Skip to content

Metvix PDT Versus Vehicle PDT With Aktilite CL128 Lamp in Patients With Actinic Keratosis on the Face and Scalp

A Multicenter, Double Blind, Vehicle-controlled, Randomized Study of Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) With Metvix 160 mg/g Cream and Aktilite CL128 LED Light in Patients With Multiple Actinic Keratosis on the Face and/or Scalp

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00304239
Enrollment
131
Registered
2006-03-17
Start date
2006-03-13
Completion date
2007-01-23
Last updated
2023-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Actinic Keratosis

Keywords

Methyl aminolevulinate, Photodynamic therapy, Aktilite CL128 LED light source, Multiple Actinic Keratosis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) with methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) cream to PDT with vehicle cream, using the Light-emitting diode (LED) light source Aktilite CL128, in treatment of participants with multiple actinic keratosis (sun-damaged skin) on the face and/or scalp.

Detailed description

Actinic keratoses are pre-malignant skin lesions, which may develop to squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). They are usually small, thin, erythematous, de-squamating lesions on light exposed atrophic skin and the lesions are often multiple. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is the selective destruction of abnormal cells through light activation of a photosensitiser in the presence of oxygen. These cells accumulate more photosensitiser than normal cells. The photosensitiser generates reactive oxygen species upon illumination. For skin diseases, such as actinic keratosis (AK), there has been an increasing interest in using topically applied precursors of the photoactive porphyrins (PAP). The most commonly used precursors have been 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and its derivatives. The present test drug contains methyl aminolevulinate, which penetrates the lesions well and shows high lesion selectivity. Different light sources (i.e. CureLight, Aktilite CL16 and Aktilite CL128) had been used for the activation of PAP, which absorbs light in the range of 400-700 nanometer (nm). The present study used the Aktilite CL 128 lamp. Aktilite 128 was based on LED technology and emits a narrow red light spectrum with an average wavelength of 630 (+/-5) nm. This study was similar to two other studies performed, on which the U.S. approval of Metvixia cream was based except for the light source used. This study was one of two studies performed to document the safety and efficacy of the Aktilite CL 128 lamp when used in combination with Metvixia cream. Previous studies have shown that the risks attributed to Metvixia PDT are few and related mainly to transient pain and local erythema during and shortly after treatment. These reactions are part of the expected local phototoxicity reaction. PDT offers an advantage to other treatment modalities for actinic keratosis, being a non-invasive treatment available on an outpatient basis. Several separate lesions can be treated simultaneously and the same lesion(s) can be treated repeatedly with success. There are no known systemic toxicity or interaction with other medication. The treatment is also lesion selective, leaving the surrounding tissue intact and functional, also allowing excellent cosmetic results after treatment.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTMetvix-PDT

Metvix 160 mg/g Cream was applied for 3 hours with occlusive dressing, and illumination with non-coherent red light using the Aktilite CL128 lamp, with a total light dose 37 Joule/square centimeter (J/cm²). All eligible lesions on the participant were treated twice with an interval of 1 week between treatments.

COMBINATION_PRODUCTVehicle-PDT

Vehicle Cream was applied for 3 hours with occlusive dressing, and illumination with non-coherent red light using the Aktilite CL128 lamp, with a total light dose 37 J/cm². All eligible lesions on the participant were treated twice with an interval of 1 week between treatments.

Sponsors

Galderma R&D
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Double blinded

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of 4-10 previously untreated, not pigmented, non-hyperkeratotic AK lesions of 3 mm or more diameter of Grade 1 and/or 2 of the face and/or scalp where other therapies are unacceptable or considered medically less appropriate. * Males or females above 18 years of age. * Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with porphyria. * Participants immunosuppressed for idiopathic, disease specific or therapeutic reasons. * Known allergy to MAL, a similar PDT compound or excipients of the cream. * Participants with history of hypersensitivity to nut products or other known protein antigens. * Participation in other clinical studies either currently or within the last 30 days. * Participants receiving local treatment (including cryotherapy and curretage) in face / scalp area within the last 30 days. * Participants receiving topical treatment (including imiquimod, 5-FU and diclofenac) in face / scalp area within the last 3 months. * Pregnant or breast-feeding: All women of child-bearing potential must use adequate contraception (oral contraceptives, intrauterine device, contraceptive skin patch, etc) during the treatment period and one month thereafter. In addition, they must have a negative pregnancy test prior to treatment. * Any conditions that may be associated with a risk of poor protocol compliance. * Participants currently receiving regular ultraviolet radiation therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant Complete Response Rate (CRR)At Week 13Participant complete response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response. Complete response was defined as the complete disappearance of the lesion determined by clinical assessment (visual inspection and palpation) by an investigator.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lesion Complete Response RateAt Week 13Lesion complete response rate was defined as the percentage of pre-existing and treated lesions at baseline that were assessed as clear (complete disappearance of the lesion, visually and by palpation) after treatment. Percentage of lesions reported by location.
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Site Adverse EventsFrom start of study drug administration up to Week 13An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory value), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. Number of participants with at least one treatment site adverse events were reported.

Countries

Germany, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 12 centers in Germany and the United States from 13 March 2006 to 23 January 2007.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 131 participants were enrolled and received treatment in this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Metvix-PDT
Participants received Metvix-PDT 160 mg/g cream on face and/or scalp for 3 hours on Day 0 and Day 7.
73
Vehicle-PDT
Participants received Vehicle-PDT on face and/or scalp for 3 hours on Day 0 and Day 7.
58
Total131

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event20
Overall StudyProtocol Deviations/Violations150

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMetvix-PDTVehicle-PDTTotal
Age, Continuous70.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
67.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
68.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
73 Participants58 Participants131 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants13 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
60 Participants45 Participants105 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 730 / 58
other
Total, other adverse events
62 / 7334 / 58
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 733 / 58

Outcome results

Primary

Participant Complete Response Rate (CRR)

Participant complete response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response. Complete response was defined as the complete disappearance of the lesion determined by clinical assessment (visual inspection and palpation) by an investigator.

Time frame: At Week 13

Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all participants that were randomized and for whom any aspect of treatment with either Metvix-PDT or Vehicle-PDT was initiated.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Metvix-PDTParticipant Complete Response Rate (CRR)68.4 Percentage of participants
Vehicle-PDTParticipant Complete Response Rate (CRR)6.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Lesion Complete Response Rate

Lesion complete response rate was defined as the percentage of pre-existing and treated lesions at baseline that were assessed as clear (complete disappearance of the lesion, visually and by palpation) after treatment. Percentage of lesions reported by location.

Time frame: At Week 13

Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all participants that were randomized and for whom any aspect of treatment with either Metvix-PDT or Vehicle-PDT was initiated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Metvix-PDTLesion Complete Response RateFace89 Percentage of lesions
Metvix-PDTLesion Complete Response RateScalp81 Percentage of lesions
Vehicle-PDTLesion Complete Response RateFace28 Percentage of lesions
Vehicle-PDTLesion Complete Response RateScalp30 Percentage of lesions
Secondary

Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Site Adverse Events

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory value), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. Number of participants with at least one treatment site adverse events were reported.

Time frame: From start of study drug administration up to Week 13

Population: The safety population consisted of all participants for whom any kind of treatment was initiated.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Metvix-PDTNumber of Participants With at Least One Treatment Site Adverse Events61 Participants
Vehicle-PDTNumber of Participants With at Least One Treatment Site Adverse Events27 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026