Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Dexlansoprazole MR Compared to Placebo on Maintaining Healing in Subjects With Healed Erosive Esophagitis

A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of TAK-390MR (30 mg QD and 60 mg QD) Compared to Placebo in Maintenance of Healing in Subjects With Healed Erosive Esophagitis.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00321737
Enrollment
445
Registered
2006-05-04
Start date
2006-05-31
Completion date
2007-05-31
Last updated
2012-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophagitis, Peptic, Esophagitis, Reflux

Keywords

Erosive Esophagitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of once-daily (QD) treatment with dexlansoprazole modified release (MR) 30 mg and 60 mg or placebo in maintaining healing of erosive esophagitis (EE).

Detailed description

This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled, 6 month maintenance study. The study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of daily dexlansoprazole MR (30 mg and 60 mg) with that of placebo, in maintaining healing of EE.

Interventions

Dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to six months.

DRUGPlacebo

Dexlansoprazole placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to six months.

Sponsors

Takeda
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must have successfully completed the Phase 3 Study T-EE04-084 (NCT00251693) or T-EE04-085 (NCT00251719); and have healed esophageal erosions proven by endoscopy. Complete healing was assessed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed (defined as anything less than the criterion for Grade A). The subject was counted as healed if endoscopy findings did not meet the Grade A criterion.

Exclusion criteria

* Use of prescription or nonprescription proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine (H2) receptor antagonists, sucralfate, misoprostol, or prokinetics throughout the study. * Use of antacids (except for study supplied) throughout the study. * Use of drugs with significant anticholinergic effects such as tricyclics who cannot stay on a stable dose throughout the study. * Chronic (\>12 doses per month) use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors. * Need for continuous anticoagulant therapy. * Evidence of uncontrolled systemic disease. * Subjects who have participated in either maintenance study (T-EE04-086 \[NCT00255164\] or T-EE04-087 \[NCT00255151\]). * Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, is unable to comply with the requirements of the study or is unsuitable for any reason.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.6 monthsCrude rates analyzed maintenance of healed EE from baseline of this study and considered prematurely discontinued subjects as relapsed.
Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method6 monthsPercentage of subjects who maintained complete healing of erosive esophagitis as assessed by endoscopy. In the life table method, subjects without post-baseline endoscopy were included as censored; subjects who did not have a recurrence of EE and did not complete the study were also considered censored.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.6 monthsThe percentage was calculated as the days that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which either a daytime or nighttime result was reported.
Percentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.6 monthsThe percentage was calculated as the days that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which either a daytime or nighttime result was marked.
Percentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.6 monthsThe percentage was calculated as the nights that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which a nighttime result was marked.
Percentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.6 monthsThe percentage was calculated as the nights that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which a nighttime result was marked.

Countries

Australia, Canada, Czechia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were enrolled at a total of 94 sites: 75 sites in the United States and 19 sites in Australia, Canada, the Czech Republic, Estonia, India, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and the Slovak Republic (date of first dose: 19 May 2006; date of last procedure: 21 May 2007).

Pre-assignment details

Subjects had to have endoscopically proven healed erosive esophagitis (EE) after 4 to 8 weeks of treatment with lansoprazole 30 mg once-daily (QD), dexlansoprazole modified release (MR) 60 mg QD, or dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD in the EE healing studies, T-EE04-084 (NCT00251693) and T-EE04-085 (NCT00251719).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo QD
Placebo capsules, orally, once daily for up to 6 months.
147
Dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg QD
Dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 6 months.
140
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 6 months.
158
Total445

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event1136
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up556
Overall StudyNoncompliance200
Overall StudyPossible Barrett's Esophagus211
Overall StudyPregnancy020
Overall StudyProtocol Violation001
Overall StudyRelapse of Erosive Esophagitis762519
Overall StudySubject Request/ Subject Unavailable002
Overall StudyTherapeutic Failure602
Overall StudyUnmet Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject191217

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo QDDexlansoprazole MR 30 mg QDDexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDTotal
Age Continuous49.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.94
47.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.15
47.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.72
48.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
Age, Customized
45 - <65 years
83 participants75 participants89 participants247 participants
Age, Customized
<45 years
50 participants54 participants58 participants162 participants
Age, Customized
≥65 years
14 participants11 participants11 participants36 participants
Baseline Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grade for Erosive Esophagitis (EE)
A: ≥1 mucosal break <5 mm
51 participants53 participants56 participants160 participants
Baseline Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grade for Erosive Esophagitis (EE)
B: ≥1 mucosal break ≥5 mm
57 participants46 participants57 participants160 participants
Baseline Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grade for Erosive Esophagitis (EE)
C: ≥1 mucosal break <75% of circumference
34 participants31 participants39 participants104 participants
Baseline Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grade for Erosive Esophagitis (EE)
D: ≥1 mucosal break ≥75% of circumference
5 participants10 participants6 participants21 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants21 Participants19 Participants60 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
127 Participants119 Participants139 Participants385 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants3 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants6 Participants11 Participants21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants4 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
138 Participants127 Participants135 Participants400 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
75 Participants71 Participants84 Participants230 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
72 Participants69 Participants74 Participants215 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / —26 / —35 / —
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / —2 / —6 / —

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.

Crude rates analyzed maintenance of healed EE from baseline of this study and considered prematurely discontinued subjects as relapsed.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: The crude rate analysis was performed on intent-to-treat (ITT) subjects (subjects from Studies T-EE04-084 or T-EE04-085 with endoscopically proven healed EE who received at least 1 dose of study drug in this study and did not have a gap of \>7 days between the EE healing studies and this study) with at least one endoscopy in this maintenance study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo QDPercentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.14.3 Percentage of Subjects
Dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg QDPercentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.66.4 Percentage of Subjects
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDPercentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.66.4 Percentage of Subjects
p-value: <0.00001Fisher Exact
p-value: <0.00001Fisher Exact
p-value: >0.99999Fisher Exact
Primary

Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method

Percentage of subjects who maintained complete healing of erosive esophagitis as assessed by endoscopy. In the life table method, subjects without post-baseline endoscopy were included as censored; subjects who did not have a recurrence of EE and did not complete the study were also considered censored.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Life table method for the maintenance rate of healed EE was performed on ITT subjects and included subjects without post-baseline endoscopy as censored.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo QDPercentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method27.2 Percentage of Subjects
Dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg QDPercentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method74.9 Percentage of Subjects
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDPercentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method82.5 Percentage of Subjects
p-value: <0.00001Log Rank
p-value: <0.00001Log Rank
p-value: 0.13932Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.

The percentage was calculated as the days that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which either a daytime or nighttime result was marked.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: The analysis of 24-hour heartburn-free days was performed on ITT subjects with at least one daytime or nighttime heartburn Yes/No question answered during treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo QDPercentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.36.0 Percentage of DaysStandard Deviation 32
Dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg QDPercentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.83.3 Percentage of DaysStandard Deviation 26.5
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDPercentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.78.4 Percentage of DaysStandard Deviation 28.3
Secondary

Percentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.

The percentage was calculated as the days that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which either a daytime or nighttime result was reported.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: The analysis of 24-hour heartburn-free days was performed on ITT subjects with at least one daytime or nighttime heartburn Yes/No question answered during treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Placebo QDPercentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.28.6 Percentage of DaysInter-Quartile Range 32
Dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg QDPercentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.96.1 Percentage of DaysInter-Quartile Range 26.5
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDPercentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.90.9 Percentage of DaysInter-Quartile Range 28.3
p-value: <0.00001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: <0.00001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.0673Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Percentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.

The percentage was calculated as the nights that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which a nighttime result was marked.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: The analysis was performed on ITT subjects with at least one nighttime heartburn Yes/No question answered during treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo QDPercentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.57.7 Percentage of DaysStandard Deviation 36.6
Dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg QDPercentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.89.3 Percentage of DaysStandard Deviation 22.3
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDPercentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.86.0 Percentage of DaysStandard Deviation 23.1
Secondary

Percentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.

The percentage was calculated as the nights that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which a nighttime result was marked.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: The analysis was performed on ITT subjects with at least one nighttime heartburn Yes/No question answered during treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Placebo QDPercentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.71.7 Percentage of DaysInter-Quartile Range 36.6
Dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg QDPercentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.98.9 Percentage of DaysInter-Quartile Range 22.3
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QDPercentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.96.2 Percentage of DaysInter-Quartile Range 23.1
p-value: <0.00001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: <0.00001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.11257Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026