Skip to content

A Clinical Trial to Compare Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant 250mg, 250mg Plus 250mg Loading Regimen and 500mg

Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant 250mg, 250mg Plus 250mg Loading Regimen and 500mg in Postmenopausal Women With ER +ve Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00313170
Acronym
FINDER II
Enrollment
144
Registered
2006-04-12
Start date
2006-05-30
Completion date
2019-03-13
Last updated
2020-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Breast Cancer, Metastatic Breast Cancer

Keywords

oncology, cancer, breast cancer

Brief summary

This study will assess the relationship between fulvestrant dose and efficacy in postmenopausal women with oestrogen receptor positive advanced breast cancer.

Interventions

DRUGFulvestrant

intramuscular injection 250 mg & 500 mg

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
45 Years to 130 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Breast Cancer has continued to grow after having received treatment with an anti-estrogen hormonal treatment such as tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor. * Requiring hormonal treatment. * Postmenopausal women (woman who has stopped having menstrual periods)

Exclusion criteria

* Treatment with more than one previous regimen of systemic anticancer therapy other than endocrine therapy for advanced BC. * Treatment with more than one previous regimen of endocrine therapy for advanced BC. * An existing condition that prevents compliance.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response (ORR)The planned data cut-off for this study was when all patients, except withdrawals, had been followed up for at least 24 weeks. Patients received treatment up to approximately 2 years.Objective response rate was defined as percentage of patients with either complete response (CR - disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR - at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions). All patients were to be followed up every 12 weeks for progression, defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST v1.1).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Progression (TTP)The planned data cut-off for this study was when all patients, except withdrawals, had been followed up for at least 24 weeks. Patients received treatment up to approximately 2 years.Time from randomisation until objective disease progression or death (in the absence of objective progression) using the Kaplan-Meier method. RECIST tumor assessments were carried out every 12 weeks until progression.
Duration of Response (DoR)The planned data cut-off for this study was when all patients, except withdrawals, had been followed up for at least 24 weeks. Patients received treatment up to approximately 2 years.DoR was defined as the time from date of first documentation of the response (CR or PR) until the date of disease progression or death from any cause.
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)The planned data cut-off for this study was when all patients, except withdrawals, had been followed up for at least 24 weeks. Patients received treatment up to approximately 2 years.CBR was defined as the proportion of all randomised patients who had clinical benefit (response of CR, PR or SD\>=24 weeks.
Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Mean Population Clearance, a Measure of the Efficiency With Which Fulvestrant is Eliminated From the BodyBaseline to 12 weeksA 2-compartment model with a 1st order absorption and 1st order elimination process was fitted to the fulvestrant concentration-time data. Relative standard error is reported for the mean.
Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Mean Volume of Distribution at Steady State, a Measure of the Apparent Volume in the Body Into Which Fulvestrant DistributesBaseline to 12 weeksA 2-compartment model with a 1st order absorption and 1st order elimination process was fitted to the fulvestrant concentration-time data. Relative standard error is reported for the mean. The mean estimate of volume of distribution at steady state was reported as the sum of V1/F and V2/F in the clinical study report.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Czechia, France, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Turkey (Türkiye)

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Postmenopausal women with oestrogen receptor positive advanced breast cancer progressing or relapsing after previous endocrine therapy were randomised between 30th May 2006 and 30th November 2007

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fulvestrant 250 mg
Fulvestrant 250 mg
47
Fulvestrant 250 mg + Loading Dose
Fulvestrant 250 mg + Loading Dose
51
Fulvestrant 500 mg
Fulvestrant 500 mg
46
Total144

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event120
Overall StudyDeath242
Overall StudyDisease progression312627
Overall StudyIncorrect enrollment021
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up001
Overall StudyProgression (investigators opinion)100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject101

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFulvestrant 250 mgFulvestrant 250 mg + Loading DoseFulvestrant 500 mgTotal
Age, Continuous63.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
68.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
65.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
65.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
45 Participants51 Participants46 Participants142 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Oriental (Asian other than Chinese or Japanese)
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Oriental (Japanese)
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
47 Participants51 Participants46 Participants144 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 474 / 502 / 46
other
Total, other adverse events
36 / 4735 / 5031 / 46
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 479 / 504 / 46

Outcome results

Primary

Objective Response (ORR)

Objective response rate was defined as percentage of patients with either complete response (CR - disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR - at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions). All patients were to be followed up every 12 weeks for progression, defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST v1.1).

Time frame: The planned data cut-off for this study was when all patients, except withdrawals, had been followed up for at least 24 weeks. Patients received treatment up to approximately 2 years.

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Fulvestrant 250 mgObjective Response (ORR)8.5 Percentage of patients
Fulvestrant 250 mg + Loading DoseObjective Response (ORR)5.9 Percentage of patients
Fulvestrant 500 mgObjective Response (ORR)15.2 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

CBR was defined as the proportion of all randomised patients who had clinical benefit (response of CR, PR or SD\>=24 weeks.

Time frame: The planned data cut-off for this study was when all patients, except withdrawals, had been followed up for at least 24 weeks. Patients received treatment up to approximately 2 years.

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Fulvestrant 250 mgClinical Benefit Rate (CBR)31.9 Percentage of patients
Fulvestrant 250 mg + Loading DoseClinical Benefit Rate (CBR)47.1 Percentage of patients
Fulvestrant 500 mgClinical Benefit Rate (CBR)47.8 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Duration of Response (DoR)

DoR was defined as the time from date of first documentation of the response (CR or PR) until the date of disease progression or death from any cause.

Time frame: The planned data cut-off for this study was when all patients, except withdrawals, had been followed up for at least 24 weeks. Patients received treatment up to approximately 2 years.

Population: All objective responders

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Fulvestrant 250 mgDuration of Response (DoR)NA Days
Fulvestrant 250 mg + Loading DoseDuration of Response (DoR)NA Days
Fulvestrant 500 mgDuration of Response (DoR)539 Days
Secondary

Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Mean Population Clearance, a Measure of the Efficiency With Which Fulvestrant is Eliminated From the Body

A 2-compartment model with a 1st order absorption and 1st order elimination process was fitted to the fulvestrant concentration-time data. Relative standard error is reported for the mean.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

Population: Participants who had PK samples only

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Fulvestrant 250 mgPharmacokinetic Parameter: Mean Population Clearance, a Measure of the Efficiency With Which Fulvestrant is Eliminated From the Body31 litres per hourStandard Error 3.29
Secondary

Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Mean Volume of Distribution at Steady State, a Measure of the Apparent Volume in the Body Into Which Fulvestrant Distributes

A 2-compartment model with a 1st order absorption and 1st order elimination process was fitted to the fulvestrant concentration-time data. Relative standard error is reported for the mean. The mean estimate of volume of distribution at steady state was reported as the sum of V1/F and V2/F in the clinical study report.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Fulvestrant 250 mgPharmacokinetic Parameter: Mean Volume of Distribution at Steady State, a Measure of the Apparent Volume in the Body Into Which Fulvestrant DistributesV1/F20600 LitersStandard Error 3.67
Fulvestrant 250 mgPharmacokinetic Parameter: Mean Volume of Distribution at Steady State, a Measure of the Apparent Volume in the Body Into Which Fulvestrant DistributesV2/F35700 LitersStandard Error 27.8
Secondary

Time to Progression (TTP)

Time from randomisation until objective disease progression or death (in the absence of objective progression) using the Kaplan-Meier method. RECIST tumor assessments were carried out every 12 weeks until progression.

Time frame: The planned data cut-off for this study was when all patients, except withdrawals, had been followed up for at least 24 weeks. Patients received treatment up to approximately 2 years.

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Fulvestrant 250 mgTime to Progression (TTP)88 Days
Fulvestrant 250 mg + Loading DoseTime to Progression (TTP)172 Days
Fulvestrant 500 mgTime to Progression (TTP)169 Days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026