Skip to content

Safety Outcomes of Lower Immunosuppression Versus Traditional Immunosuppression in Heart Transplant Recipients

Tacrolimus In Combination, Tacrolimus Alone Compared (TICTAC Trial): A Prospective Randomized Trial Of Minimized Immunosuppression In Adult Heart Transplant Recipients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00299221
Acronym
TICTAC
Enrollment
150
Registered
2006-03-06
Start date
2004-04-30
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2015-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Immunosuppression

Keywords

immunosuppression, steroid withdrawal, rejection, coronary disease, cytomegalovirus infection

Brief summary

This was a study to compare less intense immunosuppression with a more traditional approach. The hypothesis was that less immunosuppression will provide similar protection against rejection than typical 2-3 drug therapy.

Detailed description

This was a prospective, randomized, controlled (open-label) trial of 2 different strategies of immunosuppression in de novo post-heart transplant patients. The hypothesis was that immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, coupled with rapid steroid weaning would provide similar anti-rejection efficacy as tacrolimus with only a 2 week course of mycophenolate mofetil but including the same rapid steroid wean. The primary endpoint was the mean International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) biopsy score over the first 6 months post-transplant. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of adverse events over the first year post-transplant, as well as all-cause mortality, 12 month ISHLT biopsy score (mean), along with the incidence of proven cytomegalovirus disease. In addition, the incidence of allograft vasculopathy as assessed by angiography or intravascular ultrasound was compared between groups.

Interventions

DRUGTacrolimus

tacrolimus

DRUGcombination therapy

MMF

Sponsors

Astellas Pharma Inc
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Newark Beth Israel Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult (at least 18 years old) * Undergoing a first heart transplant (no heart/kidney transplants), who receive their transplant at one of the study sites * Specifically INCLUDED are patients on ventricular assist devices, and allosensitized recipients

Exclusion criteria

* Age less than 18 * Inability to provide proper informed consent * Combined organ transplantation * Re-Transplantation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Biopsy Score Over the First 6 Months Post-transplantation6 monthsMean ISHLT biopsy score Biopsies of the heart may be various grades and each is assigned a numerical score. Grade 0 is 0 points, 1A = 1, 1B = 2, grade 2 = 3, grade 3A = 4, Grade 3B = 5, and grade 4 = 6 units. The mean biopsy score is the numeric average of the biopsy scores for the first 6 post-transplant months. Best value is 0, worst score is 6.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Patients Alive at One Year Post-transplant1 yearPercent of patients alive at one year post-transplant. In other words, all cause mortality over time
Number of Patients With Cytomegalovirus (CMV) at One Year Post-transplant1 yearNumber of patients developing cytomegalovirus disease by 1 year post-transplant
Number of Patients With Allograft Vasculopathy (CAD) at One Year Post Transplant1 yearNumber of patients diagnosed with allograft vasculopathy / coronary artery disease (CAD) at one year post transplant
Mean ISHLT Biopsy Score Over First Year Post-transplant1 yearMean ISHLT biopsy score Biopsies of the heart may be various grades and each is assigned a numerical score. Grade 0 is 0 points, 1A = 1, 1B = 2, grade 2 = 3, grade 3A = 4, Grade 3B = 5, and grade 4 = 6 units. The mean biopsy score is the numeric average of the biopsy scores for the first 6 post-transplant months. Best value is 0, worst score is 6.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Pts recruited from April 2004-Aug 2008

Pre-assignment details

Consent often obtained after transplant

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Monotherapy
These patients will receive tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids, followed by a rapid 8 week wean of steroids to discontinuation. MMF will be discontinued in this group at 14 days post-transplant
79
Combination Therapy
These patients will receive tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids, followed by a rapid 8 week wean of steroids to discontinuation. MMF will be maintained in this group, unless intolerance develops.
71
Total150

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCombination TherapyMonotherapyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
14 Participants15 Participants29 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
57 Participants64 Participants121 Participants
Age, Continuous54.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
54.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
54.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Region of Enrollment
United States
71 participants79 participants150 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants17 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
60 Participants62 Participants122 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 790 / 71
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 791 / 71

Outcome results

Primary

Mean International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Biopsy Score Over the First 6 Months Post-transplantation

Mean ISHLT biopsy score Biopsies of the heart may be various grades and each is assigned a numerical score. Grade 0 is 0 points, 1A = 1, 1B = 2, grade 2 = 3, grade 3A = 4, Grade 3B = 5, and grade 4 = 6 units. The mean biopsy score is the numeric average of the biopsy scores for the first 6 post-transplant months. Best value is 0, worst score is 6.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: all pts, intention to treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MonotherapyMean International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Biopsy Score Over the First 6 Months Post-transplantation0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Combination TherapyMean International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Biopsy Score Over the First 6 Months Post-transplantation0.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

Mean ISHLT Biopsy Score Over First Year Post-transplant

Mean ISHLT biopsy score Biopsies of the heart may be various grades and each is assigned a numerical score. Grade 0 is 0 points, 1A = 1, 1B = 2, grade 2 = 3, grade 3A = 4, Grade 3B = 5, and grade 4 = 6 units. The mean biopsy score is the numeric average of the biopsy scores for the first 6 post-transplant months. Best value is 0, worst score is 6.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: all pts, Intention to treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MonotherapyMean ISHLT Biopsy Score Over First Year Post-transplant0.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
Combination TherapyMean ISHLT Biopsy Score Over First Year Post-transplant0.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
Comparison: comparing ISHLT biopsy score between groups at 1 yearp-value: 0.44t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Number of Patients With Allograft Vasculopathy (CAD) at One Year Post Transplant

Number of patients diagnosed with allograft vasculopathy / coronary artery disease (CAD) at one year post transplant

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Percent of patients with allograft CAD at one year post-transplant

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Allograft Vasculopathy (CAD) at One Year Post Transplant0 patients
Combination TherapyNumber of Patients With Allograft Vasculopathy (CAD) at One Year Post Transplant0 patients
Secondary

Number of Patients With Cytomegalovirus (CMV) at One Year Post-transplant

Number of patients developing cytomegalovirus disease by 1 year post-transplant

Time frame: 1 year

Population: all patients

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Cytomegalovirus (CMV) at One Year Post-transplant2 participants
Combination TherapyNumber of Patients With Cytomegalovirus (CMV) at One Year Post-transplant2 participants
Secondary

Percent of Patients Alive at One Year Post-transplant

Percent of patients alive at one year post-transplant. In other words, all cause mortality over time

Time frame: 1 year

Population: all pts, intention to treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MonotherapyPercent of Patients Alive at One Year Post-transplant98 percent of participants
Combination TherapyPercent of Patients Alive at One Year Post-transplant98 percent of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 29, 2026