Skip to content

A Patient-Spouse Intervention for Self-Managing High Cholesterol

A Patient-Spouse Intervention for Self-Managing High Cholesterol

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00321789
Acronym
CouPLES
Enrollment
255
Registered
2006-05-04
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
2010-08-31
Last updated
2015-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercholesterolemia

Keywords

self care, social support

Brief summary

We examined the effect of a patient-spouse intervention to lower LDL-C by increasing patient treatment adherence. A randomized controlled trial compared a one-year, telephone-based patient-spouse intervention to usual care. The primary outcome was LDL-C measured three times (baseline, 6 months, 11 months); secondary outcomes were adherence to medication, diet, and exercise, also assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 11 months.

Detailed description

Background: Background/Rationale: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death in the United States, resulting in more than 500,000 heart attacks and another 500,00 deaths per year. More than 80% of veterans have \> 2 risk factors for CHD, underscoring the need for intervention. One major modifiable risk factor for CHD is elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Despite the proven success of diet, exercise, and medication, LDL-C frequently is not at the optimum level, due in part to patient nonadherence. Therefore, interventions are needed to increase adherence, thereby lowering LDL-C. Objectives: Objectives: We examined the effect of a patient-spouse intervention to lower LDL-C by increasing patient treatment adherence. The primary hypothesis was that patients enrolled in a telephone-based, spouse-assisted intervention will experience a clinically meaningful 7% reduction in LDL-C. The secondary hypotheses were that patients who receive the intervention would show a significant increase in adherence to medication, diet, and exercise. Methods: In a 3-year study, a randomized controlled trial compared a 10-month, telephone-based, spouse-assisted intervention to usual care. Married patients with above-goal LDL-C and their spouses were consented, completed a baseline assessment, and then were randomly assigned to the intervention or usual care arm. Month 1 involved an educational call delivered to patients and spouses. Months 2-10 (except month 6) involved monthly goal setting calls delivered to patients and calls focused on increasing social support to spouses. The patient phone call will always preceded the spouse phone call. At 6 and 11 months, LDL-C and adherence were re-assessed. The primary outcome was LDL-C measured three times (baseline, 6 months, 11 months); secondary outcomes were adherence to medication, diet, and exercise, also assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 11 months. Descriptive statistics were computed for all study variables within each study arm. Mixed effects models were used to evaluate the intervention's effect on the primary and secondary outcomes at 11 months. We also calculated intervention cost. Status: Enrollment began in Fall, 2007 and was completed in July of 2009. Impact: Elevated LDL-C is a major risk factor for CHD, stroke, and peripheral vascular disease, all of which are common among veterans. The expected increase in prevalence of CHD over the next several decades will result in an increased burden for both veterans and the VA health care system. Despite the known risk of hypercholesterolemia, many veterans have suboptimal LDL-C levels. As the latest evidence and recommendations suggest that these goals should be even lower, interventions to assist patients to lower LDL-C increasingly will be needed. The VA considers the reduction of LDL-C an important goal, as indicated by the major effort of the Ischemic Heart Disease Quality Enhancement Research Initiatives (QUERI). This study is important because (1) it addresses a highly prevalent risk factor for CHD among veterans; (2) it proposes a potentially low-cost method for improving LDL-C levels, which in turn could reduce VA healthcare costs; (3) the intervention is practical and could be disseminated easily in the VA healthcare system if proven effective; and (4) this intervention provides a model for self-management of other chronic diseases, such as diabetes and hypertension.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALspouse-assisted intervention

Couples assigned to this arm received nine monthly phone calls from a nurse. The patient created monthly goals and action plans related to diet, exercise, patient-provider communication, or medication adherence. The spouse created plans to support patient goal achievement.

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* veteran * elevated baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level * married

Exclusion criteria

* no telephone number; * spouse unwilling to participate; * patient or spouse cognitively impaired, unable to communicate via telephone, living in nursing home or receiving home health care, or refuses to provide informed consent; * hospitalized past 3 months; * survival prognosis less than 1 year; * active psychosis or dementia; no primary care physician at VA; * no medical visit to VA in past year; * enrolled in another study focusing on lifestyle changes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol11-month follow-upassessed with non-fasting blood test

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Saturated Fat (Grams/Day)11-month follow-upSelf-reported, assessed via Block Brief Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ).
Total Fat (Grams/Day)11-month follow-upSelf-reported, assessed via Block Brief Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ).
Cholesterol Intake11-month follow-upSelf-reported, assessed via Block Brief Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ).
Fiber Intake11-month follow-upSelf-reported, assessed via Block Brief Food Frequency Questionnaire.
Frequency of Moderate Intensity Physical Activity11-month follow-upSelf-reported via Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors questionnaire.
Caloric Intake11-month follow-upSelf-reported, assessed via Block Brief Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ).
Total Fat (%)11-month follow-upSelf-reported, assessed via Block Brief Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ).
Saturated Fat (%)11-month follow-upSelf-reported, assessed via Block Brief Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ).
Number of Participants With Goal LDL-C11-month follow-upAssessed via non-fasting blood test. Goal is determined by 2003 National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. Goal could be 160mg/dL for low risk (no coronary heart disease (CHD), 0-1 risk factor); 130 mg/dL for medium risk (no CHD, at least 2 risk factors); or 100 mg/dL for high risk (CHD and risk equivalents including diabetes, atherosclerotic disease, and multiple risk factors that confer a 10-year risk for CHD \>20% per Framingham score).
Number of Participants Prescribed Cholesterol Medication11-month follow-upThis was assessed via electronic medical record abstraction. Results could not be modeled statistically due to missing data/small cell sizes (i.e., not all participants had a prescription for medication because this was not an inclusion criterion).
Duration of Moderate Intensity Physical Activity11-month follow-upSelf-reported via Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors questionnaire.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
Couples enrolled in the intervention arm received educational materials at baseline, followed by eight monthly phone calls from a study nurse. Each month, the patient participant created goals and action plans related to diet, exercise, patient-provider communication, or medication adherence. Following the patient call, the spouse participant was informed of the patient's goals and action plans developed a support plan to help the patient achieve his or her goal.
127
Usual Care
Couples assigned to usual care received educational materials at baseline and usual care to the patient thereafter, with no contact from the study interventionist.
128
Total255

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up47
Overall StudyProtocol Violation53
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject66

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalInterventionUsual Care
Age, Continuous61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
61.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
Education
8th grade or less
4 participants2 participants2 participants
Education
Associate's degree
44 participants23 participants21 participants
Education
Bachelor's degree
47 participants19 participants28 participants
Education
Graduate or professional degree
31 participants16 participants15 participants
Education
high school degree or equivalent
46 participants26 participants20 participants
Education
not reported
4 participants3 participants1 participants
Education
some college or vocational training, no degree
69 participants34 participants35 participants
Education
some high school
10 participants4 participants6 participants
Employment status
disabled
13 participants8 participants5 participants
Employment status
not reported
4 participants3 participants1 participants
Employment status
retired
90 participants43 participants47 participants
Employment status
unemployed, not searching for work
5 participants3 participants2 participants
Employment status
unemployed, searching for work
10 participants5 participants5 participants
Employment status
working full time
104 participants46 participants58 participants
Employment status
working part time
29 participants19 participants10 participants
High risk for cardiovascular event based on Framingham score
high risk
44 participants25 participants19 participants
High risk for cardiovascular event based on Framingham score
low or moderate risk
211 participants102 participants109 participants
Missed at least one dose of cholesterol medication in previous 30 days at baseline
did not miss at least one dose
60 participants31 participants29 participants
Missed at least one dose of cholesterol medication in previous 30 days at baseline
missed at least one dose
59 participants31 participants28 participants
Missed at least one dose of cholesterol medication in previous 30 days at baseline
not relevant (not taking medication)
136 participants65 participants71 participants
number of participants prescribed cholesterol medication at baseline
not taking cholesterol medication
136 participants65 participants71 participants
number of participants prescribed cholesterol medication at baseline
taking cholesterol medication
119 participants62 participants57 participants
number of participants who met goal for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at baseline
did not meet goal
148 participants82 participants66 participants
number of participants who met goal for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at baseline
met goal
107 participants45 participants62 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
78 Participants35 Participants43 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
12 Participants9 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
163 Participants82 Participants81 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
255 participants127 participants128 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants10 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
242 Participants117 Participants125 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1270 / 128
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1271 / 128

Outcome results

Primary

Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

assessed with non-fasting blood test

Time frame: 11-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionLow-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol123.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 25.6
Usual CareLow-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol115.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 27.8
p-value: 0.4495% CI: [-3.6, 8.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Caloric Intake

Self-reported, assessed via Block Brief Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ).

Time frame: 11-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionCaloric Intake1175.3 kcal/dayStandard Deviation 578.8
Usual CareCaloric Intake1253.9 kcal/dayStandard Deviation 575
p-value: 0.0395% CI: [-0.23, -0.01]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Cholesterol Intake

Self-reported, assessed via Block Brief Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ).

Time frame: 11-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionCholesterol Intake152.1 milligrams per dayStandard Deviation 97.4
Usual CareCholesterol Intake175.5 milligrams per dayStandard Deviation 117.1
p-value: 0.1195% CI: [-0.3, 0.03]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Duration of Moderate Intensity Physical Activity

Self-reported via Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors questionnaire.

Time frame: 11-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
InterventionDuration of Moderate Intensity Physical Activity7.3 hours per week
Usual CareDuration of Moderate Intensity Physical Activity7.8 hours per week
p-value: 0.3795% CI: [0.9, 1.4]generalized estimating equations
Secondary

Fiber Intake

Self-reported, assessed via Block Brief Food Frequency Questionnaire.

Time frame: 11-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionFiber Intake13.2 grams per dayStandard Deviation 6.3
Usual CareFiber Intake11.9 grams per dayStandard Deviation 5.7
p-value: 0.2695% CI: [-0.06, 0.2]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Frequency of Moderate Intensity Physical Activity

Self-reported via Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors questionnaire.

Time frame: 11-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
InterventionFrequency of Moderate Intensity Physical Activity10 times per week
Usual CareFrequency of Moderate Intensity Physical Activity10 times per week
p-value: 0.0695% CI: [1, 1.5]generalized estimating equations
Secondary

Number of Participants Prescribed Cholesterol Medication

This was assessed via electronic medical record abstraction. Results could not be modeled statistically due to missing data/small cell sizes (i.e., not all participants had a prescription for medication because this was not an inclusion criterion).

Time frame: 11-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
InterventionNumber of Participants Prescribed Cholesterol Medication56 participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants Prescribed Cholesterol Medication56 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Goal LDL-C

Assessed via non-fasting blood test. Goal is determined by 2003 National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. Goal could be 160mg/dL for low risk (no coronary heart disease (CHD), 0-1 risk factor); 130 mg/dL for medium risk (no CHD, at least 2 risk factors); or 100 mg/dL for high risk (CHD and risk equivalents including diabetes, atherosclerotic disease, and multiple risk factors that confer a 10-year risk for CHD \>20% per Framingham score).

Time frame: 11-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
InterventionNumber of Participants With Goal LDL-C57 participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants With Goal LDL-C62 participants
p-value: 0.8795% CI: [0.6, 1.7]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Saturated Fat (%)

Self-reported, assessed via Block Brief Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ).

Time frame: 11-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionSaturated Fat (%)11.4 percentage of caloriesStandard Deviation 2.8
Usual CareSaturated Fat (%)12.3 percentage of caloriesStandard Deviation 2.9
p-value: 0.0995% CI: [-1.38, 0.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Saturated Fat (Grams/Day)

Self-reported, assessed via Block Brief Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ).

Time frame: 11-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionSaturated Fat (Grams/Day)15.1 grams per dayStandard Deviation 8.9
Usual CareSaturated Fat (Grams/Day)17.4 grams per dayStandard Deviation 9.8
p-value: 0.0295% CI: [-0.29, -0.02]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Total Fat (%)

Self-reported, assessed via Block Brief Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ).

Time frame: 11-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionTotal Fat (%)35.4 percentage of caloriesStandard Deviation 7.3
Usual CareTotal Fat (%)38.2 percentage of caloriesStandard Deviation 9.1
p-value: 0.0495% CI: [-4.13, -0.09]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Total Fat (Grams/Day)

Self-reported, assessed via Block Brief Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ).

Time frame: 11-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionTotal Fat (Grams/Day)46.5 grams per dayStandard Deviation 25.6
Usual CareTotal Fat (Grams/Day)54.2 grams per dayStandard Deviation 31.1
p-value: 0.0295% CI: [-0.29, -0.03]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 3, 2026