Skip to content

Islet Cell Transplantation Alone and CD34+ Donor Bone Marrow Cell Infusion in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Islet Cell Transplantation Alone and CD34+ Enriched Donor Bone Marrow Cell Infusion in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus; Steroid Free Regimen

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00315614
Enrollment
3
Registered
2006-04-18
Start date
2000-12-31
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2017-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Islet Transplantation

Brief summary

SPECIFIC AIMS: * To reverse hyperglycemia and insulin dependency in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus by islet cell transplantation. * To induce a state of donor specific tolerance and eliminate the need for continuous immunosuppressive therapy by simultaneous transplantation of donor bone marrow cells with islets and utilization of the monoclonal antibody Campath-1H for induction of Immunosuppression. * To assess long-term function of successful islet cell transplants in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. * To determine whether the natural history of the microvascular, macrovascular and neuropathic complications are altered following successful transplantation of islet

Detailed description

In our current protocol (IRB #2000/0024) the immunosuppressive regimen, comprised of induction with daclizumab and maintenance therapy with sirolimus and tacrolimus, has been combined with the infusion of CD34+ enriched donor bone marrow stem cells in an attempt to create a chimeric state and hence induce donor tolerance. This strategy was tested by evaluating graft survival following the removal of all immunosuppressive medication after one year.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALIslet Transplantation and Bone Marrow

Islet transplantation and CD34 Bone Marrow infusion in subjects with type 1 diabetes.

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
Diabetes Research Institute Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Miami
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients between 18 and 65 years of age 2. Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus for more than 5 years duration 3. One or more of the following: * Hypoglycemia unawareness - judged by history of blood sugars \<54 on glucometer without symptoms and/or hypoglycemic episodes requiring assistance from either family, glucagon administration or emergency services * Poor diabetes control (HbA1c\>8% or \>2 visits/yr to hospital for treatment of ketoacidosis) despite intensive insulin therapy * Progressive complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus 4. Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤26

Exclusion criteria

1. Untreated proliferative diabetic retinopathy; 2. HbA1C \> 12%; 3. Insulin requirement \> 1.0u/kg/d 4. Stimulated or basal C-peptide \> 0.3 ng/ml 5. Creatinine clearance \< 60 and/or serum creatinine consistently \> 1.5mg/dl; 6. Macroalbuminuria \> 300mg albumin in 24 hours 7. Presence of panel reactive antibodies \> 20%; 8. Previous/concurrent organ transplantation (except failed islet cell transplantation); 9. Any medical condition requiring chronic use of steroids; 10. Malignancy or previous malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer); 11. X-ray evidence of pulmonary infection; 12. Active infections; 13. Positive tuberculin test (unless proof of adequate treatment for latent tuberculosis can be provided) 14. Active peptic ulcer disease, 15. Gall stones and/or portal hypertension and/or hemangioma on liver ultrasound; 16. Serological evidence of HIV, HBV (HBsAg+ and/or HBcAb+ and/or HBsAb+ without evidence of vaccination), HTLV-1 or HCV; 17. Negative serology for Epstein Barr virus (EBV) or evidence of acute infection (IgM\>IgG); 18. Abnormal liver function test; 19. Anemia (hemoglobin \<12.0 g/dl); 20. Hyperlipidemia (fasting total cholesterol \>240mg/dl and/or fasting triglycerides \>200mg/dl and/or fasting LDL cholesterol\>140mg/dl); 21. Body Mass Index above 26 and/or weight \>80kg; 22. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) \> 4 ng/ml; 23. Unstable cardiovascular status (including positive stress echocardiography if \>age 35); 24. Active alcohol or substance abuse; 25. Sexually active females who are not: a) post-menopausal, b) surgically sterile, or c) not using an acceptable method of contraception (oral contraceptives, Norplant, Depo-Provera, and barrier devices are acceptable; condoms used alone are not acceptable); 26. Positive pregnancy test or intent for future pregnancy, or male subject's intent to procreate. 27. Any condition or any circumstances that makes it unsafe to undergo an islet cell transplant. 28. History of previous transplant or previous bone marrow infusion. 29. Persistent leucopenia (white blood cell count \<3,000/mm3

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Achievement of Persistent Islet Function Following Cessation of Immunosuppression.for the duration of islet graft functionImmunosuppression was never discontinued. Patients elected to move to other trials to receive additional islet infusions. Since immunosuppression was never discontinued we were not able to evaluate the primary endpoint.
A Reduction or Absence of Rejection Episodesfor the duration of islet graft functionNumber of rejection episodes after transplantation. Immunosuppression was never discontinued. Patients elected to move to other trials to receive additional islet infusions. Since immunosuppression was never discontinued we were not able to evaluate the primary endpoint.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects With Basal C-peptide Greater Than 0.5 ng/mlfor the duration of islet graft functionNumber of subjects with basal C-peptide greater than 0.5 ng/ml prior to weaning of immunosuppression;
Number of Subjects With Reduction of Severe Hypoglycemia and Improvement in Hypoglycemia Awarenessfor the duration of islet graft functionNumber of subjects with reduction of episodes of severe hypoglycemia and the presence of awareness of hypoglycemia

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Islet Transplantation and CD34 Bone Marrow
Islet Transplantation: Islet transplantation
3
Total3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIslet Transplantation and CD34 Bone Marrow
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

A Reduction or Absence of Rejection Episodes

Number of rejection episodes after transplantation. Immunosuppression was never discontinued. Patients elected to move to other trials to receive additional islet infusions. Since immunosuppression was never discontinued we were not able to evaluate the primary endpoint.

Time frame: for the duration of islet graft function

Population: IImmunosuppression was never discontinued. Patients elected to move to other trials to receive additional islet infusions. Since immunosuppression was never discontinued we were not able to evaluate the primary endpoint. No data available to analyze.

Primary

The Achievement of Persistent Islet Function Following Cessation of Immunosuppression.

Immunosuppression was never discontinued. Patients elected to move to other trials to receive additional islet infusions. Since immunosuppression was never discontinued we were not able to evaluate the primary endpoint.

Time frame: for the duration of islet graft function

Population: IImmunosuppression was never discontinued. Patients elected to move to other trials to receive additional islet infusions. Since immunosuppression was never discontinued we were not able to evaluate the primary endpoint. No data available to analyze.

ArmMeasureValue
Islet Transplantation and CD34 Bone MarrowThe Achievement of Persistent Islet Function Following Cessation of Immunosuppression.0
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Basal C-peptide Greater Than 0.5 ng/ml

Number of subjects with basal C-peptide greater than 0.5 ng/ml prior to weaning of immunosuppression;

Time frame: for the duration of islet graft function

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Islet Transplantation and CD34 Bone MarrowNumber of Subjects With Basal C-peptide Greater Than 0.5 ng/ml3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Reduction of Severe Hypoglycemia and Improvement in Hypoglycemia Awareness

Number of subjects with reduction of episodes of severe hypoglycemia and the presence of awareness of hypoglycemia

Time frame: for the duration of islet graft function

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Islet Transplantation and CD34 Bone MarrowNumber of Subjects With Reduction of Severe Hypoglycemia and Improvement in Hypoglycemia Awareness3 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026