Skip to content

Hypertonic Resuscitation Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

Phase 3 Study of Hypertonic Resuscitation Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00316004
Enrollment
1331
Registered
2006-04-19
Start date
2006-05-31
Completion date
2010-01-31
Last updated
2011-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain Injuries, Traumatic

Keywords

Traumatic, Brain injury

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if hypertonic saline with and without dextran can improve neurologic outcomes in victims of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Injury and lost blood from trauma can cause your body to go into shock (low blood pressure related to blood loss). This decreased blood flow can lead to organ damage. In order to restore the blood pressure and blood flow, the medics give fluids into the patients' veins as soon as possible. This is called resuscitation. The fluid most commonly used is isotonic or one that is the same salt concentration as the blood. The investigators are trying to determine if infusing a hypertonic fluid or one more concentrated than the blood can increase the blood pressure and restore blood flow more efficiently. The hypertonic fluids they are using are called hypertonic saline with dextran (HSD) and hypertonic saline (no dextran). Hypertonic saline is a salt solution that is slightly more concentrated than blood. Dextran is a sugar solution.

Detailed description

To determine if prehospital administration of 7.5% Hypertonic Saline in 6% Dextran-70 (HSD) OR 7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS) compared to current standard therapy with NS as an initial resuscitation fluid affects neurological outcome following severe traumatic brain injury. Trauma is the leading cause of death among North Americans between the ages of 1 and 44 years. The majority of these deaths result from hypovolemic shock or severe brain injury. Patients in hypovolemic shock develop a state of systemic tissue ischemia then a subsequent reperfusion injury at the time of fluid resuscitation. Conventional resuscitation involves the IV administration of a large volume of isotonic or slightly hypotonic (lactated ringers, LR) solutions beginning in the pre-hospital setting. Although not conclusive, prior studies have suggested that alternative resuscitation with hypertonic saline (7.5%) solutions may reduce morbidity or mortality in these patients. Furthermore, hypertonic fluids may have specific advantages in the brain-injured patient, as they may aid in the rapid restoration of cerebral perfusion and prevent extravascular fluid sequestration, thereby limiting secondary brain injury. In addition, recent studies have demonstrated that hypertonicity significantly alters the activation of inflammatory cells, an effect that may reduce subsequent organ injury from ischemia-reperfusion and decrease nosocomial infection. This study is a randomized, double-blind, three-arm placebo controlled trial designed to evaluate the clinical outcome of trauma patients with severe TBI as manifested by a pre-hospital GCS of 8 or less. Patients will be randomized to a single 250cc IV dose of 7.5% saline in 6% Dextran-70 (HSD), 7.5% saline (HS) or normal saline as the initial fluid for pre-hospital resuscitation. No additional interventions will occur once the patient is admitted to the hospital. In hospital data collection will last up to 28 days. Patients will have neurologic outcome measurements at discharge, 1 month post discharge, and 6 months post injury. Enrollment will be restricted to age ≥ 15 years or ≥ 50 kg if age is unknown.

Interventions

DRUG7.5% Hypertonic Saline in 6% Dextran-70 (HSD)

250 ml intravenous bolus administration of 7.5% saline/6% dextran 70 administered as a one-time bolus fluid for initial resuscitation to injured patients with suspected severe traumatic brain injury in the out-of-hospital setting.

250 ml intravenous bolus administration of 7.5% hypertonic saline administered as a one-time bolus fluid for initial resuscitation to injured patients with suspected severe traumatic brain injury in the out-of-hospital setting.

250 ml intravenous bolus administration of 0.9% saline administered as a one-time bolus fluid for initial resuscitation to injured patients with suspected severe traumatic brain injury in the out-of-hospital setting.

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
CollaboratorFED
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Canadian Department of National Defence
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Washington
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Blunt trauma * Pre-hospital Glasgow Coma Scale equal to or less than 8(GCS≤8)\* * Age 15 years or older or 50 kg or more * Patients who met the inclusion criteria above and did not meet the

Exclusion criteria

below but who had systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤70 or SBP\>70 and SBP≤90 and heart rate (HR)≥108 were included in the Hypertonic Resuscitation following Traumatic Injury study that focused on shock patients who may or may not have a traumatic brain injury (TBI). In other words, patients with both TBI and shock would not be included in this study of TBI patients without shock at the time of enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Completer Analysis6 months after injuryGlasgow outcome score extended (GOSE) contains eight categories: 1. Dead, 2. Vegetative State (VS), 3. Lower Severe Disability (Lower SD), 4. Upper Severe Disability (Upper SD), 5. Lower Moderate Disability (Lower MD), 6. Upper Moderate Disability (Upper MD), 7. Lower Good Recovery (Lower GR) and 8. Upper Good Recovery (Upper GR). A measured neurological outcome of GOSE≤4 is a poor outcome of severe disability, vegetative state, or death. Completer analysis includes only those patients with GOSE completed at 6 months after injury.
Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Imputed Analysis6 months after injuryGlasgow outcome score extended (GOSE) contains 8 categories: 1. Dead, 2. Vegetative State, 3. Lower Severe Disability, 4. Upper Severe Disability, 5. Lower Moderate Disability, 6. Upper Moderate Disability, 7. Lower Good Recovery and 8. Upper Good Recovery. To adjust for 15% of subjects with absent 6-month GOSE data, an analysis using 20 hot deck imputations for the 6-month GOSE was done using data from patients who were discharged alive based on 1-month post discharge GOSE data or discharge GOSE (if 1-month post discharge data were not available), length of hospital stay, and treatment group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subgroup of Participants With Head Abbreviated Injury Scores (AIS) Greater Than or Equal to 2 (Head AIS≥2) Assessed to Have Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Imputed Analysis6 months after injuryThe Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ranks injuries on a scale of 1 to 6, with 1 being minor, 2 moderate, 3 serious, 4 severe, 5 critical and 6 an unsurvivable injury. A priori secondary analyses included the subgroup of participants in each intervention group with a head AIS≥2, which is a diagnostic indicator of moderate to lethal head injury. Of this subset of participants with AIS≥2, a second subset of participants with a GOSE≤4 at the 6 month follow up was analyzed. GOSE≤4 represents Upper Severe Disability or worse outcomes. 15% of subjects required imputation analysis for 6-month GOSE.
Disability Rating Score (DRS) Categories of Disability6 months after injuryThe DRS is an additional measure of neurological outcome that categorizes the patient's level of disability on a scale of 0 to 29, with 0 indicating no disability to 29 indicating extreme vegetative state. To adjust for 15% of subjects with absent 6-month DRS data, an analysis using 20 hot deck imputations for the 6-month DRS was done using data from patients who were discharged alive based on 1-month post discharge DRS data or discharge DRS (if 1-month post discharge data were not available), length of hospital stay, and treatment group.
28 Day Survival28 days after injuryThe patient who is admitted to the hospital after injury and is alive on the 28th day after injury. For 28-day survival, patients with missing 28-day vital status who were known to be discharged alive prior to 28 days were assumed to be alive at day 28.
Survival at Hospital Discharge up to 6 Months From Date of InjuryDate of hospital discharge up to 6 months from date of injuryThe patient who is admitted to the hospital alive after injury and is alive when discharged from the hospital up to 6 months from the date of injury.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)-Free Survival to Day 28From day of injury to 28 days after injuryThe patient is alive and free of ARDS from the date of injury through to the 28th day following injury. The diagnosis of ARDS is based on standard criteria: a) hypoxia with a ratio of arterial oxygen pressure to percent oxygen delivered of less than 200; b) bilateral infiltrates on chest X-ray; and c) clinical evidence of increased left atrial pressure or pulmonary artery wedge pressure of greater than 18 mmHg.
Worst Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) Through Day 28From day of injury to 28 days after injuryMultiple Organ Dysfunction Score is described as: Six organ systems were chosen: 1) respiratory; 2) renal; 3) hepatic; 4) cardiovascular; 5) hematologic; and 6) neurologica. A score of 0-4 was allotted for each organ according to function (0 being normal function through 4 for most severe dysfunction) with a maximum score of 24. The worst score based on available data (missing values were assumed normal) was taken for calculation of the aggregate score. Deaths are assigned the worst score (24).
Days Alive Out of the Hospital Through Day 28From day of injury to 28 days after injuryThe number of days the patient is alive and no longer an inpatient in the hospital through day 28
Days Alive Out of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Through Day 28From day of injury to 28 days after injuryThe number of days the patient is alive and not being cared for in the intensive care unit
Presence of Nosocomial InfectionsFrom day of injury to 28 days after injuryIncludes one or more nosocomial infections diagnosed during the hospital stay but not present on admission to the hospital from the following list: pneumonia, bloodstream infection, urinary tract infection, and/or wound infection
Total Fluids in First 24 HoursFirst 24 hours from the time dispatch received 911 callThe average (mean) total amount of intravenous (IV) fluids given in the pre-hospital setting and the hospital setting in the first 24 hours following the time of the 911 call
Packed Red Blood Cells (PRBC) First 24 HoursFirst 24 hours from the time dispatch received 911 callThe average (mean) number of units of packed red blood cells (PRBC) transfused in the first 24 hours following the time of the 911 call in each group.
Discharge DispositionDuration of hospital stayDisposition of patient at the time of discharge from the acute care hospital
Ventilator-free Days Through Day 28From day of injury to 28 days after injuryThe number of days beginning with the day of 911 call counted as Day 0 through day 28 that the patient did not require mechanical ventilation. Deaths are assigned the worst score (0).
Subgroup of Participants With Head Abbreviated Injury Scores (AIS) Greater Than or Equal to 4 (Head AIS≥4) Assessed to Have Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Imputed Analysis6 months after injuryThe Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ranks injuries on a scale of 1 to 6, with 1 being minor, 2 moderate, 3 serious, 4 severe, 5 critical and 6 an unsurvivable injury. A priori secondary analyses included the subgroup of participants in each intervention group with a head AIS≥4, which is a diagnostic indicator of severe to lethal head injury. Of this subset of participants with AIS≥4, a second subset of participants with a GOSE≤4 at the 6 month follow up was analyzed. GOSE≤4 represents Upper Severe Disability or worse outcomes. 15% of subjects required imputation analysis for 6-month GOSE.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were enrolled by Emergency Medicine Services (EMS) personnel in the prehospital setting based on pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. The first subject was enrolled in May 2006. The last subject was enrolled in May 2009.

Pre-assignment details

1331 subjects were randomized. 1282 were included in primary imputation analysis. 49 were randomized with study fluid package opened but no study fluid was given. Reasons given were: Did not meet inclusion criteria; Met an exclusion criterion; No intravenous access; Fluid bag sterility broken; EMS responder unsure of inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)
250 ml intravenous bolus administration of 7.5% saline/6% dextran 70 as the initial resuscitation fluid given to injured patients with suspected severe traumatic brain injury in the out-of-hospital setting.
373
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)
250 ml intravenous bolus administration of 7.5% hypertonic saline as the initial resuscitation fluid given to injured patients with suspected severe traumatic brain injury in the out-of-hospital setting.
355
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)
250 ml intravenous bolus administration of 0.9% saline as the initial resuscitation fluid given to injured patients with suspected severe traumatic brain injury in the out-of-hospital setting.
603
Total1,331

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudySubject was not given study fluid.141421

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Total
Age Categorical
<=18 years
33 participants19 participants43 participants95 participants
Age Categorical
>=65 years
41 participants29 participants74 participants144 participants
Age Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
296 participants305 participants484 participants1085 participants
Age Continuous38.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.6
38.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.3
39.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.2
39.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.4
Gender
Female
86 participants68 participants163 participants317 participants
Gender
Male
284 participants286 participants438 participants1008 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
82 participants96 participants162 participants340 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
291 participants259 participants441 participants991 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3590 / 3410 / 582
serious
Total, serious adverse events
69 / 35972 / 341141 / 582

Outcome results

Primary

Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Completer Analysis

Glasgow outcome score extended (GOSE) contains eight categories: 1. Dead, 2. Vegetative State (VS), 3. Lower Severe Disability (Lower SD), 4. Upper Severe Disability (Upper SD), 5. Lower Moderate Disability (Lower MD), 6. Upper Moderate Disability (Upper MD), 7. Lower Good Recovery (Lower GR) and 8. Upper Good Recovery (Upper GR). A measured neurological outcome of GOSE≤4 is a poor outcome of severe disability, vegetative state, or death. Completer analysis includes only those patients with GOSE completed at 6 months after injury.

Time frame: 6 months after injury

Population: The primary analysis was designed as modified intent-to-treat, with all patients who had fluid connected to intravenous (IV) tubing included regardless of how much fluid was administered. Per the a priori trial design, patients for whom the fluid bag was opened but not connected to the IV were not considered enrolled in the trial.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Completer Analysis181 Participants
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Completer Analysis171 Participants
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Completer Analysis276 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the percent prevalence of poor outcome between the three groups.p-value: 0.55test for differences in proportions
Primary

Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Imputed Analysis

Glasgow outcome score extended (GOSE) contains 8 categories: 1. Dead, 2. Vegetative State, 3. Lower Severe Disability, 4. Upper Severe Disability, 5. Lower Moderate Disability, 6. Upper Moderate Disability, 7. Lower Good Recovery and 8. Upper Good Recovery. To adjust for 15% of subjects with absent 6-month GOSE data, an analysis using 20 hot deck imputations for the 6-month GOSE was done using data from patients who were discharged alive based on 1-month post discharge GOSE data or discharge GOSE (if 1-month post discharge data were not available), length of hospital stay, and treatment group.

Time frame: 6 months after injury

Population: To adjust for 15% of subjects with absent 6-month GOSE data, an analysis using 20 hot deck imputations for the 6-month GOSE was done using data from patients who were discharged alive based on 1-month post discharge GOSE data or discharge GOSE (if 1-month post discharge data were not available), length of hospital stay, and treatment group.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Imputed Analysis192.9 Participants (with imputed values)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Imputed Analysis185.4 Participants (with imputed values)
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Imputed Analysis299.8 Participants (with imputed values)
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the percent prevalence of poor outcome between the three groups.p-value: 0.67test for differences in proportions
Secondary

28 Day Survival

The patient who is admitted to the hospital after injury and is alive on the 28th day after injury. For 28-day survival, patients with missing 28-day vital status who were known to be discharged alive prior to 28 days were assumed to be alive at day 28.

Time frame: 28 days after injury

Population: An analysis of this secondary outcome was done for all participants assigned to each of the three groups who did not refuse or were lost to follow-up prior to discharge.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)28 Day Survival268 Participants
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)28 Day Survival260 Participants
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)28 Day Survival432 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the percent of patients who were alive on the 28th day after injury between the three groups.p-value: 0.88test for differences in proportions
Secondary

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)-Free Survival to Day 28

The patient is alive and free of ARDS from the date of injury through to the 28th day following injury. The diagnosis of ARDS is based on standard criteria: a) hypoxia with a ratio of arterial oxygen pressure to percent oxygen delivered of less than 200; b) bilateral infiltrates on chest X-ray; and c) clinical evidence of increased left atrial pressure or pulmonary artery wedge pressure of greater than 18 mmHg.

Time frame: From day of injury to 28 days after injury

Population: Number of participants analyzed in each group is the actual number analyzed, which does not include participants with one of the following: 1. prehospital death; 2. transfer to another hospital without IRB approval; or 3. patient, family member, or legally authorized representative refused consent and was withdrawn from the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)-Free Survival to Day 28247 Participants
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)-Free Survival to Day 28239 Participants
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)-Free Survival to Day 28401 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the percent of patients who were alive and free of ARDS from the day of injury to the 28th day after injury between the three groups.p-value: 0.91test for differences in proportions
Secondary

Days Alive Out of the Hospital Through Day 28

The number of days the patient is alive and no longer an inpatient in the hospital through day 28

Time frame: From day of injury to 28 days after injury

Population: Number of participants analyzed in each group is the actual number analyzed, which does not include participants with one of the following: 1. prehospital death; 2. transfer to another hospital without IRB approval; or 3. patient, family member, or legally authorized representative refused consent and was withdrawn from the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Days Alive Out of the Hospital Through Day 289.8 DaysStandard Deviation 10.9
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Days Alive Out of the Hospital Through Day 2810 DaysStandard Deviation 11
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Days Alive Out of the Hospital Through Day 2810.7 DaysStandard Deviation 11.2
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the average number of days alive out of the hospital through day 28 between the three groups.p-value: 0.43ANOVA
Secondary

Days Alive Out of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Through Day 28

The number of days the patient is alive and not being cared for in the intensive care unit

Time frame: From day of injury to 28 days after injury

Population: Number of participants analyzed in each group is the actual number analyzed, which does not include participants with one of the following: 1. prehospital death; 2. transfer to another hospital without IRB approval; or 3. patient, family member, or legally authorized representative refused consent and was withdrawn from the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Days Alive Out of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Through Day 2815.2 DaysStandard Deviation 11.5
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Days Alive Out of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Through Day 2815.8 DaysStandard Deviation 11.4
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Days Alive Out of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Through Day 2815.6 DaysStandard Deviation 11.7
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the average number of days alive out of the ICU through day 28 between the three groups.p-value: 0.76ANOVA
Secondary

Disability Rating Score (DRS) Categories of Disability

The DRS is an additional measure of neurological outcome that categorizes the patient's level of disability on a scale of 0 to 29, with 0 indicating no disability to 29 indicating extreme vegetative state. To adjust for 15% of subjects with absent 6-month DRS data, an analysis using 20 hot deck imputations for the 6-month DRS was done using data from patients who were discharged alive based on 1-month post discharge DRS data or discharge DRS (if 1-month post discharge data were not available), length of hospital stay, and treatment group.

Time frame: 6 months after injury

Population: To adjust for 15% of subjects with absent 6-month DRS data, an analysis using 20 hot deck imputations for the 6-month DRS was done using data from patients who were discharged alive based on 1-month post discharge DRS data or discharge DRS (if 1-month post discharge data were not available), length of hospital stay, and treatment group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Disability Rating Score (DRS) Categories of Disability0-1 (none/mild disability)124.8 Participants (with imputed values)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Disability Rating Score (DRS) Categories of Disability2-6 (Partial/Moderate Disability)98.3 Participants (with imputed values)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Disability Rating Score (DRS) Categories of Disability7-21 (moderately severe/severe/extremely severe)33.0 Participants (with imputed values)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Disability Rating Score (DRS) Categories of Disability22-30 (vegetative/extreme vegetative/dead)102.9 Participants (with imputed values)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Disability Rating Score (DRS) Categories of Disability22-30 (vegetative/extreme vegetative/dead)97.0 Participants (with imputed values)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Disability Rating Score (DRS) Categories of Disability0-1 (none/mild disability)128.0 Participants (with imputed values)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Disability Rating Score (DRS) Categories of Disability7-21 (moderately severe/severe/extremely severe)26.6 Participants (with imputed values)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Disability Rating Score (DRS) Categories of Disability2-6 (Partial/Moderate Disability)89.4 Participants (with imputed values)
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Disability Rating Score (DRS) Categories of Disability22-30 (vegetative/extreme vegetative/dead)163.4 Participants (with imputed values)
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Disability Rating Score (DRS) Categories of Disability2-6 (Partial/Moderate Disability)143.2 Participants (with imputed values)
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Disability Rating Score (DRS) Categories of Disability7-21 (moderately severe/severe/extremely severe)43.3 Participants (with imputed values)
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Disability Rating Score (DRS) Categories of Disability0-1 (none/mild disability)232.0 Participants (with imputed values)
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the percent of patients at any level of disability between the three groups.p-value: 0.84test for proportions
Secondary

Discharge Disposition

Disposition of patient at the time of discharge from the acute care hospital

Time frame: Duration of hospital stay

Population: Number of participants analyzed in each group is the actual number analyzed, which does not include participants with one of the following: 1. prehospital death; 2. transfer to another hospital without IRB approval; or 3. patient, family member, or legally authorized representative refused consent and was withdrawn from the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Discharge DispositionHome138 Participants
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Discharge DispositionInpatient Rehabilitation84 Participants
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Discharge DispositionDeath89 Participants
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Discharge DispositionNursing Home or Inpatient Psychiatric Facility4 Participants
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Discharge DispositionSkilled Nursing Facility37 Participants
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Discharge DispositionHome134 Participants
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Discharge DispositionDeath81 Participants
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Discharge DispositionInpatient Rehabilitation90 Participants
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Discharge DispositionSkilled Nursing Facility28 Participants
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Discharge DispositionNursing Home or Inpatient Psychiatric Facility3 Participants
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Discharge DispositionNursing Home or Inpatient Psychiatric Facility12 Participants
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Discharge DispositionSkilled Nursing Facility40 Participants
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Discharge DispositionHome253 Participants
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Discharge DispositionInpatient Rehabilitation122 Participants
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Discharge DispositionDeath147 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the percent of patients who died during hospitalization between the three groups.p-value: 0.88test for proportions
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the percent of patients who were discharged alive from the hospital to home between the three groups.p-value: 0.26test for differences in proportions
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the percent of patients who were discharged alive from the hospital to inpatient rehabilitation facilities between the three groups.p-value: 0.16test for differences in proportions
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the percent of patients who were discharged alive from the hospital to skilled nursing facilities between the three groups.p-value: 0.17test for differences in proportions
Secondary

Packed Red Blood Cells (PRBC) First 24 Hours

The average (mean) number of units of packed red blood cells (PRBC) transfused in the first 24 hours following the time of the 911 call in each group.

Time frame: First 24 hours from the time dispatch received 911 call

Population: An analysis of this secondary outcome was done for all participants assigned to each of the three groups who had relevant data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Packed Red Blood Cells (PRBC) First 24 Hours1.4 Unit of PRBCStandard Deviation 3.6
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Packed Red Blood Cells (PRBC) First 24 Hours1.2 Unit of PRBCStandard Deviation 3.4
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Packed Red Blood Cells (PRBC) First 24 Hours1.5 Unit of PRBCStandard Deviation 4.3
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the average number of PRBC units given within the first 24 hours between the three groups.p-value: 0.43ANOVA
Secondary

Presence of Nosocomial Infections

Includes one or more nosocomial infections diagnosed during the hospital stay but not present on admission to the hospital from the following list: pneumonia, bloodstream infection, urinary tract infection, and/or wound infection

Time frame: From day of injury to 28 days after injury

Population: An analysis of this secondary outcome was done for all participants assigned to each of the three groups who had relevant data. Percentages were based on population at risk.~Row 1 nosocomial infections; Row 2 pneumonia; Row 3 bloodstream infections; Row 4 urinary tract infections; and Row 5 wound infections

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Presence of Nosocomial InfectionsUrinary Tract Infection30 Diagnoses
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Presence of Nosocomial InfectionsBloodstream Infection23 Diagnoses
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Presence of Nosocomial InfectionsNosocomial Infections ≥ 1102 Diagnoses
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Presence of Nosocomial InfectionsPneumonia72 Diagnoses
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Presence of Nosocomial InfectionsWound Infection8 Diagnoses
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Presence of Nosocomial InfectionsBloodstream Infection21 Diagnoses
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Presence of Nosocomial InfectionsNosocomial Infections ≥ 1101 Diagnoses
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Presence of Nosocomial InfectionsPneumonia71 Diagnoses
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Presence of Nosocomial InfectionsUrinary Tract Infection32 Diagnoses
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Presence of Nosocomial InfectionsWound Infection8 Diagnoses
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Presence of Nosocomial InfectionsWound Infection16 Diagnoses
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Presence of Nosocomial InfectionsUrinary Tract Infection32 Diagnoses
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Presence of Nosocomial InfectionsNosocomial Infections ≥ 1136 Diagnoses
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Presence of Nosocomial InfectionsBloodstream Infection19 Diagnoses
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Presence of Nosocomial InfectionsPneumonia100 Diagnoses
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the percent of patients with any nosocomial infections through hospital stay between the three groups.p-value: 0.06test for differences in proportions
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the percent of patients with pneumonia through hospital stay between the three groups.p-value: 0.3test for differences in proportions
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the percent of patients with bloodstream infections through hospital stay between the three groups.p-value: 0.04test for differences in proportions
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the percent of patients with urinary tract infections through hospital stay between the three groups.p-value: 0.06test for differences in proportions
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the percent of patients with wound infections through hospital stay between the three groups.p-value: 0.88test for differences in proportions
Secondary

Subgroup of Participants With Head Abbreviated Injury Scores (AIS) Greater Than or Equal to 2 (Head AIS≥2) Assessed to Have Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Imputed Analysis

The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ranks injuries on a scale of 1 to 6, with 1 being minor, 2 moderate, 3 serious, 4 severe, 5 critical and 6 an unsurvivable injury. A priori secondary analyses included the subgroup of participants in each intervention group with a head AIS≥2, which is a diagnostic indicator of moderate to lethal head injury. Of this subset of participants with AIS≥2, a second subset of participants with a GOSE≤4 at the 6 month follow up was analyzed. GOSE≤4 represents Upper Severe Disability or worse outcomes. 15% of subjects required imputation analysis for 6-month GOSE.

Time frame: 6 months after injury

Population: To adjust for 15% of subjects with absent 6-month GOSE data, an analysis using 20 hot deck imputations for the 6-month GOSE was done using data from patients who were discharged alive based on 1-month post discharge GOSE data or discharge GOSE (if 1-month post discharge data were not available), length of hospital stay, and treatment group.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Subgroup of Participants With Head Abbreviated Injury Scores (AIS) Greater Than or Equal to 2 (Head AIS≥2) Assessed to Have Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Imputed Analysis166.7 Participants (with imputed values)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Subgroup of Participants With Head Abbreviated Injury Scores (AIS) Greater Than or Equal to 2 (Head AIS≥2) Assessed to Have Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Imputed Analysis150.6 Participants (with imputed values)
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Subgroup of Participants With Head Abbreviated Injury Scores (AIS) Greater Than or Equal to 2 (Head AIS≥2) Assessed to Have Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Imputed Analysis253.2 Participants (with imputed values)
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the percent prevalence of poor outcome between the three treatment groups among patients with head AIS≥2.p-value: 0.57test for differences in proportions
Secondary

Subgroup of Participants With Head Abbreviated Injury Scores (AIS) Greater Than or Equal to 4 (Head AIS≥4) Assessed to Have Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Imputed Analysis

The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ranks injuries on a scale of 1 to 6, with 1 being minor, 2 moderate, 3 serious, 4 severe, 5 critical and 6 an unsurvivable injury. A priori secondary analyses included the subgroup of participants in each intervention group with a head AIS≥4, which is a diagnostic indicator of severe to lethal head injury. Of this subset of participants with AIS≥4, a second subset of participants with a GOSE≤4 at the 6 month follow up was analyzed. GOSE≤4 represents Upper Severe Disability or worse outcomes. 15% of subjects required imputation analysis for 6-month GOSE.

Time frame: 6 months after injury

Population: To adjust for 15% of subjects with absent 6-month GOSE data, an analysis using 20 hot deck imputations for the 6-month GOSE was done using data from patients who were discharged alive based on 1-month post discharge GOSE data or discharge GOSE (if 1-month post discharge data were not available), length of hospital stay, and treatment group.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Subgroup of Participants With Head Abbreviated Injury Scores (AIS) Greater Than or Equal to 4 (Head AIS≥4) Assessed to Have Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Imputed Analysis146.1 Participants (with imputed values)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Subgroup of Participants With Head Abbreviated Injury Scores (AIS) Greater Than or Equal to 4 (Head AIS≥4) Assessed to Have Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Imputed Analysis128.0 Participants (with imputed values)
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Subgroup of Participants With Head Abbreviated Injury Scores (AIS) Greater Than or Equal to 4 (Head AIS≥4) Assessed to Have Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)≤4 at 6 Months: Imputed Analysis219.0 Participants (with imputed values)
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the percent prevalence of poor outcome between the three treatment groups among patients with head AIS≥4.p-value: 0.59test for differences in proportions
Secondary

Survival at Hospital Discharge up to 6 Months From Date of Injury

The patient who is admitted to the hospital alive after injury and is alive when discharged from the hospital up to 6 months from the date of injury.

Time frame: Date of hospital discharge up to 6 months from date of injury

Population: An analysis of this secondary outcome was done for all participants assigned to each of the three groups who had relevant data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Survival at Hospital Discharge up to 6 Months From Date of Injury263 Participants
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Survival at Hospital Discharge up to 6 Months From Date of Injury255 Participants
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Survival at Hospital Discharge up to 6 Months From Date of Injury427 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the percent of patients who were alive on the day discharged from the hospital after injury between the three groups.p-value: 0.88test for differences in proportions
Secondary

Total Fluids in First 24 Hours

The average (mean) total amount of intravenous (IV) fluids given in the pre-hospital setting and the hospital setting in the first 24 hours following the time of the 911 call

Time frame: First 24 hours from the time dispatch received 911 call

Population: An analysis of this secondary outcome was done for all participants assigned to each of the three groups who had relevant data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Total Fluids in First 24 Hours6.7 LitersStandard Deviation 5.5
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Total Fluids in First 24 Hours6.7 LitersStandard Deviation 5.5
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Total Fluids in First 24 Hours6.9 LitersStandard Deviation 5.7
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the average amount of total fluids given within the first 24 hours between the three groups.p-value: 0.68ANOVA
Secondary

Ventilator-free Days Through Day 28

The number of days beginning with the day of 911 call counted as Day 0 through day 28 that the patient did not require mechanical ventilation. Deaths are assigned the worst score (0).

Time frame: From day of injury to 28 days after injury

Population: Number of participants analyzed in each group is the actual number analyzed, which does not include participants with one of the following: 1. prehospital death; 2. transfer to another hospital without IRB approval; or 3. patient, family member, or legally authorized representative refused consent and was withdrawn from the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Ventilator-free Days Through Day 2817.0 DaysStandard Deviation 11.6
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Ventilator-free Days Through Day 2817.6 DaysStandard Deviation 11.5
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Ventilator-free Days Through Day 2817.4 DaysStandard Deviation 11.7
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in the average number of Ventilator-free days through day 28 between the three groups.p-value: 0.77ANOVA
Secondary

Worst Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) Through Day 28

Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score is described as: Six organ systems were chosen: 1) respiratory; 2) renal; 3) hepatic; 4) cardiovascular; 5) hematologic; and 6) neurologica. A score of 0-4 was allotted for each organ according to function (0 being normal function through 4 for most severe dysfunction) with a maximum score of 24. The worst score based on available data (missing values were assumed normal) was taken for calculation of the aggregate score. Deaths are assigned the worst score (24).

Time frame: From day of injury to 28 days after injury

Population: Number of participants analyzed in each group is the actual number analyzed, which does not include participants with one of the following: 1. prehospital death; 2. transfer to another hospital without IRB approval; or 3. patient, family member, or legally authorized representative refused consent and was withdrawn from the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
7.5% Hypertonic Saline/6% Dextran (HSD)Worst Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) Through Day 289 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
7.5% Hypertonic Saline (HS)Worst Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) Through Day 288.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
0.9% Normal Saline (NS)Worst Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) Through Day 288.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in average Worst Multiple Organ Dysfunction Scores (MODS) through day 28 between the three groups.p-value: 0.81ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 30, 2026