Skip to content

P3: Pacemaker Patient Profiling Study

Pacemaker Patient Profiling (P3) Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00294060
Enrollment
2013
Registered
2006-02-20
Start date
2004-03-31
Completion date
2007-11-30
Last updated
2011-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bradycardia

Keywords

Pacemaker, Bradycardia

Brief summary

The P3 Study is a United States post market study to gather data on clinical status, primary indications, device therapy choices, clinical management and outcomes for patients with implantable pacemakers.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient meets Class I / Class II indications for pacing * Patient implanted with one of the following market-approved single or dual chamber Medtronic devices: EnRhythm™, EnPulse®, Kappa® 700, Kappa® 900, Vitatron Clarity™, Vitatron Selection® AFm, Vitatron C-Series, Vitatron T-Series, or the AT500™ DDDR Pacing System

Exclusion criteria

* Patient is enrolled in a device or cardiovascular drug study that affects treatment and/or study device programming * Patient whose life expectancy is less than two years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Dual Chamber Devicesat original implantPacemaker device choice characterized by the number of patients with dual chamber devices
Days Hospitalizedimplant to one yearHealthcare utilization clinical outcome characterized by number of days hospitalized in the first year
Multiple In-clinic Visitsimplant to one yearFollow-up practice pattern assessed by the number of patients with a dual chamber device that had two or more routine pacemaker in-clinic visits with a device interrogation

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were enrolled in the study from March 2004 through April 2006.

Pre-assignment details

Only patients who received an approved study device were enrolled in the registry.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pacing Patients
Patients implanted with a pacemaker.
2,013
Total2,013

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath225
Overall StudyDevice explanted/not replaced23
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up55
Overall StudyMedical condition3
Overall StudyOther59
Overall StudyPhysician Decision797
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPacing Patients
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1747 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
266 Participants
Age Continuous76.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
Region of Enrollment
United States
2013 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
996 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1017 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Days Hospitalized

Healthcare utilization clinical outcome characterized by number of days hospitalized in the first year

Time frame: implant to one year

Population: Patients with a twelve-month follow-up visit were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pacing PatientsDays Hospitalized0.054 average days hospitalizedStandard Deviation 2.35
Primary

Multiple In-clinic Visits

Follow-up practice pattern assessed by the number of patients with a dual chamber device that had two or more routine pacemaker in-clinic visits with a device interrogation

Time frame: implant to one year

Population: Only those patients with a dual chamber device completing 12 months of follow-up were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pacing PatientsMultiple In-clinic Visits768 participants with 2 or more visits
Primary

Number of Participants With Dual Chamber Devices

Pacemaker device choice characterized by the number of patients with dual chamber devices

Time frame: at original implant

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pacing PatientsNumber of Participants With Dual Chamber Devices1684 Participants with dual chamber devices

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026