Skip to content

Comparative Study of Intermittent Catheters and Occurrence of Urinary Tract Infections

A Prospective, Randomized, Parallel-group, Multi-center Study to Compare the Occurrence of Urinary Tract Infections in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury Using Either Coated or Uncoated Intermittent Catheters.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00318591
Enrollment
219
Registered
2006-04-27
Start date
2006-04-30
Completion date
2009-10-31
Last updated
2021-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Tract Infections

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the frequency of urinary tract infections with symptoms in spinal cord injured patients requiring intermittent catheterization for emptying the bladder. Patients will use either a coated catheter or an uncoated catheter with gel.

Detailed description

Introduction: Spinal cord injured (SCI) constitutes a large group of patients suffering from neurogenic bladder dysfunction, which is often managed by intermittent catheterization (IC). Intermittent catheterization is accepted as a safe and effective method for maintaining bladder and renal health in individuals with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. However, IC several times a day places an individual at risk for urethral trauma, hematuria, and particularly symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTI). Attempts to control UTI with prophylactic antibiotics or sterile technique have not been overly successful but more recent advances in catheter technology, such as the hydrophilic-coated catheter, offer potential benefit. The hydrophilic-coated catheter has a slippery, pre-lubricated surface (along the entire length of the catheter) when soaked in water, allowing smooth insertion without the need for additional water soluble lubricant. Two proposed advantages over uncoated catheters are 1) reduced incidence of symptomatic UTI, and 2) reduction of urethral irritation or urethral trauma, and lowered risk of urethral strictures. Currently, while there are trends in favour of hydrophilic-coated catheters with respect to UTI overall evidence remains inadequate for clinical decision-making for choice of catheter type. Randomised trials to date have been limited by short follow up, heterogeneity, attrition, imprecise outcome measures, and varying definitions of UTI5. Conclusions of the Cochrane group in 20076 were echoed in a recent comprehensive re-view of all studies on hydrophilic-coated catheters - there is modest evidence favouring hydrophilic-coated catheter in reduction of UTI, but further robust research is required.

Interventions

hydrophilic coated urinary intermittent catheter

DEVICEConveen Uncoated

Uncoated urinary intermittent catheter

Sponsors

Coloplast A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Traumatic spinal cord injury within 3 months prior to inclusion * Neurogenic bladder dysfunction requiring intermittent catheterization at least 3 times daily

Exclusion criteria

* Has symptoms of UTI at inclusion * Treated with prophylactic antibiotics to prevent UTIs * Has a history of unresolved bladder-ureteral reflux and/or stones in the urinary tract * Has used intermittent catheterization for more than 10 days prior to inclusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Occurrence of Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs)4-6 monthsOccurrence of symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs). Time to first UTI

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nurse Evaluation of Catheters - Overall Satisfaction4-6 monthsEvaluation score on an 11-point scale from 0-10 (0 being lowest satisfaction)
Patient or Caregiver's Evaluation of Catheters - Overall Satisfaction4-6 monthsEvaluation score on an 11-point scale from 0-10 (0 being lowest satisfaction)
UTIs With Bacteriuria >=100 Colony Forming Units (CFU)/ml4-6 monthsUTIs with bacteriuria \>=100 Colony Forming Units (CFU)/ml. Descriptive analysis
Device-related or Possibly Device-related AEs4-6 months
Number of Participants With One or More Urinary Tract Infection4-6 months
Nurse Time Spent on Catheterization Procedure4-6 months

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SpeediCath
Hydrophilic coated intermittent catheter
105
Conveen Uncoated
Uncoated intermittent catheter
114
Total219

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSpeediCathConveen UncoatedTotal
Age, Continuous37.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
35.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
36.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
Region of Enrollment
Canada
25 participants28 participants53 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
80 participants86 participants166 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
22 participants20 participants42 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
83 participants93 participants176 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 10514 / 114
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 1056 / 114

Outcome results

Primary

Occurrence of Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs)

Occurrence of symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs). Time to first UTI

Time frame: 4-6 months

Population: ITT-population, symptomatic urinary tract infections treated with antibiotics

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
SpeediCath CatheterOccurrence of Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs)Free of UTIs from study start to day 3019 participants 0
SpeediCath CatheterOccurrence of Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs)Free of UTIs from study start to day 1502 participants
Conveen UncoatedOccurrence of Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs)Free of UTIs from study start to day 3020 participants 0
Conveen UncoatedOccurrence of Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs)Free of UTIs from study start to day 1500 participants
Comparison: The analysis was done by comparing Kaplan-Meier estimates of the survival function of the two groups. The analysis was refined by a Cox proportional hazards regression model for survival data.p-value: 0.038395% CI: [1.022, 2.207]Kaplan-Meier
Secondary

Device-related or Possibly Device-related AEs

Time frame: 4-6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SpeediCath CatheterDevice-related or Possibly Device-related AEs16 Events
Conveen UncoatedDevice-related or Possibly Device-related AEs14 Events
Secondary

Number of Participants With One or More Urinary Tract Infection

Time frame: 4-6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SpeediCath CatheterNumber of Participants With One or More Urinary Tract Infection47 participants
Conveen UncoatedNumber of Participants With One or More Urinary Tract Infection82 participants
Secondary

Nurse Evaluation of Catheters - Overall Satisfaction

Evaluation score on an 11-point scale from 0-10 (0 being lowest satisfaction)

Time frame: 4-6 months

Population: Analysis were done on evaluations of the ITT-population. Evaluations were made at discharge from hospital. Since some participants discontinued the study prior to discharge and since some did not fill in the evaluation form, the total number of evaluations (132) do not add up to the total of the ITT population (219)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SpeediCath CatheterNurse Evaluation of Catheters - Overall Satisfaction8.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Conveen UncoatedNurse Evaluation of Catheters - Overall Satisfaction8.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
p-value: 0.767ANOVA
Secondary

Nurse Time Spent on Catheterization Procedure

Time frame: 4-6 months

Population: ITT-population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SpeediCath CatheterNurse Time Spent on Catheterization Procedure337 secondsStandard Deviation 44
Conveen UncoatedNurse Time Spent on Catheterization Procedure278 secondsStandard Deviation 25
Secondary

Patient or Caregiver's Evaluation of Catheters - Overall Satisfaction

Evaluation score on an 11-point scale from 0-10 (0 being lowest satisfaction)

Time frame: 4-6 months

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SpeediCath CatheterPatient or Caregiver's Evaluation of Catheters - Overall Satisfaction9.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Conveen UncoatedPatient or Caregiver's Evaluation of Catheters - Overall Satisfaction8.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
p-value: 0.0074ANOVA
Secondary

UTIs With Bacteriuria >=100 Colony Forming Units (CFU)/ml

UTIs with bacteriuria \>=100 Colony Forming Units (CFU)/ml. Descriptive analysis

Time frame: 4-6 months

Population: Descriptive only

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SpeediCath CatheterUTIs With Bacteriuria >=100 Colony Forming Units (CFU)/ml101 UTI
Conveen UncoatedUTIs With Bacteriuria >=100 Colony Forming Units (CFU)/ml151 UTI

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026