Skip to content

Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Stage III or Stage IV Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors

Phase II Trial of Chemotherapy in Sporadic and Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Associated High Grade Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00304083
Enrollment
48
Registered
2006-03-17
Start date
2005-12-31
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2018-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neurofibromatosis Type 1, Sarcoma

Keywords

adult neurofibrosarcoma, childhood neurofibrosarcoma, metastatic childhood soft tissue sarcoma, nonmetastatic childhood soft tissue sarcoma, stage IV adult soft tissue sarcoma, neurofibromatosis type 1

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and etoposide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Giving combination chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed. Giving combination chemotherapy after surgery may kill any tumor cells that remain after surgery. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well combination chemotherapy works in treating patients with stage III or stage IV malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * Determine the clinical response rate (complete and partial) in patients with sporadic or neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-associated high-grade stage III or IV malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) after treatment with 4 courses of chemotherapy comprising doxorubicin hydrochloride and ifosfamide (IA) followed by etoposide and ifosfamide (IE). Secondary * Evaluate the utility of fludeoxyglucose F18 positron emission tomography (\^18FDG-PET) and automated MRI volumetric tumor analysis as tools to assess response to treatment. * Correlate response evaluation by 2-dimensional WHO criteria, 1-dimensional RECIST criteria, \^18FDG-PET, and volumetric MRI with percent necrosis in tumor specimens from patients who undergo surgery for local control after chemotherapy. * Evaluate the response of plexiform neurofibroma(s) (if present) to chemotherapy using WHO criteria and automated volumetric MRI analysis. * Evaluate the molecular biology of sporadic and NF1-associated MPNSTs by performing a detailed pathologic analysis of tumor samples with the goal to analyze if markers can be identified that predict for response to chemotherapy or outcome. * Construct a tissue microarray from submitted tumor samples, that will be used in the future to identify novel targets for treatment of MPNSTs. * Assess if a serum biomarker can be identified, that predicts for the presence of a MPNST versus benign plexiform neurofibroma. * Increase the knowledge of the epidemiology and clinical presentation of NF1-associated MPNSTs. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to type of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) (sporadic MPNST vs neurofibromatosis type 1 \[NF1\]-associated MPNST). Patients receive 1 of 2 treatment regimens depending on the location of the MPNST and tumor response to chemotherapy. * Chemotherapy and local control by radiotherapy and surgery: Patients receive doxorubicin hydrochloride and ifosfamide (IA) chemotherapy comprising doxorubicin hydrochloride IV over 15 minutes on days 1 and 2 and ifosfamide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 2 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Patients then receive etoposide and ifosfamide (IE) chemotherapy comprising etoposide IV over 1 hour and ifosfamide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also receive filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously (SC) after each chemotherapy course beginning on day 6 or 7 and continuing until blood counts recover or pegfilgrastim SC once on day 6 or 7. After recovery from chemotherapy, patients undergo radiotherapy and receive 2 more courses of IE during radiotherapy followed by 2 more courses of IA after completion of radiotherapy. Some patients may then undergo surgery. * Chemotherapy and local control by surgery: Patients receive 2 courses of IA followed by 2 courses of IE as above. After recovery from chemotherapy, patients undergo surgery. After recovery from surgery, patients receive 2 more courses of IA followed by 2 more courses of IE in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for up to 5 years. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 74 patients will be accrued for this study.

Interventions

DRUGetoposide

Given IV

DRUGifosfamide

Given IV

PROCEDUREconventional surgery

Patients undergo surgery

RADIATIONradiation therapy

Patients undergo radiotherapy

BIOLOGICALfilgrastim

Given subcutaneously

DRUGdoxorubicin hydrochloride

Given IV

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Newly diagnosed sporadic or neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-associated high-grade malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) * Stage III or stage IV (metastatic) disease * Measurable disease, defined as at least 1 tumor that is measurable in 2 dimensions on CT scan or MRI PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * Ejection fraction normal by echocardiogram or MUGA * Serum creatinine normal for age OR creatinine clearance \> 60 mL/min * SGPT \< 5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) * Bilirubin \< 2.5 times ULN * Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm\^3\* * Hemoglobin ≥ 9.0 g/dL\* * Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm\^3\* * ECOG performance status 0-2 * Not pregnant or nursing * Negative pregnancy test * Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 6 months after completion of study treatment NOTE: \* Unsupported PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * No prior chemotherapy for MPNST * Prior surgical resection of MPNST allowed provided residual or recurrent measurable disease is present * Recovered from toxic effects of all prior therapy * At least 3 weeks since prior chemotherapy or biologic therapy for treatment of a plexiform neurofibroma, optical pathway tumor, or other NF1-associated tumor (in patients with NF1) * At least 6 weeks since prior radiotherapy for treatment of a plexiform neurofibroma, optical pathway tumor, or other NF1-associated tumor (in patients with NF1) * At least 4 weeks since prior radiotherapy to the area involved by MPNST * No other concurrent growth factors (e.g., sargramostim \[GM-CSF\] or interleukin-11) * Concurrent epoetin alfa allowed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Response Rate (Complete Response and Partial Response)After 4 Cycles (1 cycle=21 days)WHO criteria was used to determine responses due to the nonspherical shape of most MPNST. Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial response (PR), \>=50% decrease of target lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Utility of Fludeoxyglucose F18 Positron Emission Tomography (18FDG-PET) and Automated MRI Volumetric Tumor Analysis to Assess Response to TreatmentAfter 4 cyclesEvaluate the utility of fludeoxyglucose F18 positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) and automated MRI volumetric tumor analysis as tools to assess response to treatment.
Response Evaluation Using WHO, RECIST, 18 FDG-PET and Volumetric MRI With Percent Necrosis in Tumor SpecimensAfter 4 cyclesCorrelate response evaluation using WHO, RECIST, 18 FDG-PET and volumetric MRI with percent necrosis in tumor specimens from patients who undergo surgery for local control after chemotherapy.
Perform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseAfter 4 cyclesEvaluate the molecular biology of sporadic and NF1-associated MPNSTs by performing a detailed pathologic analysis of tumor samples with the goal to analyze if markers can be identified that predict for response to chemotherapy or outcome.
Response of Plexiform Neurofibroma to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Volumetric MRI AnalysisAfter 4 Cycles (1 cycle=21 days)Evaluate the response of plexiformneurofibroma (if present) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using WHO criteria and volumetric MRI analysis as a tool for response assessment
Identify the Number of Participants With a Serum Biomarker to Predict the Presence of MPNST Versus Benign Plexiform NeurofibromaAfter 4 cyclesAssess if a serum biomarker can be identified that predicts for the presence of a MPNST versus benign plexiform neurofibroma.
Provide Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of the Number of Participants With NF1-associated MPNSTs.After 4 cyclesIncrease the knowledge of the epidemiology and clinical presentation of NF1-associated MPNSTs.
Construct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available TissueAfter 4 cyclesConstruct a tissue microarray from submitted tumor samples that will be used in the future to identify novel targets for treatment of MPNSTs. The tissue microarray looked at various gene deletions and amplifications.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
NF1 MPNST
2 cycles of ifosfamide + doxorubicin ('IA') followed by 2 cycles of ifosfamide + etoposide ('IE') prior to local control measures (surgery and/or radiation therapy). Local control with surgery and/or radiation will commence after recovery from toxicities. Patients, who undergo surgery only, will receive 2 more cycles of 'IA' followed by 2 cycles of 'IE' beginning after recovery from surgery. Patients, who receive radiation therapy in addition to surgery, will receive 2 cycles of 'IE' during radiation treatment, as doxorubicin cannot be concurrently administered with radiation therapy, and 2 cycles of 'IA' after completion of radiation treatment. 1 cycle = 21 days Doxo = Doxorubicin 37.5 mg/m2/dose IV over 15 minutes on days 1, 2 Ifos = Ifosfamide 1,800 mg/m2/dose IV over 60 minutes on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Etop = Etoposide 100 mg/m2/dose IV over 60 minutes on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
34
Sporadic MPNST
2 cycles of ifosfamide + doxorubicin ('IA') followed by 2 cycles of ifosfamide + etoposide ('IE') prior to local control measures (surgery and/or radiation therapy). Local control with surgery and/or radiation will commence after recovery from toxicities. Patients, who undergo surgery only, will receive 2 more cycles of 'IA' followed by 2 cycles of 'IE' beginning after recovery from surgery. Patients, who receive radiation therapy in addition to surgery, will receive 2 cycles of 'IE' during radiation treatment, as doxorubicin cannot be concurrently administered with radiation therapy, and 2 cycles of 'IA' after completion of radiation treatment. 1 cycle = 21 days Doxo = Doxorubicin 37.5 mg/m2/dose IV over 15 minutes on days 1, 2 Ifos = Ifosfamide 1,800 mg/m2/dose IV over 60 minutes on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Etop = Etoposide 100 mg/m2/dose IV over 60 minutes on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
14
Total48

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDisease Progression51
Overall StudyOther52
Overall StudyPhysician Decision83
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject42

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNF1 MPNSTSporadic MPNSTTotal
Age, Continuous33 years40 years36.5 years
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
12 Participants5 Participants17 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
22 Participants9 Participants31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 48
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 48

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Response Rate (Complete Response and Partial Response)

WHO criteria was used to determine responses due to the nonspherical shape of most MPNST. Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial response (PR), \>=50% decrease of target lesions.

Time frame: After 4 Cycles (1 cycle=21 days)

Population: 37/48 patients total were evaluable for response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NF1 MPNSTNumber of Participants With Response Rate (Complete Response and Partial Response)Partial response5 Participants
NF1 MPNSTNumber of Participants With Response Rate (Complete Response and Partial Response)Complete response0 Participants
NF1 MPNSTNumber of Participants With Response Rate (Complete Response and Partial Response)Stable Disease20 Participants
NF1 MPNSTNumber of Participants With Response Rate (Complete Response and Partial Response)Progressive Disease3 Participants
Sporadic MPNSTNumber of Participants With Response Rate (Complete Response and Partial Response)Progressive Disease1 Participants
Sporadic MPNSTNumber of Participants With Response Rate (Complete Response and Partial Response)Partial response4 Participants
Sporadic MPNSTNumber of Participants With Response Rate (Complete Response and Partial Response)Stable Disease4 Participants
Sporadic MPNSTNumber of Participants With Response Rate (Complete Response and Partial Response)Complete response0 Participants
Secondary

Construct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available Tissue

Construct a tissue microarray from submitted tumor samples that will be used in the future to identify novel targets for treatment of MPNSTs. The tissue microarray looked at various gene deletions and amplifications.

Time frame: After 4 cycles

Population: The number of participants vary in the rows from overall number analyzed, due to the tissue that was available for testing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NF1 MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available TissueEGFR (7p12) amplification3 participants
NF1 MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available TissueTOPO2A (17q21-q22) amplification5 participants
NF1 MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available TissueHer2/Neu (17q11-q12) amplification2 participants
NF1 MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available TissueCyclin D1 (11q13) amplification1 participants
NF1 MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available Tissuec-MYC (8q24) amplification5 participants
NF1 MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available TissueN-MYC (2p24) amplification3 participants
NF1 MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available TissueNF1 (17q11) deletion7 participants
NF1 MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available Tissuep16 (9p21) deletion10 participants
NF1 MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available TissueRB (13q14) deletion1 participants
NF1 MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available Tissuep53 (17q13) deletion6 participants
Sporadic MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available Tissuep16 (9p21) deletion3 participants
Sporadic MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available TissueEGFR (7p12) amplification1 participants
Sporadic MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available TissueN-MYC (2p24) amplification1 participants
Sporadic MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available TissueTOPO2A (17q21-q22) amplification2 participants
Sporadic MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available Tissuep53 (17q13) deletion2 participants
Sporadic MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available TissueHer2/Neu (17q11-q12) amplification0 participants
Sporadic MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available TissueNF1 (17q11) deletion0 participants
Sporadic MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available TissueCyclin D1 (11q13) amplification2 participants
Sporadic MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available TissueRB (13q14) deletion2 participants
Sporadic MPNSTConstruct Tissue Microarray to Identify Novel Targets for Treatment for the Number of Participants With Available Tissuec-MYC (8q24) amplification0 participants
Secondary

Identify the Number of Participants With a Serum Biomarker to Predict the Presence of MPNST Versus Benign Plexiform Neurofibroma

Assess if a serum biomarker can be identified that predicts for the presence of a MPNST versus benign plexiform neurofibroma.

Time frame: After 4 cycles

Population: Data looked at response evaluable patients with MPNST and focused on the TOPO2A gene being amplified.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NF1 MPNSTIdentify the Number of Participants With a Serum Biomarker to Predict the Presence of MPNST Versus Benign Plexiform NeurofibromaNF1 patients with gene amplified3 Participants
NF1 MPNSTIdentify the Number of Participants With a Serum Biomarker to Predict the Presence of MPNST Versus Benign Plexiform NeurofibromaSporadic patients with gene amplified2 Participants
Secondary

Perform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of Response

Evaluate the molecular biology of sporadic and NF1-associated MPNSTs by performing a detailed pathologic analysis of tumor samples with the goal to analyze if markers can be identified that predict for response to chemotherapy or outcome.

Time frame: After 4 cycles

Population: The rows are among three different categories: Histologic Variant, Cellularity and Necrosis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NF1 MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseHistologic Variant- Conventional15 Participants
NF1 MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseHistologic Variant- Perineural1 Participants
NF1 MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseHistologic Variant- Epithelioid0 Participants
NF1 MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseHistologic Variant- Divergent1 Participants
NF1 MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseHistologic Variant- Mixed histology9 Participants
NF1 MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseLow Cellularity0 Participants
NF1 MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseModerate Cellularity5 Participants
NF1 MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseHigh Cellularity21 Participants
NF1 MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseNecrosis- absent5 Participants
NF1 MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseNecrosis 1-10%8 Participants
NF1 MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseNecrosis 10-50%10 Participants
NF1 MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseNecrosis >50%3 Participants
Sporadic MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseNecrosis 10-50%5 Participants
Sporadic MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseHistologic Variant- Conventional7 Participants
Sporadic MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseModerate Cellularity4 Participants
Sporadic MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseHistologic Variant- Perineural0 Participants
Sporadic MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseNecrosis 1-10%2 Participants
Sporadic MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseHistologic Variant- Epithelioid2 Participants
Sporadic MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseHigh Cellularity7 Participants
Sporadic MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseHistologic Variant- Divergent0 Participants
Sporadic MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseNecrosis >50%3 Participants
Sporadic MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseHistologic Variant- Mixed histology2 Participants
Sporadic MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseNecrosis- absent1 Participants
Sporadic MPNSTPerform Pathologic Analysis of Tumor Samples to Analyze the Number of Participants With Markers as Predictors of ResponseLow Cellularity0 Participants
Secondary

Provide Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of the Number of Participants With NF1-associated MPNSTs.

Increase the knowledge of the epidemiology and clinical presentation of NF1-associated MPNSTs.

Time frame: After 4 cycles

Population: Clinical evaluation of patients with NF1 was performed at trial enrollment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NF1 MPNSTProvide Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of the Number of Participants With NF1-associated MPNSTs.≥10 subcutaneous neurofibromas10 Participants
NF1 MPNSTProvide Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of the Number of Participants With NF1-associated MPNSTs.6 or more CAL17 Participants
NF1 MPNSTProvide Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of the Number of Participants With NF1-associated MPNSTs.Intertriginous freckling19 Participants
NF1 MPNSTProvide Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of the Number of Participants With NF1-associated MPNSTs.Neurofibromas26 Participants
NF1 MPNSTProvide Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of the Number of Participants With NF1-associated MPNSTs.Plexiform neurofibroma12 Participants
NF1 MPNSTProvide Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of the Number of Participants With NF1-associated MPNSTs.Paraspinal neurofibromas12 Participants
NF1 MPNSTProvide Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of the Number of Participants With NF1-associated MPNSTs.≥10 cutaneous neurofibromas13 Participants
NF1 MPNSTProvide Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of the Number of Participants With NF1-associated MPNSTs.Optic glioma1 Participants
NF1 MPNSTProvide Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of the Number of Participants With NF1-associated MPNSTs.Glioma1 Participants
NF1 MPNSTProvide Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of the Number of Participants With NF1-associated MPNSTs.Scoliosis5 Participants
NF1 MPNSTProvide Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of the Number of Participants With NF1-associated MPNSTs.Intellectual delay8 Participants
NF1 MPNSTProvide Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of the Number of Participants With NF1-associated MPNSTs.Hypertension8 Participants
Secondary

Response Evaluation Using WHO, RECIST, 18 FDG-PET and Volumetric MRI With Percent Necrosis in Tumor Specimens

Correlate response evaluation using WHO, RECIST, 18 FDG-PET and volumetric MRI with percent necrosis in tumor specimens from patients who undergo surgery for local control after chemotherapy.

Time frame: After 4 cycles

Population: 33 patients were evaluable for response after cycle 4, response evaluation using WHO and RECIST was performed. Response evaluation was not assessed with 18 FDG-PET and volumetric MRI.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NF1 MPNSTResponse Evaluation Using WHO, RECIST, 18 FDG-PET and Volumetric MRI With Percent Necrosis in Tumor SpecimensResponses in agreement29 Participants
NF1 MPNSTResponse Evaluation Using WHO, RECIST, 18 FDG-PET and Volumetric MRI With Percent Necrosis in Tumor SpecimensResponses were not in agreement4 Participants
Secondary

Response of Plexiform Neurofibroma to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Volumetric MRI Analysis

Evaluate the response of plexiformneurofibroma (if present) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using WHO criteria and volumetric MRI analysis as a tool for response assessment

Time frame: After 4 Cycles (1 cycle=21 days)

Population: MRI imaging of the MPNST and plexiform neurofibroma component was not sufficient to allow for volumetric analysis over time. Reasons include differences in imaging technique over time and incomplete coverage of the entire tumor.

Secondary

Utility of Fludeoxyglucose F18 Positron Emission Tomography (18FDG-PET) and Automated MRI Volumetric Tumor Analysis to Assess Response to Treatment

Evaluate the utility of fludeoxyglucose F18 positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) and automated MRI volumetric tumor analysis as tools to assess response to treatment.

Time frame: After 4 cycles

Population: This assessment involved 18FDG-PET and MRI imaging of the MPNST and plexiform neurofibroma component. Due to technical issues with MRI imaging, data was not reliably collected from any study participant to allow for meaningful analysis.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026