Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study for the Treatment of Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Placebo- Controlled, 7 Cycle Duration (196 Days), Phase 3 Study of Oral Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest Tablets for the Treatment of Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00293059
Enrollment
190
Registered
2006-02-17
Start date
2005-12-31
Completion date
2008-05-31
Last updated
2013-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metrorrhagia

Keywords

Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the study drug is safe and effective in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding.

Detailed description

This study has previously been posted by Berlex, Inc. Berlex, Inc. has been renamed to Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.is the sponsor of the trial.

Interventions

2 days of 3 mg estradiol valerate (EV);5 days of 2 mg EV + 2 mg dienogest (DNG);17 days of 2 mg EV + 3 mg DNG;2 days of 1 mg EV;2 days of placeboA blister card consists of 28 pills taken orally once a day for 28 days (one cycle)

DRUGPlacebo

Matching placebo to be taken orally daily.

Sponsors

Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women 18 years or older * With diagnosis of dysfunctional uterine bleeding without organic pathology * And with at least one of the following symptoms: prolonged, frequent, or excessive bleeding

Exclusion criteria

* The use of steroidal oral contraceptives, or any drug that could alter oral contraception metabolism will be prohibited during the study. * Women with history of endometrial ablation or dilatation or curettage within 2 months prior to study start will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Participants With no Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (DUB) Symptomsduring a time period of 90 days under treatmentUp to 8 criteria had to be met for complete response during 90-day period. No bleeding episodes (BE) \>7 days, no \>4 BE, no BE with MBL \>=80 mL, no \>1 BE increase from baseline, no increase from baseline in an individual participant's total number of bleeding days and total number of bleeding days not \>24 days. Additionally, for participants included with prolonged bleeding: decrease between maximum duration during run-in and efficacy \>=2 days excessive bleeding: MBL associated with each episode decreased by \>=50% from average of qualifying episodes during run-in.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Participants Cured From Frequent Bleedingduring a time period of 90 days under treatmentFrequent bleeding was defined as greater than 5 bleeding episodes, with a minimum of 20 bleeding days overall in a 90-day period. Participants were considered cured if they had no more than 4 bleeding episodes and the total number of bleeding days did not exceed 24 days and there was no increase in the total number of bleeding days in the efficacy phase as compared to the run-in phase.
Proportion of Participants Cured From Excessive Bleedingduring a time period of 90 days under treatmentExcessive bleeding was defined as 2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 mL or more in a 90-day period. Participants were considered cured if (1) the blood loss volume associated with each episode was less than 80 mL and (2) the blood loss volume associated with each bleeding episode represented a decrease of at least 50% from the average of the qualifying bleeding episodes, where the qualifying bleeding episodes were those with a blood loss volume ≥ 80 mL (per episode) that occurred during the run-in phase.
Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 84from baseline up to treatment day 84The investigators assessed the participants' change in DUB symptoms at day 84 (visit 7) compared with admission to the study according to a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), using the following information: central laboratory data, physical examination, e-diary data, and participant interview. Improvement was defined as being classified as a score of 3 or less.
Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 196from baseline up to treatment day 196The investigators assessed the participants' change in DUB symptoms at day 196 (visit 11) compared with admission to the study according to a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), using the following information: central laboratory data, physical examination, e-diary data, and participant interview. Improvement was defined as being classified as a score of 3 or less.
Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Participant's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 84from baseline up to treatment day 84Participants assessed their overall improvement at day 84 (visit 7) compared with their condition at admission to the study on a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as being classified as a score of 3 or less.
Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Participant's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 196from baseline up to treatment day 196Participants assessed their overall improvement at day 196 (visit 11) compared with their condition at admission to the study on a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as being classified as a score of 3 or less.
Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for All Participants to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under TreatmentBaseline and reference period of 90 days under treatmentMenstrual blood loss was determined using the alkaline hematin method for the 90 days before treatment (baseline) and for 90 days under treatment. A negative value indicates a reduction in blood loss after treatment.
Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 128 daysMenstrual blood loss volume was determined using the alkaline hematin method after participants were on treatment for one cycle
Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 328 daysMenstrual blood loss volume was determined using the alkaline hematin method after participants were on treatment for 3 cycles
Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 728 daysMenstrual blood loss volume was determined using the alkaline hematin methods after participants were on treatment for 7 cycles
Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatmentbaseline and reference period of 90 days under treatmentThe blood loss volume for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 mL or more during the run-in phase) was determined for the 90 days before treatment (ie, run-in phase) and for the 90 days under treatment. A negative value indicates a reduction in blood loss while under treatment compared to before treatment.
Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 128 daysThe blood loss volume for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 mL or more during the run-in phase) was determined using the alkaline hematin method after participants were on treatment for one cycle.
Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 328 daysThe blood loss volume for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 mL or more during the run-in phase) was determined using the alkaline hematin method after participants were on treatment for 3 cycles.
Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 728 daysThe blood loss volume for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 mL or more during the run-in phase) was determined using the alkaline hematin method after participants were on treatment for 7 cycles.
Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Days to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatmentbaseline and reference period of 90 days under treatmentThe number of bleeding days was determine for the 90 days before treatment (baseline) and for 90 days while under treatment. A negative value indicates a reduction in the number of bleeding days while under treatment compared to baseline.
Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Episodes to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatmentbaseline and reference period of 90 days under treatmentA bleeding episode was one that lasted for at least 2 days, and where the bleeding days were separated by no more than 1 bleeding-free day. An episode stopped with 2 consecutive bleeding-free days. The number of episodes was determined for the 90 days before treatment and for the 90 days under treatment. A negative values indicates a reduction from baseline in the number of episodes while under treatment.
Change From Baseline in Number of Sanitary Protection Used at 90 Days of Treatmentbaseline and reference period of 90 days under treatmentThe number of total sanitary protection items used during the 90-day run-in phase before treatment (baseline) and the number of total sanitary protection items used during the 90 days while under treatment was determined. A negative value indicates a reduction in the number of sanitary protection items used while under treatment compared to the number used before treatment.
Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Scores at Treatment Day 84baseline and treatment day 84The PGWBI questionnaire consisted of 22 questions that were answered using a 6-grade Likert scale. The minimum overall score was 22 and the maximum was 132. The higher the score, the better the well being of the participant. The observation phase was the last 4 weeks. The following 6 dimensions were derived from the questionnaire: anxiety, depressed mood, positive well-being, self-control, health, and vitality and the highest possible scores were 30, 18, 24, 18, 18, and 24, respectively.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 196treatment day 196Participants were asked how many days and hours were missed from work during the past 12 weeks because of problems associated with DUB, not including the time missed to participate in this study.
Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Scores at Treatment Day 196baseline and treatment day 196The PGWBI questionnaire consisted of 22 questions that were answered using a 6-grade Likert scale. The minimum overall score was 22 and the maximum was 132. The higher the score, the better the well being of the participant. The observation phase was the last 4 weeks. The following 6 dimensions were derived from the questionnaire: anxiety, depressed mood, positive well-being, self-control, health, and vitality and the highest possible scores were 30, 18, 24, 18, 18, and 24, respectively.
Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Scores at Treatment Day 84baseline and treatment day 84The MFSQ was designed to measure aspects of female sexuality and asked about the participants' sexual experience during the last 4 weeks. Higher scores represent higher, more complete, or better integrated levels of female sexual function. Minimum and maximum possible values are 19 and 133.
Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Scores at Treatment Day 196baseline and treatment day 196The MFSQ was designed to measure aspects of female sexuality and asked about the participants' sexual experience during the last 4 weeks. Higher scores represent higher, more complete, or better integrated levels of female sexual function. Minimum and maximum possible values are 19 and 133.
Change From Baseline in EuroQoL (Quality of Life) 5 Dimensional Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scores at Treatment Day 84baseline and treatment day 84The Health State Classification of the EQ-5D comprised 5 questions addressing mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Participants were asked to indicate their current health state by ticking the most appropriate of 3 statements about each of the questions (ie, no problems, some problems, extreme problems). The best possible answers were (1,1,1,1,1), which equals a valuation score of 1.0. The worst possible answers were (3,3,3,3,3), which equals a valuation score of .594. The change from the baseline score at day 84 is presented.
Change From Baseline in EuroQoL (Quality of Life) 5 Dimensional Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scores at Treatment Day 196baseline and treatment day 196The Health State Classification of the EQ-5D comprised 5 questions addressing mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Participants were asked to indicate their current health state by ticking the most appropriate of 3 statements about each of the questions (ie, no problems, some problems, extreme problems). The best possible answers were (1,1,1,1,1), which equals a valuation score of 1.0. The worst possible answers were (3,3,3,3,3), which equals a valuation score of .594. The change from the baseline score at day 196 is presented.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 84baseline and treatment day 84The visual analogue scale (ie, thermometer) had endpoints of 100 (best imaginable health state) at the top, and 0 (worst imaginable health state) at the bottom. Participants rated their current health state by drawing a line from the box marked 'your own health state today' to the appropriate point on the thermometer scale. The change from baseline at day 84 is presented.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 196baseline and treatment day 196The visual analogue scale (ie, thermometer) had endpoints of 100 (best imaginable health state) at the top, and 0 (worst imaginable health state) at the bottom. Participants rated their current health state by drawing a line from the box marked 'your own health state today' to the appropriate point on the thermometer scale. The change from baseline at day 196 is presented.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 84treatment day 84Participants were asked if there was any change in her employment status in the last 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with a change is displayed.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 84treatment day 84Participants were asked how many days and hours they missed from work during the past 12 weeks because of problems associated with DUB, not including the time missed to participate in this study.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 84treatment day 84Participants were asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10, how much their DUB affected productivity while working during the past 12 weeks, where 0 represented that DUB had no effect on work and 10 represented that DUB completely prevented her from working.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 84treatment day 84Participants were asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10 how much DUB affected their ability to do their regular daily activities, other than work at a job, during the past 12 weeks where 0 represented that DUB had no effect on daily activities and 10 represented that DUB completely prevented her from doing daily activities.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 196treatment day 196Participants were asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10, how much DUB affected their productivity while working during the past 12 weeks, where 0 represented that DUB had no effect on work and 10 represented that DUB completely prevented her from working.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 196treatment day 196Participants were asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10 how much DUB affected their ability to do regular daily activities, other than work at a job, during the past 12 weeks where 0 represented that DUB had no effect on daily activities and 10 represented that DUB completely prevented her from doing her daily activities.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 84treatment day 84Participants were asked if they had any unscheduled outpatient visits to a hospital because of DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to participation in this study. The proportion of participants with such visits is displayed.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 84treatment day 84Participants were asked if they had any unscheduled visits to a physician (non-hospital medical care) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to participation in this study. The proportion of participants with such visits is displayed.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 84treatment day 84Participants were asked if they had any unscheduled procedures (eg, laparoscopy, laboratory tests, ultrasound) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with such procedures is displayed.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 84treatment day 84Participants were asked if they had received ambulatory services (eg, home help, child care) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants who received such services is displayed.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 84treatment day 84Participants were asked to specify if they had out-of-pocket expenses because of DUB during the past 12 weeks, including over-the-counter medication (the name of the medication, the number of packages, and the cost per package), co-payments due to prescribed medication, and costs to travel to and from medical appointments. The proportion of participants with such expenses is displayed.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 84treatment day 84Participants were asked if they had any medical treatment (eg, prescribed medication, other treatment) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with such treatment is displayed.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 196treatment day 196Participants were asked if there was any change in employment status in the last 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with a change is displayed.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 196treatment day 196Participants were asked if they had any unscheduled outpatient visits to a hospital because of DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to participation in this study. The proportion of participants with such visits is displayed.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 196treatment day 196Participants were asked if they had any unscheduled visits to a physician (non-hospital medical care) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to participation in this study. The proportion of participants with such visits is displayed.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 196treatment day 196Participants were asked if they had any unscheduled procedures (eg, laparoscopy, laboratory tests, ultrasound) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with such procedures is displayed.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 196treatment day 196Participants were asked if they had received ambulatory services (eg, home help, child care) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants who had received such services is displayed.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 196treatment day 196Participants were asked to specify out-of-pocket expenses because of DUB during the past 12 weeks, including over-the-counter medication, co-payments due to prescribed medication, and costs to travel to and from medical appointments. The proportion of participants with such expenses is displayed.
Proportion of Participants Cured From Prolonged Bleedingduring a time period of 90 days under treatmentProlonged bleeding was defined as 2 or more bleeding episodes, each lasting 8 or more days in a 90-day period. Participants were considered cured if they had no bleeding episodes lasting more than 7 days and the decrease between the maximum duration during the run-in phase and the maximum duration during the efficacy phase was at least 2 days.
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) Concentrations at Treatment Day 196baseline and treatment day 196Hematocrit was measured before treatment and after 196 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in hematocrit from baseline at treatment day 196.
Change From Baseline in Serum Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 84baseline and treatment day 84Serum ferritin was measured before treatment and after 84 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in serum ferritin from baseline at treatment day 84.
Change From Baseline in Serum Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 196baseline and treatment day 196Serum ferritin was measured before treatment and after 196 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in serum ferritin from baseline at treatment day 196.
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 84baseline and treatment day 84Hemoglobin was measured before treatment and after 84 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in hemoglobin from baseline at treatment day 84.
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 196baseline and treatment day 196Hemoglobin was measured before treatment and after 196 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in hemoglobin from baseline at treatment day 196.
Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 196treatment day 196Participants were asked if they had any medical treatment (eg, prescribed medication, other treatment) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with such treatment is displayed.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The date of first participant, first visit was 14 Dec 2005. The date of last participant, last visit was 21 May 2008.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 1077 participants were screened for inclusion into the study; 887 participants failed screening. The remaining 190 participants were randomized; 120 participants were randomized to the estradiol valerate/dienogest group and 70 participants to the placebo group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)
A blister card consists of 28 pills taken orally once a day for 28 days (one cycle): 2 days of 3 mg estradiol valerate (EV); 5 days of 2 mg EV + 2 mg dienogest (DNG); 17 days of 2 mg EV + 3 mg DNG; 2 days of 1 mg EV; 2 days of placebo
120
Placebo
Matching placebo to be taken orally daily
70
Total190

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event124
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy20
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up23
Overall Studymissing35
Overall StudyNoncompliant - sanitary pads collection01
Overall StudyParticipant moved out of state10
Overall StudyParticipant stopped study drug10
Overall StudyPregnancy11
Overall StudyProtocol Violation20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject115

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalEstradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)
Age Continuous37.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
36.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
36.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
Body Mass Index (BMI)25.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
26.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
26.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
excessive bleeding60 participants151 participants91 participants
frequent and excessive bleeding0 participants1 participants1 participants
frequent bleeding2 participants6 participants4 participants
prolonged and excessive bleeding9 participants18 participants9 participants
prolonged and frequent bleeding2 participants5 participants3 participants
prolonged bleeding12 participants38 participants26 participants
prolonged, frequent and excessive bleeding0 participants0 participants0 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
70 Participants190 Participants120 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
46 / 11921 / 66
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1192 / 66

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Participants With no Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (DUB) Symptoms

Up to 8 criteria had to be met for complete response during 90-day period. No bleeding episodes (BE) \>7 days, no \>4 BE, no BE with MBL \>=80 mL, no \>1 BE increase from baseline, no increase from baseline in an individual participant's total number of bleeding days and total number of bleeding days not \>24 days. Additionally, for participants included with prolonged bleeding: decrease between maximum duration during run-in and efficacy \>=2 days excessive bleeding: MBL associated with each episode decreased by \>=50% from average of qualifying episodes during run-in.

Time frame: during a time period of 90 days under treatment

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) group consisted of all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Proportion of Participants With no Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (DUB) Symptoms0.292 Proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With no Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (DUB) Symptoms0.029 Proportion of participants
p-value: <0.0001inverting 2 one-sided tests
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for All Participants to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment

Menstrual blood loss was determined using the alkaline hematin method for the 90 days before treatment (baseline) and for 90 days under treatment. A negative value indicates a reduction in blood loss after treatment.

Time frame: Baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for All Participants to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment-353.1 mLStandard Deviation 309.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for All Participants to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment-130.4 mLStandard Deviation 338.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment

The blood loss volume for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 mL or more during the run-in phase) was determined for the 90 days before treatment (ie, run-in phase) and for the 90 days under treatment. A negative value indicates a reduction in blood loss while under treatment compared to before treatment.

Time frame: baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment

Population: ITT, participants with excessive bleeding at baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment-411.9 mLStandard Deviation 308.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment-152.3 mLStandard Deviation 343.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EuroQoL (Quality of Life) 5 Dimensional Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scores at Treatment Day 196

The Health State Classification of the EQ-5D comprised 5 questions addressing mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Participants were asked to indicate their current health state by ticking the most appropriate of 3 statements about each of the questions (ie, no problems, some problems, extreme problems). The best possible answers were (1,1,1,1,1), which equals a valuation score of 1.0. The worst possible answers were (3,3,3,3,3), which equals a valuation score of .594. The change from the baseline score at day 196 is presented.

Time frame: baseline and treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL (Quality of Life) 5 Dimensional Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scores at Treatment Day 1960.0052 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1504
PlaceboChange From Baseline in EuroQoL (Quality of Life) 5 Dimensional Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scores at Treatment Day 1960.0154 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1611
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EuroQoL (Quality of Life) 5 Dimensional Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scores at Treatment Day 84

The Health State Classification of the EQ-5D comprised 5 questions addressing mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Participants were asked to indicate their current health state by ticking the most appropriate of 3 statements about each of the questions (ie, no problems, some problems, extreme problems). The best possible answers were (1,1,1,1,1), which equals a valuation score of 1.0. The worst possible answers were (3,3,3,3,3), which equals a valuation score of .594. The change from the baseline score at day 84 is presented.

Time frame: baseline and treatment day 84

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL (Quality of Life) 5 Dimensional Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scores at Treatment Day 84-0.0035 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2145
PlaceboChange From Baseline in EuroQoL (Quality of Life) 5 Dimensional Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scores at Treatment Day 84-0.0024 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1507
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) Concentrations at Treatment Day 196

Hematocrit was measured before treatment and after 196 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in hematocrit from baseline at treatment day 196.

Time frame: baseline and treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) Concentrations at Treatment Day 1961.30 Percentage of blood volumeStandard Deviation 2.98
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) Concentrations at Treatment Day 1960.09 Percentage of blood volumeStandard Deviation 3.04
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 196

Hemoglobin was measured before treatment and after 196 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in hemoglobin from baseline at treatment day 196.

Time frame: baseline and treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 1960.57 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.02
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 1960.20 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.03
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 84

Hemoglobin was measured before treatment and after 84 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in hemoglobin from baseline at treatment day 84.

Time frame: baseline and treatment day 84

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 840.22 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.83
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 840.17 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.62
Secondary

Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Scores at Treatment Day 196

The MFSQ was designed to measure aspects of female sexuality and asked about the participants' sexual experience during the last 4 weeks. Higher scores represent higher, more complete, or better integrated levels of female sexual function. Minimum and maximum possible values are 19 and 133.

Time frame: baseline and treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Scores at Treatment Day 196-2.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Scores at Treatment Day 196-0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Scores at Treatment Day 84

The MFSQ was designed to measure aspects of female sexuality and asked about the participants' sexual experience during the last 4 weeks. Higher scores represent higher, more complete, or better integrated levels of female sexual function. Minimum and maximum possible values are 19 and 133.

Time frame: baseline and treatment day 84

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Scores at Treatment Day 84-3.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Scores at Treatment Day 840.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Days to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment

The number of bleeding days was determine for the 90 days before treatment (baseline) and for 90 days while under treatment. A negative value indicates a reduction in the number of bleeding days while under treatment compared to baseline.

Time frame: baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Days to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment-5.2 bleeding daysStandard Deviation 11.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Days to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment-2.0 bleeding daysStandard Deviation 6.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Episodes to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment

A bleeding episode was one that lasted for at least 2 days, and where the bleeding days were separated by no more than 1 bleeding-free day. An episode stopped with 2 consecutive bleeding-free days. The number of episodes was determined for the 90 days before treatment and for the 90 days under treatment. A negative values indicates a reduction from baseline in the number of episodes while under treatment.

Time frame: baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Episodes to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment-0.5 bleeding episodesStandard Deviation 1.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Episodes to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment-0.3 bleeding episodesStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Number of Sanitary Protection Used at 90 Days of Treatment

The number of total sanitary protection items used during the 90-day run-in phase before treatment (baseline) and the number of total sanitary protection items used during the 90 days while under treatment was determined. A negative value indicates a reduction in the number of sanitary protection items used while under treatment compared to the number used before treatment.

Time frame: baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change From Baseline in Number of Sanitary Protection Used at 90 Days of Treatment-43.6 Sanitary protection productsStandard Deviation 40.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Number of Sanitary Protection Used at 90 Days of Treatment-21.2 Sanitary protection productsStandard Deviation 43.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Scores at Treatment Day 196

The PGWBI questionnaire consisted of 22 questions that were answered using a 6-grade Likert scale. The minimum overall score was 22 and the maximum was 132. The higher the score, the better the well being of the participant. The observation phase was the last 4 weeks. The following 6 dimensions were derived from the questionnaire: anxiety, depressed mood, positive well-being, self-control, health, and vitality and the highest possible scores were 30, 18, 24, 18, 18, and 24, respectively.

Time frame: baseline and treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Scores at Treatment Day 1960.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Scores at Treatment Day 1961.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Scores at Treatment Day 84

The PGWBI questionnaire consisted of 22 questions that were answered using a 6-grade Likert scale. The minimum overall score was 22 and the maximum was 132. The higher the score, the better the well being of the participant. The observation phase was the last 4 weeks. The following 6 dimensions were derived from the questionnaire: anxiety, depressed mood, positive well-being, self-control, health, and vitality and the highest possible scores were 30, 18, 24, 18, 18, and 24, respectively.

Time frame: baseline and treatment day 84

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Scores at Treatment Day 84-1.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Scores at Treatment Day 84-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 196

Serum ferritin was measured before treatment and after 196 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in serum ferritin from baseline at treatment day 196.

Time frame: baseline and treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change From Baseline in Serum Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 1965.3 ng/mLStandard Deviation 37.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 1962.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 11.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 84

Serum ferritin was measured before treatment and after 84 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in serum ferritin from baseline at treatment day 84.

Time frame: baseline and treatment day 84

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change From Baseline in Serum Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 840.2 ng/mLStandard Deviation 35.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 84-1.5 ng/mLStandard Deviation 12.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 196

The visual analogue scale (ie, thermometer) had endpoints of 100 (best imaginable health state) at the top, and 0 (worst imaginable health state) at the bottom. Participants rated their current health state by drawing a line from the box marked 'your own health state today' to the appropriate point on the thermometer scale. The change from baseline at day 196 is presented.

Time frame: baseline and treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 196-0.07 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.86
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 196-0.51 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 84

The visual analogue scale (ie, thermometer) had endpoints of 100 (best imaginable health state) at the top, and 0 (worst imaginable health state) at the bottom. Participants rated their current health state by drawing a line from the box marked 'your own health state today' to the appropriate point on the thermometer scale. The change from baseline at day 84 is presented.

Time frame: baseline and treatment day 84

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 84-2.07 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.74
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 84-0.26 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.38
Secondary

Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 1

Menstrual blood loss volume was determined using the alkaline hematin method after participants were on treatment for one cycle

Time frame: 28 days

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 1136.5 mLStandard Deviation 141.3
PlaceboMenstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 1146.9 mLStandard Deviation 133.9
Secondary

Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 3

Menstrual blood loss volume was determined using the alkaline hematin method after participants were on treatment for 3 cycles

Time frame: 28 days

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 359.9 mLStandard Deviation 91.5
PlaceboMenstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 3139.6 mLStandard Deviation 92.2
Secondary

Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 7

Menstrual blood loss volume was determined using the alkaline hematin methods after participants were on treatment for 7 cycles

Time frame: 28 days

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 741.3 mLStandard Deviation 54.2
PlaceboMenstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 7113.3 mLStandard Deviation 76.6
Secondary

Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 1

The blood loss volume for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 mL or more during the run-in phase) was determined using the alkaline hematin method after participants were on treatment for one cycle.

Time frame: 28 days

Population: ITT, participants with excessive bleeding at baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 1206.1 mLStandard Deviation 179.8
PlaceboMenstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 1194.7 mLStandard Deviation 132.2
Secondary

Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 3

The blood loss volume for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 mL or more during the run-in phase) was determined using the alkaline hematin method after participants were on treatment for 3 cycles.

Time frame: 28 days

Population: ITT, participants with excessive bleeding at baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 367.1 mLStandard Deviation 96.2
PlaceboMenstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 3147.4 mLStandard Deviation 93.4
Secondary

Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 7

The blood loss volume for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 mL or more during the run-in phase) was determined using the alkaline hematin method after participants were on treatment for 7 cycles.

Time frame: 28 days

Population: ITT, participants with excessive bleeding at baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 747.5 mLStandard Deviation 58.5
PlaceboMenstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 7116.9 mLStandard Deviation 77.5
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Cured From Excessive Bleeding

Excessive bleeding was defined as 2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 mL or more in a 90-day period. Participants were considered cured if (1) the blood loss volume associated with each episode was less than 80 mL and (2) the blood loss volume associated with each bleeding episode represented a decrease of at least 50% from the average of the qualifying bleeding episodes, where the qualifying bleeding episodes were those with a blood loss volume ≥ 80 mL (per episode) that occurred during the run-in phase.

Time frame: during a time period of 90 days under treatment

Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized participants who enrolled with excessive bleeding.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Proportion of Participants Cured From Excessive Bleeding0.385 Proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants Cured From Excessive Bleeding0.05 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Cured From Frequent Bleeding

Frequent bleeding was defined as greater than 5 bleeding episodes, with a minimum of 20 bleeding days overall in a 90-day period. Participants were considered cured if they had no more than 4 bleeding episodes and the total number of bleeding days did not exceed 24 days and there was no increase in the total number of bleeding days in the efficacy phase as compared to the run-in phase.

Time frame: during a time period of 90 days under treatment

Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized participants who enrolled with frequent bleeding.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Proportion of Participants Cured From Frequent Bleeding0.250 Proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants Cured From Frequent Bleeding0.0 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Cured From Prolonged Bleeding

Prolonged bleeding was defined as 2 or more bleeding episodes, each lasting 8 or more days in a 90-day period. Participants were considered cured if they had no bleeding episodes lasting more than 7 days and the decrease between the maximum duration during the run-in phase and the maximum duration during the efficacy phase was at least 2 days.

Time frame: during a time period of 90 days under treatment

Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized participants who enrolled with prolonged bleeding.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Proportion of Participants Cured From Prolonged Bleeding0.154 Proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants Cured From Prolonged Bleeding0.083 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 196

The investigators assessed the participants' change in DUB symptoms at day 196 (visit 11) compared with admission to the study according to a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), using the following information: central laboratory data, physical examination, e-diary data, and participant interview. Improvement was defined as being classified as a score of 3 or less.

Time frame: from baseline up to treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 1960.807 Proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 1960.419 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 84

The investigators assessed the participants' change in DUB symptoms at day 84 (visit 7) compared with admission to the study according to a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), using the following information: central laboratory data, physical examination, e-diary data, and participant interview. Improvement was defined as being classified as a score of 3 or less.

Time frame: from baseline up to treatment day 84

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 840.880 Proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 840.509 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Participant's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 196

Participants assessed their overall improvement at day 196 (visit 11) compared with their condition at admission to the study on a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as being classified as a score of 3 or less.

Time frame: from baseline up to treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Participant's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 1960.812 Proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With Improvement in the Participant's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 1960.383 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Participant's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 84

Participants assessed their overall improvement at day 84 (visit 7) compared with their condition at admission to the study on a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as being classified as a score of 3 or less.

Time frame: from baseline up to treatment day 84

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Participant's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 840.835 Proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With Improvement in the Participant's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 840.426 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked if they had any unscheduled procedures (eg, laparoscopy, laboratory tests, ultrasound) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with such procedures is displayed.

Time frame: treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 1960.024 Proportion of participants
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 1960.0 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked if they had any unscheduled procedures (eg, laparoscopy, laboratory tests, ultrasound) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with such procedures is displayed.

Time frame: treatment day 84

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 840.012 Proportion of participants
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 840.0 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked if they had any medical treatment (eg, prescribed medication, other treatment) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with such treatment is displayed.

Time frame: treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 1960.047 Proportion of participants
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 1960.043 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked if they had any medical treatment (eg, prescribed medication, other treatment) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with such treatment is displayed.

Time frame: treatment day 84

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 840.047 Proportion of participants
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 840.062 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked if there was any change in employment status in the last 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with a change is displayed.

Time frame: treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 1960.129 Proportion of participants
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 1960.213 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked if there was any change in her employment status in the last 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with a change is displayed.

Time frame: treatment day 84

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 840.221 Proportion of participants
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 840.106 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked how many days and hours were missed from work during the past 12 weeks because of problems associated with DUB, not including the time missed to participate in this study.

Time frame: treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 1960.2 daysStandard Deviation 1.19
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 1960.4 daysStandard Deviation 1.51
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked how many days and hours they missed from work during the past 12 weeks because of problems associated with DUB, not including the time missed to participate in this study.

Time frame: treatment day 84

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 840.4 dayStandard Deviation 1.84
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 840.7 dayStandard Deviation 1.87
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked to specify out-of-pocket expenses because of DUB during the past 12 weeks, including over-the-counter medication, co-payments due to prescribed medication, and costs to travel to and from medical appointments. The proportion of participants with such expenses is displayed.

Time frame: treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 1960.241 Proportion of participants
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 1960.314 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked to specify if they had out-of-pocket expenses because of DUB during the past 12 weeks, including over-the-counter medication (the name of the medication, the number of packages, and the cost per package), co-payments due to prescribed medication, and costs to travel to and from medical appointments. The proportion of participants with such expenses is displayed.

Time frame: treatment day 84

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 840.323 Proportion of participants
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 840.407 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10, how much DUB affected their productivity while working during the past 12 weeks, where 0 represented that DUB had no effect on work and 10 represented that DUB completely prevented her from working.

Time frame: treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 1962.40 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.293
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 1964.03 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.123
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10, how much their DUB affected productivity while working during the past 12 weeks, where 0 represented that DUB had no effect on work and 10 represented that DUB completely prevented her from working.

Time frame: treatment day 84

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 842.38 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.175
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 843.07 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.088
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked if they had received ambulatory services (eg, home help, child care) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants who had received such services is displayed.

Time frame: treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 1960.012 Proportion of participants
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 1960.0 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked if they had received ambulatory services (eg, home help, child care) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants who received such services is displayed.

Time frame: treatment day 84

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 840.0 Proportion of participants
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 840.0 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10 how much DUB affected their ability to do regular daily activities, other than work at a job, during the past 12 weeks where 0 represented that DUB had no effect on daily activities and 10 represented that DUB completely prevented her from doing her daily activities.

Time frame: treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 1962.48 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.291
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 1964.10 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.903
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10 how much DUB affected their ability to do their regular daily activities, other than work at a job, during the past 12 weeks where 0 represented that DUB had no effect on daily activities and 10 represented that DUB completely prevented her from doing daily activities.

Time frame: treatment day 84

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 842.81 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.551
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 843.91 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.466
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked if they had any unscheduled outpatient visits to a hospital because of DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to participation in this study. The proportion of participants with such visits is displayed.

Time frame: treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 1960.012 Proportion of participants
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 1960.0 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked if they had any unscheduled outpatient visits to a hospital because of DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to participation in this study. The proportion of participants with such visits is displayed.

Time frame: treatment day 84

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 840.012 Proportion of participants
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 840.0 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 196

Participants were asked if they had any unscheduled visits to a physician (non-hospital medical care) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to participation in this study. The proportion of participants with such visits is displayed.

Time frame: treatment day 196

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 1960.024 Proportion of participants
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 1960.0 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 84

Participants were asked if they had any unscheduled visits to a physician (non-hospital medical care) because of DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to participation in this study. The proportion of participants with such visits is displayed.

Time frame: treatment day 84

Population: ITT, excluding participants with missing data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 840.012 Proportion of participants
PlaceboResource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 840.0 Proportion of participants
Post Hoc

Change in Absolute Value From Baseline MBL to end-of Study MBL

The MBL for each cycle includes intermenstrual bleeding in addition to withdrawal bleeding. Baseline MBL was the mean MBL of measured MBL during three cycles in the run-in Phase. One cycle was defined as 28 days. For this analysis, the run-in Phase was defined by the days 1 to 84 (= 3 cycles each of 28 days). End of Study MBL was measured during Cycle 7 of the Treatment Phase (data imputation and Last Observation Carried Forward was applied).

Time frame: during a time period of 28 days under treatment

Population: Only participants with heavy menstrual bleeding were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Change in Absolute Value From Baseline MBL to end-of Study MBL-114.60 mLStandard Deviation 138.712
PlaceboChange in Absolute Value From Baseline MBL to end-of Study MBL-49.944 mLStandard Deviation 117.038
Post Hoc

Proportion of Participants With Successful Treatment

End of Study menstrual blood loss (MBL) ≤ 80 mL and a decrease to a value of ≤ 50% of the Baseline MBL was considered as treatment success.

Time frame: during a time period of 28 days under treatment

Population: Only participants with heavy menstrual bleeding were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Proportion of Participants With Successful TreatmentEnd of study MBL <=80 mL0.568 Proportion of participants
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Proportion of Participants With Successful TreatmentDecrease MBL >=50% of baseline MBL0.568 Proportion of participants
Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)Proportion of Participants With Successful TreatmentSuccessful treatment0.511 Proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With Successful TreatmentEnd of study MBL <=80 mL0.183 Proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With Successful TreatmentDecrease MBL >=50% of baseline MBL0.217 Proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With Successful TreatmentSuccessful treatment0.133 Proportion of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 29, 2026