Skip to content

TOTEM: Switch From Other Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs) to Once Daily Truvada

Open-label Randomized Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Impact on the Lipid Profile of the Substitution of the NRTIs of a HAART Regimen by a Once Daily Fixed Dose Combination Tablet of Emtricitabine and Tenofovir DF Versus Maintained Treatment in HIV Infected Controlled Patients.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00323492
Acronym
TOTEM
Enrollment
92
Registered
2006-05-09
Start date
2005-09-30
Completion date
2008-03-31
Last updated
2010-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Keywords

HIV 1 Infection

Brief summary

This study looked at lipid changes in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infected patients when the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in their existing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen were switched to Truvada® (a fixed dose combination tablet of emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 200 mg/300 mg \[FTC/TDF\]). Subjects continued their nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or protease inhibitor (PI) at the same dose.

Detailed description

This was a Phase IV, multicenter (in France), open label study. The study was conducted in two phases: a comparative randomized phase, which served the primary objective of the study, and a follow-up phase. Study Phase 1, Day -14 to Week 12: patients were randomized on a 1:1 basis to one of two groups: * A. Truvada (substitution of their current NRTIs by Truvada \[FTC/TDF\] with continuation of their current NNRTI or PI at the same dose) * B. Maintain Baseline Regimen (continuation of previous HAART regimen, i.e., maintained baseline regimen). This phase of the study served the primary objective of the study. Study Phase 2, roll-over follow-up, Week 12 to Week 48: Patients in the Truvada group continued with Truvada + an NNRTI or PI. Patients in the control group could switch their NRTIs to Truvada in this phase of the study (Delayed Truvada group). Patients were assessed for efficacy and safety during both phases of the study.

Interventions

DRUGTruvada

Truvada + NNRTI or PI.

DRUGCurrent HAART regimen

Maintain baseline regimen

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients displaying abnormal fasted triglycerides (\> 2 g/L \[2.26 mmol/L\] and less than or equal to 10 g/L \[11.29 mmol/L\]) and/or fasted low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-CHO; \> 1.6 g/L \[4.15 mmol/L\]) * Patients on stable HAART with 2 NRTIs + 1 NNRTI or 1 PI for at least 3 months prior to screening, and with plasma viral load \< 400 copies/mL for at least 6 months prior to screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting TriglyceridesBaseline to Week 12Centralized laboratory assessment. Change = Week 12 value minus baseline value.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-CHO)Baseline to Week 12Centralized laboratory assessment. Change = Week 12 value minus baseline value.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Greater Than or Equal to 400 Copies/mL at Week 1212 weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in CD4 Cell CountBaseline to Week 48Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-CHO)Baseline to Week 12Centralized laboratory assessment. Change = Week 12 value minus baseline value.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Total Cholesterol (T-CHO)Baseline to Week 12Centralized laboratory assessment. Change = Week 12 value minus baseline value.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 4848 weeks
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting HDL-CHO/LDL-CHOBaseline to Week 12Centralized laboratory assessment. Change = Week 12 value minus baseline value.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Ultra-sensitive C-reactive Protein (Us-CRP)Baseline to Week 12Local laboratory assessment. Change = Week 12 value minus baseline value.
Percentage of Participants With Fasting Plasma Triglycerides > 10 g/L (> 11.29 mmol/L) at Week 1212 weeksCentralized laboratory assessment
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Cluster Determinant 4 (CD4) Cell CountBaseline to Week 12Change = Week 12 value minus baseline value.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting T-CHO/HDL-CHOBaseline to Week 12Centralized laboratory assessment. Change = Week 12 value minus baseline value.
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Control (Plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid [RNA] < 400 Copies/mL) at Week 1212 weeks

Countries

France

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Truvada
Truvada + NNRTI or PI.
47
Maintain Baseline Regimen
Maintain baseline regimen.
45
Total92

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Study Phase 1Adverse Event200
Study Phase 2Adverse Event100
Study Phase 2Lost to Follow-up100
Study Phase 2Noncompliance with study schedule001
Study Phase 2Physician Decision100
Study Phase 2Protocol Violation100
Study Phase 2Withdrawal by Subject010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTruvadaMaintain Baseline RegimenTotal
Age Continuous49.0 years
INTER_QUARTILE_RANGE 10.7
43.0 years
INTER_QUARTILE_RANGE 7.7
47.0 years
INTER_QUARTILE_RANGE 9.8
Cluster determinant 4 (CD4) cell count467 cells/mm^3559 cells/mm^3528 cells/mm^3
Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-CHO)4.0 mmol/L4.0 mmol/L4.0 mmol/L
Participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL47 participants45 participants92 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
47 participants45 participants92 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants4 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
39 Participants41 Participants80 Participants
Triglycerides2.3 mmol/L2.7 mmol/L2.4 mmol/L

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 476 / 4516 / 72
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 473 / 457 / 72

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-CHO)

Centralized laboratory assessment. Change = Week 12 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: ITT. LOCF method was used for the analysis if the Week 12 value was missing. A missing datum were replaced by the last post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-CHO)-0.4 mmol/L
Maintain Baseline RegimenChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-CHO)-0.1 mmol/L
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.03195% CI: [-0.67, -0.03]Wilcoxon Rank Sum text
Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Triglycerides

Centralized laboratory assessment. Change = Week 12 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: ITT. Last post-baseline observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used for the analysis if the Week 12 value was missing. A missing datum were replaced by the last post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Triglycerides-0.5 mmol/L
Maintain Baseline RegimenChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Triglycerides-0.1 mmol/L
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.03495% CI: [-0.86, -0.03]Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Cluster Determinant 4 (CD4) Cell Count

Change = Week 12 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: ITT. Missing values were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Cluster Determinant 4 (CD4) Cell Count17.5 cells/mm^3
Maintain Baseline RegimenChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Cluster Determinant 4 (CD4) Cell Count16.0 cells/mm^3
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.65Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting HDL-CHO/LDL-CHO

Centralized laboratory assessment. Change = Week 12 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: ITT. Missing values were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting HDL-CHO/LDL-CHO0.0 Ratio
Maintain Baseline RegimenChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting HDL-CHO/LDL-CHO0.0 Ratio
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.7995% CI: [-0.03, 0.02]Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-CHO)

Centralized laboratory assessment. Change = Week 12 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: ITT. Missing values were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-CHO)-0.1 mmol/L
Maintain Baseline RegimenChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-CHO)0.0 mmol/L
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.00995% CI: [-0.18, -0.02]Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting T-CHO/HDL-CHO

Centralized laboratory assessment. Change = Week 12 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: ITT. Missing values were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting T-CHO/HDL-CHO-0.5 Ratio
Maintain Baseline RegimenChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting T-CHO/HDL-CHO-0.1 Ratio
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.5195% CI: [-0.44, 0.19]Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Total Cholesterol (T-CHO)

Centralized laboratory assessment. Change = Week 12 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: ITT. Missing values were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Total Cholesterol (T-CHO)-0.8 mmol/L
Maintain Baseline RegimenChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Total Cholesterol (T-CHO)-0.1 mmol/L
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.01, -0.27]Wicoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Ultra-sensitive C-reactive Protein (Us-CRP)

Local laboratory assessment. Change = Week 12 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: ITT. Missing values were excluded. Assessment of us-CRP was added to the study schedule via protocol amendment part way through the study. This resulted in small numbers of subjects having data available for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Ultra-sensitive C-reactive Protein (Us-CRP)0.4 mg/L
Maintain Baseline RegimenChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Ultra-sensitive C-reactive Protein (Us-CRP)0.7 mg/L
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are equal. Alternative Hypothesis: changes from baseline in the two treatment groups are different (two sided).p-value: 0.86Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 48 in CD4 Cell Count

Change = Week 48 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: ITT. Missing values were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TruvadaChange From Baseline to Week 48 in CD4 Cell Count35.0 cells/mm^3
Maintain Baseline RegimenChange From Baseline to Week 48 in CD4 Cell Count40.0 cells/mm^3
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: no indication of shift from 0 in distribution of change from baseline. Alternative Hypothesis: shift from 0 is observed in distribution of change from baseline.p-value: 0.11Wilcoxon Signed Rank test
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: no indication of shift from 0 in distribution of change from baseline. Alternative Hypothesis: shift from 0 is observed in distribution of change from baseline.p-value: 0.34Wilcoxon Signed Rank test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Fasting Plasma Triglycerides > 10 g/L (> 11.29 mmol/L) at Week 12

Centralized laboratory assessment

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: ITT. Missing values were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TruvadaPercentage of Participants With Fasting Plasma Triglycerides > 10 g/L (> 11.29 mmol/L) at Week 120 Percentage of participants
Maintain Baseline RegimenPercentage of Participants With Fasting Plasma Triglycerides > 10 g/L (> 11.29 mmol/L) at Week 120 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 48

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: ITT. Missing values were treated as failure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TruvadaPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 4880 Percentage of participants
Maintain Baseline RegimenPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 4880 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Greater Than or Equal to 400 Copies/mL at Week 12

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: ITT. Missing values were excluded. Any subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA greater than or equal to 400 copies/mL at Week 12 were to have virologic genotyping performed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TruvadaPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Greater Than or Equal to 400 Copies/mL at Week 120 Percentage of participants
Maintain Baseline RegimenPercentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Greater Than or Equal to 400 Copies/mL at Week 120 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Virologic Control (Plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid [RNA] < 400 Copies/mL) at Week 12

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: ITT. Missing values were treated as failure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TruvadaPercentage of Participants With Virologic Control (Plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid [RNA] < 400 Copies/mL) at Week 1296 Percentage of participants
Maintain Baseline RegimenPercentage of Participants With Virologic Control (Plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid [RNA] < 400 Copies/mL) at Week 1298 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: treatment is not associated with the observed virologic response. Alternative Hypothesis: treatment is associated with the observed virologic responsep-value: 1Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026