Skip to content

Study to Verify Proper Detection of Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmia With Single-Lead Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ADRIA)

ADRIA - Belos A+ vs DR Clinical Investigation of Arrhythmia Discrimination

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00324662
Enrollment
260
Registered
2006-05-11
Start date
2003-08-31
Completion date
2008-07-31
Last updated
2008-09-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tachyarrhythmia

Keywords

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, Ventricular tachyarrhythmia, Supraventricular tachyarrhythmia, Electric Countershock

Brief summary

A unique single-lead dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) system (produced by Biotronik, Germany) features a conventional electrode in the ventricle (anchored in the ventricular apex) and a floating electrode (ring on the lead body) in the atrium, capable of sensing atrial electrical signals. The purpose of this study is to determine whether this system detects a supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (e.g. atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia) in the equivalent manner as conventional dual-lead dual-chamber ICDs using two separate electrodes anchored in the ventricle and in the atrium, respectively.

Detailed description

Supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT) is the main cause of inappropriate therapy in patients with single-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). To minimize inappropriate shock delivery, ICDs should sense both atrial and ventricular intracardiac signals. Dual-chamber ICDs are used for this purpose, but are associated with increased postoperative complications due to the implantation of a separate atrial lead. It has to be shown that a novel single-lead dual-chamber ICD-system with enhanced SVT discrimination can achieve the same specificity in discriminating SVT episodes as conventional dual-chamber ICD, without the disadvantage of the implantation of several leads. In this study patients eligible for dual-chamber ICD therapy who do not need atrial pacing will receive either a single-lead dual-chamber ICD (Belos A+ and Kainox A+ electrode) or a dual-lead dual-chamber ICD (Belos DR). SMART detection algorithm will be used in both study groups for discrimination between atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Atrial tachyarrhythmia episodes are facultatively induced in both groups at implantation or predischarge via a bipolar stimulation catheter. Induced episodes and the corresponding ICD intervention (detection and therapy or inhibition of therapy) are documented. Follow-ups are scheduled for 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after implantation. ICD intervention, particularly related to spontaneous SVT episodes, will be evaluated based on ICD diagnostic memory data interrogated at follow-up controls.

Interventions

Sponsors

Biotronik SE & Co. KG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ICD indication according to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines. * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Permanent atrial fibrillation * Requirement for atrial pacing * Patient is underage * No signed patient agreement * Patient life expectancy under 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Rate of correctly discriminated supraventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes (specificity)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Complication rate (e.g. lead dislocation, lead fracture)
Duration of implantation
Electrode performance (P-/R-wave amplitudes, ventricular pacing threshold and impedance)
Sensitivity (rate of correctly discriminated episodes of ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia)

Countries

Germany, Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026