Skip to content

Catheter Ablation Versus Thoracoscopic Ablation to Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation

A Randomized Study That Will Show the Effects of Catheter Ablation Compared to the Effects of Thoracoscopic Ablation to Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation.

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00296166
Enrollment
200
Registered
2006-02-24
Start date
2006-11-30
Completion date
2010-11-30
Last updated
2010-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation, Permanent Atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, thoracoscopy, Arrhythmia, Heart

Brief summary

Patents with atrial fibrillation can be treated with the purpose of curing the arrhythmia.This may be achieved by catheter ablation and Maze surgery where the latter includes open heart surgery. By catheter ablation the arrhythmia can be cured in about 70 % of patients who have episodes of atrial fibrillation. In patients with permanent atrial fibrillation the results are not as good. We will compare a conventional ablation approach where lesions are created on the inside of the heart with a thoracoscopic approach where the lesions are created from the outside of the heart.

Detailed description

Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation will be considered for randomisation Patients will be randomised to either conventional endocardial catheter ablation or epicardial thoracoscopic ablation. Objectives of study: Primary endpoint:presence of sinus rhythm after 6 months Secondary endpoints: complications, cost-effectiveness, structural changes (evaluated by echocardiography), p-BNP and inflammatory markers, atrial fibrillation burden evaluated by Holter monitoring

Interventions

PROCEDURECatheter ablation

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Permanent atrial fibrillation documented on at least 2 ecg´s with more than 1 month between ecg´s. The diagnosis is verified on Holter. * All patients have symptoms or do not tolerate rate control treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Psychiatric disease or suspicion of incapability to give informed concent * Females with birth giving potential * Previous heart surgery * Previous ablation for atrial fibrillation * Life expectance less than 1 year * Congenital heart disease * Expected need for heart surgery * Heart failure (NYHA class IV) * Inability to be treated with anticoagulation * In case of previous deep venous thromboembolism og stroke the investigators will individually consider if the patient is suitable for inclusion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Presence of sinus rhythmafter 6 months from treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
cost-effectivenessduring 12 months from treatment
structural changes (evaluated by echocardiography)during 12 months from treatment
p-BNPduring 12 months from treatment
complicationsduring 12 months from treatment
atrial fibrillation burden evaluated by Holter monitoringat 6 months from treatment
exercise performanceat 3 months from treatment
Quality of lifeat 3 months from treatment
inflammatory markersduring 12 months from treatment

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026