Skip to content

Clinical Study Comparing Two Implant Surface Finishes in Patients Undergoing Cementless Total Hip Replacement

A Prospective, Randomized Study of Summit™ Porocoat® Versus Summit™ DuoFix™ HA in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00306917
Acronym
SPD
Enrollment
245
Registered
2006-03-27
Start date
2002-11-01
Completion date
2009-01-29
Last updated
2022-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Fracture, Avascular Necrosis, Osteoarthritis, Post-traumatic Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Total Hip Replacement

Brief summary

Prospective, randomized study of Summit Porocoat versus Summit DuoFix HA in total hip arthroplasty

Detailed description

Hydroxyapatite (HA) is a bioactive ceramic that resembles the natural inorganic mineral content of bone, and as such is a highly osteoconductive material. The purpose of this study is to compare an HA coated and uncoated prosthesis.

Interventions

DEVICEnon-coated femoral hip stem

total hip replacement

DEVICEcoated femoral hip stem

total hip replacement

Sponsors

DePuy Orthopaedics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Primary total hip replacement * Patient age less than or equal to 75 * Sufficient bone stock to support prosthesis

Exclusion criteria

* Previous hip replacement * Significant angular/bony deformity * Active joint sepsis * Metal allergy * Renal transplant * Psychosocial disease * Neurological disease/musculoskeletal disease that may affect weight-bearing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Harris Hip Score (HHS)Preoperative, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 monthsThe Harris Hip scoring system assigns a numeric value to responses from patients and assessments made by a surgeon. A score of 90-100 is excellent, 80-90 is good, 70-80 is fair, 60-69 is poor, and 60 or below is failed. The patient records the following: pain level, need for assistance when walking, presence of a limp, distance able to walk, ability to put on shoes and socks, climb stairs, use public transportation and the length of time one is able to comforatably sit in a chair are all scored. The doctor assesses patient hip function by testing flexion, extension, adduction and abduction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Medical Imaging as a Secondary Outcome Inclusive of All Post-operative Intervals for All Participants at Study Closure.Postoperative, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 monthsMedical imaging as a secondary outcome inclusive of all post-operative intervals for all participants at study closure. This measure is a percentage of the overall Participants with a specific radiographic outcome. Measurements were made by an Independent Radiographic Reviewer (IRR) and include assessments made based on protocol defined radiographic success criteria that includes Subsidence (10 mm), Osseointegration, Radiolucency \> 2 mm in any zone, Complete Circumferential Radiolucencies, Spot-Welds (AP View) p \< .10, Spot-Welds (Lateral View) p \< .10, Cortical Hypertrophy (AP View), Cortical Hypertrophy (Lateral View)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment began in September 2002 and ended June 2006. Study subjects were recruited and enrolled in medical clinics by orthopaedic surgeons at eight investigational sites. Each site could enroll a maximum of 50 subjects. Recruitment was based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria as indicated in the study protocol.

Pre-assignment details

Immediately before surgery, the implant type was determined according to the randomization schedule. Enrolled subjects may have been excluded from the trial before assignment to the study arm based upon results of pre-operative clinical evaluations and radiographs that would exclude a subject based on exclusion criteria in the study protocol.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
DuoFix HA
The Summit™ DuoFix™ HA stems are primary, cementless hip implants. Summit™ cementless stems feature 3°-tapered body geometry to enhance fit, and are manufactured from forged titanium alloy. The Summit™ cementless stems are designed to load the femur toward the upper part of the stem, and therefore the Porocoat® porous coating is applied only to the upper body of the stem. The DuoFix™ HA stem also has a thin coating of hydroxyapatite on this porous-coated surface. This HA coating is only 35 microns thick, so the optimum pore size is maintained. The lower portion of the stem has a grit-blasted surface, which promotes bone on-growth and the polished bullet-tip prevents end-stem loading.
121
Porocoat Porous Coated
The Summit™ Porocoat® stems are primary, cementless hip implants that a feature 3°-tapered body geometry to enhance fit, and are manufactured from forged titanium alloy. The Summit™ cementless stems are designed to load the femur toward the upper part of the stem, and therefore the Porocoat® porous coating is applied only to the upper body of the stem. The lower portion of the stems has a grit-blasted surface, which promotes bone on-growth and the polished bullet-tip prevents end-stem loading.
124
Total245

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDuoFix HAPorocoat Porous CoatedTotal
Age, Continuous64.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
63.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
63.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
Region of Enrollment
United States
United States
121 Participants124 Participants245 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
67 Participants64 Participants131 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
54 Participants60 Participants114 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 1217 / 124
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 1214 / 124

Outcome results

Primary

Harris Hip Score (HHS)

The Harris Hip scoring system assigns a numeric value to responses from patients and assessments made by a surgeon. A score of 90-100 is excellent, 80-90 is good, 70-80 is fair, 60-69 is poor, and 60 or below is failed. The patient records the following: pain level, need for assistance when walking, presence of a limp, distance able to walk, ability to put on shoes and socks, climb stairs, use public transportation and the length of time one is able to comforatably sit in a chair are all scored. The doctor assesses patient hip function by testing flexion, extension, adduction and abduction.

Time frame: Preoperative, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months

Population: Before the first interval there were five missing HHS scores for the DuoFix arm and four missing HHS scores for the Porocoat Porous Coated arm. At the final interval (60 months), there were eleven subjects in the DuoFix arm with complete HHS scores and there were fourteen subjects in the Porocoat Porous Coated arm with complete HHS scores.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DuoFix HAHarris Hip Score (HHS)12 Month HHS92.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
DuoFix HAHarris Hip Score (HHS)36 Month HHS94.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
DuoFix HAHarris Hip Score (HHS)Postoperative to 6 Month HHS90.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
DuoFix HAHarris Hip Score (HHS)48 Month HHS91.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2
DuoFix HAHarris Hip Score (HHS)24 Month HHS93.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
DuoFix HAHarris Hip Score (HHS)60 Month HHS93.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
DuoFix HAHarris Hip Score (HHS)Preoperative HHS49.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.4
Porocoat Porous CoatedHarris Hip Score (HHS)60 Month HHS93.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Porocoat Porous CoatedHarris Hip Score (HHS)Preoperative HHS51.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Porocoat Porous CoatedHarris Hip Score (HHS)Postoperative to 6 Month HHS91.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
Porocoat Porous CoatedHarris Hip Score (HHS)12 Month HHS92.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.6
Porocoat Porous CoatedHarris Hip Score (HHS)24 Month HHS93.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
Porocoat Porous CoatedHarris Hip Score (HHS)36 Month HHS93.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
Porocoat Porous CoatedHarris Hip Score (HHS)48 Month HHS95.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
Secondary

Medical Imaging as a Secondary Outcome Inclusive of All Post-operative Intervals for All Participants at Study Closure.

Medical imaging as a secondary outcome inclusive of all post-operative intervals for all participants at study closure. This measure is a percentage of the overall Participants with a specific radiographic outcome. Measurements were made by an Independent Radiographic Reviewer (IRR) and include assessments made based on protocol defined radiographic success criteria that includes Subsidence (10 mm), Osseointegration, Radiolucency \> 2 mm in any zone, Complete Circumferential Radiolucencies, Spot-Welds (AP View) p \< .10, Spot-Welds (Lateral View) p \< .10, Cortical Hypertrophy (AP View), Cortical Hypertrophy (Lateral View)

Time frame: Postoperative, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DuoFix HAMedical Imaging as a Secondary Outcome Inclusive of All Post-operative Intervals for All Participants at Study Closure.Subsidence (10 mm)1 Percentage of Participants Analyzed
DuoFix HAMedical Imaging as a Secondary Outcome Inclusive of All Post-operative Intervals for All Participants at Study Closure.Osseointegration82 Percentage of Participants Analyzed
DuoFix HAMedical Imaging as a Secondary Outcome Inclusive of All Post-operative Intervals for All Participants at Study Closure.Radiolucency > 2 mm in any zone0 Percentage of Participants Analyzed
DuoFix HAMedical Imaging as a Secondary Outcome Inclusive of All Post-operative Intervals for All Participants at Study Closure.Complete Circumferential Radiolucencies0 Percentage of Participants Analyzed
DuoFix HAMedical Imaging as a Secondary Outcome Inclusive of All Post-operative Intervals for All Participants at Study Closure.Spot-Welds (AP View) p < .1023 Percentage of Participants Analyzed
DuoFix HAMedical Imaging as a Secondary Outcome Inclusive of All Post-operative Intervals for All Participants at Study Closure.Spot-Welds (Lateral View) p < .108 Percentage of Participants Analyzed
DuoFix HAMedical Imaging as a Secondary Outcome Inclusive of All Post-operative Intervals for All Participants at Study Closure.Cortical Hypertrophy (AP View)12 Percentage of Participants Analyzed
DuoFix HAMedical Imaging as a Secondary Outcome Inclusive of All Post-operative Intervals for All Participants at Study Closure.Cortical Hypertrophy (Lateral View)3 Percentage of Participants Analyzed
Porocoat Porous CoatedMedical Imaging as a Secondary Outcome Inclusive of All Post-operative Intervals for All Participants at Study Closure.Cortical Hypertrophy (Lateral View)4 Percentage of Participants Analyzed
Porocoat Porous CoatedMedical Imaging as a Secondary Outcome Inclusive of All Post-operative Intervals for All Participants at Study Closure.Subsidence (10 mm)0 Percentage of Participants Analyzed
Porocoat Porous CoatedMedical Imaging as a Secondary Outcome Inclusive of All Post-operative Intervals for All Participants at Study Closure.Spot-Welds (AP View) p < .1014 Percentage of Participants Analyzed
Porocoat Porous CoatedMedical Imaging as a Secondary Outcome Inclusive of All Post-operative Intervals for All Participants at Study Closure.Osseointegration80 Percentage of Participants Analyzed
Porocoat Porous CoatedMedical Imaging as a Secondary Outcome Inclusive of All Post-operative Intervals for All Participants at Study Closure.Cortical Hypertrophy (AP View)12 Percentage of Participants Analyzed
Porocoat Porous CoatedMedical Imaging as a Secondary Outcome Inclusive of All Post-operative Intervals for All Participants at Study Closure.Radiolucency > 2 mm in any zone0 Percentage of Participants Analyzed
Porocoat Porous CoatedMedical Imaging as a Secondary Outcome Inclusive of All Post-operative Intervals for All Participants at Study Closure.Spot-Welds (Lateral View) p < .103 Percentage of Participants Analyzed
Porocoat Porous CoatedMedical Imaging as a Secondary Outcome Inclusive of All Post-operative Intervals for All Participants at Study Closure.Complete Circumferential Radiolucencies0 Percentage of Participants Analyzed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026