Skip to content

IMPROVE HF: Registry to Improve the Use of Evidence-Based Heart Failure Therapies in the Outpatient Setting

Registry to Improve the Use of Evidence-Based Heart Failure Therapies in the Outpatient Setting

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00303979
Acronym
IMPROVE-HF
Enrollment
34810
Registered
2006-03-17
Start date
2005-05-31
Completion date
2009-08-31
Last updated
2019-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure, Congestive, Myocardial Infarction, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Keywords

Systolic Heart Failure, Quality of Care, Outcomes, Evidence-based Guidelines, Recommended Therapies

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to characterize current management of patients with either heart failure or prior myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction and to assess the effect of education, specific clinical guidelines, reminder systems, comprehensive disease state management tools, benchmarked quality reports, and academic detailing on the use of evidence-based heart failure therapies in cardiology practices. This study is a quality improvement initiative that is being conducted through review of patient records.

Detailed description

IMPROVE HF, the largest US outpatient HF patient registry, has substantially contributed to our knowledge of how systolic HF and post MI left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) patients are treated in the outpatient setting. The findings of IMPROVE HF clearly support this guideline and may help to establish a model framework for future performance improvement programs for outpatient cardiology practices.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older * Primary or secondary diagnosis of heart failure or prior myocardial infarction (heart attack) * Moderate-to-severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) as demonstrated by an ejection fraction \< or = 35% and/or a qualitative assessment of LVD of moderate-to-severe or severe LVD * Patient has been seen at the clinic at least twice in the past 2 years * Patient received care from the physician participating in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has died * Patient is not expected to survive for 12 months due to medical conditions other than heart failure * Patient has undergone heart transplant surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.24 Month7 performance measures: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and/or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB), beta-blokers, aldosterone receptor antagonists, anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (AF), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-P/CRT-D), cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD/CRT-D), heart failure (HF) education. We first calcuated % of patients who were eligible for a performance measure that were treated by it at baseline and 24 months. We then calculated the relative change as (% treated at 24 months - % treated at baseline)/% treated at baseline. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated and the relative change of each performance measure was evaluated using a z-test for one-sample proportion. The number of performance measures with \>= 20% relative improvement was determined. The intervention was considered successful if a relative 20% or greater improvement in at least 2 of the 7 performance measures at 24 months compared with baseline was achieved.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Observe the Number of Sites That Demonstrate a Relative 20% or Greater Improvement in 2 or More of the 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months as Compared to Baseline in Cohort A.24 monthsThe number of practices that achieved greater than or equal to 20% improvement in two or more of the 7 performance measures at 24 months as compared to baseline of cohort A is presented.
Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.24 monthsperformance measure improvement for each performance measure was analyzed at a practice level from baseline to 24 months. Performance measure adherence was calculated at the individual practice level and then combined and summarized. Mean, standard deviation, and 95% confidence intervals for performance measure adherence, composite score and relative change (24 months compared with baseline) are reported. The Composite Score is based on the ratio of the sum of the numerators of all individual performance measures to the sum of the denominators of all individual performances measures. The numerator of a performance measure is the number of patients treated with that measure. The denomiator of a performance measure is the number of patients eligible for being treated with that measure.
Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Baseline and 6 MonthsThe relative changes between baseline of cohort A and 6 months of cohort B in performance measures and composite score for the aggregate practices were calculated using mean, standard deviation and 95% CI.
Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.baseline and 18 MonthsThe relative changes between baseline of cohort A and 18 months of cohort C in performance measures and composite score for the aggregate practices were calculated using mean, standard deviation and 95% CI.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study sites included outpatient cardiology practices in the United States. Patients diagnosed with heart failure or prior myocardial infarction or developed moderate-severe left ventricular dysfunction were included. Each cardiology practice had five chart reviews and an educational workshop as a part of the process improvement intervention.

Pre-assignment details

The study included 3 mutually exclusive patient cohorts. Patients in cohort A were reviewed at baseline, 12 and 24 months. This is also called the longitudinal cohort. Patients in cohort B and C were reviewed at 6 and 18 months, respectively. These two cohorts are referred to as the single time point cohorts.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort A (Baseline, 12 and 24 Months)
Cohort A: The charts of 15,177 patients were reviewed at baseline, 12 months and 24 months. The principal investigator and HF nurse of the study sites attended an educational workshop at baseline, 12 and 24 months as well where they were provided with tools meant to improve HF care at their practices. The tools included tip cards, worksheets, and patient education materials. Cohort A is a longitudinal cohort.
15,177
Cohort B (6 Months)
Cohort B: The charts of 9,992 patients were reviewed at 6 months. The principal investigator and HF nurse of the study sites attended an educational workshop at the same time where they were provided with tools meant to improve HF care at their practices. The tools included tip cards, worksheets, and patient education materials. Cohort B is a single time point cohort.
9,992
Cohort C (18 Months)
Cohort C: The charts of 9,641 patients were reviewed at 18 months. The principal investigator and HF nurse of the study sites attended an educational workshop at the same time where they were provided with tools meant to improve HF care at their practices. The tools included tip cards, worksheets, and patient education materials. Cohort C is a single time point cohort.
9,641
Total34,810

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort C (18 Months)Cohort B (6 Months)Cohort A (Baseline, 12 and 24 Months)Total
Age, Continuous68.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
68.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
68.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
68.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
Age, Customized
<=64 years
3539 participants3606 participants5274 participants12419 participants
Age, Customized
>76 years
3010 participants3041 participants4748 participants10799 participants
Age, Customized
Between 64 and 76 years
3089 participants3344 participants5127 participants11560 participants
Age, Customized
Missing
3 participants1 participants28 participants32 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
9641 participants9992 participants15177 participants34810 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
2827 participants2918 participants4383 participants10128 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
6814 participants7069 participants10787 participants24670 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Missing
0 participants5 participants7 participants12 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.

7 performance measures: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and/or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB), beta-blokers, aldosterone receptor antagonists, anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (AF), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-P/CRT-D), cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD/CRT-D), heart failure (HF) education. We first calcuated % of patients who were eligible for a performance measure that were treated by it at baseline and 24 months. We then calculated the relative change as (% treated at 24 months - % treated at baseline)/% treated at baseline. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated and the relative change of each performance measure was evaluated using a z-test for one-sample proportion. The number of performance measures with \>= 20% relative improvement was determined. The intervention was considered successful if a relative 20% or greater improvement in at least 2 of the 7 performance measures at 24 months compared with baseline was achieved.

Time frame: 24 Month

Population: 167 practices contributed data to the baseline chart review. Twelve of the practices withdrew from the study prior to the next chart review milestone. 155 of those practices' data contributed to the follow up of the longitudinal cohort time points of 12 and 24 months post educational workshop.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A (at Baseline)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 5: CRT-P/CRT-D37.7 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (at Baseline)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 7: HF education61.8 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (at Baseline)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 6: ICD/CRT-D48.8 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (at Baseline)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 2: Beta-blocker86.2 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (at Baseline)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 1: ACEI/ARB79.8 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (at Baseline)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 3: Aldosterone antagonist34.4 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (at Baseline)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 4: Anticoagulation for AF68.6 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (at 24 Months)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 5: CRT-P/CRT-D68.5 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (at 24 Months)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 4: Anticoagulation for AF69.3 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (at 24 Months)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 3: Aldosterone antagonist61.8 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (at 24 Months)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 6: ICD/CRT-D79.1 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (at 24 Months)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 1: ACEI/ARB86.5 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (at 24 Months)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 7: HF education70.8 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (at 24 Months)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 2: Beta-blocker93.6 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 7: HF education14.7 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 1: ACEI/ARB8.4 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 2: Beta-blocker8.6 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 3: Aldosterone antagonist79.7 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 5: CRT-P/CRT-D81.9 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 6: ICD/CRT-D62.1 percentage of participants in aggregate
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)To Evaluate Over the Aggregate IMPROVE-HF Practice Sites the Relative Changes in 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months Compared With Baseline and Determine the Number of Performance Measures That Achieved a Relative 20% or Greater Positive Change.Performance Measure 4: Anticoagulation for AF1.0 percentage of participants in aggregate
Comparison: Performance Measure #1: relative change in % of eligible patients treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and/or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACEU/ARB).p-value: <0.00195% CI: [7, 9.7]a large sample test (z-test)
Comparison: Performance Measure #2: relative change in % of eligible patients treated with beta-blockers.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [7.7, 9.6]a large sample test (z-test)
Comparison: Performance Measure #3: relative change in % of eligible patients treated with aldosterone receptor antagonists.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [70.5, 89]a large sample test (z-test)
Comparison: Performance Measure #4: relative change in % of eligible patients treated with anticoagulation for AF.p-value: 0.54695% CI: [-2.2, 4.2]a large sample test (z-test)
Comparison: Performance Measure #5: relative change in % of eligible patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-P/CRT-D).p-value: <0.00195% CI: [72.2, 91.7]a large sample test (z-test)
Comparison: Performance Measure #6: relative change in % of eligible patients treated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or CRT-D.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [59.1, 65.1]a large sample test (z-test)
Comparison: Performance Measure #7: relative change in % of eligible patients with HF education.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [12.6, 16.8]a large sample test (z-test)
Secondary

Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.

performance measure improvement for each performance measure was analyzed at a practice level from baseline to 24 months. Performance measure adherence was calculated at the individual practice level and then combined and summarized. Mean, standard deviation, and 95% confidence intervals for performance measure adherence, composite score and relative change (24 months compared with baseline) are reported. The Composite Score is based on the ratio of the sum of the numerators of all individual performance measures to the sum of the denominators of all individual performances measures. The numerator of a performance measure is the number of patients treated with that measure. The denomiator of a performance measure is the number of patients eligible for being treated with that measure.

Time frame: 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 3: Aldosterone antagonist34.5 percentageStandard Deviation 18.5
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 6: ICD/CRT-D50.1 percentageStandard Deviation 17.5
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 4: Anticoagulation for AF68.0 percentageStandard Deviation 16.1
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 5: CRT-P/CRT-D37.2 percentageStandard Deviation 30.5
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Composite Score67.1 percentageStandard Deviation 8.9
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 2: Beta-blocker86.0 percentageStandard Deviation 10.8
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 1: ACEI/ARB78.3 percentageStandard Deviation 11.5
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 7: HF education59.5 percentageStandard Deviation 23.7
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 3: Aldosterone antagonist60.3 percentageStandard Deviation 25.9
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 1: ACEI/ARB85.1 percentageStandard Deviation 10.6
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 2: Beta-blocker92.2 percentageStandard Deviation 9.8
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 4: Anticoagulation for AF67.8 percentageStandard Deviation 18
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 5: CRT-P/CRT-D66.3 percentageStandard Deviation 29
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 6: ICD/CRT-D77.5 percentageStandard Deviation 16.8
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 7: HF education72.1 percentageStandard Deviation 24
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Composite Score79.0 percentageStandard Deviation 9.3
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 1: ACEI/ARB19.4 percentageStandard Deviation 128.9
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 6: ICD/CRT-D70.9 percentageStandard Deviation 62.4
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 2: Beta-blocker7.6 percentageStandard Deviation 16.1
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Composite Score19.2 percentageStandard Deviation 18.1
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 4: Anticoagulation for AF1.0 percentageStandard Deviation 28.5
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 7: HF education50.6 percentageStandard Deviation 147.7
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 5: CRT-P/CRT-D48.4 percentageStandard Deviation 62.3
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Change From Baseline to 24 Months in Each Performance Measure and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 3: Aldosterone antagonist30.0 percentageStandard Deviation 33.8
Comparison: Performance Measure #1: Relative change at 24 months compared with baseline in ACEI/ARB for the aggregate practices.p-value: 0.00495% CI: [-1.1, 39.8]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Performance Measure #2: the relative change at 24 months compared with baseline in beta-blockers for the aggregate practices.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [5.1, 10.2]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Performance Measure #3: the relative change at 24 months compared with baseline in aldosterone antagonist for the aggregate practices.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [24.6, 35.5]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Performance Measure #4: the relative change at 24 months compared with baseline in anticoagulation for AF for the aggregate practices.p-value: 0.51395% CI: [-3.6, 5.5]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Performance Measure #5: the relative change at 24 months compared with baseline in CRT-P/CRT-D for the aggregate practices.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [37.9, 58.8]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Performance Measure #6: the relative change at 24 months compared with baseline in ICD/CRT-D for the aggregate practices.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [61, 80.8]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Performance Measure #7: the relative change at 24 months compared with baseline in HF education for the aggregate practices.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [27.1, 74.2]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Composite Score: The relative change at 24 months compared with baseline in composite score for the aggregate practices.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [16.3, 22]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Observe the Number of Sites That Demonstrate a Relative 20% or Greater Improvement in 2 or More of the 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months as Compared to Baseline in Cohort A.

The number of practices that achieved greater than or equal to 20% improvement in two or more of the 7 performance measures at 24 months as compared to baseline of cohort A is presented.

Time frame: 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Number of Sites That Demonstrate a Relative 20% or Greater Improvement in 2 or More of the 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months as Compared to Baseline in Cohort A.Performance Measure 1: ACEI/ARB15 Sites
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Number of Sites That Demonstrate a Relative 20% or Greater Improvement in 2 or More of the 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months as Compared to Baseline in Cohort A.Performance Measure 2: Beta-blocker9 Sites
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Number of Sites That Demonstrate a Relative 20% or Greater Improvement in 2 or More of the 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months as Compared to Baseline in Cohort A.Performance Measure 3: Aldosterone antagonist82 Sites
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Number of Sites That Demonstrate a Relative 20% or Greater Improvement in 2 or More of the 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months as Compared to Baseline in Cohort A.Performance Measure 4: Anticoagulation for AF14 Sites
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Number of Sites That Demonstrate a Relative 20% or Greater Improvement in 2 or More of the 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months as Compared to Baseline in Cohort A.Performance Measure 5: CRT-P/CRT-D83 Sites
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Number of Sites That Demonstrate a Relative 20% or Greater Improvement in 2 or More of the 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months as Compared to Baseline in Cohort A.Performance Measure 6: ICD/CRT-D114 Sites
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Number of Sites That Demonstrate a Relative 20% or Greater Improvement in 2 or More of the 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months as Compared to Baseline in Cohort A.Performance Measure 7: HF education59 Sites
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Number of Sites That Demonstrate a Relative 20% or Greater Improvement in 2 or More of the 7 Performance Measures at 24 Months as Compared to Baseline in Cohort A.>=20% relative change in 2 or more measures123 Sites
Secondary

Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.

The relative changes between baseline of cohort A and 18 months of cohort C in performance measures and composite score for the aggregate practices were calculated using mean, standard deviation and 95% CI.

Time frame: baseline and 18 Months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 1: ACEI/ARB78.7 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 11.3
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 2: Beta-blocker85.9 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 10.9
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 3: Aldosterone antagonist34.7 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 18.7
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 4: Anticoagulation for AF67.9 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 15.8
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 5: CRT-P/CRT-D37.6 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 30.7
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 6: ICD/CRT-D49.9 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 17
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 7: HF education59.4 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 23.6
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Composite Score67.1 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 8.8
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 3: Aldosterone antagonist36.6 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 23.1
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 7: HF education75.0 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 22.6
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 4: Anticoagulation for AF69.6 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 17.1
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 5: CRT-P/CRT-D43.5 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 30.1
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 6: ICD/CRT-D54.0 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 17.2
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 1: ACEI/ARB80.3 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 12.2
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 2: Beta-blocker91.8 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 7
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Composite Score73.2 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 8.4
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 3: Aldosterone antagonist5.8 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 58.3
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 2: Beta-blocker14.3 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 87.7
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 1: ACEI/ARB10.5 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 97.9
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 4: Anticoagulation for AF6.7 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 38.3
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 7: HF education59.5 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 158.5
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 6: ICD/CRT-D17.6 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 51.3
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 5: CRT-P/CRT-D9.3 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 59.7
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 18 Months of Cohort C in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Composite Score10.6 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 18.5
Comparison: Performance Measure #1: the relative change of Cohort C (18 months) compared with Cohort A at baseline in ACEI/ARB for the aggregate practices.p-value: 0.1995% CI: [-5.3, 26.3]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Performance Measure #2: the relative change of Cohort C (18 months) compared with Cohort A at baseline in beta-blockers for the aggregate practices.p-value: 0.04895% CI: [0.1, 28.4]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Performance Measure #3: the relative change of Cohort C (18 months) compared with Cohort A at baseline in aldosterone antagonist for the aggregate practices.p-value: 0.2495% CI: [-3.9, 15.4]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Performance Measure #4: the relative change of Cohort C (18 months) compared with Cohort A at baseline in anticoagulation for AF for the aggregate practices.p-value: 0.03395% CI: [0.5, 13]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Performance Measure #5: the relative change of Cohort C (18 months) compared with Cohort A at baseline in CRT-P/CRT-D for the aggregate practices.p-value: 0.08595% CI: [-1.3, 19.8]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Performance Measure #6: the relative change of Cohort C (18 months) compared with Cohort A at baseline in ICD/CRT-D for the aggregate practices.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [9.3, 25.8]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Performance Measure #7: the relative change of Cohort C (18 months) compared with Cohort A at baseline in HF education for the aggregate practices.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [33.9, 85.2]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Composite Score: the relative change of Cohort C (18 months) compared with Cohort A at baseline in composite score for the aggregate practices.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [7.6, 13.6]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.

The relative changes between baseline of cohort A and 6 months of cohort B in performance measures and composite score for the aggregate practices were calculated using mean, standard deviation and 95% CI.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 Months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 1: ACEI/ARB78.7 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 11.3
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 2: Beta-blocker85.9 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 10.9
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 3: Aldosterone antagonist34.7 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 18.7
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 4: Anticoagulation for AF67.9 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 15.8
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 5: CRT-P/CRT-D37.6 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 30.7
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 6: ICD/CRT-D49.9 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 17
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 7: HF education59.4 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 23.6
Cohort A (at Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Composite Score67.1 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 8.8
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 3: Aldosterone antagonist33.4 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 20.7
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 7: HF education67.5 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 20.8
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 4: Anticoagulation for AF68.9 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 17.4
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 5: CRT-P/CRT-D34.9 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 27.8
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 6: ICD/CRT-D52.7 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 17.4
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 1: ACEI/ARB80.2 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 10.6
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 2: Beta-blocker90.0 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 7.2
Cohort A (at 24 Months)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Composite Score70.7 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 8
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 3: Aldosterone antagonist-1.1 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 27.4
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 2: Beta-blocker10.6 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 68.9
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 1: ACEI/ARB10.3 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 97.1
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 4: Anticoagulation for AF6.2 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 38.2
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 7: HF education38.5 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 94.8
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 6: ICD/CRT-D14.4 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 46.9
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Performance Measure 5: CRT-P/CRT-D-1.8 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 53.7
Cohort A (Relative Change 24 Months vs. Baseline)Observe the Relative Change Between Baseline of Cohort A and 6 Months of Cohort B in Performance Measures and Composite Score for the Aggregate Practices.Composite Score6.6 percentage of participantsStandard Deviation 15.1
Comparison: Performance Measure #1: the relative change of Cohort B (6 months) compared with Cohort A at baseline in ACEI/ARB for the aggregate practices.p-value: 0.19795% CI: [-5.4, 25.9]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Performance Measure #2: the relative change of Cohort B (6 months) compared with Cohort A at baseline in beta-blockers for the aggregate practices.p-value: 0.06195% CI: [-0.5, 21.7]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Performance Measure #3: the relative change of Cohort B (6 months) compared with Cohort A at baseline in aldosterone antagonist for the aggregate practices.p-value: 0.62295% CI: [-5.7, 3.4]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Performance Measure #4: the relative change of Cohort B (6 months) compared with Cohort A at baseline in anticoagulation for AF for the aggregate practices.p-value: 0.0595% CI: [0, 12.4]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Performance Measure #5: the relative change of Cohort B (6 months) compared with Cohort A at baseline in CRT-P/CRT-D for the aggregate practices.p-value: 0.71195% CI: [-11.2, 7.7]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Performance Measure #6: the relative change of Cohort B (6 months) compared with Cohort A at baseline in ICD/CRT-D for the aggregate practices.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [6.9, 22]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Performance Measure #7: the relative change of Cohort B (6 months) compared with Cohort A at baseline in HF education for the aggregate practices.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [23.2, 53.8]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Composite Score: the relative change of Cohort B (6 months) compared with Cohort A at baseline in composite score for the aggregate practices.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [4.2, 9]t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026