Skip to content

Low-Dose or High-Dose Conditioning Followed by Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

A Multi-center Phase III Study Comparing Myeloablative to Nonmyeloablative Transplant Conditioning in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00322101
Enrollment
25
Registered
2006-05-04
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2014-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia/Transient Myeloproliferative Disorder, Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Multilineage Dysplasia Following Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission, Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With 11q23 (MLL) Abnormalities, Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Del(5q), Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Inv(16)(p13;q22), Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With t(15;17)(q22;q12), Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With t(16;16)(p13;q22), Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With t(8;21)(q22;q22), Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission, Childhood Myelodysplastic Syndromes, de Novo Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm, Unclassifiable, Myelodysplastic Syndrome With Isolated Del(5q), Previously Treated Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Recurrent Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Recurrent Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Secondary Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Giving chemotherapy, such as fludarabine phosphate, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide, and total-body radiation therapy before a donor peripheral stem cell transplant helps stop the growth of cancer cells. It may also stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. When the healthy stem cells from a donor are infused into the patient they may help the patient's bone marrow make stem cells, red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. It is not yet known whether low-dose chemotherapy and total-body radiation therapy is more effective than high-dose chemotherapy in treating patients with myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia. PURPOSE: This phase III trial is studying low-dose conditioning to see how well it works compared to high-dose conditioning followed by peripheral blood stem cell transplant in treating patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: I. Determine whether the conditioning intensity affects outcomes after HCT in patients with MDS or AML who have \< 5% marrow myeloblasts at the time of HCT. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. Arm I (Nonmyeloablative regimen): CONDITIONING: Patients receive fludarabine phosphate IV on days -4 to -2 and undergo low-dose total-body irradiation on day 0. TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) infusion on day 0. GRAFT-VS-HOST DISEASE PROPHYLAXIS: Patients receive cyclosporine every 12 hours on days -3 to 57 with taper on days 57-177 or cyclosporine every 12 hours on days -3 to 100 with taper on days 101-177. Patients also receive oral mycophenolate mofetil every 12 hours on days 0-27 or every 8 hours on days 0-40 with taper on days 41-96. Arm II (Myeloablative regimen): CONDITIONING: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups. Group A: Patients receive fludarabine IV once daily and oral busulfan four times daily or busulfan IV over 3 hours on days -5 to -2. Group B: Patients receive cyclophosphamide IV over 1-2 hours on days -3 and -2 and oral busulfan four times daily or busulfan IV over 3 hours on days -7 to -4. TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo PBSC infusion on day 0. GRAFT-VS-HOST DISEASE PROPHYLAXIS: Patients receive tacrolimus IV continuously or orally every 12 hours on days -1 to 56 and taper on days 57-200. Patients also receive methotrexate IV on days 1, 3, 6, and 11. Treatment in both arms continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically.

Interventions

DRUGcyclosporine

Given IV or orally

DRUGfludarabine phosphate

Given IV

PROCEDUREallogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Undergo allogeneic transplantation

DRUGcyclophosphamide

Given IV

DRUGmycophenolate mofetil

Given orally

DRUGbusulfan

Given IV or orally

RADIATIONtotal-body irradiation

Radiation

PROCEDUREperipheral blood stem cell transplantation

Undergo transplantation

PROCEDUREnonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Undergo allogeneic transplantation

OTHERlaboratory biomarker analysis

Correlative studies

GENETICcytogenetic analysis

Correlative studies

OTHERflow cytometry

Correlative studies

GENETICfluorescence in situ hybridization

Correlative studies

OTHERpharmacological study

Correlative studies

GENETICpolymorphism analysis

Correlative studies

DRUGtacrolimus

Given IV or orally

DRUGmethotrexate

Given IV

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or transformed acute myelogenous leukemia (transformed from MDS) * De novo acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) beyond first remission * Intermediate or high risk de novo AML in first complete response (at FHCRC unrelated donor recipients only) * Chemotherapy required prior to HCT for all patients: * A) Interval between start of a cycle of cytoreductive chemotherapy and infusion of donor stem cells must be at least 30 days; chemotherapy received for disease maintenance will be allowed during this time period * B) All patients must have \< 5% myeloblasts based on marrow morphology performed within 21 days prior to start of conditioning regimen and at least 3-4 weeks after the start of pre-transplant cytoreductive chemotherapy * C) All patients must have no circulating peripheral blood myeloblasts present based on morphologic analysis * Age 65 years or under for patients with related donors; age 60 years or under for patients with unrelated donors * HCT-Specific Comorbidity Index Score (HCT-CI) \< 3 * Related donor (age \> 12 years, nonsyngeneic) or unrelated donor, HLA phenotypically or genotypically identical at the allele level at A,B,C,DRQ1, and CBQ1 * DONOR: Related or unrelated donors who are genotypically or phenotypically matched by high resolution HLA typing (HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, and DQB1); class 1 single allele mismatch allowed * DONOR: Patient and donor pairs homozygous at a mismatched allele in the graft rejection vector are considered a two-allele mismatch, i.e., the patient is A\*0101 and the donor is A\*0201, and this type of mismatch is not allowed * DONOR: A positive anti-donor cytotoxic crossmatch or flow cytometric assay is an absolute donor exclusion at FHCRC/SCCA * DONOR: Age \>= 12 years * DONOR: Donors must consent to PBSC mobilization with G-CSF and leukaphereses; bone marrow as a source of stem cells will not be allowed * DONOR: Donor must have adequate veins for leukaphereses or agree to placement of central venous catheter (femoral, subclavian)

Exclusion criteria

* HIV seropositivity * Fungal infections with radiographic progression after appropriate therapy for greater than one month * Organ dysfunction * Symptomatic coronary artery disease or ejection fraction \< 35% * DLCO \< 65%, FEV1 \< 65% or receiving supplementary continuous oxygen * Liver function abnormalities: Patients with clinical or laboratory evidence of liver disease will be evaluated for the cause of liver disease, its clinical severity in terms of liver function, histology, and the degree of portal hypertension; patients with fulminant liver failure, cirrhosis with evidence of portal hypertension or bridging fibrosis, alcoholic hepatitis, esophageal varices, a history of bleeding esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, uncorrectable hepatic synthetic dysfunction evidenced by prolongation of the prothrombin time, ascites related to portal hypertension, bacterial or fungal liver abscess, biliary obstruction, chronic viral hepatitis with total serum bilirubin \> 3 mg/dL, and symptomatic biliary disease will be excluded * Karnofsky Performance Score \< 70 * Lansky-Play Performance Score \< 70 for pediatric patients * Life expectancy severely limited (\< 2 years) by disease other than MDS/AML * Fertile men and women unwilling to use contraceptive techniques during and for 12 months following treatment * Patients with active non-hematological malignancies except: * A) Patients with follicular or low grade lymphoma will be eligible as long as they have not and do not require active treatment for control of their disease * B) Patients with localized non-melanoma skin malignancies * Patients with poorly controlled hypertension who are unable to have blood pressure stabilized below 150/90 mm Hg on standard medication * Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding * Patients with systemic, uncontrolled infections * Active CNS disease as identified by positive CSF cytospin * DONOR: Identical twin * DONOR: Age \< 12 years * DONOR: Pregnancy * DONOR: HIV seropositivity * DONOR: Inability to achieve adequate venous access * DONOR: Known adverse reaction to G-CSF

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Overall SurvivalAt 2 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free SurvivalAfter stem cell infusion to date of last follow up.IWG criteria was used to determine disease progression
Non-relapse MortalityAt 100 days
Donor Cell EngraftmentAfter stem cell infusion to day 28Chimerism analysis was performed in patients who recieved nonmyeloablative tranplsnat. In this group the definition of engraftment was a CD3 count greater than 50%. In the myeloablative group, engraftment was defined as an absolute neutrophil count greater than 50%.
Incidence of Disease Progression/RelapseAfter stem cell infusion to date of last follow up.Disease progression/relapse was defined by IWG criteria
Incidence and Severity of Acute and Chronic Graft-vs-host DiseaseAfter transplantation

Countries

Germany, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited from medical clinics while being evaluated for stem cell transplantation

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Regimen)
CONDITIONING: Patients receive fludarabine phosphate IV on days -4 to -2 and undergo low-dose total-body irradiation on day 0. TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) infusion on day 0. GRAFT-VS-HOST DISEASE PROPHYLAXIS: Patients receive cyclosporine every 12 hours on days -3 to 57 with taper on days 57-177 or cyclosporine every 12 hours on days -3 to 100 with taper on days 101-177. Patients also receive oral mycophenolate mofetil every 12 hours on days 0-27 or every 8 hours on days 0-40 with taper on days 41-96.
14
Arm II (Myeloablative Regimen)
CONDITIONING: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups. Group A: Patients receive fludarabine IV once daily and oral busulfan four times daily or busulfan IV over 3 hours on days -5 to -2. Group B: Patients receive cyclophosphamide IV over 1-2 hours on days -3 and -2 and oral busulfan four times daily or busulfan IV over 3 hours on days -7 to -4. TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo PBSC infusion on day 0. GRAFT-VS-HOST DISEASE PROPHYLAXIS: Patients receive tacrolimus IV continuously or orally every 12 hours on days -1 to 56 and taper on days 57-200. Patients also receive methotrexate IV on days 1, 3, 6, and 11.
11
Total25

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm I (Nonmyeloablative Regimen)Arm II (Myeloablative Regimen)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
14 Participants11 Participants25 Participants
Age, Continuous51.47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.49
52.82 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.78
52.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.94
Region of Enrollment
Germany
6 participants4 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 participants7 participants15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants3 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants8 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 1211 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 124 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival

Time frame: At 2 years

Population: 2 patients in the nonmyeloablative arm did not receive transplant due to relapse and withdrawal of consent

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Regimen)Overall Survival6 participants
Arm II (Myeloablative Regimen)Overall Survival6 participants
Secondary

Donor Cell Engraftment

Chimerism analysis was performed in patients who recieved nonmyeloablative tranplsnat. In this group the definition of engraftment was a CD3 count greater than 50%. In the myeloablative group, engraftment was defined as an absolute neutrophil count greater than 50%.

Time frame: After stem cell infusion to day 28

Population: 2 patients who were randomized to receive nonmyeloablative conditioning did not undergo transplant due to relapse and withdrawal of consent

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Regimen)Donor Cell Engraftment11 participants
Arm II (Myeloablative Regimen)Donor Cell Engraftment11 participants
Secondary

Incidence and Severity of Acute and Chronic Graft-vs-host Disease

Time frame: After transplantation

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Regimen)Incidence and Severity of Acute and Chronic Graft-vs-host Disease1 participants
Arm II (Myeloablative Regimen)Incidence and Severity of Acute and Chronic Graft-vs-host Disease4 participants
Secondary

Incidence of Disease Progression/Relapse

Disease progression/relapse was defined by IWG criteria

Time frame: After stem cell infusion to date of last follow up.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Regimen)Incidence of Disease Progression/Relapse7 participants
Arm II (Myeloablative Regimen)Incidence of Disease Progression/Relapse2 participants
Secondary

Non-relapse Mortality

Time frame: At 100 days

Population: 2 patients in the nonmyeloablative arm did not receive transplant due to relapse and withdrawal of consent

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Regimen)Non-relapse Mortality0 participants
Arm II (Myeloablative Regimen)Non-relapse Mortality0 participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival

IWG criteria was used to determine disease progression

Time frame: After stem cell infusion to date of last follow up.

Population: 2 patients in the nonmyeloablative arm did not receive a transplant due to relapse and withdrawal of consent

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative Regimen)Progression-free Survival7 participants
Arm II (Myeloablative Regimen)Progression-free Survival5 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026