Skip to content

Study of Milnacipran for the Treatment of Fibromyalgia

A Phase III Pivotal, Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Monotherapy Study of Milnacipran for the Treatment of Fibromyalgia.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00314249
Enrollment
1025
Registered
2006-04-13
Start date
2006-04-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2010-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia

Keywords

Fibromyalgia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of milnacipran at a dosage of 100 mg/day in the treatment of the fibromyalgia syndrome or the pain associate with fibromyalgia.

Interventions

DRUGMilnacipran 100mg

Milnacipran 100mg per day (50mg BID \[twice a day\])

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo, oral administration, twice daily for 12 weeks

Sponsors

Cypress Bioscience, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Forest Laboratories
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosis of fibromyalgia defined by 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria

Exclusion criteria

* psychiatric illness, * depression, * suicidal risk, * substance abuse, * pulmonary dysfunction, * renal impairment, * active cardiac disease, * liver disease, * autoimmune disease, * cancer, * inflammatory bowel disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite Syndrome Responder StatusAt the end of the three-month stable dose treatment phaseComposite Syndrome Responder Status is the number of responders based on 3 domains: (1) 30% reduction in pain (as recorded in the Patient Experience Diary \[PED\], electronic diary, during the morning report; 24 hour recall); (2) patient global impression of change (PGIC) score of very much improved and much improved; and (3) physical function improvement of 6 or more points on Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS)
Composite Pain Responder StatusAt the end of three-month stable dose treatment phaseComposite Pain Responder Status is the number of responders based on two domains: (1) 30% reduction in pain (as recorded in the Patient Experience Diary \[PED\], electronic diary, during the morning report; 24 hour recall); and (2) Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score of very much improved or much improved.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time-Weighted Average of Patient Experience Diary (PED) Reported Morning 24-Hour Recall Pain Scores for Weeks 1-12 of the Stable Dose PhaseWeeks 1 through 12 of the stable dose treatment phase (Visit TX0-TX12)Time-weighted average (area under the curve \[AUC\]) of the weekly average Patient Experience Diary (PED)-reported morning recall pain scores for weeks 1 through 12 of the stable dose treatment phase is the area under the Patient Experience Diary (PED)-time curve estimated using the trapezoidal method and normalized by time. PED is the Patient Experience Diary, an electronic diary system used for collection of patient self-reported pain data. Outcome measure is assessed using the VAS Pain Intensity Scale from 0-100 millimeters anchored at 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain).
Time-Weighted Average of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Visit TX0-TX12.Weeks 1-12 (Visit TX0-TX12) of the stable dose treatment phaseTime-weighted average (area under the curve \[AUC\]) for Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) from Visit TX0-TX12 is the area under the PGIC-time curve estimated using the trapezoidal method and normalized by time. PGIC is an efficacy assessment on a scale of 1-7 taken at visits TX0-TX12. The wording of the assessment is as follows: Since the start of the study, overall my fibromyalgia is: 1=Very Much Improved, 2=Much Improved, 3=Minimally Improved, 4=No Change, 5=Minimally Worse, 6=Much Worse, and 7-Very Much Worse.
Change From Baseline in the Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Total Score at Visit TX12.Baseline through end of week 12 (Visit TX12)Change from Baseline in the Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) total score at TX12. Negative differences indicate decrease of fatigue. MFI is a subjective report of fatigue symptoms consisting of 20 items that can be scored to produce 5 dimensions: general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced motivation, and reduced activity. The MFI is a 1-5 scale with 1=yes, that is true and 5=no, that is not true.
Time-Weighted Average of the Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS) Score From Visit TX0-TX12Weeks 1-12 (Visit TX0-TX12) of the stable dose treatment phaseShort Form-36 (SF-36): pt. questionnaire (36 questions) which give rise to 8 domains & 2 component summaries (mental and physical); assessing quality of life, health & functional status. SF-36 PCS: weighted summary of physical function using all 8 domains. Scores are standardized so that the range for all domains and component summaries is 0 (worst possible score) to 100 (best possible score). Higher scores indicate better health or functional status. SF-36 PCS AUC (Area under the Curve): estimated using trapezoidal method, normalized by time.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment period was from 4/28/06 through 12/27/07 with last patient last visit on 6/30/08 at 65 centers in the US and 3 centers in Canada

Pre-assignment details

Upon completion of the washout period, a two-week baseline period was completed prior to randomization. Patients were then randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either placebo or milnacipran 100 mg/day (50 mg BID \[twice a day\])

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo administered orally BID (twice a day) for 12 weeks of stable dose treatment phase
509
Milnacipran
Milnacipran 100 mg per day, administered orally (BID \[twice a day\]) for 12 weeks of stable dose treatment phase
516
Total1,025

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event7394
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy3324
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up159
Overall StudyNon-Compliant56
Overall StudyPhysician Decision11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2128
Overall StudyWithdrawn for other reasons41

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboMilnacipranTotal
Age Continuous48.73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.56
49.07 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.79
48.90 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.67
Age, Customized
<=20 years
2 participants2 participants4 participants
Age, Customized
>=60 years
70 participants85 participants155 participants
Age, Customized
Between 20 and 60 years
437 participants429 participants866 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
46 participants47 participants93 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
463 participants469 participants932 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
477 Participants500 Participants977 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
32 Participants16 Participants48 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
382 / 509434 / 516
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 50910 / 516

Outcome results

Primary

Composite Pain Responder Status

Composite Pain Responder Status is the number of responders based on two domains: (1) 30% reduction in pain (as recorded in the Patient Experience Diary \[PED\], electronic diary, during the morning report; 24 hour recall); and (2) Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score of very much improved or much improved.

Time frame: At the end of three-month stable dose treatment phase

Population: The primary efficacy analysis was performed based on intent-to-treat population defined as all randomized patients who took at least one dose of double-blind study medication. All subjects with missing assessments at the end of three-month stable dose treatment phase were considered non-responders (baseline value carried forward (BOCF)).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboComposite Pain Responder Status90 Pain Responder Participants
MilnacipranComposite Pain Responder Status147 Pain Responder Participants
Comparison: The test of no difference in the responder rate between milnacipran and placebo groups was performed using a logistic regression model with the treatment group and baseline pain score as explanatory variables.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.38, 2.51]Regression, Logistic
Primary

Composite Syndrome Responder Status

Composite Syndrome Responder Status is the number of responders based on 3 domains: (1) 30% reduction in pain (as recorded in the Patient Experience Diary \[PED\], electronic diary, during the morning report; 24 hour recall); (2) patient global impression of change (PGIC) score of very much improved and much improved; and (3) physical function improvement of 6 or more points on Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS)

Time frame: At the end of the three-month stable dose treatment phase

Population: The primary efficacy analysis was performed based on intent-to-treat population defined as all randomized patients who took at least one dose of double-blind study medication. All subjects with missing assessments at the end of the three-month stable dose treatment phase were considered non-responders (baseline value carried forward (BOCF)).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboComposite Syndrome Responder Status56 Syndrome Responder Participants
MilnacipranComposite Syndrome Responder Status103 Syndrome Responder Participants
Comparison: The test of no difference in the responder rate between milnacipran and placebo groups was performed using a logistic regression model with treatment group, baseline pain score, and baseline SF-36 PCS score as explanatory variables.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.45, 2.94]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Total Score at Visit TX12.

Change from Baseline in the Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) total score at TX12. Negative differences indicate decrease of fatigue. MFI is a subjective report of fatigue symptoms consisting of 20 items that can be scored to produce 5 dimensions: general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced motivation, and reduced activity. The MFI is a 1-5 scale with 1=yes, that is true and 5=no, that is not true.

Time frame: Baseline through end of week 12 (Visit TX12)

Population: The analysis was performed based on intent-to-treat population defined as all randomized patients who took at least one dose of double-blind study medication. For all subjects with missing assessments at the end of week 12 (Visit TX12), values were imputed using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Total Score at Visit TX12.-3.96 units on scaleStandard Error 0.549
MilnacipranChange From Baseline in the Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Total Score at Visit TX12.-5.50 units on scaleStandard Error 0.599
Comparison: This parameter was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment group and study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.95% CI: [-3.27, -0.11]ANCOVA
Secondary

Time-Weighted Average of Patient Experience Diary (PED) Reported Morning 24-Hour Recall Pain Scores for Weeks 1-12 of the Stable Dose Phase

Time-weighted average (area under the curve \[AUC\]) of the weekly average Patient Experience Diary (PED)-reported morning recall pain scores for weeks 1 through 12 of the stable dose treatment phase is the area under the Patient Experience Diary (PED)-time curve estimated using the trapezoidal method and normalized by time. PED is the Patient Experience Diary, an electronic diary system used for collection of patient self-reported pain data. Outcome measure is assessed using the VAS Pain Intensity Scale from 0-100 millimeters anchored at 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain).

Time frame: Weeks 1 through 12 of the stable dose treatment phase (Visit TX0-TX12)

Population: The analysis was performed based on intent-to-treat population defined as all randomized patients who took at least one dose of double-blind study medication. For all subjects with missing assessments for weeks 1-12 of the stable dose treatment phase, values were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTime-Weighted Average of Patient Experience Diary (PED) Reported Morning 24-Hour Recall Pain Scores for Weeks 1-12 of the Stable Dose Phase48.0 units on scaleStandard Error 0.83
MilnacipranTime-Weighted Average of Patient Experience Diary (PED) Reported Morning 24-Hour Recall Pain Scores for Weeks 1-12 of the Stable Dose Phase41.2 units on scaleStandard Error 0.87
Comparison: This parameter was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment group and study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.95% CI: [-8.56, -4.19]ANCOVA
Secondary

Time-Weighted Average of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Visit TX0-TX12.

Time-weighted average (area under the curve \[AUC\]) for Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) from Visit TX0-TX12 is the area under the PGIC-time curve estimated using the trapezoidal method and normalized by time. PGIC is an efficacy assessment on a scale of 1-7 taken at visits TX0-TX12. The wording of the assessment is as follows: Since the start of the study, overall my fibromyalgia is: 1=Very Much Improved, 2=Much Improved, 3=Minimally Improved, 4=No Change, 5=Minimally Worse, 6=Much Worse, and 7-Very Much Worse.

Time frame: Weeks 1-12 (Visit TX0-TX12) of the stable dose treatment phase

Population: The analysis was performed based on intent-to-treat population defined as all randomized patients who took at least one dose of double-blind study medication. For all subjects with missing assessments from weeks 1-12 of the stable dose treatment phase, values were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTime-Weighted Average of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Visit TX0-TX12.3.4 units on scaleStandard Error 0.06
MilnacipranTime-Weighted Average of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Visit TX0-TX12.2.9 units on scaleStandard Error 0.06
Comparison: This parameter was analyzed using an ANOVA model with treatment group and study center as factors.95% CI: [-0.69, -0.38]ANOVA
Secondary

Time-Weighted Average of the Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS) Score From Visit TX0-TX12

Short Form-36 (SF-36): pt. questionnaire (36 questions) which give rise to 8 domains & 2 component summaries (mental and physical); assessing quality of life, health & functional status. SF-36 PCS: weighted summary of physical function using all 8 domains. Scores are standardized so that the range for all domains and component summaries is 0 (worst possible score) to 100 (best possible score). Higher scores indicate better health or functional status. SF-36 PCS AUC (Area under the Curve): estimated using trapezoidal method, normalized by time.

Time frame: Weeks 1-12 (Visit TX0-TX12) of the stable dose treatment phase

Population: The analysis was performed based on intent-to-treat population defined as all randomized patients who took at least one dose of double-blind study medication. For all subjects with missing assessments from weeks 1-12 (Visit TX0-TX12) of the stable dose treatment phase, values were imputed using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTime-Weighted Average of the Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS) Score From Visit TX0-TX1236.4 units on scaleStandard Error 0.37
MilnacipranTime-Weighted Average of the Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS) Score From Visit TX0-TX1237.9 units on scaleStandard Error 0.37
Comparison: This parameter was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment group and study center as factors and baseline value as a covariate.95% CI: [0.86, 2.44]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026