Skip to content

Voriconazole Versus Itraconazole In Primary Prophylaxis Of Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI) In Subjects With Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplants (HSCT)

Prospective, Open-Label, Comparative, Multi-Center Study Of Voriconazole Compared To Itraconazole For The Primary Prophylaxis Of Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI) With Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplants (HSCT)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00289991
Acronym
IMPROVIT
Enrollment
489
Registered
2006-02-10
Start date
2006-03-31
Completion date
2009-02-28
Last updated
2015-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Antifungal Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infections

Brief summary

Study is to compare antifungal prophylaxis of Voriconazole and Itraconazole in subjects who have had a Stem Cell Transplant. The success of the end point will be measured using evidence of Infection, drug compliance and survival.

Interventions

DRUGItraconazole

Prophylaxis

DRUGVfend - voriconazole

Prophylaxis

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Allogeneic HSCT for acute leukemia (AML, ALL or myelodysplastic syndrome) failed lymphoma therapy or transformation of CML * Male and Female over 12 years or greater

Exclusion criteria

* Possible, probable or proven IFI at study entry or at any time in 6 months prior to study entry, defined according to the 'consensus criteria' (Ascioglu et al 2002) * Previous history of zygomycosis * Anticipated survival less than one month

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success at Day 180: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)Day 180 (Visit 9)Percent of responders (by randomization strata) with success of antifungal prophylaxis at 180 days after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Success: alive at Day 180 (Visit 9), had not developed a breakthrough proven or probable invasive fungal infection (IFI) by Visit 9, and received full course of study drug prophylaxis without interruption of greater than 14 days in total during the prophylaxis period; defined as failure if these criteria were not met. Additionally, if subject withdrew from study completely before Visit 9, imputed as failure at Visit 9 (programmatically).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI)Day 1 up to Day 180 (Visit 9)Summary of time (in days) from start of prophylaxis to first recorded occurrence of breakthrough proven or probable IFI.
Percent of Subjects With Occurrence of Breakthrough IFIDay 1 up to Day 100 (Visit 7) and Day 180 (Visit 9)Percent of subjects with occurrence of breakthrough IFI (proven or probable). Included all subjects in the MITT population.
Survival: Percent of Subjects Who Died at or Before Day 180Day 1 up to Day 180 (Visit 9)Percent of subjects who died at or before Day 180, derived from the crude death rate. All subjects in the MITT population included in this proportion.
Success at Day 100: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)Day 100 (Visit 7)Percent of responders (by randomization strata) with success of antifungal prophylaxis at 100 days after allogeneic HSCT. Success defined as: alive at Day 100 (Visit 7), had not developed a breakthrough proven or probable IFI by Visit 7, and received full course of study drug prophylaxis without an interruption of \>14 days in total during the prophylaxis period; defined as failure if these criteria were not met. Additionally, if subject withdrew from study completely before Visit 7, imputed as failure at Visit 7 (programmatically).
Survival: Percent of Subjects Who Died Within 1 YearDay 1 up to 1 year (Day 365)Percent of subjects who died within 1 year after transplant, derived from the crude death rate. All subjects in the MITT population included in this proportion. Only deaths up until and including 365 days after first dose of study medication included in the analysis.
Duration of TreatmentDay 1 up to Day 180Median duration in days of treatment. Treatment is defined as the total number of days on which subjects took medication.
Percent of Subjects With Use of Other Systemic Antifungal Agents as Empirical or Therapeutic TreatmentDay 1 up to Day 180Percent of subjects who used other systemic antifungal agents as empirical or therapeutic treatment, defined as either empirical: subject took a systemic antifungal agent at any time after the day of first dose of medication and did not develop a breakthrough proven or probable IFI during the study or therapeutic: subject developed a breakthrough proven or probable IFI.
Time to Discontinuation of Study TreatmentDay 1 up to Day 180 (Visit 9)Time in days to discontinuation of study treatment defined as the number of days from first dose to last dose inclusive as recorded in the dosing log.

Countries

Canada, Czechia, Egypt, France, Greece, Jordan, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Subjects were stratified at the time of randomization by the following factors: conditioning regimen (myeloablative or non-myeloablative); relatedness of donor (matched/related or mismatched/unrelated).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Voriconazole
Voriconazole (tablet or powder for oral suspension) loading dose regimen IV for first 24 hours: 6 mg/kg of body weight every 12 hours; maintenance dose (after first 24 hours) 4 mg/kg of body weight (IV) BID or 200 mg tablet or powder for oral suspension PO BID (subjects ≥ 40 kg body weight) or 100 mg tablet or powder for oral suspension twice daily (subjects \< 40 kg body weight).
234
Itraconazole
Itraconazole (Sporanox™ Liquid) oral solution 200 mg PO BID. Loading dose as IV formulation on Days 0 and 1.
255
Total489

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event1513
Overall StudyDeath3538
Overall StudyFailure of prophylaxis11
Overall StudyFungal breakthrough infection01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyOther514
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject212

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalItraconazoleVoriconazole
Age, Continuous43.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
42.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
43.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
Age, Customized
<18 years
20 participants11 participants9 participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
25 participants10 participants15 participants
Age, Customized
Between 18 and 44 years
225 participants119 participants106 participants
Age, Customized
Between 45 and 64 years
219 participants115 participants104 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
196 Participants100 Participants96 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
293 Participants155 Participants138 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
228 / 234252 / 255
serious
Total, serious adverse events
111 / 23495 / 255

Outcome results

Primary

Success at Day 180: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)

Percent of responders (by randomization strata) with success of antifungal prophylaxis at 180 days after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Success: alive at Day 180 (Visit 9), had not developed a breakthrough proven or probable invasive fungal infection (IFI) by Visit 9, and received full course of study drug prophylaxis without interruption of greater than 14 days in total during the prophylaxis period; defined as failure if these criteria were not met. Additionally, if subject withdrew from study completely before Visit 9, imputed as failure at Visit 9 (programmatically).

Time frame: Day 180 (Visit 9)

Population: Modified Intent to Treat (MITT): primary analysis population; all randomized subjects: received at least 1 dose of randomized study drug and had allogeneic HSCT; data from 1 site excluded due to Good Clinical Practice (GCP) deviations; (n)=number of subjects with analyzable data at observation for voriconazole and itraconazole, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
VoriconazoleSuccess at Day 180: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)Myeloablative/matched related (n=66, 85)59.1 percent of participants
VoriconazoleSuccess at Day 180: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)Non-myeloablative/matched related (n=58, 57)34.5 percent of participants
VoriconazoleSuccess at Day 180: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)Myeloablative/mismatched unrelated (n=59, 58)52.5 percent of participants
VoriconazoleSuccess at Day 180: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)Non-myeloablative/mismatched unrelated (n=41, 41)46.3 percent of participants
ItraconazoleSuccess at Day 180: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)Non-myeloablative/mismatched unrelated (n=41, 41)26.8 percent of participants
ItraconazoleSuccess at Day 180: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)Myeloablative/matched related (n=66, 85)44.7 percent of participants
ItraconazoleSuccess at Day 180: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)Myeloablative/mismatched unrelated (n=59, 58)25.9 percent of participants
ItraconazoleSuccess at Day 180: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)Non-myeloablative/matched related (n=58, 57)28.1 percent of participants
Comparison: Non-inferiority inferred if lower limit of the 2-sided 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) for the difference between the voriconazole and itraconazole treatment groups in the adjusted proportion of subjects classified as Success at Day 180 after transplant is above -10%. Superiority achieved if 2-sided 95% CI for difference between these treatment groups in the adjusted proportion of subjects classified as Success at Day 180 after transplant does not include zero and is positive.95% CI: [7.7, 25.1]Difference in adjusted responder rates
Secondary

Duration of Treatment

Median duration in days of treatment. Treatment is defined as the total number of days on which subjects took medication.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 180

Population: MITT; data from 1 site excluded due to GCP deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
VoriconazoleDuration of Treatment96.0 days
ItraconazoleDuration of Treatment68.0 days
Secondary

Percent of Subjects With Occurrence of Breakthrough IFI

Percent of subjects with occurrence of breakthrough IFI (proven or probable). Included all subjects in the MITT population.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 100 (Visit 7) and Day 180 (Visit 9)

Population: MITT; data from 1 site excluded due to GCP deviations. Analysis excludes additional data on IFIs that were only captured on EORTC/MSG worksheets (not on Case Report Forms or in the database).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
VoriconazolePercent of Subjects With Occurrence of Breakthrough IFIDay 1000.9 percent of participants
VoriconazolePercent of Subjects With Occurrence of Breakthrough IFIDay 1801.3 percent of participants
ItraconazolePercent of Subjects With Occurrence of Breakthrough IFIDay 1001.2 percent of participants
ItraconazolePercent of Subjects With Occurrence of Breakthrough IFIDay 1801.7 percent of participants
Comparison: Day 100; difference in proportions (expressed as percentages), voriconazole relative to itraconazole.p-value: 0.711495% CI: [-2.2, 1.5]Difference in proportions
Comparison: Day 180; difference in proportions (expressed as percentages), voriconazole relative to itraconazole.p-value: 0.775995% CI: [-2.5, 1.9]Difference in proportions
Secondary

Percent of Subjects With Use of Other Systemic Antifungal Agents as Empirical or Therapeutic Treatment

Percent of subjects who used other systemic antifungal agents as empirical or therapeutic treatment, defined as either empirical: subject took a systemic antifungal agent at any time after the day of first dose of medication and did not develop a breakthrough proven or probable IFI during the study or therapeutic: subject developed a breakthrough proven or probable IFI.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 180

Population: MITT; data from 1 site excluded due to GCP deviations. Subjects who developed a breakthrough proven or probable IFI were identified only from the study database, not the EORTC/MSG worksheet. In addition, all agents identified to be antifungals were considered to be systemic.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VoriconazolePercent of Subjects With Use of Other Systemic Antifungal Agents as Empirical or Therapeutic Treatment40.6 percent of participants
ItraconazolePercent of Subjects With Use of Other Systemic Antifungal Agents as Empirical or Therapeutic Treatment49.4 percent of participants
Comparison: Difference in proportions (expressed as a percentage), voriconazole relative to itraconazole.p-value: 0.05795% CI: [-17.8, 0.3]Difference in proportions
Secondary

Success at Day 100: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)

Percent of responders (by randomization strata) with success of antifungal prophylaxis at 100 days after allogeneic HSCT. Success defined as: alive at Day 100 (Visit 7), had not developed a breakthrough proven or probable IFI by Visit 7, and received full course of study drug prophylaxis without an interruption of \>14 days in total during the prophylaxis period; defined as failure if these criteria were not met. Additionally, if subject withdrew from study completely before Visit 7, imputed as failure at Visit 7 (programmatically).

Time frame: Day 100 (Visit 7)

Population: MITT; data from 1 site excluded due to GCP deviations; (n)=number of subjects with analyzable data at observation for voriconazole and itraconazole, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
VoriconazoleSuccess at Day 100: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)Myeloablative/matched related (n=66, 85)65.2 percent of participants
VoriconazoleSuccess at Day 100: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)Myeloablative/mismatched unrelated (n=59, 58)55.9 percent of participants
VoriconazoleSuccess at Day 100: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)Non-myeloablative/matched related (n=58, 57)43.1 percent of participants
VoriconazoleSuccess at Day 100: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)Non-myeloablative/mismatched unrelated (n=41, 41)48.8 percent of participants
ItraconazoleSuccess at Day 100: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)Non-myeloablative/mismatched unrelated (n=41, 41)36.6 percent of participants
ItraconazoleSuccess at Day 100: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)Myeloablative/matched related (n=66, 85)50.6 percent of participants
ItraconazoleSuccess at Day 100: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)Non-myeloablative/matched related (n=58, 57)38.6 percent of participants
ItraconazoleSuccess at Day 100: Percent of Responders (Randomization Strata)Myeloablative/mismatched unrelated (n=59, 58)27.6 percent of participants
95% CI: [6.6, 24.2]Difference in adjusted responder rates
Secondary

Survival: Percent of Subjects Who Died at or Before Day 180

Percent of subjects who died at or before Day 180, derived from the crude death rate. All subjects in the MITT population included in this proportion.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 180 (Visit 9)

Population: MITT; data from 1 site excluded due to GCP deviations. Analysis does not include any deaths recorded in the long-term follow-up data (not available at time of analysis).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VoriconazoleSurvival: Percent of Subjects Who Died at or Before Day 18015.6 percent of participants
ItraconazoleSurvival: Percent of Subjects Who Died at or Before Day 18015.4 percent of participants
Comparison: Day 180; difference in proportions (expressed as a percentage), voriconazole relative to itraconazole.95% CI: [-6.3, 6.9]Difference in proportions
Secondary

Survival: Percent of Subjects Who Died Within 1 Year

Percent of subjects who died within 1 year after transplant, derived from the crude death rate. All subjects in the MITT population included in this proportion. Only deaths up until and including 365 days after first dose of study medication included in the analysis.

Time frame: Day 1 up to 1 year (Day 365)

Population: MITT; data from 1 site excluded due to GCP deviations. Typically, subjects received first dose study treatment on the day of their transplant; however, some subjects started treatment up to 48 hours after transplant. Data summarized with first day of study medication defined as Day 1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VoriconazoleSurvival: Percent of Subjects Who Died Within 1 Year25.9 percent of participants
ItraconazoleSurvival: Percent of Subjects Who Died Within 1 Year30.7 percent of participants
Comparison: Day 365; difference in proportions (expressed as a percentage), voriconazole relative to itraconazole.p-value: 0.248795% CI: [-13, 3.4]Difference in proportions
Secondary

Time to Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI)

Summary of time (in days) from start of prophylaxis to first recorded occurrence of breakthrough proven or probable IFI.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 180 (Visit 9)

Population: MITT; data from 1 site excluded due to GCP deviations. Analysis excludes additional data on IFIs that were only captured on European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) worksheets (not on Case Report Forms or in the database). Times were summarized only for subjects who experienced a breakthrough IFI.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VoriconazoleTime to Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI)119.0 days95% Confidence Interval 28.58
ItraconazoleTime to Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI)77.0 days95% Confidence Interval 77.08
Secondary

Time to Discontinuation of Study Treatment

Time in days to discontinuation of study treatment defined as the number of days from first dose to last dose inclusive as recorded in the dosing log.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 180 (Visit 9)

Population: MITT; data from 1 site excluded due to GCP deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VoriconazoleTime to Discontinuation of Study Treatment88.7 days95% Confidence Interval 61.41
ItraconazoleTime to Discontinuation of Study Treatment71.5 days95% Confidence Interval 52.21
Comparison: Mann-Whitney test used to investigate the null hypothesis that the times to discontinuation of study medication in each treatment group come from the same distribution.p-value: 0.0026Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026