Skip to content

Prospective Evaluation of Proteinuria and Renal Function in Non-diabetic Patients With Progressive Renal Disease

Randomised, Double-blind, 52-wk, Parallel-grp Multicentre, PIIb Study to Evaluate Effects of Rosuvastatin 10mg, Rosuvastatin 40mg and Atorvastatin 80mg on Urinary Protein Excretion in Hypercholesterolaemic Non-diabetic Patients With Moderate Proteinuria

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00296400
Acronym
PLANET II
Enrollment
237
Registered
2006-02-27
Start date
2006-02-28
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2011-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperlipidemia

Keywords

Hyperlipidemia, Proteinuria, Diabetes Mellitus

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Crestor (rosuvastatin) and (Lipitor) atorvastatin on urinary protein excretion over 1 year in non-diabetes with moderate proteinuria and hypercholesterolaemia.

Interventions

DRUGRosuvastatin
DRUGAtorvastatin

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* greater than or equal to 18 years of age * Hyperlipidemia * Urinary protein

Exclusion criteria

* Previous rosuvastatin treatment \< 6 months prior to Visit 1 * Statin intolerance * Severe hypertension * Diabetes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio at Week 52 [LOCF]Assessed at baseline and Week 52 (LOCF)Urinary protein/creatinine ratio (mg/g) =urine protein concentration (mg/dL)/ urine creatinine concentration (g/dL). Outcome measure is the ratio of Week 52 \[LOCF\] urine protein/creatinine ratio over baseline urine protein/creatinine ratio.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio at Week 26Assessed at baseline and Week 26Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (mg/g) =urine albumin concentration (mg/dL)/ urine creatinine concentration (g/dL). Outcome measure is the ratio of Week 26 urine albumin/creatinine ratio over baseline urine albumin/creatinine ratio.
Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio at Week 52 [LOCF]Assessed at baseline and Week 52 [LOCF]Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (mg/g) =urine albumin concentration (mg/dL)/ urine creatinine concentration (g/dL). Outcome measure is the ratio of Week 52 \[LOCF\] urine albumin/creatinine ratio over baseline urine albumin/creatinine ratio.
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Week 26Assessed at baseline and Week 26The change from baseline in eGFR at Week 26 is the Week 26 value minus baseline value.
Change From Baseline in eGFR at Week 52 [LOCF]Assessed at baseline and Week 52 [LOCF]The change from baseline in eGFR at Week 52 \[LOCF\] is the Week 52 value or last observation carried forward minus baseline value.
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol [TC] at Week 26.baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol [TC] at Week 52.52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline inUrinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol [HDL-C] at Week 2626 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Non-high Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol [nonHDL-C] at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship. )
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Triglyceride [TG] at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 [ApoA-1] at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA-1 at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B [ApoB] at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA-1 at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA-1 at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 5252 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TGBaseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio at Week 26.Assessed at baseline and Week 26Urinary protein/creatinine ratio (mg/g) =urine protein concentration (mg/dL)/ urine creatinine concentration (g/dL). Outcome measure is the ratio of Week 26 urine protein/creatinine ratio over baseline urine protein/creatinine ratio.
Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA1 at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA1 at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)
Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52Baseline and 52 weeksCorrelation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Countries

Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Mexico, Romania, South Africa, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

797 patients entered the study with moderate proteinuria and hypercholesterolemia and were receiving stable treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for 3 or more months prior to Visit 1. The study was conducted at 114 participating centers in 11 countries.

Pre-assignment details

237 patients \[pts\] completed the 8-week lead-in period and were randomized. The most common reasons for discontinuation during the lead in period included incorrect enrollment (466 pts), development of study-specific discontinuation criteria (41 pts), and voluntary discontinuation (29 pts). 189 patients completed the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rosuvastatin 10 mg70
Rosuvastatin 40 mg87
Atorvastatin 80 mg80
Total237

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event777
Overall StudyIncorrect enrollment200
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up112
Overall StudyPregnancy120
Overall StudyProtocol Violation111
Overall StudyStudy specific discontinuation criteria001
Overall StudyVisit 10 was performed earlier010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject562

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalAtorvastatin 80 mgRosuvastatin 10 mgRosuvastatin 40 mg
Age, Customized
18 to 49 years
120 Participants42 Participants34 Participants44 Participants
Age, Customized
50 to 64 years
92 Participants30 Participants31 Participants31 Participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
25 Participants8 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]75.419 mL/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.6012
71.464 mL/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.0156
78.315 mL/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.0653
76.774 mL/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.3878
Sex: Female, Male
Female
94 Participants31 Participants28 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
143 Participants49 Participants42 Participants52 Participants
Urine albumin/creatinine ratio1091.263 mg/g
STANDARD_DEVIATION 775.1889
1069.103 mg/g
STANDARD_DEVIATION 720.8011
1023.165 mg/g
STANDARD_DEVIATION 720.0251
1167.368 mg/g
STANDARD_DEVIATION 865.4584
Urine protein/creatinine ratio1416.023 mg/g
STANDARD_DEVIATION 975.7636
1439.720 mg/g
STANDARD_DEVIATION 991.2295
1301.163 mg/g
STANDARD_DEVIATION 832.7398
1487.131 mg/g
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1068.0642

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 6916 / 8717 / 80
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 696 / 875 / 80

Outcome results

Primary

Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio at Week 52 [LOCF]

Urinary protein/creatinine ratio (mg/g) =urine protein concentration (mg/dL)/ urine creatinine concentration (g/dL). Outcome measure is the ratio of Week 52 \[LOCF\] urine protein/creatinine ratio over baseline urine protein/creatinine ratio.

Time frame: Assessed at baseline and Week 52 (LOCF)

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgUrinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio at Week 52 [LOCF]0.938 ratio
Rosuvastatin 40 mgUrinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio at Week 52 [LOCF]1.082 ratio
Atorvastatin 80 mgUrinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio at Week 52 [LOCF]0.759 ratio
Secondary

Change From Baseline in eGFR at Week 52 [LOCF]

The change from baseline in eGFR at Week 52 \[LOCF\] is the Week 52 value or last observation carried forward minus baseline value.

Time frame: Assessed at baseline and Week 52 [LOCF]

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rosuvastatin 10 mgChange From Baseline in eGFR at Week 52 [LOCF]-2.71 mL/minStandard Deviation 13.083
Rosuvastatin 40 mgChange From Baseline in eGFR at Week 52 [LOCF]-3.30 mL/minStandard Deviation 12.325
Atorvastatin 80 mgChange From Baseline in eGFR at Week 52 [LOCF]-1.74 mL/minStandard Deviation 13.964
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Week 26

The change from baseline in eGFR at Week 26 is the Week 26 value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Assessed at baseline and Week 26

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rosuvastatin 10 mgChange From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Week 261.39 mL/minStandard Deviation 15.431
Rosuvastatin 40 mgChange From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Week 26-3.41 mL/minStandard Deviation 13.228
Atorvastatin 80 mgChange From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Week 26-1.61 mL/minStandard Deviation 9.494
Secondary

Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA1 at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA1 at Week 260.13029 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA1 at Week 260.17554 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA1 at Week 260.14191 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA1 at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA1 at Week 520.11047 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA1 at Week 520.07751 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA1 at Week 520.08580 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 260.02907 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 26-0.09476 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 26-0.00160 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 52-0.15415 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 520.10486 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 52-0.06121 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 260.06098 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 26-0.03181 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 260.03861 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 52-0.11217 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 520.11006 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 52-0.03932 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.04858 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26-0.05535 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.02023 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52-0.20805 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 520.18299 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52-0.07681 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 260.06029 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 26-0.08151 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 260.02283 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 52-0.19532 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 520.14967 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 52-0.09001 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.08263 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26-0.06860 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.04337 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52-0.23887 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 520.17170 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52-0.10817 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.08194 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26-0.06576 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.04477 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52-0.23597 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 520.19933 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52-0.10205 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TG

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TG-0.12643 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TG0.00486 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TG-0.08301 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 260.04160 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 260.00531 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Change From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 260.03430 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 260.01684 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 260.01755 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 260.01758 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 520.14080 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 520.02750 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 520.09472 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 260.02679 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 26-0.07603 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 26-0.00171 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 52-0.15731 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 520.15368 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 52-0.06310 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 260.06641 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 26-0.07964 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 260.02900 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in eGFR with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 52-0.15721 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 520.16110 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in eGFR With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 52-0.05794 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA-1 at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA-1 at Week 260.16499 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA-1 at Week 260.02609 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA-1 at Week 260.15049 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA-1 at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA-1 at Week 520.20021 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA-1 at Week 520.12953 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA-1 at Week 520.18870 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 260.10258 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 260.13505 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 260.11103 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 520.08108 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 52-0.16753 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 520.00479 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 260.18720 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 260.16167 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 260.18717 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 520.21082 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 52-0.04379 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 520.14085 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 260.23547 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 260.25043 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 260.25208 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 520.17479 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 520.18677 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 520.18203 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 260.14783 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 260.21561 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 260.16899 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 520.20285 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 52-0.13565 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 520.12568 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.05037 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.09779 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.05936 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 520.10365 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52-0.24717 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 520.01386 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 260.16080 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 260.17150 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 260.16578 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 520.24107 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 52-0.08640 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 520.16525 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.04955 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.02740 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.03798 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 520.11997 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52-0.21073 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 520.03955 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 260.18188 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 260.17503 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 260.18566 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 520.23734 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 520.01311 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC at Week 520.17958 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.02506 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.02201 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.01860 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 520.08954 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52-0.20870 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 520.01926 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 260.11526 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 26-0.06890 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 260.07248 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 520.21730 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 520.21151 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 520.21477 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA-1 at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA-1 at Week 520.19626 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA-1 at Week 520.09835 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoA-1 at Week 520.18349 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 260.10698 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 260.13814 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 260.11414 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 520.05859 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 52-0.12938 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio at Week 52-0.00540 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 520.18473 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 52-0.02690 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in ApoB at Week 520.12496 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 [ApoA-1] at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 [ApoA-1] at Week 260.12595 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 [ApoA-1] at Week 260.05628 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 [ApoA-1] at Week 260.13754 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B [ApoB] at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B [ApoB] at Week 260.18504 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B [ApoB] at Week 260.17259 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B [ApoB] at Week 260.19146 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 520.20346 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 520.18041 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 520.20818 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol [HDL-C] at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol [HDL-C] at Week 260.18055 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol [HDL-C] at Week 260.24987 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol [HDL-C] at Week 260.22094 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline inUrinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline inUrinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C0.16868 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline inUrinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C-0.09428 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline inUrinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C0.10679 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.06383 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.12687 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.07462 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 520.05881 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52-0.20262 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52-0.01340 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 260.14302 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 260.24393 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 260.17632 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 520.20386 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 52-0.04698 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C at Week 520.14495 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.06794 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.05410 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.05465 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 520.07188 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52-0.16669 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in nonHDL-C/HDL-C Ratio at Week 520.00955 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Non-high Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol [nonHDL-C] at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship. )

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Non-high Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol [nonHDL-C] at Week 260.16206 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Non-high Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol [nonHDL-C] at Week 260.20032 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Non-high Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol [nonHDL-C] at Week 260.17628 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.04652 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.06344 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 260.04149 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 520.03957 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52-0.17644 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio at Week 52-0.01549 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 52

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 520.20659 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 520.23989 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in TG at Week 520.21728 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol [TC] at Week 26.

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol [TC] at Week 26.0.17601 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol [TC] at Week 26.0.21701 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol [TC] at Week 26.0.19643 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol [TC] at Week 52.

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 52. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol [TC] at Week 52.0.20462 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol [TC] at Week 52.0.03480 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol [TC] at Week 52.0.16077 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Correlation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Triglyceride [TG] at Week 26

Correlation of changes from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio with percent change from baseline in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations at Week 26. (Correlation values range from -1 to +1. -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship while a +1 indicates a perfect linear positive relationship. A value of zero indicates no relationship.)

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Triglyceride [TG] at Week 260.15348 Correlation coefficient
Rosuvastatin 40 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Triglyceride [TG] at Week 26-0.06049 Correlation coefficient
Atorvastatin 80 mgCorrelation of Changes From Baseline in Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio With Percent Change From Baseline in Triglyceride [TG] at Week 260.10089 Correlation coefficient
Secondary

Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio at Week 26

Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (mg/g) =urine albumin concentration (mg/dL)/ urine creatinine concentration (g/dL). Outcome measure is the ratio of Week 26 urine albumin/creatinine ratio over baseline urine albumin/creatinine ratio.

Time frame: Assessed at baseline and Week 26

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgUrinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio at Week 260.850 ratio
Rosuvastatin 40 mgUrinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio at Week 260.946 ratio
Atorvastatin 80 mgUrinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio at Week 260.731 ratio
Secondary

Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio at Week 52 [LOCF]

Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (mg/g) =urine albumin concentration (mg/dL)/ urine creatinine concentration (g/dL). Outcome measure is the ratio of Week 52 \[LOCF\] urine albumin/creatinine ratio over baseline urine albumin/creatinine ratio.

Time frame: Assessed at baseline and Week 52 [LOCF]

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgUrinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio at Week 52 [LOCF]0.879 ratio
Rosuvastatin 40 mgUrinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio at Week 52 [LOCF]0.967 ratio
Atorvastatin 80 mgUrinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio at Week 52 [LOCF]0.719 ratio
Secondary

Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio at Week 26.

Urinary protein/creatinine ratio (mg/g) =urine protein concentration (mg/dL)/ urine creatinine concentration (g/dL). Outcome measure is the ratio of Week 26 urine protein/creatinine ratio over baseline urine protein/creatinine ratio.

Time frame: Assessed at baseline and Week 26

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Rosuvastatin 10 mgUrinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio at Week 26.0.932 ratio
Rosuvastatin 40 mgUrinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio at Week 26.1.057 ratio
Atorvastatin 80 mgUrinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio at Week 26.0.762 ratio

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026