Skip to content

Comparison of the ProAdjuster Analysis to the Penning Method of Determining Intersegmental Motion of the Cervical Spine

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00321529
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2006-05-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
2006-10-31
Last updated
2007-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Spine Instability

Keywords

Cervical spine instability, Penning Study

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the ProAdjuster system of analysis can be used to determine cervical spine instability using the Penning system of radiographic marking as a standard of comparison.

Detailed description

This study will utilize the ProAdjuster Device as a method of assessing the motion of the cervical spine in participants with instability as determined by a Penning Radiographic analysis. Only participants with existing radiographic studies will be included in the study. No additional Radiographic will be required.

Interventions

DEVICEmotion analysis by durometer

Sponsors

Logan College of Chiropractic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
DEFINED_POPULATION
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Logan student, staff, or faculty with no history of ankle injury; 2. Age 18 - 60 yoa.

Exclusion criteria

1. Logan student, staff, or faculty ; 2. Local infection, injury or other malignancy affecting the cervical spine; 3. Any unstable joints of the cervical spine than require immobilization ; 4. Any manipulation to cervical spine within 48 hours; 5. Pregnancy.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026