Comparison of Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Versus Automatic CPR Machine During Ambulance Transport.

Comparison of Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Versus Automatic CPR Machine on the CPR Performance for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During Ambulance Transport.

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT00308815

Enrollment

100

Registered

2006-03-30

Start date

2005-01-31

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2006-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Keywords

Resuscitation, Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, cardiac arrest, CPR

Brief summary

This is a randomized controlled prospective study which assigned patient to receive manual CPR or automatic CPR machine use. The quality and efficacy between manual CPR and machine CPR will be evaluated.

Interventions

DEVICEAutomatic CPR machine

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

16 Years to No maximum

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* Non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient in Taipei distric * Patients sent to National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) through Jhongsiao Emergency medical service (EMS) team

Exclusion criteria

* Younger than 15 years old * Traumatic cardia arrest * Patients not sent to NTUH by Jhongsiao EMS team

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Quality of CPR	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
End-tidal CO2 on arrival at ER	—
Recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate	—
Survival rate at 1hr, 24hr, and discharge from hospital	—

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026