Skip to content

ACT34-CMI -- Adult Autologous CD34+ Cells

A DB, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study of the Tolerability, Efficacy, Safety, and Dose Range of Intramyocardial CLBS14 for Reduction of Angina Episodes in Patients With Refractory Chronic Myocardial Ischemia (ACT34-CMI)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00300053
Enrollment
321
Registered
2006-03-08
Start date
2006-04-30
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2021-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myocardial Ischemia

Keywords

angina

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intramyocardial injections of CLBS14 in patients with refractory chronic myocardial ischemia.

Detailed description

This is a double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to determine the tolerability, efficacy, safety and dose range of intramyocardial injections of adult autologous CD34+ cells mobilized with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for the reduction of angina episodes in patients with refractory chronic myocardial ischemia.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALCLBS14 (low-dose)

Eligible subjects will receive subcutaneous injections of 5 µg/kg/day G-CSF for 5 days to mobilize CD34+ cells from the bone marrow to the peripheral blood. Mononuclear cells (MNCs) will be collected via apheresis on day 5. On the day of the cell/placebo injection (day 6), the apheresis product will be enriched for CD34+ cells using the Isolex 300i Magnetic Cell Selection System (Baxter Healthcare). Autologous CD34+ cells will be delivered in 10 intramyocardial injections of 0.2 mL at a dose of 1 x 10\^5 (=100000) cells/kg bodyweight each using the MyoStar injection catheter (Biosense Webster, Inc.) into the target areas of myocardial ischemia.

BIOLOGICALCLBS14 (high-dose)

Eligible subjects will receive subcutaneous injections of 5 µg/kg/day G-CSF for 5 days to mobilize CD34+cells from the bone marrow to the peripheral blood. Mononuclear cells (MNCs) will be collected via apheresis on day 5. On the day of the cell/placebo injection (day 6), the apheresis product will be enriched for CD34+ cells using the Isolex 300i Magnetic Cell Selection System (Baxter Healthcare). Autologous CD34+ cells will be delivered in 10 intramyocardial injections of 0.2 mL at a dose of 5 x 10\^5 (=500000) cells/kg bodyweight each using the MyoStar injection catheter (Biosense Webster, Inc.) into the target areas of myocardial ischemia.

BIOLOGICALplacebo injection

Eligible subjects will receive subcutaneous injections of 5 µg/kg/day G-CSF for 5 days to mobilize CD34+ cells from the bone marrow to the peripheral blood. Mononuclear cells (MNCs) will be collected via apheresis on day 5. On the day of the cell/placebo injection (day 6), the apheresis product will be enriched for CD34+ cells using the Isolex 300i Magnetic Cell Selection System (Baxter Healthcare). Placebo will be delivered in 10 intramyocardial injections of 0.2 mL each of 0.9% NaCl (saline) in 5% autologous plasma into the target areas of myocardial ischemia.

Sponsors

Lisata Therapeutics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) functional class III or IV chronic refractory angina * subjects without control of their angina symptoms, in spite of maximal tolerated doses of anti-anginal drugs, must be on optimal therapy for their angina and on a stable anti-anginal medication regimen for at least 1 month prior to entering the screening period of the study * identified as unsuitable for conventional revascularization * recent coronary angiogram (within the last 12 months) to document the coronary anatomy and to verify the revascularization procedures * subjects must have objective evidence of inducible ischemia or viable myocardium in the potential target injection zone * a left ventricular ejection fraction equal to or greater than 25% by ECHO or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) at screening * subjects must experience at minimum an average of 7 angina or anginal equivalent episodes per week * subjects must be able to complete a minimum of 3 minutes but nor more than 10 minutes on a treadmill following the Modified Bruce Protocol * subjects must experience angina or anginal equivalent episodes during the screening exercise treadmill test * female subjects must either be no longer capable of reproduction or using medically valid contraception to prevent pregnancy during the study * subjects must be willing and able to comply with specified follow-up evaluations

Exclusion criteria

* predominant congestive heart failure * myocardial infarction within 60 days of treatment * successful or partially successful coronary revascularization procedures (any vessel) within 6 months of study enrollment * placement of a bi-ventricular pacemaker for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for heart failure in the past 90 days * documented stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 60 days of study enrollment * history of moderate to severe aortic stenosis or severe aortic insufficiency; severe mitral stenosis or severe mitral insufficiency * prosthetic aortic valve replacement * evidence of any life-threatening arrhythmia that requires intervention on the 24-hour Holter monitor. Life-threatening arrhythmia that is successfully treated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is not exclusionary. * splenomegaly and/or severe co-morbidity associated with a reduction in life expectancy of less than 1 year, such as chronic medical illness (ie, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal failure or cancer \[exceptions: in-situ skin cancer or fully removed skin cancer other than melanoma, in-situ cervical cancer, or cancer free for 5 years with no history of a stem cell transplant\]) * sickle cell disease or sickle cell trait * platelet count greater than 10% above the upper limit of normal or a platelet count below 100,000 if on Clopidogrel or 50,000 without Clopidogrel * hematocrit \<30% * serum creatinine \>2.5 mg/dL * any clinically significant laboratory abnormality on screening laboratories * currently enrolled in another IDE or IND that has not completed the protocol required primary follow-up period (excludes 15 year follow up of gene therapy trials) * history of alcohol or drug abuse within 3 months of screening * joint or peripheral vascular disease or neurologic disease that severely limits treadmill walking * chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that severely limits walking or FEV1 \<30% predicted * females who are pregnant or lactating * female subjects who are capable of reproduction and will not use medically valid contraception to prevent pregnancy during the study * subjects who test positive for HIV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C, or are on chronic immunosuppressive medications or have had a prior stem cell transplant * subjects with a known hypersensitivity to E. coli-derived proteins, or to any component of Neupogen (Filgrastim) or G-CSF * subjects who have a significant psychiatric disorder or mental disability that could interfere with the subject´s ability to provide informed consent and/or comply with protocol procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Angina Episodes Per Week at 6 and 12 Months6 and 12 monthsThe number of angina episodes were collected via an electronic subject diary for four weeks at Baseline and at 6 and 12 months. The four-week angina episodes (per week mean) were used as the frequency for each visit. A lower number represents fewer angina episodes. A lower number is better.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Exercise Treadmill Test According to Modified Bruce Protocol: Mean Change From Baseline in Duration of ExerciseChange from Baseline to 6 months and change from baseline to 12 months after treatmentA modified Bruce Protocol Exercise Treadmill Test was used to evaluate duration of exercise in all subjects.
Number of Participants With Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Anginal Classification LevelsBaseline and 12 months after treatmentThe Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Functional Classification of Angina is as follows: * Class I - Angina only during strenuous or prolonged physical activity * Class II - Slight limitation, with angina only during vigorous physical activity * Class III - Symptoms with everyday living activities, i.e., moderate limitation * Class IV - Inability to perform any activity without angina or angina at rest, i.e., severe limitation
Changes From Baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Scores at 6 MonthsBaseline to 6 months after treatmentAngina symptoms were evaluated based on the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), which was used to analyze the following: physical limitations, angina stability, angina frequency, treatment satisfaction, and disease perception. The SAQ consisted of 11 questions with 5 or 6 possible responses. Responses were ordinal values (1-7, 10, 11, 97, depending on the type of question; no uniform ranges throughout); responses that corresponded to the lowest level of functioning (worse outcomes) were assigned values of 1, while responses that corresponded to higher functioning levels (better outcome) were assigned a higher ordinal value. If the response to any of these questions was 97 it was recoded as a missing value. Each scale can have a scored value ranging from 0 to 100. A larger number is better.
Changes From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersBaseline to 6 months after treatmentThe Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey form was used to analyze physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, general mental health, and health transition. Responses were coded as ordinal numbers going from worst (=1) to best (=highest number). These ordinal scores were transformed into scales ranging from 0 to 100. Higher numbers are generally considered better.
Change in Anti-anginal Medication (ie, Nitroglycerin) UseBaseline to 6 monthsThe mean nitroglycerin use per week was analyzed at baseline and 6 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Enrollment was conducted at 26 clinical sites in the US.

Pre-assignment details

Of 321 enrolled subjects, 147 were screen failures. Of 174 subjects who started cell mobilization, 1 did not complete the mobilization due to possible left ventricular mural thrombosis. Of 173 subjects who completed mobilization, 168 were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups, of which 1 was discontinued prior to treatment due to coagulopathy.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CLBS14: Low-Dose Group
Intramyocardial injections of auto-CD34+ cells at low dose (1 x 10\^5 cells/kg bodyweight)
55
CLBS14: High-Dose Group
Intramyocardial injections of auto-CD34+ cells at high dose (5 x 10\^5 cells/kg bodyweight)
56
Placebo Control
Intramyocardial placebo injections
56
Total167

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDeath003
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up010
Overall StudyPatient/Caregiver Preference223

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCLBS14: Low-Dose GroupCLBS14: High-Dose GroupPlacebo ControlTotal
Age, Continuous61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
61.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
Region of Enrollment
United States
55 participants56 participants56 participants167 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants7 Participants6 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
46 Participants49 Participants50 Participants145 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 550 / 563 / 560 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
54 / 5552 / 5652 / 565 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
21 / 5524 / 5632 / 565 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Angina Episodes Per Week at 6 and 12 Months

The number of angina episodes were collected via an electronic subject diary for four weeks at Baseline and at 6 and 12 months. The four-week angina episodes (per week mean) were used as the frequency for each visit. A lower number represents fewer angina episodes. A lower number is better.

Time frame: 6 and 12 months

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupNumber of Angina Episodes Per Week at 6 and 12 Months6 months6.8 angina episodes/weekStandard Deviation 1.1
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupNumber of Angina Episodes Per Week at 6 and 12 Months12 months6.3 angina episodes/weekStandard Deviation 1.2
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupNumber of Angina Episodes Per Week at 6 and 12 Months6 months8.3 angina episodes/weekStandard Deviation 1.1
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupNumber of Angina Episodes Per Week at 6 and 12 Months12 months7.2 angina episodes/weekStandard Deviation 1.1
Placebo ControlNumber of Angina Episodes Per Week at 6 and 12 Months6 months10.9 angina episodes/weekStandard Deviation 1.2
Placebo ControlNumber of Angina Episodes Per Week at 6 and 12 Months12 months11.0 angina episodes/weekStandard Deviation 1.2
Comparison: Frequency of angina episodes per week 6 months after treatment.p-value: 0.02ANCOVA
Comparison: Frequency of angina episodes per week 12 months after treatment.p-value: 0.035ANCOVA
Comparison: Frequency of angina episodes per week 6 months after treatment.p-value: 0.167ANCOVA
Comparison: Frequency of angina episodes per week 12 months after treatment.p-value: 0.181ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Anti-anginal Medication (ie, Nitroglycerin) Use

The mean nitroglycerin use per week was analyzed at baseline and 6 months

Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

Population: ITT population (note that the number of participants analyzed may differ due to missing data)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupChange in Anti-anginal Medication (ie, Nitroglycerin) Use-6.3 nitroglycerin use (tablets per week)Standard Deviation 8.1
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupChange in Anti-anginal Medication (ie, Nitroglycerin) Use-7.3 nitroglycerin use (tablets per week)Standard Deviation 9.9
Placebo ControlChange in Anti-anginal Medication (ie, Nitroglycerin) Use-4.2 nitroglycerin use (tablets per week)Standard Deviation 8.8
Secondary

Changes From Baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Scores at 6 Months

Angina symptoms were evaluated based on the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), which was used to analyze the following: physical limitations, angina stability, angina frequency, treatment satisfaction, and disease perception. The SAQ consisted of 11 questions with 5 or 6 possible responses. Responses were ordinal values (1-7, 10, 11, 97, depending on the type of question; no uniform ranges throughout); responses that corresponded to the lowest level of functioning (worse outcomes) were assigned values of 1, while responses that corresponded to higher functioning levels (better outcome) were assigned a higher ordinal value. If the response to any of these questions was 97 it was recoded as a missing value. Each scale can have a scored value ranging from 0 to 100. A larger number is better.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 months after treatment

Population: ITT population (note that the number of participants analyzed may differ due to missing data)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Scores at 6 MonthsTreatment satisfaction scale11.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Scores at 6 MonthsAngina frequency scale28.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.3
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Scores at 6 MonthsPhysical limitations scale12.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.6
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Scores at 6 MonthsAngina stability scale29.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.1
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Scores at 6 MonthsDisease perception scale14.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.2
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Scores at 6 MonthsAngina frequency scale21.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.6
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Scores at 6 MonthsPhysical limitations scale10.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Scores at 6 MonthsAngina stability scale25.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.3
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Scores at 6 MonthsTreatment satisfaction scale10.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Scores at 6 MonthsDisease perception scale12.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
Placebo ControlChanges From Baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Scores at 6 MonthsDisease perception scale15.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.1
Placebo ControlChanges From Baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Scores at 6 MonthsTreatment satisfaction scale4.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Placebo ControlChanges From Baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Scores at 6 MonthsPhysical limitations scale10.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.2
Placebo ControlChanges From Baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Scores at 6 MonthsAngina frequency scale26.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.3
Placebo ControlChanges From Baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Scores at 6 MonthsAngina stability scale13.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.9
Secondary

Changes From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Parameters

The Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey form was used to analyze physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, general mental health, and health transition. Responses were coded as ordinal numbers going from worst (=1) to best (=highest number). These ordinal scores were transformed into scales ranging from 0 to 100. Higher numbers are generally considered better.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 months after treatment

Population: ITT population (note that the number of participants analyzed may differ due to missing data)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersGeneral health7.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersHealth transition40.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.5
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersSocial functioning16.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.1
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersVitality14.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersPhysical functioning13.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.1
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersMental health6.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersBodily pain13.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersRole-physical17.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.1
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersRole emotional10.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 43.9
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersVitality14.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.7
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersPhysical functioning13.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.4
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersRole-physical15.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.6
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersBodily pain13.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.6
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersGeneral health6.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersSocial functioning12.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.3
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersRole emotional17.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 51.8
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersMental health8.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.9
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersHealth transition32.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.1
Placebo ControlChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersBodily pain9.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.1
Placebo ControlChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersPhysical functioning7.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
Placebo ControlChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersRole emotional9.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 50.5
Placebo ControlChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersRole-physical19.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.2
Placebo ControlChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersHealth transition29.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30
Placebo ControlChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersVitality8.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.2
Placebo ControlChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersGeneral health6.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.4
Placebo ControlChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersMental health3.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.6
Placebo ControlChanges From Baseline to 6 Months in Short Form 36 (SF-36) ParametersSocial functioning12.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.3
Secondary

Exercise Treadmill Test According to Modified Bruce Protocol: Mean Change From Baseline in Duration of Exercise

A modified Bruce Protocol Exercise Treadmill Test was used to evaluate duration of exercise in all subjects.

Time frame: Change from Baseline to 6 months and change from baseline to 12 months after treatment

Population: ITT population (note that the number of participants analyzed may differ due to missing data)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupExercise Treadmill Test According to Modified Bruce Protocol: Mean Change From Baseline in Duration of ExerciseChange from baseline to 6 months139 secondsStandard Deviation 151
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupExercise Treadmill Test According to Modified Bruce Protocol: Mean Change From Baseline in Duration of ExerciseChange from baseline to 12 months140 secondsStandard Deviation 171
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupExercise Treadmill Test According to Modified Bruce Protocol: Mean Change From Baseline in Duration of ExerciseChange from baseline to 6 months110 secondsStandard Deviation 155
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupExercise Treadmill Test According to Modified Bruce Protocol: Mean Change From Baseline in Duration of ExerciseChange from baseline to 12 months103 secondsStandard Deviation 162
Placebo ControlExercise Treadmill Test According to Modified Bruce Protocol: Mean Change From Baseline in Duration of ExerciseChange from baseline to 6 months69 secondsStandard Deviation 122
Placebo ControlExercise Treadmill Test According to Modified Bruce Protocol: Mean Change From Baseline in Duration of ExerciseChange from baseline to 12 months58 secondsStandard Deviation 146
Comparison: Change from baseline to 6 monthsp-value: 0.014ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from baseline to 12 monthsp-value: 0.017ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from baseline to 6 monthsp-value: 0.097ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from baseline to 12 monthsp-value: 0.134ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Anginal Classification Levels

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Functional Classification of Angina is as follows: * Class I - Angina only during strenuous or prolonged physical activity * Class II - Slight limitation, with angina only during vigorous physical activity * Class III - Symptoms with everyday living activities, i.e., moderate limitation * Class IV - Inability to perform any activity without angina or angina at rest, i.e., severe limitation

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months after treatment

Population: ITT population (note that the number of participants analyzed may differ due to missing data)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupNumber of Participants With Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Anginal Classification LevelsWorsening by 1 level (CCS) from baseline2 Participants
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupNumber of Participants With Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Anginal Classification LevelsImprovement by 2 levels (CCS) from baseline11 Participants
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupNumber of Participants With Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Anginal Classification LevelsNo change in CCS classification from baseline16 Participants
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupNumber of Participants With Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Anginal Classification LevelsImprovement by 1 level (CCS) from baseline22 Participants
CLBS14: Low-Dose GroupNumber of Participants With Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Anginal Classification LevelsWorsening by 2 levels (CCS) from baseline0 Participants
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupNumber of Participants With Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Anginal Classification LevelsImprovement by 2 levels (CCS) from baseline12 Participants
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupNumber of Participants With Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Anginal Classification LevelsNo change in CCS classification from baseline19 Participants
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupNumber of Participants With Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Anginal Classification LevelsImprovement by 1 level (CCS) from baseline17 Participants
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupNumber of Participants With Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Anginal Classification LevelsWorsening by 1 level (CCS) from baseline3 Participants
CLBS14: High-Dose GroupNumber of Participants With Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Anginal Classification LevelsWorsening by 2 levels (CCS) from baseline0 Participants
Placebo ControlNumber of Participants With Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Anginal Classification LevelsWorsening by 2 levels (CCS) from baseline0 Participants
Placebo ControlNumber of Participants With Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Anginal Classification LevelsWorsening by 1 level (CCS) from baseline4 Participants
Placebo ControlNumber of Participants With Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Anginal Classification LevelsNo change in CCS classification from baseline16 Participants
Placebo ControlNumber of Participants With Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Anginal Classification LevelsImprovement by 2 levels (CCS) from baseline5 Participants
Placebo ControlNumber of Participants With Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society Anginal Classification LevelsImprovement by 1 level (CCS) from baseline19 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026