Skip to content

The Effect of Diflunisal on Familial Amyloidosis

The Effect of Diflunisal on Familial Amyloidosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00294671
Enrollment
130
Registered
2006-02-22
Start date
2006-02-28
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2017-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Familial Amyloidosis, Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy

Keywords

familial amyloid polyneuropathy, familial amyloidosis, diflunisal, amyloidosis, transthyretin, peripheral neuropathy, autonomic neuropathy, amyloid cardiomyopathy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if diflunisal can prevent progressive lower leg nerve damage in patients with familial amyloidosis polyneuropathy. Funding Source - FDA Office of Orphan Products Development (OOPD); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

Detailed description

Familial amyloidosis polyneuropathy (FAP) is a rare, lethal, autosomal dominant, neurodegenerative disease characterized by misfolding of variant transthyretin tetramer (TTR) - a transport protein produced by the liver. The disease causes TTR to become unstable, triggering amyloid fibrils to form and leading to peripheral and autonomic nerve dysfunction. Currently, the only treatment for FAP is a liver transplant, which is expensive and risk-filled. Medicines are needed to treat this disease. Previous in vitro (in a test tube) studies have shown that a common anti-inflammatory drug called diflunisal stabilizes TTR, preventing the formation of amyloid fibrils. The goal of this 2-year randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled research study is to establish whether diflunisal can stop the nerve damage, or peripheral neuropathy, resulting from amyloid production in patients with FAP. Scientists already know that diflunisal prevents formation of amyloid in the test tube. This study will determine if the drug can block amyloid production in FAP patients. Participants will be randomly chosen to receive either diflunisal or an inactive (placebo) pill twice daily for 24 months. Participants will be carefully monitored through 7 follow-up visits, either at the study center or with individual primary care physicians. Participating in the study does not preclude patients from being listed for liver transplantation.

Interventions

given twice daily for 24 months

OTHERplacebo

an inactive substance given twice daily for 24 months

Sponsors

Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
CollaboratorFED
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
Boston University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 to 75 years * Biopsy proven amyloidosis * Genotyping of variant transthyretin * Signs of peripheral or autonomic neuropathy

Exclusion criteria

* Use of other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs * Other causes of sensorimotor polyneuropathy * Anticipated survival \<2 years or liver transplantation in \<1 yr * Liver transplantation * Profound nerve, heart or kidney impairment * Pregnancy or unwillingness to use contraception by women of childbearing age * Active or recent gastrointestinal bleeding * Non-steroidal or aspirin drug allergy/hypersensitivity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neurologic Impairment Score + 7 (NIS+7)Baseline, 1 and 2 yearsThe primary endpoint, the difference in polyneuropathy progression between treatments, was measured by the Neuropathy Impairment Score plus 7 nerve tests (NIS+7) which ranges from 0 (no neurologic deficits) to 270 points (no detectable peripheral nerve function).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kumamoto Neurologic Scale;Baseline, 1 and 2 yearsChange from baseline of the Kumamoto Score (0-102 points, increasing with disease severity), a clinical neurologic scale of motor, sensory, and autonomic function combined with heart and kidney end organ measures developed to track disease progression in Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy (ATTR-FAP)
Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI);Baseline, 1 and 2 yearsThe product of body mass index (BMI) and serum albumin level (g/L) \[kg/M2xg/L\].
Quality of Life Questionnaire: SF-36 Physical Component ScoreBaseline, 1 and 2 yearsThe 36 item short-form health survey (SF-36) was used to assess the difference between treatment groups for change of physical component scores over 2 years treatment. Range 0-100; lower scores reflect lower quality-of-life.
Quality of Life Questionnaire: SF-36 Mental Component ScoreBaseline, 1 and 2 yearsThe 36 item short-form health survey (SF-36) was used to assess the difference between treatment groups for change of mental component scores over 2 years treatment. Range 0-100; lower scores reflect lower quality-of-life.

Countries

Italy, Japan, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited between May 2006 and December 2010 from amyloid centers of excellence in Sweden (Umea), Italy (Pavia), United Kingdom (London), Japan (Matsumoto and Kumamoto), and the United States (New York, Minnesota, and Massachusetts).

Pre-assignment details

All enrolled participants were randomized to treatment groups.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Diflunisal
Diflunisal 250 mg taken by mouth twice daily for 24 months
64
Placebo
Placebo, an inactive substance, taken by mouth twice daily for 24 months
66
Total130

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyDrug related adverse event (AE)42
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1123
Overall StudyLiver transplant79
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up13
Overall StudyNon-compliance10
Overall StudyNon-drug related AE32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboDiflunisalTotal
Age, Continuous59.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
59.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
Kumamoto score16.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
15.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
16.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
Modified BMI1019 kg/M2 x g/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 255
1024.4 kg/M2 x g/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 226.3
1021.7 kg/M2 x g/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 240.4
NIS+7 score59.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 50
51.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 42.8
55.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 46.5
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
6 Participants8 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
50 Participants52 Participants102 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
11 participants10 participants21 participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
4 participants5 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
12 participants12 participants24 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
4 participants3 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
35 participants34 participants69 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants21 Participants43 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
44 Participants43 Participants87 Participants
SF-36 mental component score46.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
46.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
46.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
SF-36 physical component score34.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
35.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
35.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
29 / 6427 / 66
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 644 / 66

Outcome results

Primary

Neurologic Impairment Score + 7 (NIS+7)

The primary endpoint, the difference in polyneuropathy progression between treatments, was measured by the Neuropathy Impairment Score plus 7 nerve tests (NIS+7) which ranges from 0 (no neurologic deficits) to 270 points (no detectable peripheral nerve function).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 and 2 years

Population: Longitudinal analysis examined data from all 130 participants using intention-to-treat principles.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
DiflunisalNeurologic Impairment Score + 7 (NIS+7)Change from baseline to 2 years8.2 units on a scale
DiflunisalNeurologic Impairment Score + 7 (NIS+7)Change from baseline to 1 year6.2 units on a scale
PlaceboNeurologic Impairment Score + 7 (NIS+7)Change from baseline to 2 years26.3 units on a scale
PlaceboNeurologic Impairment Score + 7 (NIS+7)Change from baseline to 1 year12.5 units on a scale
Comparison: Longitudinal analysis of the difference between placebo and diflunisal treatment groups in NIS+7 change from baseline to 2 years.p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Longitudinal analysis of the difference between placebo and diflunisal treatment groups in NIS+7 change from baseline to 1years.p-value: 0.02t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Kumamoto Neurologic Scale;

Change from baseline of the Kumamoto Score (0-102 points, increasing with disease severity), a clinical neurologic scale of motor, sensory, and autonomic function combined with heart and kidney end organ measures developed to track disease progression in Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy (ATTR-FAP)

Time frame: Baseline, 1 and 2 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
DiflunisalKumamoto Neurologic Scale;Change from baseline to 2 years3.1 units on a scale
DiflunisalKumamoto Neurologic Scale;Change from baseline to 1 year1.9 units on a scale
PlaceboKumamoto Neurologic Scale;Change from baseline to 2 years8.0 units on a scale
PlaceboKumamoto Neurologic Scale;Change from baseline to 1 year4.1 units on a scale
Comparison: Longitudinal analysis of the difference between placebo and diflunisal treatment groups in Kumamoto score change from baseline to 2 years.p-value: 0.002t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Longitudinal analysis of the difference between placebo and diflunisal treatment groups in Kumamoto score change from baseline to 1 year.p-value: 0.1t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI);

The product of body mass index (BMI) and serum albumin level (g/L) \[kg/M2xg/L\].

Time frame: Baseline, 1 and 2 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
DiflunisalModified Body Mass Index (mBMI);Change from baseline to 2 years-33.7 kg/M2xg/L
DiflunisalModified Body Mass Index (mBMI);Change from baseline to 1 year-18.7 kg/M2xg/L
PlaceboModified Body Mass Index (mBMI);Change from baseline to 2 years-67.9 kg/M2xg/L
PlaceboModified Body Mass Index (mBMI);Change from baseline to 1 year-38.5 kg/M2xg/L
Comparison: Longitudinal analysis of the difference between placebo and diflunisal treatment groups in mBMI change from baseline to 2 years.p-value: 0.21t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Longitudinal analysis of the difference between placebo and diflunisal treatment groups in mBMI change from baseline to 1 year.p-value: 0.43t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Quality of Life Questionnaire: SF-36 Mental Component Score

The 36 item short-form health survey (SF-36) was used to assess the difference between treatment groups for change of mental component scores over 2 years treatment. Range 0-100; lower scores reflect lower quality-of-life.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 and 2 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
DiflunisalQuality of Life Questionnaire: SF-36 Mental Component ScoreChange from baseline to 2 years3.5 units on a scale
DiflunisalQuality of Life Questionnaire: SF-36 Mental Component ScoreChange from baseline to 1 year2.5 units on a scale
PlaceboQuality of Life Questionnaire: SF-36 Mental Component ScoreChange from baseline to 2 years-0.9 units on a scale
PlaceboQuality of Life Questionnaire: SF-36 Mental Component ScoreChange from baseline to 1 year0.8 units on a scale
Comparison: Longitudinal analysis of the difference between placebo and diflunisal treatment groups in SF-36 mental component change from baseline to 2 years.p-value: 0.06t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Longitudinal analysis of the difference between placebo and diflunisal treatment groups in SF-36 mental component change from baseline to 1 year.p-value: 0.37t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Quality of Life Questionnaire: SF-36 Physical Component Score

The 36 item short-form health survey (SF-36) was used to assess the difference between treatment groups for change of physical component scores over 2 years treatment. Range 0-100; lower scores reflect lower quality-of-life.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 and 2 years

Population: Longitudinal analysis examined data from all 130 participants using intention-to-treat principles.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
DiflunisalQuality of Life Questionnaire: SF-36 Physical Component ScoreChange from baseline to 1 year0.7 units on a scale
DiflunisalQuality of Life Questionnaire: SF-36 Physical Component ScoreChange from baseline to 2 years1.2 units on a scale
PlaceboQuality of Life Questionnaire: SF-36 Physical Component ScoreChange from baseline to 1 year-1.9 units on a scale
PlaceboQuality of Life Questionnaire: SF-36 Physical Component ScoreChange from baseline to 2 years-4.9 units on a scale
Comparison: Longitudinal analysis of the difference between placebo and diflunisal treatment groups in SF-36 physical component change from baseline to 2 years.p-value: 0.001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Longitudinal analysis of the difference between placebo and diflunisal treatment groups in SF-36 physical component change from baseline to 1 year.p-value: 0.06t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026