Skip to content

Pulse Steroids Versus Oral Steroids in Problematic Hemangiomas of Infancy

The Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Pulse Steroids Compared to Standard Oral Steroids in the Treatment of Problematic Hemangiomas in Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00312520
Enrollment
20
Registered
2006-04-10
Start date
2002-07-31
Completion date
2005-06-30
Last updated
2018-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemangiomas

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to determine if pulse steroids are more efficacious and safer than the standard treatment with oral corticosteroids.

Detailed description

Currently there is no prospective study in hemangioma patients answering critical questions such as: which type of steroid should be used,how much should we use and for how long. This study is an investigator blinded study with two arms:one arm is receiving standard treatment with daily oral corticosteroids and the other is receiving intravenous pulse corticosteroids daily for 3 days, monthly for 3 months. The main outcome of the study is assess the efficacy of each treament modality as the percentage improvement in the hemangioma's appearance. The secondary outcomes are the safety profiles of the two drugs and the changes in the angiogenesis markers as a result of treatment intervention.

Interventions

DRUGprednisolone
DRUGmethylprednisolone

Sponsors

Society for Pediatric Dermatology
CollaboratorOTHER
The Hospital for Sick Children
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 4 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* problematic facial hemangiomas (periorbital/facial hemangiomas with potential visual obstruction, large/dysfiguring hemangiomas) * 1-4 months of age * signed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* refusal to participate * age \> 4 months * complicated nonvisible hemangiomas * congenital heart disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percent improvement in the appearance of hemangioma

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Frequency of side-effects experienced by the patients
Changes in the angiogenesis markers

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026