Skip to content

Specialized Treatment Early in Psychosis (STEP)

Randomized Trial of Usual Care Versus Specialized, Phase-specific Care in the Public Sector for First Episode Psychosis.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00309452
Acronym
STEP
Enrollment
120
Registered
2006-03-31
Start date
2006-03-31
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2017-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia and Disorders With Psychotic Features

Keywords

First episode psychosis, Specialized care, Phase-specific treatment, Schizophrenia, Disorders with psychotic features

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to understand the effectiveness of a specialized package of phase-specific treatments for individuals in the midst of their first episode of psychosis. The pharmacologic and psychosocial treatments will be delivered within a state public mental health center.

Detailed description

We propose to conduct a clinical trial for first episode psychosis patients not eligible for CMHC services that will compare randomized access to care at CMHC versus the usual procedure of referral to community providers outside CMHC. Patients randomized to access to CMHC services will receive multifaceted, intensive, phase-specific care delivered by a specialized clinical team. This care will include five principal components: antipsychotic prescription, multi-family group therapy, group cognitive behavioral therapy, cognitive remediation and individual case management including supportive, problem solving approaches and a focus on resumption of movement towards educational and/or employment related goals. All consenting subjects will undergo research evaluations every six months for up to five years. Outcomes will be assessed in the domains of re-admission (primary outcome), relapse, symptoms, overall functioning, quality of life, education and employment, treatment satisfaction, adherence, substance use, adverse events (including self-harm) and economic measures including service use, cost of care and forensic data.

Interventions

once per week

BEHAVIORALCognitive remediation

as needed

Individualized prescription of psychotropic medications including but not restricted to antipsychotic, antidepressant and mood stabilizers.

BEHAVIORALMFG

Multi-Family psychoeducation Group based on the model published by McFarlane et al.

BEHAVIORALAssertive case management

Meetings with an individual clinician (social work or nursing) who provides supportive psychotherapy, helps assist with vocational and educational supports.

OTHERTreatment as Usual in the community

Subjects randomized to this arm either return to their existing outpatient psychiatrist or, if they do not have one yet, are referred by the clinic to preferred providers in the community. The nature of the interventions provided is variable and is being monitored by the research clinic.

Sponsors

Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 16-45 2. Meets DSM-IV schizophrenia spectrum psychosis or affective psychosis according to the SCID 3. ≤8 weeks of received antipsychotic treatment lifetime at time of referral 4. Willing to be treated in New Haven

Exclusion criteria

1. Psychosis believed due to substance use (based on the SCID) 2. Unable or unwilling to give informed consent 3. MR as indicated by receipt of services from Dept of Mental Retardation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Patients Hospitalized1 year after enrollment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Functioning- Global Assessment of Functioning12 monthsThe Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) is a numeric scale (1 through 100) used by mental health clinicians and physicians to rate subjectively the social, occupational, and psychological functioning of adults, e.g., how well or adaptively one is meeting various problems-in-living. A higher score indicates better functioning. The score reported is a change from baseline. The change was calculated as score at 12 months minus score from baseline. A positive score indicates higher functioning.
Quality of Life- Heinrich's Quality of Life Scale12 monthsThe Quality of Life Scale (QLS) is a 21-item scale rated from a semistructured interview providing information on symptoms and functioning during the preceding 4 weeks. Each item is rated on a seven point scale, and a higher score reflects normal or unimpaired functioning. The range is from 0 to 126. The score reflected is a change from baseline. Total score at 12 months minus total score at baseline. A positive score indicates better mental health.
Vocationally Engaged1 year after enrollment
Treatment Satisfactionevery 6 months
Relapseevery 6 monthsData was not collected, instead Hospitalization (primary outcome) was used as a proxy
Substance Useevery 6 months
Subjects Who Committed Self-harm and Violence12 monthsThe number of subjects who committed an act of self-harm or violence. This data was collected at 12 months.
Medication (Including Metabolic) Side Effectsevery 6 months
Economic Measures Including Service Use, Cost of Care and Forensic Data.every 6 monthsTotal annual cost per patient
Adherence- in Contact With Mental Health Services1 yearNumber of participants in contact with mental health services. Collected via self-report.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

There were 512 requests for information, of which 491 were screened by phone for eligibility. 284 were excluded. Of the 207 who completed a full in-person eligibility assessment, 2 were deemed ineligible and 29 were provided STEP care without randomization in an initial pilot (data not included). 120 of the remaining 176 patients were enrolled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment as Usual
Referral to community providers. Treatment as Usual in the community: Subjects randomized to this arm either return to their existing outpatient psychiatrist or, if they do not have one yet, are referred by the clinic to preferred providers in the community. The nature of the interventions provided is variable and is being monitored by the research clinic.
57
STEP Care
Integrated and comprehensive treatment provided by a specialized team in a public mental health center.Interventions include pharmacotherapy, family education, cognitive behavioral group and individual psychotherapy and case management focused on vocational rehabilitation. Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy: once per week Cognitive remediation: as needed Medications: Individualized prescription of psychotropic medications including but not restricted to antipsychotic, antidepressant and mood stabilizers. MFG: Multi-Family psychoeducation Group based on the model published by McFarlane et al. Assertive case management: Meetings with an individual clinician (social work or nursing) who provides supportive psychotherapy, helps assist with vocational and educational supports.
60
Total117

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment as UsualSTEP CareTotal
Age, Continuous22.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
22.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
22.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
Gender
Female
11 Participants11 Participants22 Participants
Gender
Male
46 Participants49 Participants95 Participants
Global Assessment of Functioning34.42 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.43
36.22 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.89
35.88 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.04
PANNS Positive and Negative Symptom Scale
General Symptoms
33.70 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.56
33.42 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.62
33.56 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.56
PANNS Positive and Negative Symptom Scale
Negative Dimension
17.01 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
17.82 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.42
17.44 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.95
PANNS Positive and Negative Symptom Scale
Positive Dimension
19.60 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
20.75 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.74
20.21 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.36
PANNS Positive and Negative Symptom Scale
Total
70.33 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.52
72.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.76
71.21 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.14

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 570 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 570 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients Hospitalized

Time frame: 1 year after enrollment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treatment as UsualNumber of Patients Hospitalized25 participants
STEP CareNumber of Patients Hospitalized14 participants
Comparison: Between groups comparison for hospitalization rates, adjusted for pretreatment hospitalizationp-value: 0.018Chi-squared, Corrected
Secondary

Adherence- in Contact With Mental Health Services

Number of participants in contact with mental health services. Collected via self-report.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Patients were lost to follow up. 15 subjects in the Treatment as Usual arm, and 15 subjects in the STEP care arm.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treatment as UsualAdherence- in Contact With Mental Health Services33 participants
STEP CareAdherence- in Contact With Mental Health Services39 participants
Secondary

Economic Measures Including Service Use, Cost of Care and Forensic Data.

Total annual cost per patient

Time frame: every 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment as UsualEconomic Measures Including Service Use, Cost of Care and Forensic Data.12157.46 dollarsStandard Error 2948.83
STEP CareEconomic Measures Including Service Use, Cost of Care and Forensic Data.7625.22 dollarsStandard Error 2539.7
Secondary

Medication (Including Metabolic) Side Effects

Time frame: every 6 months

Population: data no collected

Secondary

Overall Functioning- Global Assessment of Functioning

The Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) is a numeric scale (1 through 100) used by mental health clinicians and physicians to rate subjectively the social, occupational, and psychological functioning of adults, e.g., how well or adaptively one is meeting various problems-in-living. A higher score indicates better functioning. The score reported is a change from baseline. The change was calculated as score at 12 months minus score from baseline. A positive score indicates higher functioning.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment as UsualOverall Functioning- Global Assessment of FunctioningBaseline34.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.43
Treatment as UsualOverall Functioning- Global Assessment of FunctioningChange from baseline20.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.61
STEP CareOverall Functioning- Global Assessment of FunctioningBaseline36.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.89
STEP CareOverall Functioning- Global Assessment of FunctioningChange from baseline22.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.46
Secondary

Quality of Life- Heinrich's Quality of Life Scale

The Quality of Life Scale (QLS) is a 21-item scale rated from a semistructured interview providing information on symptoms and functioning during the preceding 4 weeks. Each item is rated on a seven point scale, and a higher score reflects normal or unimpaired functioning. The range is from 0 to 126. The score reflected is a change from baseline. Total score at 12 months minus total score at baseline. A positive score indicates better mental health.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment as UsualQuality of Life- Heinrich's Quality of Life ScaleBaseline59.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.02
Treatment as UsualQuality of Life- Heinrich's Quality of Life ScaleChange from Baseline-.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.18
STEP CareQuality of Life- Heinrich's Quality of Life ScaleBaseline59.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.25
STEP CareQuality of Life- Heinrich's Quality of Life ScaleChange from Baseline9.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.85
Secondary

Relapse

Data was not collected, instead Hospitalization (primary outcome) was used as a proxy

Time frame: every 6 months

Secondary

Subjects Who Committed Self-harm and Violence

The number of subjects who committed an act of self-harm or violence. This data was collected at 12 months.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: This data was collected, numbers reflect actual data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treatment as UsualSubjects Who Committed Self-harm and Violence0 participants
STEP CareSubjects Who Committed Self-harm and Violence0 participants
Secondary

Substance Use

Time frame: every 6 months

Population: This was not a planned primary or secondary outcome in our analysis (though collected at baseline) and because of significant attrition we did not report on this outcome despite having phone call f/u data on other outcomes. We did not believe phone reports on this outcome would produce reliable data.

Secondary

Treatment Satisfaction

Time frame: every 6 months

Population: Data was not collected

Secondary

Vocationally Engaged

Time frame: 1 year after enrollment

Population: 20 subjects from the treatment as usual arm were lost to follow-up. 12 subjects from STEP Care arm were lost to follow up.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treatment as UsualVocationally Engaged26 participants
STEP CareVocationally Engaged44 participants
Comparison: Between groups comparison for vocational engagement, adjusted for pretreatment vocational engagementp-value: 0.002Chi-squared, Corrected

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026