Fibromyalgia
Conditions
Keywords
Fibromyalgia
Brief summary
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of milnacipran at a dosage of 100 mg/day in the treatment of the fibromyalgia syndrome or the pain associate with fibromyalgia.
Interventions
Milnacipran 100mg per day (50mg BID \[twice a day\])
Placebo, oral administration, twice daily for 12 weeks
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* diagnosis of fibromyalgia defined by 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria
Exclusion criteria
* psychiatric illness, * depression, * suicidal risk, * substance abuse, * pulmonary dysfunction, * renal impairment, * active cardiac disease, * liver disease, * autoimmune disease, * cancer, * inflammatory bowel disease
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Composite Syndrome Responder Status | At the end of the three-month stable dose treatment phase | Composite Syndrome Responder Status is the number of responders based on 3 domains: (1) 30% reduction in pain (as recorded in the Patient Experience Diary \[PED\], electronic diary, during the morning report; 24 hour recall); (2) patient global impression of change (PGIC) score of very much improved and much improved; and (3) physical function improvement of 6 or more points on Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS) |
| Composite Pain Responder Status | At the end of three-month stable dose treatment phase | Composite Pain Responder Status is the number of responders based on two domains: (1) 30% reduction in pain (as recorded in the Patient Experience Diary \[PED\], electronic diary, during the morning report; 24 hour recall); and (2) Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score of very much improved or much improved. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time-Weighted Average of Patient Experience Diary (PED) Reported Morning 24-Hour Recall Pain Scores for Weeks 1-12 of the Stable Dose Phase | Weeks 1 through 12 of the stable dose treatment phase (Visit TX0-TX12) | Time-weighted average (area under the curve \[AUC\]) of the weekly average Patient Experience Diary (PED)-reported morning recall pain scores for weeks 1 through 12 of the stable dose treatment phase is the area under the Patient Experience Diary (PED)-time curve estimated using the trapezoidal method and normalized by time. PED is the Patient Experience Diary, an electronic diary system used for collection of patient self-reported pain data. Outcome measure is assessed using the VAS Pain Intensity Scale from 0-100 millimeters anchored at 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain). |
| Time-Weighted Average of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Visit TX0-TX12. | Weeks 1-12 (Visit TX0-TX12) of the stable dose treatment phase | Time-weighted average (area under the curve \[AUC\]) for Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) from Visit TX0-TX12 is the area under the PGIC-time curve estimated using the trapezoidal method and normalized by time. PGIC is an efficacy assessment on a scale of 1-7 taken at visits TX0-TX12. The wording of the assessment is as follows: Since the start of the study, overall my fibromyalgia is: 1=Very Much Improved, 2=Much Improved, 3=Minimally Improved, 4=No Change, 5=Minimally Worse, 6=Much Worse, and 7-Very Much Worse. |
| Change From Baseline in the Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Total Score at Visit TX12. | Baseline through end of week 12 (Visit TX12) | Change from Baseline in the Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) total score at TX12. Negative differences indicate decrease of fatigue. MFI is a subjective report of fatigue symptoms consisting of 20 items that can be scored to produce 5 dimensions: general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced motivation, and reduced activity. The MFI is a 1-5 scale with 1=yes, that is true and 5=no, that is not true. |
| Time-Weighted Average of the Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS) Score From Visit TX0-TX12 | Weeks 1-12 (Visit TX0-TX12) of the stable dose treatment phase | Short Form-36 (SF-36): pt. questionnaire (36 questions) which give rise to 8 domains & 2 component summaries (mental and physical); assessing quality of life, health & functional status. SF-36 PCS: weighted summary of physical function using all 8 domains. Scores are standardized so that the range for all domains and component summaries is 0 (worst possible score) to 100 (best possible score). Higher scores indicate better health or functional status. SF-36 PCS AUC (Area under the Curve): estimated using trapezoidal method, normalized by time. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Recruitment period was from 4/28/06 through 12/27/07 with last patient last visit on 6/30/08 at 65 centers in the US and 3 centers in Canada
Pre-assignment details
Upon completion of the washout period, a two-week baseline period was completed prior to randomization. Patients were then randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either placebo or milnacipran 100 mg/day (50 mg BID \[twice a day\])
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Placebo administered orally BID (twice a day) for 12 weeks of stable dose treatment phase | 509 |
| Milnacipran Milnacipran 100 mg per day, administered orally (BID \[twice a day\]) for 12 weeks of stable dose treatment phase | 516 |
| Total | 1,025 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 73 | 94 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 33 | 24 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 15 | 9 |
| Overall Study | Non-Compliant | 5 | 6 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 21 | 28 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawn for other reasons | 4 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | Milnacipran | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | 48.73 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.56 | 49.07 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.79 | 48.90 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.67 |
| Age, Customized <=20 years | 2 participants | 2 participants | 4 participants |
| Age, Customized >=60 years | 70 participants | 85 participants | 155 participants |
| Age, Customized Between 20 and 60 years | 437 participants | 429 participants | 866 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada | 46 participants | 47 participants | 93 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 463 participants | 469 participants | 932 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 477 Participants | 500 Participants | 977 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 32 Participants | 16 Participants | 48 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 382 / 509 | 434 / 516 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 7 / 509 | 10 / 516 |
Outcome results
Composite Pain Responder Status
Composite Pain Responder Status is the number of responders based on two domains: (1) 30% reduction in pain (as recorded in the Patient Experience Diary \[PED\], electronic diary, during the morning report; 24 hour recall); and (2) Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score of very much improved or much improved.
Time frame: At the end of three-month stable dose treatment phase
Population: The primary efficacy analysis was performed based on intent-to-treat population defined as all randomized patients who took at least one dose of double-blind study medication. All subjects with missing assessments at the end of three-month stable dose treatment phase were considered non-responders (baseline value carried forward (BOCF)).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Composite Pain Responder Status | 90 Pain Responder Participants |
| Milnacipran | Composite Pain Responder Status | 147 Pain Responder Participants |
Composite Syndrome Responder Status
Composite Syndrome Responder Status is the number of responders based on 3 domains: (1) 30% reduction in pain (as recorded in the Patient Experience Diary \[PED\], electronic diary, during the morning report; 24 hour recall); (2) patient global impression of change (PGIC) score of very much improved and much improved; and (3) physical function improvement of 6 or more points on Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS)
Time frame: At the end of the three-month stable dose treatment phase
Population: The primary efficacy analysis was performed based on intent-to-treat population defined as all randomized patients who took at least one dose of double-blind study medication. All subjects with missing assessments at the end of the three-month stable dose treatment phase were considered non-responders (baseline value carried forward (BOCF)).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Composite Syndrome Responder Status | 56 Syndrome Responder Participants |
| Milnacipran | Composite Syndrome Responder Status | 103 Syndrome Responder Participants |
Change From Baseline in the Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Total Score at Visit TX12.
Change from Baseline in the Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) total score at TX12. Negative differences indicate decrease of fatigue. MFI is a subjective report of fatigue symptoms consisting of 20 items that can be scored to produce 5 dimensions: general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced motivation, and reduced activity. The MFI is a 1-5 scale with 1=yes, that is true and 5=no, that is not true.
Time frame: Baseline through end of week 12 (Visit TX12)
Population: The analysis was performed based on intent-to-treat population defined as all randomized patients who took at least one dose of double-blind study medication. For all subjects with missing assessments at the end of week 12 (Visit TX12), values were imputed using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Total Score at Visit TX12. | -3.96 units on scale | Standard Error 0.549 |
| Milnacipran | Change From Baseline in the Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Total Score at Visit TX12. | -5.50 units on scale | Standard Error 0.599 |
Time-Weighted Average of Patient Experience Diary (PED) Reported Morning 24-Hour Recall Pain Scores for Weeks 1-12 of the Stable Dose Phase
Time-weighted average (area under the curve \[AUC\]) of the weekly average Patient Experience Diary (PED)-reported morning recall pain scores for weeks 1 through 12 of the stable dose treatment phase is the area under the Patient Experience Diary (PED)-time curve estimated using the trapezoidal method and normalized by time. PED is the Patient Experience Diary, an electronic diary system used for collection of patient self-reported pain data. Outcome measure is assessed using the VAS Pain Intensity Scale from 0-100 millimeters anchored at 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain).
Time frame: Weeks 1 through 12 of the stable dose treatment phase (Visit TX0-TX12)
Population: The analysis was performed based on intent-to-treat population defined as all randomized patients who took at least one dose of double-blind study medication. For all subjects with missing assessments for weeks 1-12 of the stable dose treatment phase, values were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Time-Weighted Average of Patient Experience Diary (PED) Reported Morning 24-Hour Recall Pain Scores for Weeks 1-12 of the Stable Dose Phase | 48.0 units on scale | Standard Error 0.83 |
| Milnacipran | Time-Weighted Average of Patient Experience Diary (PED) Reported Morning 24-Hour Recall Pain Scores for Weeks 1-12 of the Stable Dose Phase | 41.2 units on scale | Standard Error 0.87 |
Time-Weighted Average of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Visit TX0-TX12.
Time-weighted average (area under the curve \[AUC\]) for Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) from Visit TX0-TX12 is the area under the PGIC-time curve estimated using the trapezoidal method and normalized by time. PGIC is an efficacy assessment on a scale of 1-7 taken at visits TX0-TX12. The wording of the assessment is as follows: Since the start of the study, overall my fibromyalgia is: 1=Very Much Improved, 2=Much Improved, 3=Minimally Improved, 4=No Change, 5=Minimally Worse, 6=Much Worse, and 7-Very Much Worse.
Time frame: Weeks 1-12 (Visit TX0-TX12) of the stable dose treatment phase
Population: The analysis was performed based on intent-to-treat population defined as all randomized patients who took at least one dose of double-blind study medication. For all subjects with missing assessments from weeks 1-12 of the stable dose treatment phase, values were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Time-Weighted Average of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Visit TX0-TX12. | 3.4 units on scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Milnacipran | Time-Weighted Average of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Visit TX0-TX12. | 2.9 units on scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
Time-Weighted Average of the Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS) Score From Visit TX0-TX12
Short Form-36 (SF-36): pt. questionnaire (36 questions) which give rise to 8 domains & 2 component summaries (mental and physical); assessing quality of life, health & functional status. SF-36 PCS: weighted summary of physical function using all 8 domains. Scores are standardized so that the range for all domains and component summaries is 0 (worst possible score) to 100 (best possible score). Higher scores indicate better health or functional status. SF-36 PCS AUC (Area under the Curve): estimated using trapezoidal method, normalized by time.
Time frame: Weeks 1-12 (Visit TX0-TX12) of the stable dose treatment phase
Population: The analysis was performed based on intent-to-treat population defined as all randomized patients who took at least one dose of double-blind study medication. For all subjects with missing assessments from weeks 1-12 (Visit TX0-TX12) of the stable dose treatment phase, values were imputed using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Time-Weighted Average of the Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS) Score From Visit TX0-TX12 | 36.4 units on scale | Standard Error 0.37 |
| Milnacipran | Time-Weighted Average of the Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS) Score From Visit TX0-TX12 | 37.9 units on scale | Standard Error 0.37 |