Skip to content

Peripheral Body Fat Distribution After Switching Zidovudine and Lamivudine to Truvada

Pilot Phase IV, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label and Controlled Study to Assess the Evolution of Peripheral Body Fat Distribution After Switching From Zidovudine Containing Backbone to Truvada in HIV-1-infected Patients on HAART (RECOMB Study).

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00324649
Acronym
RECOMB
Enrollment
80
Registered
2006-05-11
Start date
2006-05-31
Completion date
2008-09-30
Last updated
2015-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV-1

Keywords

HIV-1

Brief summary

This study evaluated changes in body fat distribution in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infected participants who either switched from a zidovudine- plus lamivudine- containing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen to a regimen containing Truvada® (a fixed-dose combination tablet of emtricitabine \[FTC, 200 mg\] and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF, 300 mg\]) or who remained on a zidovudine- plus lamivudine-containing regimen. Subjects continued their protease inhibitor (PI) or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI).

Detailed description

Standard care for the treatment of HIV infection involves the use of a combination of three antiretroviral drugs. The initial recommended regimen in antiretroviral-naive patients according to therapeutic guidelines of the US Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHS) includes two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and a third drug from another class (PI or NRTI). The use of nucleoside analogues, especially stavudine and zidovudine, is associated with untoward side effects, including lipodystrophy hepatic steatosis/lactic acidosis syndrome, peripheral neuropathy, and anemia. However, Truvada has a low potential for both mitochondrial toxicity and fat distribution disturbances. As described in the Consensus Document of the Spanish Group for the Study of AIDS (GESIDA), and the AIDS National Plan from the Spanish Ministry of Health Recommendations on metabolic alterations and body fat distribution, studies should focus on the evaluation of body fat disturbances after antiretroviral drug substitutions, based on the basic assumption of virologic control of the patient and equivalence in potency of the new drug regarding virological control. In addition, studies based on selective substitution of antiretroviral drugs in HIV-1 infected patients under virological control, are recommended in the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in the Guideline on the clinical development of medicinal products for the treatment of HIV infection. In this study, stable, virologically controlled, HIV-1 infected participants receiving antiretroviral regimens containing zidovudine and lamivudine were randomized to switch to Truvada or to stay on their zidovudine- plus lamivudine-containing regimen. Participants in both groups continued the third drug of their antiretroviral regimen (either an NNRTI or PI). Changes in limb fat in the two groups were assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

Interventions

DRUGTruvada

Truvada once daily with continuation of the current NNRTI or PI at randomization.

Continuation of the zidovudine + lamivudine containing regimen plus the current NNRTI or PI at randomization.

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HIV-1 infection documented by confirmed positive HIV-1 antibody test and/or positive polymerase chain reaction for HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA). * Adult patients (over 18 years of age). * Current HAART regimen containing zidovudine + lamivudine at usual doses for at least 6 months. * Viral load \< 50 copies/mL on the last two consecutive determinations, under zidovudine + lamivudine containing HAART regimen. * For women of childbearing potential, negative urine pregnancy test at screening visit. * Agreement to take part in the study and sign the informed consent. * Patients on lipid lowering treatment were allowed to participate in the study only if the lipid-lowering treatment (either statins or fibrates) was stable for at least 8 weeks prior to screening and it was not expected to change during the first 3 months of the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients on current FTC or TDF therapy. * Patients with previous history of virological failure on an FTC or TDF-containing regimen. * Patients receiving a non-registered antiretroviral drug. * Patients receiving a triple-nucleoside antiretroviral combination. * Hypersensitivity to one of the components of the dosage forms of TDF or FTC, or previous history of intolerance to one of those drugs. * Known history of drug abuse or chronic alcohol consumption * Women who were pregnant or breast feeding, or female of childbearing potential who did not use an adequate method of contraception according to the investigator's judgment. * Active opportunistic infection or documented infection within the previous 4 weeks. * Documented active malignant disease (excluding Kaposi sarcoma limited to the skin). * Renal disease with creatinine clearance \< 50 mL/min. * Concomitant use of nephrotoxic or immuno-suppressive drugs which could not be stopped without affecting the safety of the patient. * Receiving on-going therapy with systemic corticosteroids, Interleukin-2 or chemotherapy. * Patients who were not to be included in the study according to the investigator's criterion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Limb Fat at Week 48Baseline to Week 48Limb fat was measured by DEXA. Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Mitochondrial DNA/Nuclear DNA Ratio (Lymphocytes)Baseline to Week 48Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Lactate ConcentrationBaseline to Week 48Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.
Percentage of Days for Which Participants Were Compliant With Study DrugBaseline to Week 72Compliance = \[1 - \[(sum of days with a missed dose \[per Question 6 study medication assessment questionnaire (SMAQ)\])/(sum of days between SMAQ visits)\]\] \*100 for visits with SMAQ data. An assessable visit is one where the number of missed days was reported \[Question 6\] and the number of days between SMAQ visits could be calculated.
Percentage of Participants Who Maintain Confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL48 weeks
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA > 50 and < 400 Copies/mL48 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure48 weeksVirologic failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA values \> 400 copies/mL.
Change From Baseline in Cluster Determinant 4 (CD4) Cell CountBaseline to Week 48Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum TriglyceridesBaseline to Week 48Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.
Change From Baseline in the Mitochondrial DNA/Nuclear DNA Ratio (Oral Mucosa)Baseline to Week 48Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL)Baseline to Week 48Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Fasting High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL)Baseline to Week 48Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.
Change From Baseline in HemoglobinBaseline to Week 48Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.
Percent Change From Baseline in HematocritBaseline to Week 48Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value expressed as median percent change.
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference/Hip Circumference RatioBaseline to Week 48Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.
Percentage of Participants With Any Adverse Event72 weeksParticipants with treatment-emergent adverse events were analyzed. Adverse events were defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment, and were categorized using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Version 11. Treatment-emergent adverse events were events that met one of the following criteria: * Began or worsened in severity or relationship to study drug, on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and on or before the date of the last dose of study drug plus 30 days. * Had no recorded start date.
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinue the Study Prematurely (Before Week 48) Due to Adverse Events.48 weeks
Change From Baseline in Fasting Total CholesterolBaseline to Week 48Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Truvada
Truvada + NNRTI or PI.
39
Zidovudine/Lamivudine
Zidovudine/lamivudine + NNRTI or PI.
41
Total80

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event14
Overall StudyNoncompliance10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicZidovudine/LamivudineTruvadaTotal
Age, Continuous44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Cluster determinant 4 (CD4) cell count504.0 cells/mm^3655.0 cells/mm^3600.5 cells/mm^3
HIV-1 RNA Level
< 50 copies/mL
39 Participants38 Participants77.0 Participants
HIV-1 RNA Level
50 to < 400 copies/mL
2 Participants1 Participants3.0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1.0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black, of African heritage
2 Participants1 Participants3.0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants1 Participants2.0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
38 Participants36 Participants74.0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
41 participants39 participants80.0 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants11 Participants15.0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
37 Participants28 Participants65.0 Participants
Total limb fat3589 grams (g)3565 grams (g)3589 grams (g)
Years on zidovudine (AZT)/lamivudine (3TC)6.2 Years5.8 Years5.9 Years

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
24 / —28 / —
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / —3 / —

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Limb Fat at Week 48

Limb fat was measured by DEXA. Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Treated participants. Number of participants analyzed is those with baseline and post-baseline DEXA data. Last post-baseline observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used if the Week 48 limb fat value was missing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline in Limb Fat at Week 48392 grams (g)
Zidovudine/LamivudineChange From Baseline in Limb Fat at Week 48-257 grams (g)
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.0014Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cluster Determinant 4 (CD4) Cell Count

Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Treated participants. Missing values were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline in Cluster Determinant 4 (CD4) Cell Count60.5 cells/mm^3
Zidovudine/LamivudineChange From Baseline in Cluster Determinant 4 (CD4) Cell Count9.0 cells/mm^3
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.0789Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL)

Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Treated participants. Missing values were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline in Fasting High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL)-2.0 mg/dL
Zidovudine/LamivudineChange From Baseline in Fasting High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL)2.0 mg/dL
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.2907Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL)

Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Treated participants. Missing values were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL)7.0 mg/dL
Zidovudine/LamivudineChange From Baseline in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL)5.0 mg/dL
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.6638Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum Triglycerides

Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Treated participants. Missing values were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline in Fasting Serum Triglycerides1.5 mg/dL
Zidovudine/LamivudineChange From Baseline in Fasting Serum Triglycerides4.0 mg/dL
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.9633Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol

Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Treated participants. Missing values were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol4.5 mg/dL
Zidovudine/LamivudineChange From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol1.0 mg/dL
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.9686Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin

Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Treated participants. Missing values were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin0.9 g/dL
Zidovudine/LamivudineChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin0.3 g/dL
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.0072Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Lactate Concentration

Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Treated participants. Missing values were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline in Lactate Concentration-0.23 mmol/L
Zidovudine/LamivudineChange From Baseline in Lactate Concentration0.09 mmol/L
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.0078Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Mitochondrial DNA/Nuclear DNA Ratio (Lymphocytes)

Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Treated participants. Missing values were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline in the Mitochondrial DNA/Nuclear DNA Ratio (Lymphocytes)36.0 Ratio
Zidovudine/LamivudineChange From Baseline in the Mitochondrial DNA/Nuclear DNA Ratio (Lymphocytes)43.0 Ratio
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.9725Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Mitochondrial DNA/Nuclear DNA Ratio (Oral Mucosa)

Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Treated participants. Missing values were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline in the Mitochondrial DNA/Nuclear DNA Ratio (Oral Mucosa)62.0 Ratio
Zidovudine/LamivudineChange From Baseline in the Mitochondrial DNA/Nuclear DNA Ratio (Oral Mucosa)97.0 Ratio
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.9713Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference/Hip Circumference Ratio

Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Treated participants. Missing values were excluded. Assessment of waist and hip circumference was added to the study schedule via protocol amendment part way through the study. This resulted in small numbers of subjects having data available for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline in Waist Circumference/Hip Circumference Ratio-0.01 Ratio
Zidovudine/LamivudineChange From Baseline in Waist Circumference/Hip Circumference Ratio0.01 Ratio
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.1785Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Percentage of Days for Which Participants Were Compliant With Study Drug

Compliance = \[1 - \[(sum of days with a missed dose \[per Question 6 study medication assessment questionnaire (SMAQ)\])/(sum of days between SMAQ visits)\]\] \*100 for visits with SMAQ data. An assessable visit is one where the number of missed days was reported \[Question 6\] and the number of days between SMAQ visits could be calculated.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 72

Population: Treated participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaPercentage of Days for Which Participants Were Compliant With Study Drug100.0 Percentage of days with compliance
Zidovudine/LamivudinePercentage of Days for Which Participants Were Compliant With Study Drug100.0 Percentage of days with compliance
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: percentages of days with compliance in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: percentages of days with compliance in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.6984Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinue the Study Prematurely (Before Week 48) Due to Adverse Events.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Treated participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TruvadaPercentage of Participants Who Discontinue the Study Prematurely (Before Week 48) Due to Adverse Events.3 Percentage of participants
Zidovudine/LamivudinePercentage of Participants Who Discontinue the Study Prematurely (Before Week 48) Due to Adverse Events.10 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Maintain Confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Treated participants. Missing values were treated as failure (i.e., as HIV-1 RNA greater than or equal to 50 copies/mL).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TruvadaPercentage of Participants Who Maintain Confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL92.3 Percentage of participants
Zidovudine/LamivudinePercentage of Participants Who Maintain Confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL78.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: treatment is not associated with the observed virologic response.~Alternative Hypothesis: treatment is associated with the observed virologic response.p-value: 0.116595% CI: [-0.9, 29.4]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Any Adverse Event

Participants with treatment-emergent adverse events were analyzed. Adverse events were defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment, and were categorized using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Version 11. Treatment-emergent adverse events were events that met one of the following criteria: * Began or worsened in severity or relationship to study drug, on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and on or before the date of the last dose of study drug plus 30 days. * Had no recorded start date.

Time frame: 72 weeks

Population: Treated participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TruvadaPercentage of Participants With Any Adverse Event77 Percentage of participants
Zidovudine/LamivudinePercentage of Participants With Any Adverse Event85 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA > 50 and < 400 Copies/mL

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Treated participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TruvadaPercentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA > 50 and < 400 Copies/mL0 Percentage of participants
Zidovudine/LamivudinePercentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA > 50 and < 400 Copies/mL5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure

Virologic failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA values \> 400 copies/mL.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: Treated participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TruvadaPercentage of Participants With Virologic Failure0 Percentage of participants
Zidovudine/LamivudinePercentage of Participants With Virologic Failure0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Hematocrit

Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value expressed as median percent change.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Treated participants. Missing values were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaPercent Change From Baseline in Hematocrit2.7 Percent change in hematocrit
Zidovudine/LamivudinePercent Change From Baseline in Hematocrit1.0 Percent change in hematocrit
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.0006Wilcoxon Rank Sum test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026