Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Conditions
Brief summary
To compare the efficacy of SMP-114 (120 and 240 mg/d) versus placebo in terms of the percentage of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement in RA (ACR20) at week 24. The study hypothesis would be to demonstrate that the use of methotrexate and SMP-114 is more efficacious than Methotrexate alone.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Male or female patients aged at least 18 years, with RA for a minimum of 6 months * Has been receiving methotrexate treatment (stable for 8 weeks) * Has active disease classified as ACR functional class of I, II or III
Exclusion criteria
* Has previously discontinued DMARD therapy due to hepatic intolerance * Has received any DMARD in addition to methotrexate during the 4 weeks prior to randomisation * Is receiving more than 2 DMARDs in addition to methotrexate at the time of screening * Is receiving or has received Gold, leflunomide or biological agents including TNF/IL-1 inhibitors within the 8 weeks prior to randomisation * Has previously failed 2 or more DMARDS
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare the efficacy of SMP-114 versus placebo in terms of the percentage of patients meeting the ACR criteria for 20% improvement in RA (ACR20) at Week 24. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare efficacy of SMP-114 versus placebo after 24 weeks in terms of ACR50, ACR70, DAS28 and EULAR response. | — |
| To compare the efficacy of SMP-114 versus placebo in terms of change in core variables, time to response, Quality of Life, radiological measurements of joint damage, assessment of safety and tolerability, and PK measurements | — |
Countries
Czechia, Germany, Hungary, Netherlands, Poland, United Kingdom