Skip to content

Oral Budesonide vs. Oral Mesalazine in Active Crohn's Disease (CD)

Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomized, Multicentre Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Budesonide (9 mg) and Oral Mesalazine (4.5 g) in Moderately Active Crohn's Disease Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00300118
Enrollment
311
Registered
2006-03-08
Start date
2004-09-30
Completion date
2008-05-31
Last updated
2014-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohn's Disease

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether mesalazine or budesonide is more active in the treatment of active Crohn's disease.

Detailed description

Crohn's disease is often treated with glucocorticoids or mesalazine. Both drugs are indicated for active Crohn's disease. Treatment with mesalazine is indicated for the treatment of mildly to moderately active Crohn's disease. Budesonide 9 mg/day or mesalazine 4.5 g/day are better than lower doses. So far only one trial compares the efficacy and safety of budesonide and 5-ASA. The result of this trial is that budesonide is more effective in inducing remission than mesalazine. The primary objective of this trial is to confirm this result for other presentations of budesonide and mesalazine; i.e. Budenofalk® capsules (9 mg/day) and Salofalk® tablets (Eudragit-L-coated oral mesalazine; 4.5 g/day) in moderately active Crohn's disease. Mesalazine is used in this trial as a comparator.

Interventions

DRUGbudesonide

9 mg

DRUGmesalazine

4.5 g

Sponsors

Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(main): * Symptoms of Crohn's disease since at least 3 months; diagnosis confirmed by endoscopic and histological, or endoscopic and radiological criteria \[endoscopy not older than 12 months or if older, then clinical signs (e.g. pain localization, pain intensity, blood in stool) and behaviour (according to Vienna classification) should be unchanged compared to former episodes\] * Localisation of CD either in terminal ileum, ascending colon or ileocolitis * Active phase of disease (200 \< CDAI \< 400)

Exclusion criteria

(main): * Known Crohn's lesion in the upper GI-tract (up to and including the jejunum) with present symptoms * CD in the rectum currently present * Short bowel syndrome * Septic complications * Baseline stool positive for germs causing bowel disease * Abscess, perforation or active fistulas * Ileostomy or colostomy * Resection of more than 50 cm of the ileum * Bowel surgery within the last 3 months * Immediate surgery required * Clinical signs of stricturing disease * Subileus within the last 6 months * Suspicion of ileus, subileus or corresponding symptomatology * Contra-indications, special warnings and precautions mentioned in SmPC * Treatment with immunosuppressants, cytostatics, 6-TG, methotrexate, or cyclosporine within the last 3 months; in case of treatment with azathioprine or 6-MP the drugs have to be used for maintenance of remission only and dosage has to be unchanged within the last 3 months before baseline visit and during the study * Treatment with ketoconazole, ciprofloxacin or other CYP3A inhibitors within the last month before baseline visit * Treatment with anti-TNF-a therapy within 6 months before baseline visit * Conventional steroids (iv, po, rectal) within 2 weeks before the study * \> 6 mg/d budesonide po or \> 3 g/d mesalazine po within 2 weeks before the study * Patients known to be steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent from former CD episodes * Treatment of study disease with oral antibiotics (e.g., metronidazole) within the last 2 weeks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Rate of remission

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Response to treatment
Time to response
Time to remission
PGA
QoL

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026