Skip to content

Calcium Gluconate and Magnesium Sulfate in Preventing Neurotoxicity Caused By Oxaliplatin in Patients Receiving Combination Chemotherapy for Stage II, Stage III, or Stage IV Colorectal Cancer That Has Been Completely Removed By Surgery

A Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Intravenous Calcium/Magnesium to Prevent Oxaliplatin-Induced Sensory Neurotoxicity

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00316914
Enrollment
104
Registered
2006-04-21
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2012-11-30
Last updated
2016-08-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer, Neurotoxicity

Keywords

neurotoxicity, stage II colon cancer, stage III colon cancer, adenocarcinoma of the colon, stage II rectal cancer, stage III rectal cancer, stage IV rectal cancer, stage IV colon cancer, adenocarcinoma of the rectum

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Calcium gluconate and magnesium sulfate may prevent or lessen neurotoxicity caused by oxaliplatin. It is not yet known whether calcium gluconate and magnesium sulfate are more effective than a placebo in preventing neurotoxicity caused by oxaliplatin in patients receiving combination chemotherapy. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying calcium gluconate and magnesium sulfate to see how well they work compared to a placebo in preventing neurotoxicity caused by oxaliplatin in patients receiving combination chemotherapy for stage II, stage III, or stage IV colorectal cancer that has been completely removed by surgery.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: * Determine whether calcium gluconate and magnesium sulfate (CaMg) infusions can prevent or ameliorate chronic, cumulative oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity in patients receiving FOLFOX combination chemotherapy for stage II, III or IV colorectal cancer. * Determine whether CaMg infusions can increase the cumulative oxaliplatin doses that can be delivered without chronic neurotoxicity. * Determine whether CaMg infusions can ameliorate the acute neuropathy associated with oxaliplatin. * Determine whether CaMg infusions cause any adverse events. * Investigate whether CaMg infusions influence quality of life, fatigue, and activities of daily living of these patients. * Determine if polymorphisms in the GSTP1 gene predict early onset of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to age (\< 65 vs \> 65), gender, and chemotherapy regimen (FOLFOX4 vs modified FOLFOX6). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I: Patients receive calcium gluconate and magnesium sulfate IV over 30 minutes immediately before and after each oxaliplatin administration (once every 2 weeks) of their assigned chemotherapy regimen. * Arm II: Patients receive a placebo IV over 30 minutes immediately before and after each oxaliplatin administration (once every 2 weeks) of their assigned chemotherapy regimen. In both arms, treatment continues until chemotherapy is discontinued (approximately 6 months). Patients complete quality of life questionnaires on day 1, a symptom experience diary on days 2-5 of their chemotherapy regimen, and questionnaires at 1 and 3 months after completion of study treatment. Blood samples are collected at baseline and tested for the GSTP1 gene. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed for at least 3 months. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 300 patients will be accrued for this study.

Interventions

Given IV

DRUGmagnesium sulfate

Given IV

OTHERplacebo

Given IV

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
North Central Cancer Treatment Group
CollaboratorNETWORK
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum * Stage II disease * Stage III disease * Stage IV disease (completely resected with no evidence of residual tumor) * Must have undergone curative resection for stage II or III disease * Scheduled to receive 6 months of adjuvant treatment with either of the following FOLFOX chemotherapy regimens: * FOLFOX4, comprising leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (2-week course) * Modified FOLFOX6, comprising high-dose leucovorin calcium, high-dose fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (2-week course) PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm\^3 * Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm\^3 * Hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL * WBC ≥ 3,000/mm\^3 * Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) * Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN * Calcium normal * Not pregnant or nursing * Negative pregnancy test * Fertile patients must use effective contraception * No pre-existing peripheral neuropathy of any grade * No hypercalcemia * No concurrent heart block or a history of heart block * No other medical condition that, in the opinion of the treating physician, would make this protocol unreasonably hazardous for the patient * No family history of a genetic/familial neuropathy PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * See Disease Characteristics * No prior treatment with neurotoxic chemotherapy such as oxaliplatin, cisplatin, taxanes, or vinca alkaloids * Concurrent use of bevacizumab or cetuximab in combination with FOLFOX as part of a clinical trial or clinical practice are allowed * No concurrent digitalis medication * No concurrent digoxin * No concurrent treatment with anticonvulsants such as carbamazepine, phenytoin, or valproic acid * No other concurrent neurotropic agents such as gabapentin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients With Oxaliplatin-induced Grade 2+ Chronic Neuropathic Adverse Event127 daysNeuropathic adverse events were assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0. Neurotoxicity evaluation grade: loss of deep tendon reflexes or paresthesia, including tingling, but not interfering with function (Grade 1); objective sensory alteration or paresthesia, including tingling, interfering with function, but not with activities of daily living (Grade 2); sensory alteration or paresthesia interfering with activities of daily living (Grade 3); permanent sensory losses that are disabling (Grade 4)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Onset of Grade 2+ Chronic Neurotoxicity127 daysNeurotoxicity were assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0.
Time to Onset of Grade 3+ Chronic Neurotoxicity127 daysNeurotoxicity was assessed by CTCAE v3.0.
Average Duration of Chronic Neuropathic Toxicity127 daysNeuropathic adverse events were assessed by CTCAE v3.0.
Percentage of Patients Discontinuing Therapy for Chronic Neurotoxicity127 daysNeurotoxicity were assessed by CTCAE v3.0.
Average Cumulative Oxaliplatin Dose127 days
Incidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse Event127 daysAdverse Events were measured using CTCAE V3.0.
Percentage of Patients With Acute Neuropathic Adverse Event127 daysAcute neuropathic toxicities were measured using the Symptom Experience Diary and supplemental quality of life questions in the scale of 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst symptom). The item score was reversed and transformed into 0 (low QOL) to 100 (best QOL) scale for analysis. Any score greater than 0 was considered having acute neuropathy.
Percentage of Patients Experiencing Impact on Activities of Daily Living (ADL)127 daysActivities of daily living were measured using the Symptom Experience Diary and supplemental quality of life questions. The questionnaires' items were in the scale of 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst symptom).
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Score at One MonthBaseline and One monthFatigue was measured by Brief Fatigue Inventory in the scale of 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (fatigue as bad as you can imagine). The item score was reversed and transformed into 0 (low quality of life (QOL)) to 100 (best QOL) scale for analysis. Change: score at one month minus score at baseline.
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthBaseline and One monthQuality of Life (QOL) were measured using the Symptom Experience Diary and supplemental quality of life questions. Item score range: 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst symptom). The score was reversed and transformed into 0 (low QOL) to 100 (best QOL) scale for analysis. Change: score at one month minus score at baseline.
Average Duration of Oxaliplatin-containing Treatment127 days

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

One-hundred and four (104) participants were recruited between January 2006 and June 2007 from 20 North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) member sites.

Pre-assignment details

Two participants in Calcium/Magnesium arm canceled prior to study medication begins. These two participants were excluded from all analysis.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ca/Mg
Patients receive calcium gluconate (Ca) and magnesium sulfate (Mg) IV over 30 minutes immediately before and after each oxaliplatin administration (once every 2 weeks) of their assigned chemotherapy regimen.
50
Placebo
Patients receive a placebo IV over 30 minutes immediately before and after each oxaliplatin administration (once every 2 weeks) of their assigned chemotherapy regimen.
52
Total102

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event87
Overall StudyMissing end of treatment documentation1415
Overall StudyOther Problems611
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject53

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCa/MgPlaceboTotal
Age, Customized
<65
33 Participants33 Participants66 Participants
Age, Customized
>=65
17 Participants19 Participants36 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
48 Participants50 Participants98 Participants
Regimen
FOLFOX4 (Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin, and Fluorouracil
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Regimen
Modified FOLFOX6
47 Participants49 Participants96 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
50 participants52 participants102 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants25 Participants48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants27 Participants54 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
48 / 5046 / 52
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 501 / 52

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients With Oxaliplatin-induced Grade 2+ Chronic Neuropathic Adverse Event

Neuropathic adverse events were assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0. Neurotoxicity evaluation grade: loss of deep tendon reflexes or paresthesia, including tingling, but not interfering with function (Grade 1); objective sensory alteration or paresthesia, including tingling, interfering with function, but not with activities of daily living (Grade 2); sensory alteration or paresthesia interfering with activities of daily living (Grade 3); permanent sensory losses that are disabling (Grade 4)

Time frame: 127 days

Population: Efficacy analyses use all patients that reported at least one value after baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ca/MgPercentage of Patients With Oxaliplatin-induced Grade 2+ Chronic Neuropathic Adverse Event22 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients With Oxaliplatin-induced Grade 2+ Chronic Neuropathic Adverse Event41 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Comparison in Percentage of Patients With Oxaliplatin-induced Grade 2+ Chronic Neuropathic Adverse Event between Armsp-value: 0.038Chi-squared
Secondary

Average Cumulative Oxaliplatin Dose

Time frame: 127 days

Population: Because of the early closure of this trial, no reliable data were available for this outcome.

Secondary

Average Duration of Chronic Neuropathic Toxicity

Neuropathic adverse events were assessed by CTCAE v3.0.

Time frame: 127 days

Population: Includes all patients that reported at least one value after baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ca/MgAverage Duration of Chronic Neuropathic Toxicity81 days
PlaceboAverage Duration of Chronic Neuropathic Toxicity72 days
Comparison: Comparison of Average Duration of Chronic Neuropathic Toxicity between Armsp-value: 0.6556Log Rank
Secondary

Average Duration of Oxaliplatin-containing Treatment

Time frame: 127 days

Population: Because of the early closure of this trial, no reliable data were available for this outcome.

Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fatigue Score at One Month

Fatigue was measured by Brief Fatigue Inventory in the scale of 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (fatigue as bad as you can imagine). The item score was reversed and transformed into 0 (low quality of life (QOL)) to 100 (best QOL) scale for analysis. Change: score at one month minus score at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and One month

Population: Includes all patients with at least one assessment after baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ca/MgChange From Baseline in Fatigue Score at One MonthFatigue NOW1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.96
Ca/MgChange From Baseline in Fatigue Score at One MonthFatigue USUAL3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.38
Ca/MgChange From Baseline in Fatigue Score at One MonthFatigue WORST0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fatigue Score at One MonthFatigue NOW-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.92
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fatigue Score at One MonthFatigue USUAL-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.81
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fatigue Score at One MonthFatigue WORST-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.41
Comparison: Comparison of Fatigue NOW between two armsp-value: 0.234Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Comparison of Fatigue USUAL between two armsp-value: 0.201Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Comparison of Fatigue WORST between two armsp-value: 0.9364Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One Month

Quality of Life (QOL) were measured using the Symptom Experience Diary and supplemental quality of life questions. Item score range: 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst symptom). The score was reversed and transformed into 0 (low QOL) to 100 (best QOL) scale for analysis. Change: score at one month minus score at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and One month

Population: Includes all patients with at least one assessment after baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ca/MgChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthDiarrhea-7.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.43
Ca/MgChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthBowel Problems with Normal Activity-3.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.06
Ca/MgChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthButtoning Shirt or Tying Laces-2.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.27
Ca/MgChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthShortness of Breath (Week 2 - Baseline)-0.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.16
Ca/MgChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthConstipation-2.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.87
Ca/MgChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthSwallowing (Week 2 - Baseline)-7.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.56
Ca/MgChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthWalking-2.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.54
Ca/MgChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthNumbness in Fingers, Toes (Week 2 - Baseline)-8.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.49
Ca/MgChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthAbdominal Cramping-2.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.75
Ca/MgChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthTingling in Fingers, Toes (Week 2 - Baseline)-14.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.65
Ca/MgChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthFatigue WORST0.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthTingling in Fingers, Toes (Week 2 - Baseline)-20.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.53
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthFatigue WORST-1.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.41
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthWalking0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.78
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthButtoning Shirt or Tying Laces0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthDiarrhea-10.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.77
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthConstipation0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.94
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthAbdominal Cramping1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.46
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthBowel Problems with Normal Activity-9.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthShortness of Breath (Week 2 - Baseline)2.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthSwallowing (Week 2 - Baseline)2.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Quality of Life (QOL) at One MonthNumbness in Fingers, Toes (Week 2 - Baseline)-9.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.74
Comparison: Fatigue WORSTp-value: 0.9364Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Walkingp-value: 0.6275Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Buttoning Shirt or Tying Lacesp-value: 0.6988Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Diarrheap-value: 0.5124Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Constipationp-value: 0.3103Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Abdominal Crampingp-value: 0.8601Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Bowel Problems with Normal Activityp-value: 0.2439Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Shortness of Breath (Week 2 - Baseline)p-value: 0.9283Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Swallowing (Week 2 - Baseline)p-value: 0.4715Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Numbness in Fingers, Toes (Week 2 - Baseline)p-value: 0.5105Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Tingling in Fingers, Toes (Week 2 - Baseline)p-value: 0.2181Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Incidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse Event

Adverse Events were measured using CTCAE V3.0.

Time frame: 127 days

Population: Analyses of adverse events includes all patients. Adverse event data is not available on one patient in Placebo arm, which leads to the total of 51 in Placebo arm for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventLaryngeal Discomfort0 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventFatigue10 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventLeukopenia6 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventConstipation42 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventMuscle Weakness2 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventHypercalcemia0 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventMyalgia4 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventAcne NOS2 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventNausea60 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventHyperglycemia2 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventNeuro-motor4 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventDehydration2 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventNeuro-sensory2 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventHypermagnesemia14 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventNeutropenia18 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventAnorexia4 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventOral cavity MS CE2 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventHypersensitivity6 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventPain-Abdominal0 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventHypokalemia4 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventPain-Chest0 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventDiarrhea-No Colostom68 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventPain-Headache0 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventHypomagnesemia0 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventRash/Desquamation4 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventAbdominal Infection2 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventSkin Rxn-Hand/Foot4 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventHyponatremia4 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventStomatitis2 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventDry Skin0 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventTaste2 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventInfection0 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventThrombocytopenia2 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventClostridial Infection0 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventThrombosis6 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventIschemia-Cerebral0 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventUrticaria0 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventErythema Multiforme4 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventVasc Access Complication2 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventIschemia/Infarction2 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventVomiting34 Percentage of Participants
Ca/MgIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventAnemia4 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventVomiting33 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventAbdominal Infection0 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventAcne NOS2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventAnemia4 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventAnorexia2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventClostridial Infection2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventConstipation47 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventDehydration6 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventDiarrhea-No Colostom73 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventDry Skin2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventErythema Multiforme0 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventFatigue25 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventHypercalcemia2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventHyperglycemia0 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventHypermagnesemia18 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventHypokalemia2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventHypomagnesemia2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventHyponatremia0 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventInfection2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventIschemia-Cerebral2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventIschemia/Infarction0 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventLaryngeal Discomfort2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventLeukopenia10 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventMuscle Weakness0 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventMyalgia0 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventNausea71 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventNeuro-motor4 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventNeuro-sensory12 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventNeutropenia33 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventOral cavity MS CE0 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventPain-Abdominal8 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventPain-Chest2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventPain-Headache4 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventRash/Desquamation0 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventSkin Rxn-Hand/Foot2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventStomatitis2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventTaste2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventThrombocytopenia2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventThrombosis4 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventUrticaria2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventVasc Access Complication0 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboIncidence of Calcium Magnesium (CaMg)-Induced Adverse EventHypersensitivity0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Discontinuing Therapy for Chronic Neurotoxicity

Neurotoxicity were assessed by CTCAE v3.0.

Time frame: 127 days

Population: Includes all patients that reported at least one value after baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ca/MgPercentage of Patients Discontinuing Therapy for Chronic Neurotoxicity46 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients Discontinuing Therapy for Chronic Neurotoxicity55.8 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: Comparison of Percentage of patients discontinuing therapy for chronic neurotoxicity between Armsp-value: 0.3238Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Experiencing Impact on Activities of Daily Living (ADL)

Activities of daily living were measured using the Symptom Experience Diary and supplemental quality of life questions. The questionnaires' items were in the scale of 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst symptom).

Time frame: 127 days

Population: Data was collected but not analyzed for this outcome.

Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Acute Neuropathic Adverse Event

Acute neuropathic toxicities were measured using the Symptom Experience Diary and supplemental quality of life questions in the scale of 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst symptom). The item score was reversed and transformed into 0 (low QOL) to 100 (best QOL) scale for analysis. Any score greater than 0 was considered having acute neuropathy.

Time frame: 127 days

Population: Includes all patients that reported at least one value after baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ca/MgPercentage of Patients With Acute Neuropathic Adverse Event88 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients With Acute Neuropathic Adverse Event90 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Comparison of Percentage of Patients With Acute Neuropathic Adverse Event between Armsp-value: 0.7498Chi-squared
Secondary

Time to Onset of Grade 2+ Chronic Neurotoxicity

Neurotoxicity were assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0.

Time frame: 127 days

Population: Includes all patients that reported at least one value after baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ca/MgTime to Onset of Grade 2+ Chronic NeurotoxicityNA Days
PlaceboTime to Onset of Grade 2+ Chronic Neurotoxicity18.1 Days
Comparison: Comparison of time to Onset of Grade 2+ Chronic Neurotoxicity between Armsp-value: 0.0503Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Onset of Grade 3+ Chronic Neurotoxicity

Neurotoxicity was assessed by CTCAE v3.0.

Time frame: 127 days

Population: Includes all patients that reported at least one value after baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ca/MgTime to Onset of Grade 3+ Chronic NeurotoxicityNA Days
PlaceboTime to Onset of Grade 3+ Chronic NeurotoxicityNA Days
Comparison: Comparison of Time to Onset of Grade 3+ Chronic Neurotoxicity between Armsp-value: 0.4048Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026