Skip to content

Cotrifazid Safety and Efficacy Against Malaria

A Randomised Safety and Efficacy Trial of Rifampicin/Cotrimoxazole/Isoniazid Versus Mefloquine or Quinine+SP Against Resistant Malaria in Papua New Guinea

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00322907
Enrollment
330
Registered
2006-05-08
Start date
2000-04-30
Completion date
2003-01-31
Last updated
2006-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clinical Malaria

Keywords

malaria, treatment, cotrifazid, clinical trial, efficacy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of Cotrifazid to treat uncomplicated resistant malaria and to compare the outcome with mefloquine or quinine+sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP)

Detailed description

Design: Open-label, block-randomised, comparative, multicentric trial. Setting: Four primary care health facilities, two in urban and two in rural areas of Madang and East Sepik Province, Papua New Guinea. Participants: Patients of all ages with recurrent uncomplicated malaria Intervention: Random assignment to receive either Cotrifazid, mefloquine or the standard treatment of quinine+sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP). Outcome measures: Incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events; rate of clinical and/or parasitological failure at day 14

Interventions

DRUGCotrifazid vs mefloquine or quinine+SP

Sponsors

Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisante), University of Lausanne, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

All subjects \> 6 months of age who presented at the centres and who were diagnosed with malaria (history of fever, OptiMAL® test positive, no other major symptom) and who had already been treated for malaria in the 28 days before, could be included in the study, if the subject or legal guardian (for children) gave informed consent and if the clinician in charge would have given the standard treatment for resistant malaria independent of the study -

Exclusion criteria

A subject was not to be included if the clinician preferred to use quinine for whatever reason, if the patient had one of the symptoms or signs of complicated or severe malaria (i.e. history of recent convulsion, any neurological sign or impairment of consciousness, heavy vomiting, haemoglobinuria, respiratory distress, bleeding, circulatory collapse, shock, jaundice, haemoglobin \< 5 g/dl), had contra-indications for mefloquine (history of psychiatric disorder, epilepsy), or was pregnant. \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical treatment failure rate on day 14.
Incidence of adverse events.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Parasite clearance time
Parasitological failure rate on day 14
Occurrence of complications
Symptoms clearance time
Fever clearance time

Countries

Papua New Guinea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026