Skip to content

Percutaneous Neuromodulation Therapy (PNT) With Chronic Low Back Pain Patients

Percutaneous Neuromodulation Therapy With Chronic Low Back Pain Patients With or Without Lower Extremity Pain - A Randomized, Controlled, Parallel Groups Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00290238
Enrollment
122
Registered
2006-02-10
Start date
2005-12-31
Completion date
2008-09-30
Last updated
2009-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Chronic Low Back Pain, Lower Extremity Pain, Central Sensitization, Percutaneous Neuromodulation Therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the benefits of Percutaneous Neuromodulation Therapy when compared to a reference sham treatment in the treatment of patients who have undergone surgical intervention for chronic low back pain with or without a radiating lower extremity pain component.

Interventions

DEVICEVertis Percutaneous Neuromodulation Therapy (PNT)

* Ten PNT sessions in eleven weeks * On average, one PNT session per week * Ten lumbar Safeguide electrodes (three centimeters in length) deployed per lumbar montage * Forty-five minutes of electrical stimulation for each session * Electrical stimulation parameters: * Continuous 50 Hz current * Charge-balanced, biphasic (each phase is 200 microsec), rectangular waveform * Intensity to subject's tolerance for ten minutes then increased to a mildly uncomfortable level

DEVICETranscutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)

* Ten TENS sessions in eleven weeks * On average, one TENS session per week * Four 2-inch (5.1 centimeters) diameter pads applied per TENS lumbar montage * Forty-five minutes of electrical stimulation for each session * Electrical stimulation parameters: * Current at 2 Hz-low frequency * Pulse trains delivered as asymmetric, biphasic, square waveform current, with pulse width lasting 20 microsec * Intensity titrated according to subject's sensory threshold * To maintain blinding, the treating physician or clinician will check on the subject after 10 minutes and dial the channels down just prior to the point of turning off the device.

Sponsors

RS Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Low back pain for at least 6 months * If lower extremity pain present, must be present for at least 3 months * Visual analog scale (VAS) score for low back pain at least 50 out of 100 * Lumbar or lumbosacral surgical intervention without pain relief * Central sensitization symptoms * Agrees to follow randomized treatment plan * 18 years of age or older * Signed informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Significant change to low back or lower extremity pain within 4 weeks prior to enrollment * Nociceptive and/or neuropathic pain symptoms in the spine due to structural and/or mechanical instabilities * Three or more lumbar or lumbosacral surgical interventions; one or more surgical interventions in areas other than lumbar or lumbosacral spine * Three or more lumbar vertebral segments fused * Lumbar or lumbosacral surgical intervention in last 9 months; areas other than lumbar or lumbosacral in last 12 months * Any additional surgical intervention required 3 months post-enrollment * Symptoms consistent with sympathetically-maintained pain * Evidence of serious neurological deficits or impairments * Significant changes in pain medications within 4 weeks prior to enrollment * Psychosocial issues that conflict with valid reporting by patient * Prior treatment with percutaneous electrical stimulation or sensitivity to electrical stimulation * Current use of another electrical stimulation device for low back or lower extremity pain * Current enrollment in another clinical trial within the last 30 days * Current or prior malignancy or cancer * Serious or uncontrolled systemic illness * Body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 * Pregnant or intends to become pregnant during the study * Implanted medical device * Relationship with study staff * Unable to attend study office visits or complete study measures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Time-averaged Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreTime-averaged from the first available observation to the last available observation (12 months for completed subjects)Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain (100mm line with 0/No pain on the left and 100/Worst pain imaginable on the right). Subjects drew vertical line to indicate pain. Time-averaged method accounts for time between visits by dividing area beneath the score curve by time between first and last available visits.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Expenditure Per Day on All Lower Back Pain Related InterventionsBaseline, Month 01, Month 02, Month 04, Month 06, Month 08, Month 10, Month 12Expenditures were assessed by patient report at each visit. Interventions were coded to Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) 2008; costs were derived from Medicare, Managed Care, and Workers' Comp fees. Costs for providers assume 30 minutes at returning patient rate. Drug costs were coded to a dictionary extrapolated from 2008 market prices.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Percutaneous Neuromodulation Therapy (PNT)
Active/test group receiving 10 Percutaneous Neuromodulation Therapy (PNT) sessions of 45 minutes each over 11 weeks. PNT delivers 50 Hz current in a charge-balanced, biphasic, rectangular waveform.
57
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)
Sham comparator group receiving 10 TENS sessions of 45 minutes each over 11 weeks. Delivered 2 Hz pulse trains as asymmetric, biphasic, square waves with pulse width of 20 microseconds.
65
Total122

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyStudy terminated2727
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1513

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTranscutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)Percutaneous Neuromodulation Therapy (PNT)Total
Age Categorical
<=18 years
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Age Categorical
>=65 years
10 participants14 participants24 participants
Age Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
54 participants43 participants97 participants
Age Continuous55.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.1
54.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
Region of Enrollment
United States
65 participants57 participants122 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
37 Participants33 Participants70 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants24 Participants52 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
29 / —38 / —
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / —3 / —

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Time-averaged Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain (100mm line with 0/No pain on the left and 100/Worst pain imaginable on the right). Subjects drew vertical line to indicate pain. Time-averaged method accounts for time between visits by dividing area beneath the score curve by time between first and last available visits.

Time frame: Time-averaged from the first available observation to the last available observation (12 months for completed subjects)

Population: Analysis population was intention to treat (ITT), excluding subjects who had no follow-up (after the initial 10-week treatment phase) data available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Percutaneous Neuromodulation Therapy (PNT)Change From Baseline in Time-averaged Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreBack pain-10.9 mmStandard Error 3.1
Percutaneous Neuromodulation Therapy (PNT)Change From Baseline in Time-averaged Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreRadiating leg/buttock pain-12.8 mmStandard Error 3.2
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)Change From Baseline in Time-averaged Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreBack pain-11.7 mmStandard Error 2.7
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)Change From Baseline in Time-averaged Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreRadiating leg/buttock pain-9.8 mmStandard Error 2.9
Secondary

Total Expenditure Per Day on All Lower Back Pain Related Interventions

Expenditures were assessed by patient report at each visit. Interventions were coded to Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) 2008; costs were derived from Medicare, Managed Care, and Workers' Comp fees. Costs for providers assume 30 minutes at returning patient rate. Drug costs were coded to a dictionary extrapolated from 2008 market prices.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 01, Month 02, Month 04, Month 06, Month 08, Month 10, Month 12

Population: Analysis population was intention to treat (ITT).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Percutaneous Neuromodulation Therapy (PNT)Total Expenditure Per Day on All Lower Back Pain Related Interventions2.97 Dollars
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)Total Expenditure Per Day on All Lower Back Pain Related Interventions5.30 Dollars

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026