Skip to content

Low-Dose Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Follicular or Marginal Zone Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

A Phase III Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial of Low-Dose Radiotherapy for Follicular Lymphoma and Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00310167
Acronym
FoRT
Enrollment
614
Registered
2006-04-03
Start date
2005-10-31
Completion date
2017-01-31
Last updated
2017-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphoma

Keywords

stage I grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage I grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage I grade 3 follicular lymphoma, contiguous stage II grade 1 follicular lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II grade 1 follicular lymphoma, contiguous stage II grade 2 follicular lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II grade 2 follicular lymphoma, contiguous stage II grade 3 follicular lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 3 follicular lymphoma, recurrent grade 1 follicular lymphoma, recurrent grade 2 follicular lymphoma, recurrent grade 3 follicular lymphoma, Marginal zone lymphoma

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill cancer cells. It is not yet known which regimen of low-dose radiation therapy is more effective in treating follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying two different regimens of low-dose radiation therapy (24Gy versus 4Gy) to compare how well they work in treating patients with follicular or marginal zone non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * Compare the local progression-free interval in patients with follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) treated with 2 different regimens of low-dose radiotherapy. Secondary * Compare acute toxicity at 4 weeks in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare late toxicity in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare tumor response at 12 weeks in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare overall survival in patients treated with these regimens. * Assess the health economics of these regimens in these patients. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, randomized study. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. * Arm I 4Gy: Patients undergo low-dose radiotherapy once daily on days 1 and 2. * Arm II 24Gy: Patients undergo low-dose radiotherapy once daily on days 1-5, 8-12, 15, and 16. In both arms, treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study therapy, patients are followed up for 5 years. Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 650 patients will be accrued for this study.

Interventions

RADIATIONradiation therapy

Sponsors

University College, London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically confirmed follicular or mmarginal zone non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) * Any stage * Radiotherapy is indicated for curative treatment of stage IA or IIA disease OR palliation due to tumor bulk or anatomical position PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * Life expectancy \> 3 months PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * More than 4 weeks since prior chemotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Local progression-free interval in irradiated fieldup to 5 years after randomisationTime form randomisation to tumour progression within the irradiated field

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Tumor response in irradiated area at 12 weeks after randomizationat 12 weeks after randomization
Overall survivalup to 5 years after randomisation
Health economic assessmentup to 5 years after randomisation
Acute toxicityat 4 weeks after randomization
Late toxicityfrom 12 weeks after randomisation up to 5 years

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026