabetes. The hypothesis being tested is that a strategy of surgical revascularization is superior to percutaneous intervention in preventing death or myocardial infarction in diabetics with severe ischemic heart disease.

Detailed description

Diabetic patients (HbA1c greater than 6.0% if treated or greater than 6.9% untreated) with severe ischemic heart disease and clinical indications for coronary revascularization will be screened and, if agreeable, entered into the study. Qualified patients unwilling to participate in the randomized trial will be approached for participation in a Registry that will collect computerized health data. The study consists of a 4-year accrual period. The median follow-up will be 3.7 years with a maximum of six years and a minimum of two years. Six sites will begin recruitment in the first year followed by nine additional sites for the remaining three years. The study is powered to detect a 40% relative difference between the groups in time to death or MI with a two-sided, type I error of 5% and a power of 90%.

Interventions

DEVICEPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

percutaneous coronary stenting with drug eluding stents

PROCEDURECoronary artery bypass graft (CABG)

coronary bypass

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients with diabetes with severe coronary artery disease General Inclusion Criteria 1. Age at least 18 years old 2. Patients with either Type I or Type II diabetes with a documented HbA1c greater than site ULN (If not on diabetic medication must be confirmed by a blood glucose of \>126 mg/dL fasting, or \>200mg/dL non-fasting); OR on diabetic medication with a documented physician diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. 3. No child bearing potential (if female) 4. Patient competent to provide consent

Exclusion criteria

General

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Hypothesis Being Tested is That a Strategy of Initial Surgical Revascularization is Superior to Percutaneous Intervention in Preventing Death or Myocardial Infarction in Diabetics With Severe Ischemic Heart Disease Assessed up to 4 Years.Date of Death and non-fatal MIParticipants were monitored for up to 4 years. This is the number of particiapnts who have died or had at least one myocardial infarction.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study recruitment occured at 23 VA medical centers and thestudy recruitment lasted from 8/25/2006 thru 3/24/2010.

Pre-assignment details

Study participants were were pre-screened by Cath lab. The remaining participants were consented and screened for study eligibility.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Percutaneous coronary intervention
101
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)
97
Total198

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPercutaneous Coronary InterventionCoronary Artery Bypass GraftTotal
Age, Continuous62.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
62.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
62.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
Region of Enrollment
United States
101 participants97 participants198 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
100 Participants96 Participants196 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 10167 / 97
serious
Total, serious adverse events
23 / 10146 / 97

Outcome results

Primary

The Hypothesis Being Tested is That a Strategy of Initial Surgical Revascularization is Superior to Percutaneous Intervention in Preventing Death or Myocardial Infarction in Diabetics With Severe Ischemic Heart Disease Assessed up to 4 Years.

Participants were monitored for up to 4 years. This is the number of particiapnts who have died or had at least one myocardial infarction.

Time frame: Date of Death and non-fatal MI

Population: The number of participants for analysis was determined by intent to treat principal.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Percutaneous Coronary InterventionThe Hypothesis Being Tested is That a Strategy of Initial Surgical Revascularization is Superior to Percutaneous Intervention in Preventing Death or Myocardial Infarction in Diabetics With Severe Ischemic Heart Disease Assessed up to 4 Years.21 participants
Coronary Artery Bypass GraftThe Hypothesis Being Tested is That a Strategy of Initial Surgical Revascularization is Superior to Percutaneous Intervention in Preventing Death or Myocardial Infarction in Diabetics With Severe Ischemic Heart Disease Assessed up to 4 Years.16 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026