Skip to content

Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial 2

Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial 2 (COMET2): A Randomized Trial of the Effect of Progressive Addition Lenses Versus Single Vision Lenses on Low Myopia Associated With Large Accommodative Lags and Near Esophoria in Children

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00320593
Acronym
COMET2
Enrollment
118
Registered
2006-05-03
Start date
2005-04-01
Completion date
2010-03-01
Last updated
2026-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Keywords

Myopia, Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs), Single Vision Lenses (SVLs), Accommodative lags, Near esophoria, Refractive error

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to determine if progressive addition lenses (PALs) versus single vision lenses (SVLs) slow the progression of low myopia in children with poor accommodative responses (i.e., large accommodative lags) and near esophoria.

Detailed description

Myopia is a significant public health problem that affects at least 34% of children in the United States and a much higher percentage in Asia. It is a predisposing factor for retinal detachment, myopic retinopathy, and glaucoma, thus contributing to loss of vision and blindness. As might be expected for such a prevalent condition, treatment costs are high. If interventions to retard myopia progression are successful, sight-threatening complications might be avoided and costs should be reduced. The study has been designed as a simple trial that, other than the type of lenses being determined through the randomization process and the addition of accommodation testing using an autorefractor, largely approximates standard clinical practice. Screening consists of non-cycloplegic procedures of subjective refraction, testing of oculomotor alignment, and testing of accommodative response using the Grand Seiko autorefractor. Patients who appear to be eligible for the randomized trial will be tested with their eyes dilated to determine whether refractive error in each eye is within the eligibility range for the randomized trial. Patients will be randomized to either progressive addition lenses (PALs) with a +2.00 D addition or to single vision lenses (SVLs). Children will have three years of follow up, with visits every 6 months. The primary outcome visit is timed 3 years from randomization, with the primary analysis being a comparison of the average change from baseline to 3 years in amount of myopia between children in the single-vision lens group and the children in the progressive-addition lens group. The primary outcome is change in spherical equivalent refractive error (SER) in diopters (D) as measured by cycloplegic autorefraction. A separate ancillary study nested within the screening process will collect data on two additional methods of measuring accommodation, Monocular Estimate Method (MEM) retinoscopy and Nott retinoscopy. The aim of the ancillary study to help determine whether a simple, effective measure exists that can be easily used by clinicians to identify children with reduced accommodative response who, if they have low myopia and esophoria, might benefit from the treatment with PALs.

Interventions

DEVICEProgressive Addition Lenses (PALs)

Varilux Ellipse progressive addition lenses (PALs) with a +2.00 D addition

Single vision lenses

Sponsors

Jaeb Center for Health Research
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Eye Institute (NEI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 11 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Refractive error determined by cycloplegic autorefraction which meets all of the following: 1. Spherical equivalent: -0.50 to -3.00 D in both eyes 2. Astigmatism \<= 1.5 D in both eyes 3. Anisometropia \<= 1.00 D difference between eyes in spherical equivalent * Visual acuity is at least 20/20 with best subjective refraction in both eyes * Accommodative response at near (33 cm) is less than 2.0D by non-cycloplegic autorefraction * Near esophoria (\>= 2.0 PD) present by alternate prism and cover test (APCT) at near using best refractive correction determined from non-cycloplegic subjective refraction

Exclusion criteria

* Strabismus present by cover-uncover test at far, near, and/or near with +2.00D over best subjective refraction * Current or prior use of PALs, bifocals, or contact lenses in either eye (prior or current use of SVLs is allowed)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 YearsBaseline to 3 yearsMeasured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and each time point, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 3 years. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.
Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years3 yearsMeasured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and each time point, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 3 years. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.
Primary Outcome Measure Stratified by Sex3 yearsNIH-required analysis. Primary outcome measure (stratified by sex): Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and each time point, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 3 years. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.
Primary Outcome Measure Stratified by Race3 yearsNIH-required analysis. Primary outcome measure (stratified by race): Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and each time point, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 3 years. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.
Primary Outcome Measure Stratified by Ethnicity3 yearsNIH-required analysis. Primary outcome measure (stratified by ethnicity): Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and each time point, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 3 years. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Distribution of Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 Years3 yearsMeasured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. A SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction, and the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis.
Mean Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 Years3 yearsMeasured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. A SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction, and the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis.
Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsBaseline to 3 yearsMeasured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and 3 years, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 3 years. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.
Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsBaseline to 3 yearsMeasured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and 3 years, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 3 years. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.
Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 1 YearBaseline to 1 yearMeasured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and 1 year, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 1 year. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.
Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 2 YearsBaseline to 2 yearsMeasured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and 2 years, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 2 years. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.
Excellent Spectacle ComplianceBaseline to 3 yearsSpectacle compliance was assessed on a five-point Likert scale: always, 5; often, 4; sometimes, 3; rarely, 2; and never, 1. Excellent compliance indicates that for the specified period (during school, after school, on weekends), spectacles were estimated at all visits to have been worn either always or often.

Countries

United States

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRJane E Gwiazda, Ph.D.

New England College of Optometry

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORWendy L Marsh-Tootle

University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Optometry

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRuth E Manny

University of Houston College of Optometry

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORErik M Weissberg

New England College of Optometry

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDavid I Silbert

Family Eye Group

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDon W Lyon

Indiana University

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMitchell M Scheiman

Pennsylvania College of Optometry

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMarjean T Kulp

Ohio State University

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSusan A Cotter

Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Between April 2005 and March 2007, 118 subjects age 8 to \<12 years were enrolled in the study at 8 clinical centers.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)
Varilux Ellipse progressive addition lenses (PALs) with a +2.00 D addition
59
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)
Standard single vision lenses
59
Total118

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicProgressive Addition Lenses (PALs)TotalSingle Vision Lenses (SVLs)
Accommodative Lag
0.50 to 0.99 diopters (D)
8 participants14 participants6 participants
Accommodative Lag
1.00 to 1.49 D
26 participants59 participants33 participants
Accommodative Lag
1.50 to 1.99 D
13 participants29 participants16 participants
Accommodative Lag
2.00 D or more
12 participants16 participants4 participants
Accommodative Lag1.47 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.53
1.44 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
1.40 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.48
Age, Continuous10.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
10.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
10.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
Age, Customized
10 to <11 years
18 participants32 participants14 participants
Age, Customized
11 to <12 years
18 participants32 participants14 participants
Age, Customized
8 to <9 years
8 participants22 participants14 participants
Age, Customized
9 to <10 years
15 participants32 participants17 participants
Anisometropia0.22 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
0.22 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.18
0.21 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.16
Average J0 Between the Eyes-0.02 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.18
-0.02 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.16
-0.02 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15
Average J45 Between the Eyes0.11 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.07
0.11 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.07
0.10 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.07
Average Spherical Equivalent Between the Eyes
-0.75 to -0.99 diopters (D)
8 participants20 participants12 participants
Average Spherical Equivalent Between the Eyes
-1.00 to -1.49 D
22 participants45 participants23 participants
Average Spherical Equivalent Between the Eyes
-1.50 to -1.99 D
18 participants32 participants14 participants
Average Spherical Equivalent Between the Eyes
-2.00 to -2.50 D
11 participants21 participants10 participants
Average Spherical Equivalent Between the Eyes-1.50 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.45
-1.48 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.46
-1.45 diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.47
Near Esophoria
11 to 15 PD
3 participants6 participants3 participants
Near Esophoria
16 to 20 PD
1 participants2 participants1 participants
Near Esophoria
2 to 5 prism diopters (PD)
33 participants67 participants34 participants
Near Esophoria
6 to 10 PD
22 participants43 participants21 participants
Near Esophoria5.8 prism diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
5.9 prism diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3
5.9 prism diopters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
Parental History of Myopia
Both parents
18 participants38 participants20 participants
Parental History of Myopia
Missing/unknown
15 participants39 participants24 participants
Parental History of Myopia
Neither parent
10 participants15 participants5 participants
Parental History of Myopia
One parent
16 participants26 participants10 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
14 participants24 participants10 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
5 participants9 participants4 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
10 participants22 participants12 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 participants4 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
28 participants59 participants31 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
59 participants118 participants59 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
36 Participants64 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants54 Participants31 Participants
Spectacle wear (single vision lenses)
Currently
33 participants66 participants33 participants
Spectacle wear (single vision lenses)
In past but not currently
4 participants6 participants2 participants
Spectacle wear (single vision lenses)
Never
22 participants46 participants24 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 590 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 590 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years

Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and each time point, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 3 years. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.

Time frame: Baseline to 3 years

Population: The analysis followed the intent-to-treat principle.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years0.00 to -0.49 D11 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years-1.00 to -1.49 D12 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years-0.50 to -0.99 D16 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years<= -1.50 D (more myopia)7 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years>0.00 D (less myopia)6 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years<= -1.50 D (more myopia)21 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years>0.00 D (less myopia)3 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years0.00 to -0.49 D8 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years-0.50 to -0.99 D13 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years-1.00 to -1.49 D13 participants
Primary

Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years

Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and each time point, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 3 years. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: All analyses followed the intent-to-treat principle. The Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) method of multiple imputation was used to impute data for subjects who did not complete the 3-year visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years-0.87 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.72
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years-1.15 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.75
Comparison: The primary analysis was a comparison of treatment groups using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model in which myopia at 3 years was adjusted for myopia at baseline and prior SVL wear. The sample size was computed to reach a 90% power and type I error rate of 5%, so that a difference in 3-year myopia progression between treatment groups would be detected if the true difference was at least 0.60 D, assuming a standard deviation of 0.85 D in each group and loss of follow up of 10%.95% CI: [0.01, 0.55]ANCOVA
Comparison: An adjusted analysis for the treatment group difference of change in spherical equivalent from baseline to 3 years was performed by including in an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model the following covariates in addition to baseline myopia and prior single vision lens wear, which are known to be related to myopia progression: age, sex, ethnicity, accommodative lag, and magnitude of near esophoria.95% CI: [0.02, 0.53]ANCOVA
Secondary

Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline Characteristics

Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and 3 years, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 3 years. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.

Time frame: Baseline to 3 years

Population: The analysis followed the intent-to-treat principle.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsGender: Female33 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAge at baseline: 8 to <9 years8 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsRace/Ethnicity: White26 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsSpherical equivalent at baseline: -1.50 to -2.50 D27 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsPrior spectacle wear: Never21 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAccommodative lag at baseline: 0.50 to 1.49 D28 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAge at baseline: 9 to <10 years13 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAccommodative lag at baseline: 1.50 or worse24 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsPrior spectacle wear: Currently or in past31 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsNear esophoria at baseline: 2 to 5 PD30 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsNear esophoria at baseline: 6 to 10 PD18 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAge at baseline: 10 to <11 years15 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsNear esophoria at baseline: >10 PD4 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsSpherical equivalent at baseline: -0.75 to -1.49 D25 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsParental history of myopia: Neither parent9 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAge at baseline: 11 to <12 years16 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsParental history of myopia: One parent15 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsRace/Ethnicity: Nonwhite26 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsParental history of myopia: Both parents18 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsGender: Male19 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsParental history of myopia: Both parents20 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsRace/Ethnicity: White30 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsRace/Ethnicity: Nonwhite28 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsNear esophoria at baseline: 2 to 5 PD33 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsPrior spectacle wear: Currently or in past34 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsPrior spectacle wear: Never24 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsSpherical equivalent at baseline: -0.75 to -1.49 D33 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAge at baseline: 8 to <9 years13 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAge at baseline: 9 to <10 years17 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAge at baseline: 10 to <11 years14 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAge at baseline: 11 to <12 years14 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsGender: Female27 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsSpherical equivalent at baseline: -1.50 to -2.50 D25 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAccommodative lag at baseline: 0.50 to 1.49 D38 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAccommodative lag at baseline: 1.50 or worse20 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsNear esophoria at baseline: 6 to 10 PD21 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsNear esophoria at baseline: >10 PD4 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsParental history of myopia: Neither parent5 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsParental history of myopia: One parent10 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsGender: Male31 participants
Secondary

Distribution of Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 Years

Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. A SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction, and the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: The analysis followed the intent-to-treat principle.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 Years-2.00 to -2.99 D20 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 YearsBetter than or equal to -0.49 D0 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 Years-0.50 to -0.99 D2 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 Years-1.00 to -1.99 D18 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 Years-3.00 to -3.99 D8 participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Distribution of Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 YearsWorse than or equal to -4.00 D4 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 Years-3.00 to -3.99 D17 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 Years-2.00 to -2.99 D21 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 Years-1.00 to -1.99 D14 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 YearsBetter than or equal to -0.49 D1 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 YearsWorse than or equal to -4.00 D4 participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Distribution of Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 Years-0.50 to -0.99 D1 participants
Secondary

Excellent Spectacle Compliance

Spectacle compliance was assessed on a five-point Likert scale: always, 5; often, 4; sometimes, 3; rarely, 2; and never, 1. Excellent compliance indicates that for the specified period (during school, after school, on weekends), spectacles were estimated at all visits to have been worn either always or often.

Time frame: Baseline to 3 years

Population: The analysis followed the intent-to-treat principle. Two patients had no compliance data because they had no follow-up visits (one single vision lenses, and one progressive-addition lenses).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Excellent Spectacle ComplianceDuring school72 percent of participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Excellent Spectacle ComplianceAfter school60 percent of participants
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Excellent Spectacle ComplianceWeekends60 percent of participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Excellent Spectacle ComplianceDuring school90 percent of participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Excellent Spectacle ComplianceAfter school76 percent of participants
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Excellent Spectacle ComplianceWeekends71 percent of participants
Secondary

Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 1 Year

Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and 1 year, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 1 year. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.

Time frame: Baseline to 1 year

Population: The analysis followed the intent-to-treat principle.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 1 Year-0.29 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.39
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 1 Year-0.42 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.37
Comparison: A secondary analysis was conducted to assess the treatment effect on myopia at the interim time point of 1 year, using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model for the treatment group difference of change in spherical equivalent refractive error from baseline to 1 year, in which myopia at 1 year was adjusted for myopia at baseline and prior single vision lenses wear. Only complete cases (cases in which both baseline and 1 year values were known) were included.95% CI: [-0.005, 0.28]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 2 Years

Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and 2 years, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 2 years. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.

Time frame: Baseline to 2 years

Population: The analysis followed the intent-to-treat principle

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 2 Years-0.58 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.55
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 2 Years-0.80 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.61
Comparison: A secondary analysis was conducted to assess the treatment effect on myopia at the interim time point of 2 years, using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model for the treatment group difference of change in spherical equivalent refractive error from baseline to 2 years, in which myopia at 2 years was adjusted for myopia at baseline and prior single vision lenses wear. Only complete cases (cases in which both baseline and 2 year values were known) were included.95% CI: [0.02, 0.45]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline Characteristics

Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and 3 years, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 3 years. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.

Time frame: Baseline to 3 years

Population: The analysis followed the intent-to-treat principle.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAge at baseline: 10 to <11 years-0.71 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.52
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsSpherical equivalent at baseline: -0.75 to -1.49 D-0.79 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.61
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsGender: Female-0.82 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.76
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAge at baseline: 9 to <10 years-1.11 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.76
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsSpherical equivalent at baseline: -1.50 to -2.50 D-0.93 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.81
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAccommodative lag at baseline: 0.50 to 1.49 D-0.91 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.59
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsRace/Ethnicity: White-0.79 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.74
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAccommodative lag at baseline: 1.50 or worse-0.81 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.86
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAge at baseline: 11 to <12 years-0.64 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.55
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsNear esophoria at baseline: 2 to 5 PD-0.97 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.82
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsRace/Ethnicity: Nonwhite-0.94 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.7
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsNear esophoria at baseline: 6 to 10 PD-0.66 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.54
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsNear esophoria at baseline: >10 PD-1.01 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.43
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAge at baseline: 8 to <9 years-1.23 dioptersStandard Deviation 1.06
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsParental history of myopia: Neither parent-0.83 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.63
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsPrior spectacle wear: Currently or in past-0.90 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.75
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsParental history of myopia: One parent-0.73 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.52
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsGender: Male-0.95 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.64
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsParental history of myopia: Both parents-0.99 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.79
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsPrior spectacle wear: Never-0.81 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.68
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsParental history of myopia: Both parents-1.29 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.87
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAge at baseline: 8 to <9 years-1.39 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.79
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAge at baseline: 9 to <10 years-1.14 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.78
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAge at baseline: 10 to <11 years-1.19 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.81
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAge at baseline: 11 to <12 years-0.88 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.58
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsGender: Male-1.09 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.75
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsGender: Female-1.21 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.76
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsRace/Ethnicity: White-1.10 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.76
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsRace/Ethnicity: Nonwhite-1.19 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.75
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsPrior spectacle wear: Currently or in past-1.10 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.63
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsPrior spectacle wear: Never-1.22 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.9
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsSpherical equivalent at baseline: -1.50 to -2.50 D-1.08 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.75
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsSpherical equivalent at baseline: -0.75 to -1.49 D-1.20 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.76
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAccommodative lag at baseline: 0.50 to 1.49 D-1.12 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.72
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsAccommodative lag at baseline: 1.50 or worse-1.20 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.82
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsNear esophoria at baseline: 2 to 5 PD-1.13 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.79
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsNear esophoria at baseline: >10 PD-1.60 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.86
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsParental history of myopia: Neither parent-0.72 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.76
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsParental history of myopia: One parent-1.28 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.62
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsNear esophoria at baseline: 6 to 10 PD-1.09 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.67
Secondary

Mean Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 Years

Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. A SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction, and the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: The analysis followed the intent-to-treat principle.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Progressive Addition Lenses (PALs)Mean Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 Years-2.41 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.95
Single Vision Lenses (SVLs)Mean Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 Years-2.60 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.91

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 10, 2026