Skip to content

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Rotigotine Nasal Spray for the Acute Treatment of Parkinson Symptoms

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Proof of Concept Trial to Assess the Tolerability, Safety, and Efficacy of Rotigotine Nasal Spray for the Acute Treatment of OFF Symptoms in Subjects With Advanced-Stage, Idiopathic Parkinson Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00296192
Enrollment
82
Registered
2006-02-24
Start date
2006-02-28
Completion date
2006-06-30
Last updated
2014-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson's Disease

Keywords

Rotigotine, Rotigotine nasal spray, Efficacy, safety and tolerability, Parkinson's disease

Brief summary

The objective of this trial is to evaluate safety and efficacy of rotigotine nasal spray (SPM 952) in a single dose application scheme. Subjects will undergo a 2 - 28 days screening period in which eligibility criteria will be checked. Subjects will then be hospitalized for one night. In the morning of the next day, subjects will be randomly assigned either to rotigotine or placebo nasal spray and will then receive a single dose of trial medication. Safety assessments after application include adverse events, 12-lead electrocardiograms, blood pressure and heart rate assessments, and laboratory checks. Efficacy will be assessed by application of motor examination scores. The first subject is planned to be enrolled in February 2006. The last subject is planned to be enrolled in May 2006. Last subject out is expected for August 2006.

Detailed description

The objective of this trial is to evaluate safety and efficacy of rotigotine nasal spray (SPM 952)in a single dose application scheme. Subjects will undergo a 2-28 days screening period in which eligibility criteria will be checked. Subjects will then be hospitalized for one night. In the morning of the next day, subjects will be randomly assigned either to rotigotine or placebo nasal spray and will then receive a single dose of trial medication. Safety assessments after application include adverse events, 12-lead electrocardiograms, blood pressure and heart rate assessments, and laboratory checks. Efficacy will be assessed by application of motor examination scores.

Interventions

Rotigotine- HCl 2.5mg/mL nasal spray, dosage per puff of 275µg per 110µg administered in up to 4 deliveries

OTHERPlacebo

placebo nasal spray 1, 2 3, and 4 puffs

Sponsors

UCB Pharma
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female subjects with idiopathic Parkinson's disease for at least 3 years in duration * At least 30 years of age

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with atypical Parkinson's or clinically relevant concomitant diseases or medical conditions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Subjects Who Complete the Trial15 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline at 24 Minutes Post-dose in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor ExaminationBaseline, and 24 minutes post-doseThe Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is a scale for the assessment of function in Parkinson's disease. UPDRS Part III measures Motor Examination. Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 56 (Worst score possible) Change = 24 minute value minus baseline value.
Change From Baseline to 34 Minutes Post-dose in Tapping Rate (Taps/Min)Baseline and 34 minutes post-doseOne-minute tapping rate will be calculated as the number of times a subject could tap on two 4 x 4 cm marks placed on a board 30 cm apart during 1 minute (30 cm measured from the inner border of the two boxes).
Success Rate (Percentage of Subjects Achieving Off Reversals)Up to 6 hours post-doseSubjects reversing from off to on following initiation of treatment. On and off state refer to periods where Parkinson's disease symptoms are not present (on) and periods where symptoms are present (off); the on/off determination at each assessment timepoint was made by the investigator.
Time of First Off ReversalUp to 6 hours post-doseNumber of minutes to first reversal of symptoms from off to on. Estimated via Kaplan-Meier estimation method. On and off state refer to periods where Parkinson's disease symptoms are not present (on) and periods where symptoms are present (off); the on/off determination at each assessment timepoint was made by the investigator.

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants flow shows all subjects randomized. Safety analyses are based on actual treatment received; 4 subjects randomized to placebo were mistreated (1 subject each in the rotigotine 1 puff, rotigotine 2 puffs, rotigotine 3 puffs, and rotigotine 4 puffs treatment arms).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo 1-4 Puffs
Placebo nasal spray 1 - 4 puffs
17
Rotigotine 1 Puff
Rotigotine Nasal Spray 1 puff (0.25 mg Rotigotine)
16
Rotigotine 2 Puffs
Rotigotine Nasal Spray - 2 puffs (0.49 mg Rotigotine)
16
Rotigotine 3 Puffs
Rotigotine Nasal Spray - 3 puffs (0.74 mg Rotigotine)
17
Rotigotine 4 Puffs
Rotigotine Nasal Spray - 4 puffs (0.99 mg Rotigotine)
16
Total82

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo 1-4 PuffsRotigotine 1 PuffRotigotine 2 PuffsRotigotine 3 PuffsRotigotine 4 PuffsTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants8 Participants11 Participants8 Participants6 Participants41 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants8 Participants5 Participants9 Participants10 Participants41 Participants
Age, Continuous63.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.94
67.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.54
66.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.67
63.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.28
60.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.04
64.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.28
Region of Enrollment
Austria
2 participants2 participants1 participants4 participants1 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
11 participants12 participants12 participants10 participants13 participants58 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
3 participants1 participants1 participants3 participants0 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
1 participants1 participants2 participants0 participants2 participants6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants5 Participants4 Participants7 Participants4 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants11 Participants12 Participants10 Participants12 Participants58 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 139 / 175 / 179 / 189 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 171 / 170 / 181 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Subjects Who Complete the Trial

Time frame: 15 days

Population: Full Analysis Set: Subjects receiving at least one delivery of trial medication and with at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo 1-4 PuffsNumber of Subjects Who Complete the Trial17 participants
Rotigotine 1 PuffNumber of Subjects Who Complete the Trial16 participants
Rotigotine 2 PuffsNumber of Subjects Who Complete the Trial16 participants
Rotigotine 3 PuffsNumber of Subjects Who Complete the Trial17 participants
Rotigotine 4 PuffsNumber of Subjects Who Complete the Trial16 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline at 24 Minutes Post-dose in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination

The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is a scale for the assessment of function in Parkinson's disease. UPDRS Part III measures Motor Examination. Range: 0 (Best score possible) to 56 (Worst score possible) Change = 24 minute value minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline, and 24 minutes post-dose

Population: Full Analysis Set: Subjects receiving at least one delivery of trial medication and with at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. Missing values at 24 minutes post-dose timepoint were not imputed; number of observations at 24 minutes post-dose timepoint may be less than that for baseline timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo 1-4 PuffsChange From Baseline at 24 Minutes Post-dose in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor ExaminationBaseline35.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.77
Placebo 1-4 PuffsChange From Baseline at 24 Minutes Post-dose in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor ExaminationChange from baseline to 24 minutes post-dose-9.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Placebo 1-4 PuffsChange From Baseline at 24 Minutes Post-dose in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination24 minutes post-dose25.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.44
Rotigotine 1 PuffChange From Baseline at 24 Minutes Post-dose in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination24 minutes post-dose30.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.35
Rotigotine 1 PuffChange From Baseline at 24 Minutes Post-dose in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor ExaminationBaseline37.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.68
Rotigotine 1 PuffChange From Baseline at 24 Minutes Post-dose in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor ExaminationChange from baseline to 24 minutes post-dose-7.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.32
Rotigotine 2 PuffsChange From Baseline at 24 Minutes Post-dose in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination24 minutes post-dose29.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.53
Rotigotine 2 PuffsChange From Baseline at 24 Minutes Post-dose in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor ExaminationBaseline39.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.94
Rotigotine 2 PuffsChange From Baseline at 24 Minutes Post-dose in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor ExaminationChange from baseline to 24 minutes post-dose-10.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.17
Rotigotine 3 PuffsChange From Baseline at 24 Minutes Post-dose in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor ExaminationBaseline36.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Rotigotine 3 PuffsChange From Baseline at 24 Minutes Post-dose in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor ExaminationChange from baseline to 24 minutes post-dose-7.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.47
Rotigotine 3 PuffsChange From Baseline at 24 Minutes Post-dose in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination24 minutes post-dose29.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.51
Rotigotine 4 PuffsChange From Baseline at 24 Minutes Post-dose in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination24 minutes post-dose26.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.95
Rotigotine 4 PuffsChange From Baseline at 24 Minutes Post-dose in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor ExaminationBaseline37.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
Rotigotine 4 PuffsChange From Baseline at 24 Minutes Post-dose in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor ExaminationChange from baseline to 24 minutes post-dose-11.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.65
Comparison: Analysis of covariance modeling change from baseline at 24 minutes post-dose in UPDRS Part III, controlling for treatment group and baseline value.95% CI: [-2.9, 8.7]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of covariance modeling change from baseline at 24 minutes post-dose in UPDRS Part III, controlling for treatment group and baseline value.95% CI: [-5.7, 6]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of covariance modeling change from baseline at 24 minutes post-dose in UPDRS Part III, controlling for treatment group and baseline value.95% CI: [-2.8, 8.6]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of covariance modeling change from baseline at 24 minutes post-dose in UPDRS Part III, controlling for treatment group and baseline value.95% CI: [-7.4, 4.6]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to 34 Minutes Post-dose in Tapping Rate (Taps/Min)

One-minute tapping rate will be calculated as the number of times a subject could tap on two 4 x 4 cm marks placed on a board 30 cm apart during 1 minute (30 cm measured from the inner border of the two boxes).

Time frame: Baseline and 34 minutes post-dose

Population: Full Analysis Set: Subjects receiving at least one delivery of trial medication and with at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. Missing values at 34 minutes post-dose timepoint were not imputed; number of observations at 34 minutes post-dose timepoint may be less than that for baseline timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo 1-4 PuffsChange From Baseline to 34 Minutes Post-dose in Tapping Rate (Taps/Min)Baseline112.7 taps per minuteStandard Deviation 47.08
Placebo 1-4 PuffsChange From Baseline to 34 Minutes Post-dose in Tapping Rate (Taps/Min)Change from baseline to 34 minutes post-dose28.5 taps per minuteStandard Deviation 27.83
Placebo 1-4 PuffsChange From Baseline to 34 Minutes Post-dose in Tapping Rate (Taps/Min)34 minutes post-dose141.2 taps per minuteStandard Deviation 50.92
Rotigotine 1 PuffChange From Baseline to 34 Minutes Post-dose in Tapping Rate (Taps/Min)34 minutes post-dose131.0 taps per minuteStandard Deviation 30.01
Rotigotine 1 PuffChange From Baseline to 34 Minutes Post-dose in Tapping Rate (Taps/Min)Baseline109.8 taps per minuteStandard Deviation 28.94
Rotigotine 1 PuffChange From Baseline to 34 Minutes Post-dose in Tapping Rate (Taps/Min)Change from baseline to 34 minutes post-dose21.2 taps per minuteStandard Deviation 26.69
Rotigotine 2 PuffsChange From Baseline to 34 Minutes Post-dose in Tapping Rate (Taps/Min)34 minutes post-dose138.7 taps per minuteStandard Deviation 44.42
Rotigotine 2 PuffsChange From Baseline to 34 Minutes Post-dose in Tapping Rate (Taps/Min)Baseline127.2 taps per minuteStandard Deviation 44.33
Rotigotine 2 PuffsChange From Baseline to 34 Minutes Post-dose in Tapping Rate (Taps/Min)Change from baseline to 34 minutes post-dose11.5 taps per minuteStandard Deviation 11.27
Rotigotine 3 PuffsChange From Baseline to 34 Minutes Post-dose in Tapping Rate (Taps/Min)Baseline115.9 taps per minuteStandard Deviation 41.05
Rotigotine 3 PuffsChange From Baseline to 34 Minutes Post-dose in Tapping Rate (Taps/Min)Change from baseline to 34 minutes post-dose27.1 taps per minuteStandard Deviation 25.25
Rotigotine 3 PuffsChange From Baseline to 34 Minutes Post-dose in Tapping Rate (Taps/Min)34 minutes post-dose142.9 taps per minuteStandard Deviation 51.2
Rotigotine 4 PuffsChange From Baseline to 34 Minutes Post-dose in Tapping Rate (Taps/Min)34 minutes post-dose144.4 taps per minuteStandard Deviation 57.64
Rotigotine 4 PuffsChange From Baseline to 34 Minutes Post-dose in Tapping Rate (Taps/Min)Baseline118.3 taps per minuteStandard Deviation 40.41
Rotigotine 4 PuffsChange From Baseline to 34 Minutes Post-dose in Tapping Rate (Taps/Min)Change from baseline to 34 minutes post-dose22.9 taps per minuteStandard Deviation 27.75
Comparison: Analysis of covariance modeling change from baseline to 34 minutes post-dose in tapping rate, controlling for treatment group and baseline value.95% CI: [-25.7, 8.5]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of covariance modeling change from baseline to 34 minutes post-dose in tapping rate, controlling for treatment group and baseline value.95% CI: [-34, 0.4]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of covariance modeling change from baseline to 34 minutes post-dose in tapping rate, controlling for treatment group and baseline value.95% CI: [-18.2, 15.4]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of covariance modeling change from baseline to 34 minutes post-dose in tapping rate, controlling for treatment group and baseline value.95% CI: [-23.3, 12.2]ANCOVA
Secondary

Success Rate (Percentage of Subjects Achieving Off Reversals)

Subjects reversing from off to on following initiation of treatment. On and off state refer to periods where Parkinson's disease symptoms are not present (on) and periods where symptoms are present (off); the on/off determination at each assessment timepoint was made by the investigator.

Time frame: Up to 6 hours post-dose

Population: Full Analysis Set: Subjects receiving at least one delivery of trial medication and with at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo 1-4 PuffsSuccess Rate (Percentage of Subjects Achieving Off Reversals)Reversed from off to on (success)70.6 percentage of participants
Placebo 1-4 PuffsSuccess Rate (Percentage of Subjects Achieving Off Reversals)Did not reverse from off to on29.4 percentage of participants
Rotigotine 1 PuffSuccess Rate (Percentage of Subjects Achieving Off Reversals)Reversed from off to on (success)50.0 percentage of participants
Rotigotine 1 PuffSuccess Rate (Percentage of Subjects Achieving Off Reversals)Did not reverse from off to on50.0 percentage of participants
Rotigotine 2 PuffsSuccess Rate (Percentage of Subjects Achieving Off Reversals)Reversed from off to on (success)75.0 percentage of participants
Rotigotine 2 PuffsSuccess Rate (Percentage of Subjects Achieving Off Reversals)Did not reverse from off to on25.0 percentage of participants
Rotigotine 3 PuffsSuccess Rate (Percentage of Subjects Achieving Off Reversals)Did not reverse from off to on29.4 percentage of participants
Rotigotine 3 PuffsSuccess Rate (Percentage of Subjects Achieving Off Reversals)Reversed from off to on (success)70.6 percentage of participants
Rotigotine 4 PuffsSuccess Rate (Percentage of Subjects Achieving Off Reversals)Reversed from off to on (success)75.0 percentage of participants
Rotigotine 4 PuffsSuccess Rate (Percentage of Subjects Achieving Off Reversals)Did not reverse from off to on25.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: 95% confidence interval in difference in success rate95% CI: [-53.3, 12.1]Confidence interval
Comparison: 95% confidence interval in difference in success rate95% CI: [-25.9, 34.7]95% confidence interval
Comparison: 95% confidence interval in difference in success rate95% CI: [-30.6, 30.6]95% confidence interval
Comparison: 95% confidence interval in difference in success rate95% CI: [-25.9, 34.7]95% confidence interval
Secondary

Time of First Off Reversal

Number of minutes to first reversal of symptoms from off to on. Estimated via Kaplan-Meier estimation method. On and off state refer to periods where Parkinson's disease symptoms are not present (on) and periods where symptoms are present (off); the on/off determination at each assessment timepoint was made by the investigator.

Time frame: Up to 6 hours post-dose

Population: Full Analysis Set: Subjects receiving at least one delivery of trial medication and with at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo 1-4 PuffsTime of First Off Reversal50 minutes
Rotigotine 1 PuffTime of First Off Reversal60 minutes
Rotigotine 2 PuffsTime of First Off Reversal51 minutes
Rotigotine 3 PuffsTime of First Off Reversal50 minutes
Rotigotine 4 PuffsTime of First Off Reversal59 minutes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026