Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of PEG-uricase in the Treatment of Hyperuricemic Patients With Symptomatic Gout

Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of 8 mg PEG-uricase in Two Dose Regimens in Hyperuricemic Subjects With Symptomatic Gout

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00325195
Enrollment
225
Registered
2006-05-12
Start date
2006-05-31
Completion date
2007-12-31
Last updated
2011-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gout

Brief summary

These are two replicate studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PEG (polyethylene glycol)-uricase in controlling the uric acid level in symptomatic gout patients with high uric acid levels who are unable to take standard gout therapies, or for whom those therapies have been unsuccessful in controlling their uric acid level.

Detailed description

The primary objective of each of the studies is to demonstrate superiority in the response rate (control of uric acid levels to below 6 mg/dL) in the PEG-uricase treatment groups compared to the placebo-control group. While reduction or resolution of tophi have been reported in the setting of prolonged urate-lowering therapy, there is photographic and additional anecdotal evidence from the Phase 2 PEG-uricase study of resolution or significant reduction of tophi after 3 months of therapy. Therefore, an assessment of changes in tophi over time will be conducted through the use of digital photographs obtained in a standardized manner from all subjects during the study. The effect on other clinical outcomes, including quality of life, health-related disability measures, gout flares and the number of swollen and tender joints will also be compared between the treatment groups and control group. Subjects will be randomized to one of the three treatment arms in a 2:2:1 ratio: 8 mg PEG-uricase every 2 weeks; 8 mg PEG-uricase every 4 weeks; or placebo. All subjects will receive an intravenous infusion (PEG-uricase or placebo) every two weeks in order to maintain the blind throughout the study. Study duration is approximately 26 weeks, including two weeks for screening and 24 weeks (6 months) of treatment.

Interventions

OTHERplacebo

placebo by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks

BIOLOGICALpegloticase

8 mg pegloticase by intravenous infusion

Sponsors

Savient Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Outpatients of either gender, age 18 or older ( no upper age limit). 2. Patient is hyperuricemic: screening serum uric acid must be ≥8 mg/dL. 3. Patient has symptomatic gout (presence of at least 3 gout flares in the 18 months prior to entry, or at least one gout tophus, or gouty arthritis). 4. Conventional therapy is contraindicated or has been ineffective in this patient, i.e., patient has a history (either by medical record or patient interview) of hypersensitivity or of failure to normalize SUA with at least 3 months treatment with allopurinol at the maximum labeled dose (800 mg/dL in the U.S.), or at a medically appropriate lower dose based on dose-limiting toxicity or dose-limiting co-morbidity. 5. Patient is willing and able to give informed consent and adhere to visit/protocol schedules (informed consent must be given before the first study procedure is performed, including washout). 6. If the patient is a woman of childbearing potential, she must have had a negative screening serum pregnancy test and must use a medically approved form of birth control during her participation in the protocol. Such methods include oral, injectable or implantable contraceptives; IUDs and barrier contraceptives in combination with spermicide. (If male or surgically sterile, check N/A.)

Exclusion criteria

1. The patient has unstable angina. 2. The patient has uncontrolled arrhythmia. 3. The patient has non-compensated congestive heart failure. 4. The patient has uncontrolled hypertension (above 150/95). 5. The patient has a history of end stage renal disease requiring dialysis. 6. The patient has hemoglobin \< 8 g/dL (males) or \< 7 g/dL (females). 7. The patient is an organ transplant recipient 8. The patient has had prior treatment with PEG-uricase, or other recombinant uricase, or any concomitant therapy with a PEG-conjugated drug. 9. The patient has had a gout flare at screening that is resolved for less than one week prior to first treatment with study drug (exclusive of chronic synovitis/ arthritis). 10. The patient has glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. 11. The patient has a history of anaphylactic reaction to a recombinant protein or porcine product, or hypersensitivity to PEG. 12. The patient is pregnant or breast feeding. 13. The patient has taken an investigational drug within 4 weeks prior to study drug administration or plans to take an investigational agent during the study. 14. The patient has a known allergy to urate oxidase or PEGylated products. 15. The patient has any other medical or psychological condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, might create undue risk to the subject or interfere with the subject's ability to comply with the protocol requirements, or to complete the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plasma Uric Acid (PUA) ResponderMonths 3 and 6PUA Responder was defined as a participant who achieved and maintained plasma uric acid concentrations \< 6 mg/dL for at least 80% of the time during months 3 and 6 combined. Participants who withdrew from the study before month 6 were considered non-responders.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction in Tophus BurdenBaseline and Final Visit (6 months or LOCF)percentage of tophaceous subjects who demonstrated a complete resolution (100 % decrease in measured area or complete disappearance)of at least one tophus in the absence of other tophus progression or new tophi, as assessed by a blinded Central Reader using standardized digital photographs and image analysis software.
Percentage of Subjects With Gout Flare Per 3-month PeriodMonths 1-3 and Months 4-6Percent of participants reporting a gout flare during Months 1-3 and Months 4-6. Denominator during the respective period was based upon number of participants during that period.
Change in Number of Swollen JointsBaseline and Final Visit (Month 6 or LOCF)Change from Baseline to Month 6 (or last observation carried forward)in number of swollen joints per subject. Values were inputed using last observation carried forward analysis for subjects who did not complete the studies.
Change in Number of Tender JointsBaseline and Final Visit (Month 6 or LOCF)Change from Baseline to Month 6 (or last observation carried forward) in number of tender joints per participant
Change in Patient Reported Outcomes of Pain, Physical Function and Quality of LifeBaseline to Final Visit (Month 6 or LOCF)Health Assessment Questionnaire(HAQ: VAS pain scale where 0 (no pain)-100 (severe pain); HAQ disability index (HAQ-DI) on a scale from 0(no disability) to 3 (completely disabled), and a unit change of \> or =0.22 is considerd a mimimal clinically important difference(MCID). SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score (SF36-PCS), a composite score where 0 is the worst score and 100 the best possible, and where a change of \> or =2.5 units in the PCS is considered a MCID.

Countries

Canada, Mexico, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Rheumatology practices across the US, Canada and Mexico

Pre-assignment details

13 subjects were randomized but withdrew before intervention. These subjects were not part of the modified Intent to Treat Population, which included only subjects who received at least one dose of study drug.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
q2 Wks
8 mg pegloticase every 2 weeks
85
q4 Wks
8 mg pegloticase every 4 weeks (alternating with placebo infusion every 4 weeks)
84
Placebo
placebo infusion every 2 weeks
43
Total212

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
RandomizedNot dosed553
Received Intervention: ITT PopulationAdverse Event15171
Received Intervention: ITT PopulationDeath310
Received Intervention: ITT PopulationLost to Follow-up002
Received Intervention: ITT PopulationProtocol violation/non-compliance110
Received Intervention: ITT PopulationWithdrawal by Subject761

Baseline characteristics

Characteristicq2 Wksq4 WksPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
29 Participants19 Participants12 Participants60 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
56 Participants65 Participants31 Participants152 Participants
Age Continuous56.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.53
54.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.34
55.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.21
55.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.01
Region of Enrollment
Canada
1 participants1 participants1 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
11 participants6 participants3 participants20 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
73 participants77 participants39 participants189 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants15 Participants7 Participants39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
68 Participants69 Participants36 Participants173 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
69 / 8579 / 8436 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
20 / 8519 / 845 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Plasma Uric Acid (PUA) Responder

PUA Responder was defined as a participant who achieved and maintained plasma uric acid concentrations \< 6 mg/dL for at least 80% of the time during months 3 and 6 combined. Participants who withdrew from the study before month 6 were considered non-responders.

Time frame: Months 3 and 6

Population: Modified ITT (all patients receiving at least one dose of study drug). Participants dropping out before Week 25 were imputed as Non-Responders

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
q2 WksPlasma Uric Acid (PUA) Responder36 Participants
q4 WksPlasma Uric Acid (PUA) Responder29 Participants
PlaceboPlasma Uric Acid (PUA) Responder0 Participants
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Secondary

Change in Number of Swollen Joints

Change from Baseline to Month 6 (or last observation carried forward)in number of swollen joints per subject. Values were inputed using last observation carried forward analysis for subjects who did not complete the studies.

Time frame: Baseline and Final Visit (Month 6 or LOCF)

Population: All ITT participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment were included in analysis. LOCF was used for participants dropping out early.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
q2 WksChange in Number of Swollen Joints-5.5 Swollen jointsStandard Deviation 10.47
q4 WksChange in Number of Swollen Joints-5.1 Swollen jointsStandard Deviation 7.83
PlaceboChange in Number of Swollen Joints-2.6 Swollen jointsStandard Deviation 11.64
p-value: 0.166t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.17t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Number of Tender Joints

Change from Baseline to Month 6 (or last observation carried forward) in number of tender joints per participant

Time frame: Baseline and Final Visit (Month 6 or LOCF)

Population: All ITT participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment were included in analysis. LOCF was used for participants dropping out early.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
q2 WksChange in Number of Tender Joints-7.4 Tender jointsStandard Deviation 11.95
q4 WksChange in Number of Tender Joints-6.1 Tender jointsStandard Deviation 10.64
PlaceboChange in Number of Tender Joints-1.2 Tender jointsStandard Deviation 12.3
p-value: 0.008t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.024t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Patient Reported Outcomes of Pain, Physical Function and Quality of Life

Health Assessment Questionnaire(HAQ: VAS pain scale where 0 (no pain)-100 (severe pain); HAQ disability index (HAQ-DI) on a scale from 0(no disability) to 3 (completely disabled), and a unit change of \> or =0.22 is considerd a mimimal clinically important difference(MCID). SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score (SF36-PCS), a composite score where 0 is the worst score and 100 the best possible, and where a change of \> or =2.5 units in the PCS is considered a MCID.

Time frame: Baseline to Final Visit (Month 6 or LOCF)

Population: Number of participants analyzed was based upon the number who had baseline and at least one follow-up assessment, with the final visit for each subject included (LOCF).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
q2 WksChange in Patient Reported Outcomes of Pain, Physical Function and Quality of LifeHAQ-DI-0.22 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
q2 WksChange in Patient Reported Outcomes of Pain, Physical Function and Quality of LifeHAQ-VAS Pain-11.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.8
q2 WksChange in Patient Reported Outcomes of Pain, Physical Function and Quality of LifeSF-36 PCS4.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
q4 WksChange in Patient Reported Outcomes of Pain, Physical Function and Quality of LifeHAQ-DI-0.20 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
q4 WksChange in Patient Reported Outcomes of Pain, Physical Function and Quality of LifeHAQ-VAS Pain-6.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
q4 WksChange in Patient Reported Outcomes of Pain, Physical Function and Quality of LifeSF-36 PCS4.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
PlaceboChange in Patient Reported Outcomes of Pain, Physical Function and Quality of LifeHAQ-VAS Pain1.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30
PlaceboChange in Patient Reported Outcomes of Pain, Physical Function and Quality of LifeSF-36 PCS-0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
PlaceboChange in Patient Reported Outcomes of Pain, Physical Function and Quality of LifeHAQ-DI0.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Gout Flare Per 3-month Period

Percent of participants reporting a gout flare during Months 1-3 and Months 4-6. Denominator during the respective period was based upon number of participants during that period.

Time frame: Months 1-3 and Months 4-6

Population: Number analyzed in each period was based upon number of participants remaining in study during the assessed treatment period: 85/84/43 in Months 1-3 and 69/69/43 in Months 4-6

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
q2 WksPercentage of Subjects With Gout Flare Per 3-month PeriodMonths 1-375 Percent subjects reporting flares
q2 WksPercentage of Subjects With Gout Flare Per 3-month PeriodMonths 4-641 Percent subjects reporting flares
q4 WksPercentage of Subjects With Gout Flare Per 3-month PeriodMonths 1-381 Percent subjects reporting flares
q4 WksPercentage of Subjects With Gout Flare Per 3-month PeriodMonths 4-656 Percent subjects reporting flares
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Gout Flare Per 3-month PeriodMonths 1-354 Percent subjects reporting flares
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Gout Flare Per 3-month PeriodMonths 4-667 Percent subjects reporting flares
Comparison: % of pegloticase q2 participants reporting flares compared to placebo pts during Months 4-6 treatment periodp-value: 0.007Fisher Exact
Comparison: % of pegloticase q4 participants reporting flares compared to placebo pts during Months 4-6 treatment periodp-value: 0.321Fisher Exact
Secondary

Reduction in Tophus Burden

percentage of tophaceous subjects who demonstrated a complete resolution (100 % decrease in measured area or complete disappearance)of at least one tophus in the absence of other tophus progression or new tophi, as assessed by a blinded Central Reader using standardized digital photographs and image analysis software.

Time frame: Baseline and Final Visit (6 months or LOCF)

Population: Number of participants analyzed was based upon the number of patients who had one or more tophus at Baseline, as determined by the PI, AND who had at least one follow-up assessment, with the final visit for each subject included (last observation carried forward).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
q2 WksReduction in Tophus Burden40 Percent subjects with resolved tophus
q4 WksReduction in Tophus Burden21 Percent subjects with resolved tophus
PlaceboReduction in Tophus Burden7 Percent subjects with resolved tophus
p-value: <0.002Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.2Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026