Skip to content

MOVIPREP® Versus NaP Pivotal Phase III Study

A Prospective Randomised Single-Blinded Multicentric and Pivotal Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Acceptability of a New 2 Litres Gut Lavage Solution NRL994 Versus a Sodium Phosphate Solution for Colonoscopy Preparation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00322062
Enrollment
340
Registered
2006-05-04
Start date
2002-04-30
Completion date
2003-03-31
Last updated
2008-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colonoscopy

Keywords

Colon cleansing

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to compare a new 2 litre bowel cleansing product versus a sodium phosphate solution already on the market. Efficacy of each bowel preparation, safety and acceptability will be assessed.

Detailed description

Multicentric (15 centres), prospective, randomised, single-blinded phase III pivotal study in patients undergoing a colonoscopy. Gut cleansing will be performed using 2 litres of NRL994 gut lavage solution with 1 litre (or more) of extra clear liquids or 2 x 45 ml of a sodium phosphate solution plus 2 litres (or more) of extra clear liquids the day before colonoscopy. Patients requiring a morning colonoscopy who fulfil the inclusion criteria, will be randomised. One of the two tested products will be delivered by a pharmacist, blindly from the gastroenterologist. The assigned product will be taken the day before the coloscopy according to the information leaflet. Efficacy of the two tested preparations will be measured on video-tape record of each colonoscopy by a final grading i.e. the overall quality of colonoscopy prep by an gastroenterologist expert. A standardised patient questionnaire administered by a nurse on the morning before colonoscopy will assess clinical tolerance and acceptability (satisfaction) of the prep. A baseline blood sampling will be withdrew before intake of the preparation and one more blood sample will be performed after the intake on the morning, before the coloscopy. After the coloscopy, as the gastroenterologist gives the result of the coloscopy , a last visit is performed.

Interventions

DRUGSodium Phosphate Solution

1 x 45ml solution, BID

Sponsors

Norgine
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* male or female, out and inpatients to be at least 18 years old and \<75 years old sent to the endoscopic ward for diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy * willing and able to complete the entire procedure and to comply with study instructions * females of childbearing potential must employ an adequate method of contraception.

Exclusion criteria

* age \<18 or \> 75 years old * ileus * suspected intestinal occlusion or perforation * toxic or congenital megacolon * history of colonic resection * patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis * congestive heart failure NYHA III or IV * documented renal insufficiency history with creatinine \>170µmol/l * known hypersensitivity to polyethylene glycols or Na phosphate and/or vitamin C * concurrent participation in an investigational drug study or participation within 90 days of study entry * females who are pregnant, or planning a pregnancy. Females of childbearing potential not using reliable methods of contraception * subject has a condition or is in a situation which in the investigators opinion may put the subject at significant risk, may confound the study results, or may interfere significantly

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
efficacy will be measured and graded using video-taped record of each colonoscopy for cleansing in a 0 - 4 grade scale for each of the predefined colon areas by an endoscopist.
Grades A or B means a good or correct preparation and are considered as a success whilst C or D are considered as a failed preparation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
evaluation of the preparation quality using a visual analogue scale
recording adverse events and clinical tolerance
patient satisfaction

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026