Skip to content

Evaluation Of Safety And Efficacy Of 0.3 Mg/Eye Macugen In Patients With Small Age-Related Macular Degeneration Lesions

A Prospective, Open-Label Multi Center Trial Evaluating The Safety And Efficacy Of 0.3 Mg/Eye Pegaptanib Sodium (Macugen) Intravitreous Injection Given Every 6 Weeks For 54 Weeks In Patients With Small Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Lesions

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00324116
Enrollment
81
Registered
2006-05-10
Start date
2006-07-31
Completion date
2008-08-31
Last updated
2010-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Macular Degeneration

Brief summary

To evaluate the efficacy, based on the best-corrected visual acuity (using the ETDRS chart), of a 0.3 mg/eye pegaptanib sodium intravitreous injection given every 6 weeks for 54 weeks in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration and evidence of recent onset, subfoveal and/or juxtafoveal choroidal neovascularization.

Interventions

0.3 MG/eye pegaptanib IB sodium by intravitreous injection given every 6 weeks for 54 weeks.

Sponsors

ITEC GROUP 3
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical and angiographic evidence of juxtafoveal or subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD with a total lesion size of less than 2 MPS disc areas * Best-corrected visual acuity in the study eye greater than 54 letters (ETDRS) * Women must be using 2 forms of effective contraception * Adequate hematological, renal and liver functions

Exclusion criteria

* Any atrophy or fibrosis; any retinal hemorrhage measuring more than 1 disc area * Any extrafoveal choroidal neovascularization * Any intraocular surgery or thermal laser to the study eye within 3 months of enrollment * Previous or concomitant therapy for AMD including PDT with verteporfin (Visudyne) or subfoveal/non-foveal thermal laser therapy, transpupillary thermotherapy, external beam radiation, submacular surgery. * Presence of other causes of choroidal neovascularization, including pathological myopia, the ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, angioid streaks, choroidal rupture and multifocal choroiditis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Responders for Visual Acuity Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)Baseline, 54 WeeksBest-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0. Responders defined as subjects having lost from baseline less than 15 letters of the best-corrected visual acuity; includes subjects with visual acuity gain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects Gaining Vision54 weeks or at early terminationSubjects gaining vision: gain from baseline of more than 15 letters of visual acuity. Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0.
Number of Subjects Maintaining Vision54 weeks or at early terminationSubjects maintaining vision: gain from baseline of more than 0 letters of visual acuity. Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0.
Change From Baseline in Visual AcuityBaseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 54 weeksBest-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0. Change: mean score at observation minus mean score at baseline.
Number of Subjects With a Distance Visual Acuity of > 20/200 at Baseline and Progressing to (<= 20/200)54 weeksSubjects with improving scores are those with \> 20/200 at Baseline and progressing to =\< 20/200 at Week 54. Subjects with no change are those with \> 20/200 at Baseline and remaining at \> 20/200 at Week 54.
Change in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25).Baseline, 54 weeks or at early terminationPatient reported vision-related functioning and quality of life as measured using the 25 item NEI-VFQ 25. Change = Mean score at 54 weeks - mean score at baseline. A positive change represents an increase in function/health from Baseline. Items grouped as the following - Composite: mean score items 1-25; General Health: item 1; General Vision: item 2; Ocular Pain:4,19; Near Vision:5,6,7; Distance Vision:8,9,14; Social Functioning:11,13; Mental Health Activities:3,21,22,25; Role Difficulties:17,18; Dependency:20,23,24; Driving:15c,16, 16a; Color Vision: 12; Peripheral Vision: 10.
Number of Subjects With Severe Visual Loss54 weeks or at early terminationSubjects with severe visual loss: loss from baseline of \>= 30 letters of visual acuity. Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0.

Countries

France

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pegaptanib Sodium
All subjects received a 0.3 mg/eye pegaptanib sodium intravitreous injection every 6 weeks for 54 weeks.
81
Total81

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event5
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy17
Overall StudyOther5
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPegaptanib Sodium
Age Continuous76.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
28 / —
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / —

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Responders for Visual Acuity Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)

Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0. Responders defined as subjects having lost from baseline less than 15 letters of the best-corrected visual acuity; includes subjects with visual acuity gain.

Time frame: Baseline, 54 Weeks

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was derived from the set of all enrolled subjects who 1) were administered the study medication AND 2) had post-baseline documentation of efficacy available. In the case of missing data post-baseline, the subject was considered censored at the time of the last available data for the score.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pegaptanib SodiumNumber of Responders for Visual Acuity Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)Responders40 participants
Pegaptanib SodiumNumber of Responders for Visual Acuity Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)Non-Responders7 participants
Pegaptanib SodiumNumber of Responders for Visual Acuity Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)Censored (subjects with missing data)33 participants
95% CI: [76, 95]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity

Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0. Change: mean score at observation minus mean score at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 54 weeks

Population: FAS; n=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pegaptanib SodiumChange From Baseline in Visual Acuity6 weeks (n=76)-4.29 score on scaleStandard Deviation 11.11
Pegaptanib SodiumChange From Baseline in Visual Acuity12 weeks (n=74)-5.86 score on scaleStandard Deviation 13.79
Pegaptanib SodiumChange From Baseline in Visual Acuity54 weeks (n=49)-11.12 score on scaleStandard Deviation 17.96
Comparison: 6 weeks95% CI: [-6.83, -1.75]
Comparison: 12 weeks95% CI: [-9.06, -2.67]
Comparison: 54 weeks95% CI: [-16.28, -5.96]
Secondary

Change in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25).

Patient reported vision-related functioning and quality of life as measured using the 25 item NEI-VFQ 25. Change = Mean score at 54 weeks - mean score at baseline. A positive change represents an increase in function/health from Baseline. Items grouped as the following - Composite: mean score items 1-25; General Health: item 1; General Vision: item 2; Ocular Pain:4,19; Near Vision:5,6,7; Distance Vision:8,9,14; Social Functioning:11,13; Mental Health Activities:3,21,22,25; Role Difficulties:17,18; Dependency:20,23,24; Driving:15c,16, 16a; Color Vision: 12; Peripheral Vision: 10.

Time frame: Baseline, 54 weeks or at early termination

Population: FAS; n=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pegaptanib SodiumChange in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25).Composite (n=25)-2.25 score on scaleStandard Deviation 15.71
Pegaptanib SodiumChange in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25).General Health (n=42)-4.17 score on scaleStandard Deviation 14.52
Pegaptanib SodiumChange in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25).General Vision (n=41)3.90 score on scaleStandard Deviation 16.26
Pegaptanib SodiumChange in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25).Ocular Pain (n=43)0.35 score on scaleStandard Deviation 15.29
Pegaptanib SodiumChange in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25).Near Vision Activities (n=43)-3.88 score on scaleStandard Deviation 27.6
Pegaptanib SodiumChange in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25).Distance Vision Activities (n=43)-6.78 score on scaleStandard Deviation 23.68
Pegaptanib SodiumChange in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25).Social Functioning (n=43)-0.58 score on scaleStandard Deviation 24.84
Pegaptanib SodiumChange in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25).Role Difficulties (n=41)-4.39 score on scaleStandard Deviation 26.46
Pegaptanib SodiumChange in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25).Dependency (n=41)-5.28 score on scaleStandard Deviation 22.15
Pegaptanib SodiumChange in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25).Driving (n=27)-3.70 score on scaleStandard Deviation 30.67
Pegaptanib SodiumChange in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25).Color Vision (n=41)-1.83 score on scaleStandard Deviation 18.87
Pegaptanib SodiumChange in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25).Peripheral Vision (n=42)-4.17 score on scaleStandard Deviation 25.25
Pegaptanib SodiumChange in Vision-related Functioning and Quality of Life Using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25).Mental Health Activities (n=43)-0.30 score on scaleStandard Deviation 20.45
Secondary

Number of Subjects Gaining Vision

Subjects gaining vision: gain from baseline of more than 15 letters of visual acuity. Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0.

Time frame: 54 weeks or at early termination

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pegaptanib SodiumNumber of Subjects Gaining VisionGained4 participant
Pegaptanib SodiumNumber of Subjects Gaining VisionDid not gain74 participant
Pegaptanib SodiumNumber of Subjects Gaining VisionAssessment Not Done2 participant
95% CI: [1.61, 11.32]
Secondary

Number of Subjects Maintaining Vision

Subjects maintaining vision: gain from baseline of more than 0 letters of visual acuity. Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0.

Time frame: 54 weeks or at early termination

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pegaptanib SodiumNumber of Subjects Maintaining VisionMaintained18 participants
Pegaptanib SodiumNumber of Subjects Maintaining VisionDid not maintain60 participants
Pegaptanib SodiumNumber of Subjects Maintaining VisionNot Done2 participants
95% CI: [14.22, 32.11]
Secondary

Number of Subjects With a Distance Visual Acuity of > 20/200 at Baseline and Progressing to (<= 20/200)

Subjects with improving scores are those with \> 20/200 at Baseline and progressing to =\< 20/200 at Week 54. Subjects with no change are those with \> 20/200 at Baseline and remaining at \> 20/200 at Week 54.

Time frame: 54 weeks

Population: FAS; n=77 (number of Subjects at Baseline with \>20/200 Visual Acuity)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pegaptanib SodiumNumber of Subjects With a Distance Visual Acuity of > 20/200 at Baseline and Progressing to (<= 20/200)Improved20 participants
Pegaptanib SodiumNumber of Subjects With a Distance Visual Acuity of > 20/200 at Baseline and Progressing to (<= 20/200)No Change57 participants
95% CI: [16.28, 34.81]
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Severe Visual Loss

Subjects with severe visual loss: loss from baseline of \>= 30 letters of visual acuity. Best-corrected visual acuity assessed using retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts. When possible to measure visual acuity @ 2.0 m (≥20 letters), visual acuity score for that eye recorded as number of letters correct plus 15; otherwise, score was number of letters read correctly @ 1.0 m plus number, if any, read @ 2.0 m. If no letter was read correctly either at 2.0 or 1.0 m, then visual acuity score was recorded as 0.

Time frame: 54 weeks or at early termination

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pegaptanib SodiumNumber of Subjects With Severe Visual LossSevere Loss11 participants
Pegaptanib SodiumNumber of Subjects With Severe Visual LossNot severe loss67 participants
Pegaptanib SodiumNumber of Subjects With Severe Visual LossNot Done2 participants
95% CI: [7.39, 22.24]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026