Skip to content

Lipid Efficacy and Safety in Participants With Mixed Hyperlipidemia (MK-0524B-024)

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, 12 Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MK0524B Versus Atorvastatin in Patients With Mixed Hyperlipidemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00289900
Enrollment
2340
Registered
2006-02-10
Start date
2006-01-24
Completion date
2010-08-06
Last updated
2018-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mixed Hyperlipidemia

Brief summary

This is a 12-week clinical trial in participants with mixed hyperlipidemia to study the effects of MK-0524B on lipids.The primary hypothesis is that MK-0524B (dosed as MK-0524A coadministered with simvastatin) will be superior to atorvastatin on decreasing the low denisity lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio for the following dose comparisons: 2g/20 mg MK-0524B versus 10 mg atorvastatin, 2g/40 mg MK-0524B versus 20 mg atorvastatin, 2g/40 mg MK-0524B versus 40 mg atorvastatin, and 2g/40 mg MK-0524B versus 80 mg atorvastatin.

Interventions

DRUGAtorvastatin
DRUGSimvastatin

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant 18 to 80 years of age with Mixed Hyperlipidemia with LDL-C between 130 and 190 mg/dL and Triglycerides between 150 and 500 mg/dL

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or lactating women, or women intending to become pregnant * Diabetes mellitus that is poorly controlled, newly diagnosed, or taking new or recently adjusted antidiabetic therapy (with the exception of ± 10 units of insulin) * Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive * Any of the following within the past 3 months: heart attack, stoke, heart bypass surgery, unstable angina, angioplasty * Active or chronic liver disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change From Baseline in the LDL-C/HDL-C RatioBaseline and Week 12Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the LDL-C and HDL-C levels. The LDL-C/HDL-C ratio was then calculated for baseline and Week 12 and the change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change From Baseline in HDL-CBaseline and Week 12Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the HDL-C levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)Baseline and Week 12Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the TG levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-CBaseline and Week 12Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the non-HDL-C levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.
Percentage Change From Baseline in LDL-CBaseline and Week 12Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the LDL-C levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) BBaseline and Week 12Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the Apo B levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Apo A-IBaseline and Week 12Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the Apo A-I levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a])Baseline and Week 12Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the Lp(a) levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.
Percentage Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)Baseline and Week 12Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the CRP levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.
Percentage Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C RatioBaseline and Week 12Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the TC and HDL-C levels. The TC/HDL-C ratio was then calculated for baseline and Week 12 and the change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.
Percentage of Participants With Consecutive Elevations in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) of >=3 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)up to 12 weeksParticipants had AST and ALT levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had 2 consecutive assessments of either AST or ALT that were 3 x ULN or greater were recorded. The AST UNLs for males and females were 43 U/L and 36 U/L, respectively. The ALT UNLs for males and females were 40 U/L and 33 U/L, respectively.
Percentage of Participants With Elevations in ALT and/or AST of >=5 x ULNup to 12 weeksParticipants had AST and ALT levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had an assessment of either AST or ALT that was 5 x ULN or greater were recorded. The AST UNLs for males and females were 43 U/L and 36 U/L, respectively. The ALT UNLs for males and females were 40 U/L and 33 U/L, respectively.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)Baseline and Week 12Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the TC levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.
Percentage of Participants With Creatine Kinase (CK) >=10 x ULNup to 12 weeksParticipants had CK assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had any CK level that was \>=10 x ULN were recorded. The UNLs for males and females were 207 U/L and 169 U/L, respectively.
Percentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptomsup to 12 weeksParticipants had CK assessed throughout the 24 week treatment period. Participants who had any CK level that was \>=10 x ULN and had associated muscle symptoms present within +/- 7 days were recorded. The UNLs for males and females were 207 U/L and 169 U/L, respectively.
Percentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptoms - Drug Relatedup to 12 weeksParticipants had CK assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had any CK level that was \>=10 x ULN and had associated muscle symptoms present within +/- 7 days that were reported as at least possibly related to study drug were recorded. The UNLs for males and females were 207 U/L and 169 U/L, respectively.
Percentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Impaired Fasting Blood Glucoseup to 12 weeksParticipants had blood glucose levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had the new diagnosis of impaired fasting blood glucose were recorded. A pre-defined set of MedDRA terms was used to identify participants whose glycemic status became 'impaired' during the course of treatment (from clinical adverse experience reports). The MedDRA terms were as follows: blood glucose increased, blood glucose abnormal, glucose tolerance decreased, glucose tolerance test abnormal, carbohydrate tolerance decreased, glucose tolerance impaired, hyperglycaemia, impaired fasting glucose, impaired insulin secretion, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, insulin resistance syndrome.
Percentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Diabetesup to 12 weeksParticipants had blood glucose levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who with newly diagnosed of diabetes were recorded. A participant was classified as having new onset diabetes if they experienced an adverse Event (AE) related to a diagnosis of diabetes (based on a pre-defined set of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities \[MedDRA\] terms), or if they started taking an anti-diabetic medication during the course of the study. The MedDRA terms were as follows: diabetes mellitus, diabetes mellitus insulin-dependent, diabetes mellitus non-insulin dependent, insulin-requiring type II diabetes mellitus, insulin resistant diabetes, diabetes with hyperosmolarity, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults.
Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Adjudicated Cardiovascular Eventup to 14 weeksSelect serious adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality that occurred during the treatment phase of the study were adjudicated by an expert committee external to the sponsor. Those events confirmed by the committee a cardiovascular events were recorded.
Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Clinical Adverse Event (AE)up to 14 weeksAn AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A clinical AE was an AE reported as a result of a clinical examination or reported by the participant.
Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Laboratory Adverse Event (AE)up to 14 weeksAn AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A laboratory AE was an AE reported as a result of a laboratory assessment or test.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Clinical AEup to 14 weeksAn AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A clinical AE was an AE reported as a result of a clinical examination or reported by the participant. Participants who were discontinued from the study due to a clinical AE were recorded.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Laboratory AEup to 14 weeksAn AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A laboratory AE was an AE reported as a result of a laboratory assessment or test. Participants who were discontinued from the study due to a laboratory AE were recorded.
Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Hepatitis-related Clinical AEup to 14 weeksAn AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. Hepatitis-related AEs were identified by a collective review using the following pre-specified set of preferred terms: cholestasis, hepatic necrosis, hepatocellular damage, cytolytic hepatitis, hepatitis, hepatomegaly, jaundice, hepatic failure, hepatitis cholestatic, jaundice cholestatic, hepatitis fulminant, hyperbilirubinaemia, jaundice hepatocellular, ocular icterus, yellow skin, hepatic function abnormal, acute hepatic failure, subacute hepatic failure, hepatitis acute, hepatitis toxic, hepatotoxicity, and mixed hepatocellular-cholestatic injury.
Percentage of Participants With Elevations in ALT and/or AST of >=10 x ULNup to 12 weeksParticipants had AST and ALT levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had an assessment of either AST or ALT that was 10 x ULN or greater were recorded. The AST UNLs for males and females were 43 U/L and 36 U/L, respectively. The ALT UNLs for males and females were 40 U/L and 33 U/L, respectively.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MK-0524B 2g/20 mg
Co-administration of one tablet of MK-0524A (Extended Release \[ER\] niacin/laropiprant \[LRPT\] 1g + one tablet of simvastatin 10 mg for 4 weeks, then co-administration of two tablets of MK-0524A 1g + simvastatin 20 mg for 8 weeks
297
MK-0524B 2g/40mg
Co-administration of one tablet of MK-0524A 1g + one tablet of simvastatin 20 mg for 4 weeks, then co-administration of two tablets of MK-0524A 1g + simvastatin 40 mg for 8 weeks
436
Atorvastatin 10 mg
Atorvastatin 10 mg, orally, once daily for 12 weeks
298
Atorvastatin 20 mg
Atorvastatin 20 mg, orally, once daily for 12 weeks
439
Atorvastatin 40 mg
Atorvastatin 40 mg, orally, once daily for 12 weeks
437
Atorvastatin 80 mg
Atorvastatin 80 mg, orally, once daily for 12 weeks
433
Total2,340

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyAdverse Event284013192033
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up778848
Overall StudyNot treated010000
Overall StudyOther000510
Overall StudyParticipant had flushing18421204
Overall StudyParticipant moved100111
Overall StudyProtocol Violation392674
Overall Studysite terminated101000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10218181211

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMK-0524B 2g/20 mgMK-0524B 2g/40mgAtorvastatin 10 mgAtorvastatin 20 mgAtorvastatin 40 mgAtorvastatin 80 mgTotal
Age, Continuous54.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
55.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
54.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
55.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
54.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
54.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
165 Participants237 Participants169 Participants248 Participants232 Participants258 Participants1309 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
132 Participants199 Participants129 Participants191 Participants205 Participants175 Participants1031 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
71 / 297136 / 43525 / 29827 / 43931 / 43735 / 433
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 2978 / 4353 / 2985 / 4393 / 4377 / 433

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage Change From Baseline in the LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the LDL-C and HDL-C levels. The LDL-C/HDL-C ratio was then calculated for baseline and Week 12 and the change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of post-randomization study medication and had a baseline value and at least one post-titration measurement for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in the LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio-50.9 Percentage Change
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage Change From Baseline in the LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio-53.0 Percentage Change
Atorvastatin 10 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in the LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio-37.6 Percentage Change
Atorvastatin 20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in the LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio-42.4 Percentage Change
Atorvastatin 40 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in the LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio-47.9 Percentage Change
Atorvastatin 80 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in the LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio-48.8 Percentage Change
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-16.8, -9.6]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-13.8, -7.8]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-8.1, -2.1]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.00795% CI: [-7.2, -1.2]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Apo A-I

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the Apo A-I levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of post-randomization study medication and had a baseline value and at least one post-titration measurement for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Apo A-I10.7 Percentage change
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Apo A-I8.2 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 10 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Apo A-I1.7 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Apo A-I0.4 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 40 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Apo A-I-0.8 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 80 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Apo A-I-2.5 Percentage change
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [6.6, 11.4]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [5.8, 9.7]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [7, 10.9]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [8.7, 12.7]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the Apo B levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of post-randomization study medication and had a baseline value and at least one post-titration measurement for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B-36.1 Percentage change
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B-38.0 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 10 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B-26.9 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B-32.8 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 40 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B-37.2 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 80 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B-38.3 Percentage change
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-12.1, -6.3]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-7.7, -2.8]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.47695% CI: [-3.3, 1.5]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.84595% CI: [-2.2, 2.7]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the CRP levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of post-randomization study medication and had a baseline value and at least one post-titration measurement for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)-15.4 Percentage change
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)-20.0 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 10 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)-19.5 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)-28.6 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 40 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)-33.3 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 80 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)-38.1 Percentage change
p-value: 0.595% CI: [-9.6, 7.5]Non-parametric ANOVA
p-value: 0.08395% CI: [0, 13.8]Non-parametric ANOVA
p-value: 0.00595% CI: [5.2, 18.8]Non-parametric ANOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [9.8, 22.8]Non-parametric ANOVA
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in HDL-C

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the HDL-C levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of post-randomization study medication and had a baseline value and at least one post-titration measurement for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in HDL-C26.9 Percentage change
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage Change From Baseline in HDL-C26.6 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 10 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in HDL-C7.0 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in HDL-C5.3 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 40 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in HDL-C4.5 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 80 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in HDL-C3.6 Percentage change
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [17.2, 22.6]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [19, 23.6]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [19.8, 24.4]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [20.7, 25.3]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in LDL-C

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the LDL-C levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of post-randomization study medication and had a baseline value and at least one post-titration measurement for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in LDL-C-40.4 Percentage change
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage Change From Baseline in LDL-C-42.8 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 10 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in LDL-C-33.6 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in LDL-C-39.8 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 40 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in LDL-C-45.6 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 80 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in LDL-C-47.5 Percentage change
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-10.2, -3.5]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.03795% CI: [-5.8, -0.2]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.04795% CI: [0, 5.6]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2, 7.5]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a])

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the Lp(a) levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of post-randomization study medication and had a baseline value and at least one post-titration measurement for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a])-15.2 Percentage change
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a])-14.6 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 10 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a])0.0 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a])0.0 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 40 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a])7.8 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 80 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a])8.8 Percentage change
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-24.2, -14.2]Non-parametric ANOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-25, -16.6]Non-parametric ANOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-27.8, -19.4]Non-parametric ANOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-28.6, -20]Non-parametric ANOVA
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the non-HDL-C levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of post-randomization study medication and had a baseline value and at least one post-titration measurement for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C-40.4 Percentage change
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C-42.2 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 10 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C-31.3 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C-36.8 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 40 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C-42.6 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 80 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C-44.6 Percentage change
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-12.1, -6]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-8, -2.9]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.77195% CI: [-2.2, 2.9]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.06595% CI: [-0.2, 5]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the TC and HDL-C levels. The TC/HDL-C ratio was then calculated for baseline and Week 12 and the change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of post-randomization study medication and had a baseline value and at least one post-titration measurement for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio-41.0 Percentage change
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio-42.3 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 10 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio-28.2 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio-31.5 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 40 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio-36.0 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 80 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio-36.7 Percentage change
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-15.6, -9.9]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-13.2, -8.4]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-8.8, -4]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-8, -3.2]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the TC levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of post-randomization study medication and had a baseline value and at least one post-titration measurement for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)-28.1 Percentage change
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)-30.0 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 10 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)-24.6 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)-29.4 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 40 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)-34.2 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 80 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)-36.1 Percentage change
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [-6, -1.2]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.59595% CI: [-2.5, 1.5]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.2, 6.2]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [4.1, 8.1]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)

Blood samples taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment to determine the TG levels. The change from baseline at Week 12 was recorded.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of post-randomization study medication and had a baseline value and at least one post-titration measurement for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)-40.3 Percentage change
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)-42.0 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 10 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)-21.9 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 20 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)-23.8 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 40 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)-30.4 Percentage change
Atorvastatin 80 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG)-33.8 Percentage change
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-19.1, -11.9]Non-parametric ANOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-13.7, -7]Non-parametric ANOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-10.2, -3.4]Non-parametric ANOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-21.2, -13.3]Non-parametric ANOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Clinical Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A clinical AE was an AE reported as a result of a clinical examination or reported by the participant.

Time frame: up to 14 weeks

Population: All participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication. Results for participants who received either MK-0524B 2g/20mg or 2g/40 mg were pooled. Results for participants who received atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg were pooled.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Clinical Adverse Event (AE)59.6 Percentage of Participants
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Clinical Adverse Event (AE)45.9 Percentage of Participants
95% CI: [9.4, 18]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Hepatitis-related Clinical AE

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. Hepatitis-related AEs were identified by a collective review using the following pre-specified set of preferred terms: cholestasis, hepatic necrosis, hepatocellular damage, cytolytic hepatitis, hepatitis, hepatomegaly, jaundice, hepatic failure, hepatitis cholestatic, jaundice cholestatic, hepatitis fulminant, hyperbilirubinaemia, jaundice hepatocellular, ocular icterus, yellow skin, hepatic function abnormal, acute hepatic failure, subacute hepatic failure, hepatitis acute, hepatitis toxic, hepatotoxicity, and mixed hepatocellular-cholestatic injury.

Time frame: up to 14 weeks

Population: All participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication. Results for participants who received either MK-0524B 2g/20mg or 2g/40 mg were pooled. Results for participants who received atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg were pooled.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Hepatitis-related Clinical AE0.0 Percentage of Participants
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Hepatitis-related Clinical AE0.1 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.499795% CI: [-0.4, 0.5]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Laboratory Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A laboratory AE was an AE reported as a result of a laboratory assessment or test.

Time frame: up to 14 weeks

Population: All participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and had data available for endpoint. Results for participants who received either MK-0524B 2g/20mg or 2g/40 mg were pooled. Results for participants who received atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg were pooled.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Laboratory Adverse Event (AE)5.2 Percentage of Participants
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Laboratory Adverse Event (AE)5.9 Percentage of Participants
95% CI: [-2.6, 1.4]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Clinical AE

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A clinical AE was an AE reported as a result of a clinical examination or reported by the participant. Participants who were discontinued from the study due to a clinical AE were recorded.

Time frame: up to 14 weeks

Population: All participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and had data available for endpoint. Results for participants who received either MK-0524B 2g/20mg or 2g/40 mg were pooled. Results for participants who received atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg were pooled.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Clinical AE16.5 Percentage of Participants
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Clinical AE4.9 Percentage of Participants
95% CI: [8.9, 14.7]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Laboratory AE

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. A laboratory AE was an AE reported as a result of a laboratory assessment or test. Participants who were discontinued from the study due to a laboratory AE were recorded.

Time frame: up to 14 weeks

Population: All participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and had data available for endpoint. Results for participants who received either MK-0524B 2g/20mg or 2g/40 mg were pooled. Results for participants who received atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg were pooled.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Laboratory AE0.7 Percentage of Participants
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage of Participants Who Were Discontinued From the Study Due to a Laboratory AE0.7 Percentage of Participants
95% CI: [-0.8, 0.9]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Adjudicated Cardiovascular Event

Select serious adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality that occurred during the treatment phase of the study were adjudicated by an expert committee external to the sponsor. Those events confirmed by the committee a cardiovascular events were recorded.

Time frame: up to 14 weeks

Population: All participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication. Results for participants who received either MK-0524B 2g/20mg or 2g/40 mg were pooled. Results for participants who received atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg were pooled.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage of Participants With a Confirmed Adjudicated Cardiovascular Event0.1 Percentage of Participants
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage of Participants With a Confirmed Adjudicated Cardiovascular Event0.2 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.785895% CI: [-0.4, 0.6]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptoms

Participants had CK assessed throughout the 24 week treatment period. Participants who had any CK level that was \>=10 x ULN and had associated muscle symptoms present within +/- 7 days were recorded. The UNLs for males and females were 207 U/L and 169 U/L, respectively.

Time frame: up to 12 weeks

Population: All participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and had data available for endpoint. Results for participants who received either MK-0524B 2g/20mg or 2g/40 mg were pooled. Results for participants who received atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg were pooled.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptoms0.1 Percentage of Participants
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptoms0.0 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.13495% CI: [-0.1, 0.8]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptoms - Drug Related

Participants had CK assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had any CK level that was \>=10 x ULN and had associated muscle symptoms present within +/- 7 days that were reported as at least possibly related to study drug were recorded. The UNLs for males and females were 207 U/L and 169 U/L, respectively.

Time frame: up to 12 weeks

Population: All participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and had data available for endpoint. Results for participants who received either MK-0524B 2g/20mg or 2g/40 mg were pooled. Results for participants who received atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg were pooled.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptoms - Drug Related0.1 Percentage of Participants
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage of Participants With CK >=10 x ULN With Muscle Symptoms - Drug Related0.0 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.13495% CI: [-0.1, 0.8]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Consecutive Elevations in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) of >=3 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)

Participants had AST and ALT levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had 2 consecutive assessments of either AST or ALT that were 3 x ULN or greater were recorded. The AST UNLs for males and females were 43 U/L and 36 U/L, respectively. The ALT UNLs for males and females were 40 U/L and 33 U/L, respectively.

Time frame: up to 12 weeks

Population: All participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and had data available for endpoint. Results for participants who received either MK-0524B 2g/20mg or 2g/40 mg were pooled. Results for participants who received atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg were pooled.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage of Participants With Consecutive Elevations in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) of >=3 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)0.4 Percentage of Participants
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage of Participants With Consecutive Elevations in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) of >=3 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)1.8 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.00895% CI: [-2.3, -0.5]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Creatine Kinase (CK) >=10 x ULN

Participants had CK assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had any CK level that was \>=10 x ULN were recorded. The UNLs for males and females were 207 U/L and 169 U/L, respectively.

Time frame: up to 12 weeks

Population: All participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and had data available for endpoint. Results for participants who received either MK-0524B 2g/20mg or 2g/40 mg were pooled. Results for participants who received atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg were pooled.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage of Participants With Creatine Kinase (CK) >=10 x ULN0.1 Percentage of Participants
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage of Participants With Creatine Kinase (CK) >=10 x ULN0.1 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.55695% CI: [-0.2, 0.7]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Elevations in ALT and/or AST of >=10 x ULN

Participants had AST and ALT levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had an assessment of either AST or ALT that was 10 x ULN or greater were recorded. The AST UNLs for males and females were 43 U/L and 36 U/L, respectively. The ALT UNLs for males and females were 40 U/L and 33 U/L, respectively.

Time frame: up to 12 weeks

Population: All participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and had data available for endpoint. Results for participants who received either MK-0524B 2g/20mg or 2g/40 mg were pooled. Results for participants who received atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg were pooled.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage of Participants With Elevations in ALT and/or AST of >=10 x ULN0.0 Percentage of Participants
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage of Participants With Elevations in ALT and/or AST of >=10 x ULN0.1 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.34695% CI: [-0.5, 0.4]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Elevations in ALT and/or AST of >=5 x ULN

Participants had AST and ALT levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had an assessment of either AST or ALT that was 5 x ULN or greater were recorded. The AST UNLs for males and females were 43 U/L and 36 U/L, respectively. The ALT UNLs for males and females were 40 U/L and 33 U/L, respectively.

Time frame: up to 12 weeks

Population: All participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and had data available for endpoint. Results for participants who received either MK-0524B 2g/20mg or 2g/40 mg were pooled. Results for participants who received atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg were pooled.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage of Participants With Elevations in ALT and/or AST of >=5 x ULN0.1 Percentage of Participants
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage of Participants With Elevations in ALT and/or AST of >=5 x ULN0.9 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.04295% CI: [-1.4, 0]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Diabetes

Participants had blood glucose levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who with newly diagnosed of diabetes were recorded. A participant was classified as having new onset diabetes if they experienced an adverse Event (AE) related to a diagnosis of diabetes (based on a pre-defined set of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities \[MedDRA\] terms), or if they started taking an anti-diabetic medication during the course of the study. The MedDRA terms were as follows: diabetes mellitus, diabetes mellitus insulin-dependent, diabetes mellitus non-insulin dependent, insulin-requiring type II diabetes mellitus, insulin resistant diabetes, diabetes with hyperosmolarity, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults.

Time frame: up to 12 weeks

Population: All participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and did not have diabetes at baseline. Results for participants who received either MK-0524B 2g/20mg or 2g/40 mg were pooled. Results for participants who received atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg were pooled.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Diabetes0.9 Percentage of Participants
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Diabetes0.2 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.023395% CI: [0.1, 1.7]Miettinen and Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Impaired Fasting Blood Glucose

Participants had blood glucose levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had the new diagnosis of impaired fasting blood glucose were recorded. A pre-defined set of MedDRA terms was used to identify participants whose glycemic status became 'impaired' during the course of treatment (from clinical adverse experience reports). The MedDRA terms were as follows: blood glucose increased, blood glucose abnormal, glucose tolerance decreased, glucose tolerance test abnormal, carbohydrate tolerance decreased, glucose tolerance impaired, hyperglycaemia, impaired fasting glucose, impaired insulin secretion, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, insulin resistance syndrome.

Time frame: up to 12 weeks

Population: All participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and normal glycemic status at baseline. Results for participants who received either MK-0524B 2g/20mg or 2g/40 mg were pooled. Results for participants who received atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg were pooled.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MK-0524B 2g/20 mgPercentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Impaired Fasting Blood Glucose0.2 Percentage of Participants
MK-0524B 2g/40mgPercentage of Participants With New Diagnosis of Impaired Fasting Blood Glucose0.1 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.562595% CI: [-0.3, 0.9]Miettinen and Nurminen

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026