Skip to content

POWER (Pulse Width Optimized Waveform Evaluation Trial)

Phase 4 Study That Compares the DFT (Defibrillation Threshold) Efficacy of 3 Different Membrane Time Constant Based Biphasic Defibrillation Waveforms

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00311181
Enrollment
217
Registered
2006-04-05
Start date
2006-08-31
Completion date
2008-04-30
Last updated
2019-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sudden Cardiac Death

Keywords

ICD, Defibrillation, ULV, Tuned

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to compare the ULV (Upper Limit of Vulnerability)/DFT (Defibrillation Threshold) efficacy between the 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5 ms membrane time constant based biphasic defibrillation waveforms. This comparison will result in identifying the optimal membrane time constant when programming the tuned defibrillation waveform.

Detailed description

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) continues to be a significant cause of cardiac mortality with annual deaths ranging from 250,000 to 400,000 in the United States. Accordingly, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD's) have proven to be an important therapeutic option for patients susceptible to SCD. Successful therapy and generator longevity are greatly dependent on proper defibrillation threshold (DFT) determination. All modern ICD's utilize a biphasic waveform for defibrillation. It has been clearly shown that biphasic waveforms reduce the energy required for internal defibrillation of the heart. However, there is no consensus on which pulse widths are best for defibrillation. St. Jude Medical ICD's (implantable cardioverter defibrillators) have programmable pulse widths, which allow the physician multiple options in dealing with ICD patients. By implanting ICD's with programmable pulse widths, this study utilizes the Tissue RC Resistance/Capacitance) model to try to identify the optimal pulse widths. To determine the efficacy of an optimal membrane time constant estimate for the tuned waveform, defibrillation testing must be performed. Upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) has been proposed as an alternative means of predicting the DFT and it has been shown that ULV guided DFT testing can achieve a defibrillation success rate of 95%.

Interventions

DEVICEImplantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD), Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT-D)

Patients that are indicated for an ICD or CRT-D receive one of these devices.

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient is a candidate for ICD/CRT-D implantation. * Patient has a compatible transvenous defibrillation lead system. * Patient has had an echocardiogram, MUGA, or cath procedure within 6 months of ICD/CRT-D implant. * Patient is able to tolerate ULV guided DFT testing.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has a mechanical valve in the tricuspid position. * Patient has epicardial defibrillation electrodes. * Patient is pregnant. * Patient is less than 18 years old.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Defibrillation Thresholds (DFTs) (3.5 ms Waveform)Implant
DFT (2.5 ms Waveform)Implant
DFT (4.5 ms Waveform)Implant

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1217
Total217

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyFinal DFTs were not obtained96

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 1
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
129 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
88 Participants
Age, Continuous67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Region of Enrollment
United States
217 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
57 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
160 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 217
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 217

Outcome results

Primary

Defibrillation Thresholds (DFTs) (3.5 ms Waveform)

Time frame: Implant

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1Defibrillation Thresholds (DFTs) (3.5 ms Waveform)427 VoltsStandard Error 11
Primary

DFT (2.5 ms Waveform)

Time frame: Implant

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1DFT (2.5 ms Waveform)454 VoltsStandard Error 11
Primary

DFT (4.5 ms Waveform)

Time frame: Implant

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1DFT (4.5 ms Waveform)435 VoltsStandard Error 11

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026