Skip to content

Sequential vs Upfront Intensified Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Large Resectable or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.

Sequential vs Upfront Intensified Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Large Resectable and/or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. The INTENS Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00314977
Acronym
INTENS
Enrollment
200
Registered
2006-04-17
Start date
2006-02-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2010-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Large resectable breast cancer, Locally advanced breast cancer, Neoadjuvant therapy

Brief summary

2 different treatment schedules may be used for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using adriamycin, cyclophosphamide and taxotere. The most optimal sequence- concurrent or sequential- is however unclear. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with AC followed by T(adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, taxotere) versus TAC ( with upfront T) in patient with large resectable or locally advanced breast cancer.

Interventions

DRUGDoxorubicin

doxorubicin (arm A:60 mg/m2) and arm B: 50 mg/m2)

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Cyclophosphamide: (arm A; 6000 mg/m2) an (arm B: 500 mg/m2)

DRUGDocetaxel

Docetaxel: (arm A: 100 mg/m2) and (arm B: 75 mg/m2)

Sponsors

Sanofi
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Amgen
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Radboud University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women presenting with large resectable or locally advanced breast cancer (T2 ≥3 cm, T3, or T4, and/or LN positive) * Measurable disease (breast and/or lymph nodes) * No prior surgery other than biopsy and no prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy * Age ≥18 years and age ≤70 years * Karnofsky Performance score ≥70% * Estrogen and/or progesterone receptor analysis performed on the primary tumour in the biopsy material * In case the tumor is ER/PgR ³ 50% positive, (neo)adjuvant hormonal therapy in stead of chemotherapy should be considered (e.g. in TEAM II study) * Her2/neu receptor analysis performed on the primary tumour in the biopsy material * Adequate bone marrow function (within 14 days prior to registration): WBC ≥3.0 x 109/l, neutrophils ≥1.5 x 109/l, platelets ≥100 x 109/l * Adequate liver function (within 4 weeks prior to start treatment): bilirubin ≤1.5 x upper limit of normal (UNL) range, ALAT and/or ASAT ≤2.5 x UNL, Alkaline Phosphatase ≤5 x UNL * Adequate renal function (within 4 weeks prior to start treatment): the calculated creatinine clearance should be ≥50 mL/min * Patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up * Written informed consent according to the local Ethics Committee requirements

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with advanced pulmonary disease of any cause (oxygen dependent)- Peripheral neuropathy \> grade 2 whatever the cause * Serious other diseases as recent myocardial infarction, clinical signs of cardiac failure or clinically significant arrythmias * Evidence of distant metastases (M1) * Patients with a history of breast cancer * Patients with a history of another malignancy (except basal cell skin carcinoma and carcinoma-in-situ of the uterine cervix) within 5 years of study entry- Pregnant or lactating women, or potentially fertile women not using adequate contraception

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The pathologic complete response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The tolerability (grade 3/4 CTC toxicities) of both chemotherapy regimens.
The clinical responses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy correlated to pathological responses after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
The value of breast MRI in evaluating response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as compared to clinical palpation, ultrasound techniques and histo-pathological outcome.
The false-negative rate of the sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
The delivered chemotherapy dose and dose-intensity of both chemotherapy regimens
The relation between pCR and DFS/OS.
The feasibility of the criteria for reporting pathological tumour response in surgical breast and axillary node resection specimens.
The prognostic and predictive value of tumour- and molecular markers, including ER, PgR, c-erbB2, microarray and other tumour characteristic analyses.
The disease-free and overall survival after 3 and 5 years follow-up.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026