Skip to content

Impact of Using Mini-Bronchoalveolar Lavage as a Diagnostic Test for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Impact of Using Mini-Bronchoalveolar Lavage as a Diagnostic Test for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00319644
Enrollment
37
Registered
2006-04-27
Start date
2006-05-31
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2012-11-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Brief summary

The proposed study will evaluate adult patients admitted to the medical or surgical intensive care units (ICUs) at San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH). On admission, patients will be randomized in a 1:1 manner to the mini-bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) quantitative culture arm in the setting of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) versus the tracheal aspirate culture arm, which is the current test available at SFGH.

Detailed description

Patients will be randomized to either Mini-Bal or tracheal aspirate then samples will be taken to the lab for culture. Comparative analysis will then be performed based upon lab results.

Interventions

DEVICEBronchoalveolar lavage

Using catheter to obtain respiratory sample

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All adult patients (\> age 18) admitted to 5E, 5R, and 4E intensive care units and are on the ventilator for greater than 48 hours and expected to remain on the ventilator for awhile * Study procedures would be performed only in patients clinically suspected of having VAP.

Exclusion criteria

* Severe respiratory distress at the time of suspected VAP defined by: * FiO2 ≥ 0.7 * PEEP ≥ 12

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Antibiotic Usage or ExposureIt is theorized that patients randomized to the tracheal aspirate will receive an average of 15 days of antibiotics while patients randomized under the minibal arm will receive an average of 10 days of antibioticsWe expect that 100-110 adult patients will have clinically suspected VAP over a 2-year period. We assume that 50 patients with suspected VAP will be randomized to mini-BAl, and 50 patients will be randomized to tracheal aspirate. We expect that patients randomized to tracheal aspirate group will receive an average of approximately 14 total days of antibiotics over their ICU stay. This study will have \>80% power to detect a difference of 4 days of antibiotics (i.e. average of 10 days in mini-BAL group) with a 7-day standard deviation in both groups (alpha error level 5%).
Antibiotics Exposure Days15 daysWe hypothesize that Mini-BAL quantitative culture in place of tracheal aspirate culture will reduce the total days of antibiotics exposure

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study was a randomized, controlled trial of adult patients admitted to the trauma/surgical intensive care unit of San Francisco General Hospital and was conducted from 5/1/2005 to August 15, 2008

Pre-assignment details

Adult patients with suspected VAP were randomized to the mini-BAL (MB) diagnostic group or the tracheal aspirate (TA) diagnostic group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Minibal Arm
Using Mini bronchoalveolar lavage
16
Tracheal Aspirates
No intervention. Standard of care in ICU.
21
Total37

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTracheal AspiratesMinibal ArmTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
21 Participants16 Participants37 Participants
Age Continuous52.81 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.3
49.38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3
51.09 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.45
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 participants16 participants37 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants2 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants14 Participants25 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 160 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 160 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Antibiotics Exposure Days

We hypothesize that Mini-BAL quantitative culture in place of tracheal aspirate culture will reduce the total days of antibiotics exposure

Time frame: 15 days

Population: Random

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mini-BALAntibiotics Exposure Days4 daysStandard Deviation 3.89
Tracheal AspiratesAntibiotics Exposure Days5.81 daysStandard Deviation 6.95
Primary

Change in Antibiotic Usage or Exposure

We expect that 100-110 adult patients will have clinically suspected VAP over a 2-year period. We assume that 50 patients with suspected VAP will be randomized to mini-BAl, and 50 patients will be randomized to tracheal aspirate. We expect that patients randomized to tracheal aspirate group will receive an average of approximately 14 total days of antibiotics over their ICU stay. This study will have \>80% power to detect a difference of 4 days of antibiotics (i.e. average of 10 days in mini-BAL group) with a 7-day standard deviation in both groups (alpha error level 5%).

Time frame: It is theorized that patients randomized to the tracheal aspirate will receive an average of 15 days of antibiotics while patients randomized under the minibal arm will receive an average of 10 days of antibiotics

Population: Of the 37 adult critically ill patients, 21 belonged to the tracheal aspirate (TA) group and 16 patients were classified as mini-BAL (MB) group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mini-BALChange in Antibiotic Usage or Exposure11.87 daysStandard Deviation 13.8
Tracheal AspiratesChange in Antibiotic Usage or Exposure7.76 daysStandard Deviation 1.06
Comparison: The chi-square test(or Fisher exact test where needed) was used to compare proportions with dichotomous variables. The Student-t test was used for quantitative variables woth normal distribution, and Mann-Whitney-U test was used for data not normally distributed.p-value: 0.26Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026